Warren Turkal writes:
Is there any chance of upstream acceptance of this type of work? A lot of
the utility binaries should be pretty easy to break out the xc hierarchy.
This issue is coming up from time to time and I have jet failed to
understand the benefit of breaking out things out
Ar an 13ú lá de mí 8, scríobh Egbert Eich :
Bug #72 has not been committed as it is not yet clear what your final
conclusions are.
Perhaps a comment to that effect could have been added to the bug? Anyway,
as I said, I don't have the free time any more. If anyone else wants to take
that on,
As an excercise, I autotooled xrandr. It was easy for xrandr, and I expect
it would be easy for a number of other small utility programs in the X
distribution. The source for this experiment is located at
http://ss.kicks-ass.org/~wt/development/xfree86-autotool/xrandr/. Are there
any efforts to
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:53:32PM +0100, Aidan Kehoe wrote:
Ar an 12ú lá de mí 8, scríobh Harold L Hunt II :
However, I wouldn't expect a lot of interest from others, as this gets
mentioned every so often but the person suggesting it often gives up
after they realize how large of a job it
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Warren,
Most people are probably smart enough not to respond to this... so I
will take the plunge for all of them :)
Autotooling xrandr might not have been too hard, for one platform and
one version of the autotools.
However, autotooling X as a whole might
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 03:36:09AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
As an excercise, I autotooled xrandr. It was easy for xrandr, and I expect
it would be easy for a number of other small utility programs in the X
distribution. The source for this experiment is located at
Ar an 12ú lá de mí 8, scríobh Harold L Hunt II :
However, I wouldn't expect a lot of interest from others, as this gets
mentioned every so often but the person suggesting it often gives up
after they realize how large of a job it is.
I would venture to say too that since the build system
