Since there is no other module, I think we can use this specific package name
to tell people what it is.
It is also good for feature isolation.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:53 AM
To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming
; Kubacki, Michael
Would you please clarify the position of SecuritySamplePkg ?
What is the difference between SecurityPkg and SecuritySamplePkg ?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:46 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming ; Kubacki, Michael
A ; Oram, Isaac W ;
Kinney, Michael
Would you please clarify what "sample" here really means? Not for production?
Or something else?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 4:02 PM
To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming
; Kubacki, Michael A ; Oram,
Isaac W ; Kinney, Michael D
S
u can those description in StoredHashFvPpi.h file
8) Same code above, would you please clarify if it is legal or illegal that
StoredHashFvPpi->FvNumber == 0 ?
If it is illegal, I prefer use ASSERT()
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Tuesd
Thanks. Got it.
I would use term - "MemoryManagement". :-)
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Hao A
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 2:20 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Zeng, Star
> ; ler...@redhat.com; Ni, Ray ;
> Gao, Liming
Good list.
What does "memory" mean ? MemoryTest ?
How about put "LockBox" into "S3"?
How about list "EBC" as standalone component?
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Wu, Hao A
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 2:02 PM
> To:
thanks
How about to put driversample to ui?
How about to put iommu to device?
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2019年6月25日，上午4:30，Laszlo Ersek 写道：
>
>> On 06/24/19 03:16, Wu, Hao A wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> With Leif's comment on the better usage of the wildcard
Thanks Jian. Comment below:
1) My previous comment 8 is NOT addressed.
Please add assert for "StoredHashFvPpi->FvNumber".
if (!EFI_ERROR(Status) && StoredHashFvPpi != NULL &&
StoredHashFvPpi->FvNumber > 0) {
With that fixed, reviewed-by: jiewen..
, maybe we have other C-tool update.
Should we add them to CC list in any tool patch?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 10:09 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Zhang,
> Shenglei ; ard.biesheu...@linaro.or
Please address the feedback from Leif.
With email address fixed, reviewed-by: jiewen@intel.com.
> -Original Message-
> From: Desai, Imran
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 2:14 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; Leif Lindholm
> ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Zhang, Chao B ; Wang, J
Thanks Jason.
I think we should NOT measure TPM2 table *after* ACPI table patch.
The measurement should happen *before* ACPI table patch.
Hi Chao
Do you agree on that?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
jason.spottsw...@hpe.com
Sent
Yes, ok for me.
Good idea to add the overview of the package content.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Oram, Isaac W
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 8:55 AM
To: Gao, Liming ; Yao, Jiewen ;
Dong, Eric ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages
Hi
It is good to support 2nd instance.
But the risk is that 2 instances may access to the same variable region.
It might cause unpredictable behavior in the variable driver later.
Do we have investigate that impact?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: deve
TFORM repo?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 10:31 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Zhang,
> Shenglei
> Cc: Feng, Bob C
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platform patch 0/6] Add tools FMMT FCE
>
HI
I saw some conflict:
=
BaseTools/FCE: Add a tool FCE
Add FMMT and FCE into Platform/Intel/Tools.
=
I agree that FitGet goes to Intel silicon.
Should we put both FCE/FMMT to BaseTools?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.gro
Thanks Leif to point out.
Other comment:
Would you please describe the delta between v1, v2 and v3?
I have reviewed the v1. Please share with us on what is updated in v2 and v3.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindh...@linaro.org]
Cool. Thanks!
Then I would like to see a patch to remove INC check. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 7:05 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; Shi, Steven
> ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Feng, Bob C ; Rodriguez, Christian
> ; Johnson, Mic
source code.
As such, when we need skip more type of file, we just update the configuration,
instead of tool source code.
Just like we have tools_def and build_rule today, when we need update those
configuration, we don't need update tool source code.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Mes
ed.
May I know what is the relationship between this patch and Bugzilla?
