On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
Hi,
I see the patch already comitted to xc tree so wanted to compile xfree86
with -rpath ...
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 06:09:46PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
David Dawes wrote (in a message from Saturday 24)
If there is no general consensus, I will
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
I will stick to -rpath on Linux, so what should I do to compile X with
it on Linux and where is it documented, Dave?;)
Add the following line to your host.def file:
#define UseRpath YES
The
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
I will stick to -rpath on Linux, so what should I do to compile X with
it on Linux and where is it documented, Dave?;)
Add the following line to
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:44:57PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
I will stick to -rpath on Linux, so what should I do to compile X with
it on Linux
Hi!
Am 27.01.2004 um 18:13 schrieb David Dawes:
No, LD_LIBRARY_PATH always overrides except SUID case.
That's not what I've found (or what Jakub Jelinek reported for
Linux or what the rtld codes shows for FreeBSD). I've done some
simple tests on FreeBSD, Linux, and Solaris, and the
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:13:51PM +0100, Mario Klebsch wrote:
Hi!
Am 27.01.2004 um 18:13 schrieb David Dawes:
No, LD_LIBRARY_PATH always overrides except SUID case.
That's not what I've found (or what Jakub Jelinek reported for
Linux or what the rtld codes shows for FreeBSD). I've done some
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:43:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:34:17PM +0100, Gian Filippo Pinzari wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
I don't have any objections to doing this on Linux. As I said, we
already do it on a range of other platforms and I'm not sure why
Linux is
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 07:08:00AM +0100, Bernd Ernesti wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:23:38PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
[glibc search order]
That possibly means that we should be removing -rpath from other platforms
rather than adding it on Linux.
No, please don't do that.
On NetBSD you
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 10:31:21AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
So long as ld.so.conf overrides the rpath (does it?) then this won't
matter. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD won't work for setuid apps.
I'd be happy to make the change for 4.4 if there is some concensus
that it isn't a bad
David Dawes wrote (in a message from Saturday 24)
Does NetBSD have an ld.so cache/hints mechanism like Linux and
FreeBSD?
NetBSD has /etc/ld.so.conf. But it's default setup doesn't include
/usr/X11R6/lib.
Or is the search order different on NetBSD? What about OpenBSD?
OpenBSD adds
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 06:09:46PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
David Dawes wrote (in a message from Saturday 24)
If there is no general consensus, I will at least add a build option to
make it easy to turn -rpath on or off for a host.def setting, and leave
the defaults as they are now.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:34:17PM +0100, Gian Filippo Pinzari wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
I don't have any objections to doing this on Linux. As I said, we
already do it on a range of other platforms and I'm not sure why
Linux is something of an exception in this regard. Does anyone
have a
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:43:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
So long as ld.so.conf overrides the rpath (does it?) then this won't
matter. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD won't work for setuid apps.
It doesn't.
Searching for libraries is done in glibc the following order:
DT_RPATH directories
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:16:08PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:43:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
So long as ld.so.conf overrides the rpath (does it?) then this won't
matter. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD won't work for setuid apps.
It doesn't.
Searching for
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:23:38PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
[glibc search order]
That possibly means that we should be removing -rpath from other platforms
rather than adding it on Linux.
No, please don't do that.
On NetBSD you can't use LD_LIBRARY_PATH for setuid or setgid programs
and
David Dawes wrote:
I don't have any objections to doing this on Linux. As I said, we
already do it on a range of other platforms and I'm not sure why
Linux is something of an exception in this regard. Does anyone
have a good reason to not do this?
In NX we use alternate versions of libX11,
Does anyone have a good reason to not do this?
I seem to remember an rpath considered harmful message from
around the time the libraries changed from R5 to R6. The
author said to use rpath-link instead of rpath. I don't know
if that would do what you want (sorry, it's been so long I
don't even
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
Hi,
so I downloaded latest cvs version of xc and compiled with defaults on
Linux. Running ldd ./programs/xdm/xdm show xlibs are resolved from
/usr/X11R6/lib. OK, I edited /etc/ld.so.conf and commented out line
/usr/X11R6/lib and rerun ldconfig. Ran ldd
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:54:05PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
Hi,
so I downloaded latest cvs version of xc and compiled with defaults on
Linux. Running ldd ./programs/xdm/xdm show xlibs are resolved from
/usr/X11R6/lib. OK, I edited /etc/ld.so.conf and
Hi,
I've reported the following bug:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
I believe -Wl,-rpath,$(SHLIBDIRPATH) should be used on Linux and possibly
all Unix platforms. Running ldconfig did not help on my system but
LD_LIBRARY_PATH did. But, that's not a solution, because
Hi!
Am Mittwoch, 07.01.04 um 14:00 Uhr schrieb Martin MOKREJ:
I believe -Wl,-rpath,$(SHLIBDIRPATH) should be used on Linux and
possibly
all Unix platforms.
Me too, in fact, I am convinced, this should be done. But this probably
is a religious issue.
Running ldconfig did not help on my
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 08:00:27PM +0100, Mario Klebsch wrote:
Hi!
Am Mittwoch, 07.01.04 um 14:00 Uhr schrieb Martin MOKREJĀ:
I believe -Wl,-rpath,$(SHLIBDIRPATH) should be used on Linux and
possibly
all Unix platforms.
Me too, in fact, I am convinced, this should be done. But this
Martin MOKREJ wrote:
I believe -Wl,-rpath,$(SHLIBDIRPATH) should be used on Linux and possibly
all Unix platforms.
It should be restricted to just those platforms using the GNU ld or similar
flags. For Solaris, for instance, it should be -R $(SHLIBDIRPATH) instead.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-
23 matches
Mail list logo