Why we need change the default value?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 2:
Sorry, it is CPU2 not CPU_IO2.
Right, I did not find CPU2 protocol in PI spec today.
> -Original Message-
> From: Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 10:35 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Zhichao ; Gao,
> Liming
> Cc: Sean Brogan ; Kinney, Michael D
EFI_CPU_IO2_PROCOL is defined in PI spec Volume 5 Chapter 15 CPU I/O Protocol.
Thank you
Yao jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Gao, Zhichao
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 10:28 PM
> To: Gao, Liming ; devel
Thanks.
We are also reviewing the VTd disabling flow and may update recently.
If you want to file Bugzilla, please go ahead.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Zeng, Star
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2019 8:33 PM
To: Jerry Zhou(BJ-RD) ; edk2-de...@lists.01.org;
devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Yao, Jiewen ; Ni, Ray
hi
thanks for this contribution
Besides the comment from Laszlo, would you please also share your unit test
result?
What test you have done for this patch?
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2019年5月17日，下午2:43，Imran Desai 写道：
>
> https://github.com/idesai/edk2/tree/enable_sm3_meas
Reviewed-by: jiewen@intel.com
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> > Dandan Bi
> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 10:16 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Yao, Jiewen ; Chao
&g
Hi
Can we have better way to describe the binary cache?
I have 2 concern:
1) we have other type of binary besides MCB. How can we indicate that without
update base tool source code ?
2) .inc might be text file, instead of binary. How can we support that?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Origi
Cool Thanks
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2019年5月21日，上午9:58，Desai, Imran 写道：
>
> Hello Jiewen,
>
> I tested SM3 PCR extensions on the OvmfPkg using swTPM (and TPM2 simulator).
> The validation was done comparing PCR extensions from the TCG2 EventLog and
> SM3 PCR Bank da
Answer below:
> -Original Message-
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Friday, July 5, 2019 12:59 PM
> To: Lu, XiaoyuX ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen
> Subject: RE: [edk2-InfSpecification PATCH] Document: Add new
> MODULE_TYPE HOST_APPLICATION
>
> Xiaoyu:
Hi
Would you please share the info on what test has been done for this 5 level
paging?
Such as stack paging enable/disable, SMM profile, etc.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ni,
> Ray
> Sent:
that, please drop me a mail and I can help you on
that.
Once sm3 is added in the next uefi spec, we may add sm3 to mdepkg at that time.
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2019年7月13日，上午8:47，Imran Desai 写道：
>
> BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
> GITHUB: https://github.com
HI Eric
Would you please share what unit test you have done for this new feature?
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Dong, Eric
> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 10:43 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray ; Laszlo Ersek
>
It looks great. Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Dong, Eric
> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 10:58 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray ; Laszlo Ersek
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [Patch v3 0/2] Enable new MM MP protocol
>
> Hi Jiewen,
>
Right. So far we just duplicate what USER_DEFINED does.
With more and more example, we will see if and how we enhance that.
But it is good enough now.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 9:15 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ;
Hi Jason
Would you mind to help us to file a Bugzilla - https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/
for tracking purpose?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Yao,
Jiewen
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 12:08 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; jason.spottsw
, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
> ; Ni, Ray ; Zeng, Star
> ; Yao, Jiewen
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [Patch] MdeModulePkg/PiSmmCore: Use unique
> structure signatures
>
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1948
>
> Update the data structure signatures in the PiSmmCore
> to b
Reviewed-by: jiewen@intel.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Shenglei
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 9:31 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Zhang, Chao B ; Yao, Jiewen
> ; Wang, Jian J
> Subject: [PATCH] SecurityPkg/DxeDeferImageLoadLib: Remove
&
Evelyn
I still saw below EFIAPI missing issue:
+UINTN
+GetGlobalVtdPmrAlignment (
+);
Thank you
Yao jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Evelyn Wang
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 12:48 PM
> To: devel@edk2
Thanks and agree.
Comment inlined.
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2019年8月3日，上午6:06，Laszlo Ersek 写道：
>
>> On 08/02/19 04:46, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
>> Thanks Laszlo. Comment below:
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:dev
VERIFY_SIZE_OF – the other patch and the other Bugzilla
3) Step 3: Scan the rest, if there is need. – Another patch and another
Bugzilla
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Vitaly
Cheptosv via Groups.Io
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 12
in real world, we deprecate AB-seg usage because they are vulnerable to smm
cache poison attack.
I assume cache poison is out of scope in the virtual world, or there is a way
to prevent ABseg cache poison.
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2019年8月19日，上午3:50，Paolo Bonzini 写道：
>
>> On
Hi Paolo
I am not sure what do you mean - "You do not need a reset vector ...".
If so, where is the first instruction of the new CPU in the virtualization
environment?
Please help me understand that at first. Then we can continue the discussion.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Ori
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao
From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Vitaly
Cheptosv via Groups.Io
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 10:22 AM
To: Gao, Liming ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen
; Kinney, Michael D
Cc: Laszlo Ersek ; leif.lindh
Comment below:
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 12:21 AM
> To: Laszlo Ersek ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen
>
> Cc: edk2-rfc-groups-io ; qemu devel list
> ; Igor Mammedov ;
> Chen,
below
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 3:20 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; Laszlo Ersek
> ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: edk2-rfc-groups-io ; qemu devel list
> ; Igor Mammedov ;
> Chen, Yingwen ;
My comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 12:09 AM
> To: edk2-devel-groups-io
> Cc: edk2-rfc-groups-io ; qemu devel list
> ; Igor Mammedov ;
> Paolo Bonzini ; Yao, Jiewen
> ; Chen, Y
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 6:20 AM
> To: Laszlo Ersek
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen ; Paolo Bonzini
> ; devel@edk2.groups.io; edk2-rfc-groups-io
> ; qemu devel list ; Igor
> Mammedov ; Ch
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Evelyn Wang
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 1:50 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Huang, Jenny ; Shih, More
> ; Ni, Ray ; Chaganty, Rangasai V
>
> Subject:
I give my thought.
Paolo may add more.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 11:25 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; Paolo Bonzini
> ; Laszlo Ersek ;
> r...@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> Cc: Alex Williamson ; devel@edk2.groups.
potential attack surface in virtual environment, if
hot-added CPU need run code with stack or heap before SMI rebase.
Other threats, such as SMRAM or DMA, are same.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 9:03 AM
> To: P
buffer.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Johnson, Michael
Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2019 5:52 AM
To: Kubacki, Michael A ; devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] UEFI Variable SMI Reduction
Yes - both things I bring up are just
Nate
I believe this SMI reduction work only handle GetVariable.
VarCheckLib only handles SetVariable.
VarCheckLib does not handle GetVaraible.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Desimone, Nathaniel L
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 10:43 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen ; Johnson, Michael
That is correct.
Current trunk only supports ARM system.
I have branch to support x86 -
https://github.com/jyao1/edk2/tree/StandaloneSmmX86Poc
But that is not merged into trunk yet.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Monday, September 1
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2019 3:05 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: ler...@redhat.com; achin.gu...@arm.com; Yao, Jiewen
> ; Ard Biesheuvel
> Subject: [PATCH] StandaloneMmPkg: make pa
This patch adds "Threat model for EDK II" as the appendix section
of "EDK II secure coding guide" document.
The threat model discussed here is a general guide and serves as the baseline of
the EDK II firmware. For each specific feature in EDK II firmware, there might
be
additional
Good. Reviewed-by: jiewen@intel.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Shenglei
> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 1:55 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Zhang, Shenglei ; Yao, Jiewen
> ; Wang, Jian J ; Zhang,
> Chao B
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] SecurityPkg/TpmCo
the door, but leave windows open.
It is necessary but not sufficient.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 11:22 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io;
ick "EDK II Security White Papers", then goto
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Security-White-Papers
Or you can search "security" keyword in the wiki search box. Then "EDK II
Security White Papers" will show up.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
&g
of supported combination to
reduce the effort of validation and maintenance.
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2019年8月1日，上午7:13，Laszlo Ersek 写道：
>
> Hi Ray, Jiewen,
>
> I've got several comments / questions:
>
>> On 07/31/19 18:38, Ni, Ray wrote:
>> This patch skip
SmmAccessOut = SMM access memory outside SMRAM.
So, do we want to treat SMM access ACPI NVS, RSVD, Runtime, MMIO, to be
SmmAccessOut?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 10:24 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.grou
memory. It could be static or
dynamic paging.
PcdCpuSmmAccessOut seems also confusing.
What "Out" means ???
What Out=False means? Only allow inside SMRAM access?
Anyway, I am open for the naming proposal.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From
Thanks Laszlo. Comment below:
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 10:05 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray ; Dong, Eric ; Wang,
> Jian J
Hi
I think this policy protocol should be EDKII specific. Currently it is no in PI
spec.
Should it be in MdeModulePkg ?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Liming Gao
> Sent: Monday, July 29,
they are updated.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Javeed, Ashraf
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 4:12 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao,
> Liming
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D ; Ni, Ray
>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging/UEFI_PCI_ENHA
, then decide if there is need
to add to PI spec.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Javeed, Ashraf
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 7:18 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao,
> Liming
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D ; Ni, Ray
>
> Subject
Forgot to mention: since we want to handle device policy, another option is to
create PCI_DEVICE_POLICY_PROTOCOL. No need to update previous one.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Yao, Jiew
always hardcode BASE_4GB, the ProtectedHighBase in hob is useless.
8) Please use LShiftU64 for 64bit operation.
HighTop = (UINT64) SysMemHob->ProtectedHighLimit << 20;
Using direct shift might cause link failure in non-optimization mode.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message
ame:" in the title.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Iwen Evelyn
> Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 8:29 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Huang, Jenny ; Yao, Jiewen
>
> Subject: [PATCH] Extened PMR feature: allow silicon code to adjust
Patch 1~3, reviewed-by: jiewen@intel.com
Patch 4, acked-by: jiewen@intel.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Desai, Imran
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 6:53 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D ; Gao, Liming
> ; Zhang, Chao B ; Yao,
>
OS, we also need reserve the
black hole here.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 7:35 PM
> To: edk2-devel-groups-io
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Boris Ostrovsky
> ; Brijesh
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 10:52 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Boris Ostrovsky
> ; Brijesh Singh ; Igor
> Mammedov ; Joao M Martins
> ; Justen, Jordan L ;
Thank you Liming. That is cool feature.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Liming Gao
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 3:46 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen ; Shi, Steven ;
> Justen, Jordan L ; Laszl
Hi
+int GLOBAL_USED _fltused = 1;
May I know what is the use of GLOBAL_USED? Only for compiler stub symbol?
If so, why we add __GNUC__ here? Any other usage?
+#if defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__)
+ #define GLOBAL_USED __attribute__((used))
+#else
+ #define GLOBAL_USED
+#endif
>
Got it. Thanks for the reminder. I will follow.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 1:23 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen
> Cc: Zhang, Chao B
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Add Laml
below
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Igor
> Mammedov
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 8:37 PM
> To: Laszlo Ersek
> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; qemu-de...@nongnu.org; Chen, Yingwen
> ; phillip.go...@oracle.com;
> alex.william...
Correct Lasa according to TCG ACPI spec.
Cc: Michael D Kinney
Cc: Liming Gao
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Tpm2Acpi.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Tpm2Acpi.h
Tcg2Dxe produces PcdTpm2AcpiTableLaml/Lasa for event log address.
Tcg2Smm consumes PcdTpm2AcpiTableLaml/Lasa to fill TPM2 ACPI table.
Cc: Jian J Wang
Cc: Chao Zhang
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Dxe/Tcg2Dxe.c | 32 +++--
Those PCDs will be used for TPM2 ACPI table.
Tcg2Dxe need produce those for event log address.
Tcg2Smm need consume those to fill TPM2 ACPI table.
Cc: Jian J Wang
Cc: Chao Zhang
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.dec | 8
SecurityPkg/SecurityPkg.uni | 9 +
TCG2_PROTOCOL.
Test:
Use default TPM2 version 3. No ALMA/ALSA shown in TPM2 table.
Use TPM2 version 4. The DXE driver reports ALMA/ALSA PCD and the SMM driver
installs ALMA/ALSA in TPM2 table.
Cc: Jian J Wang
Cc: Chao Zhang
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
Jiewen Yao (3):
MdePkg/Include: correct Lasa
Thanks.
Comment below:
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 8:30 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Zhang, Chao B ; Hernandez Beltran, Jorge
> ; Han, Harry
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] Common OBB verificatio
Thank you Christopher.
Your code looks good to me.
I also recommend MdeModulePkg/SCSI owner take a look and give r-b.
Ray or Hao
Can you help on that?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Zurcher, Christopher J
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 6:26 AM
> To:
Currently, it is xxx.efi.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Gao, Liming
> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 8:43 AM
> To: Lu, XiaoyuX ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Feng, Bob C ; Yao, Jiewen
>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] BaseTools: Add HOST_APPL
Reviewed by: Jiewen Yao
> -Original Message-
> From: Derek Lin
> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 9:01 AM
> To: derek.l...@hpe.com; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: jason.spottsw...@hpe.com; Yao, Jiewen ; Wang,
> Jian J ; Zhang, Chao B
> Subject: [PATCH] Secur
Agree. I will remove them.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 4:20 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V ; Lou, Yun
>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 4/6] IntelSiliconPkg/IntelPciDeviceSecurityD
Hi Ray
I checked the UEFI spec and other protocol definition again.
I believe Revision is a better name for minor update. I will update the
structure field from Version to Revision.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 201
Hi Jian/Hao/Ray
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:30 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>
Hi Jian/Hao/Ray
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:30 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>
Hi Ray/Sai
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:31 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
&
Hi Liming/Michael
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:30 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Hi Ray/Sai
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:31 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
&
Hi Jian/Hao/Ray
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:30 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>
Hi Ray/Sai
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:31 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
&
Hi Ray/Sai
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:31 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
&
Hi Ray/Sai
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:31 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
&
Hi Ray/Sai
Would you please review this patch?
We need this feature in next stable tag as planned.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:31 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
&
access the device once the device access protocol is
installed.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 3:56 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen
> Cc: Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A ;
> Lou, Yun
> Subject: RE
Hi
I forget to mention that this patch is also pushed to git.
The EDKII repo update is at
https://github.com/jyao1/edk2/tree/DeviceSecurityMasterV3
The EDKII platform repo update is at
https://github.com/jyao1/edk2-platforms/tree/DeviceSecurityMasterV3
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -Origi
devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 9:38 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V3 0/6] Add Device Security driver
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2303
>
> === V3
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2303
Cc: Ray Ni
Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty
Cc: Yun Lou
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
.../IndustryStandard/IntelPciSecurity.h | 92 +++
1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2303
Cc: Ray Ni
Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty
Cc: Yun Lou
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dsc | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dsc
The device measurement can be shown in TCG event log.
signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
Jiewen Yao (6):
IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Intel PciSecurity definition.
IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol
IntelSiliconPkg/dec: Add ProtocolGuid definition.
IntelSiliconPkg/Inte
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2303
Cc: Ray Ni
Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty
Cc: Yun Lou
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dec | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/IntelSiliconPkg.dec
1 - 100 of 1335 matches
Mail list logo
