/index.html
http://www.ethernut.de/api/index.html
It's a bit thicker, but maybe we can afford it.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., RD dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@laptop.org
http://mailman.laptop.org
that Marvell was being friendly
with us. Maybe we should report this NDA thing to the LWN
editor for a new scoop.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., RD dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@laptop.org
http
that would
work on an OLPC system.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., RD dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@laptop.org
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
can still spare one (but
I'm afraid it's a bit too late for the courier).
I intend to give an overview of the project and its spirit,
then describe the hardware peculiarities, some OS details,
and finally the concept of Sugar's UI.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - RD director
\X/ http
be an interesting
experiment to see whether free-as-in-speech hardware products
would start appearing.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - SYS64738
\X/ http://www.codewiz.org/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@laptop.org
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
such a link would be appropriate. The sw
development info is slightly outdated imho.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti
\X/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@laptop.org
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Mitch Bradley wrote:
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
The syntax is:
rdmsr addr
wrmsr addr l h
In the hardware documentation that I have seen, MSR values are
conventionally shown as 64-bit numbers. The l h ordering will make
it necessary to do a mental flip. The 32-bit pieces of MSR do
to coordinate the order of the high and low
dwords with the order they are specified with 'wrmsr'?
Yeah, I did it as suggested by Mitch. Here's a thrid
revision of the patch with everything included:
From 1850ca76585306e2484cf5e709434049f1df3c1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernardo Innocenti
anyway. It's the valid MSR writes that could
cause unrecoveable problems! :)
--
// Bernardo Innocenti
\X/ http://www.codewiz.org/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@laptop.org
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
differences that
may bite us in the future.
As of build 428, we're still shipping with i686 versions
of glibc and openssl. For safety, these should either
be downgraded to i586 or replaced by the Geode specific
versions.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti
\X/ http://www.codewiz.org
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
glibc
=
Optimized routines and benchmark results are here:
http://dev.laptop.org/git.do?p=geode-perf;a=tree
I talked about it with Rob Savoye, who has been porting
this work with glibc. Patches are due soon, and I will
push them to the glibc maintainers
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
We don't have the numbers yet, but we'll most probably
need to custom-build at least glibc. Other candidates
include openssl, the X server, python and maybe cairo.
And yet another thing I forgot: a few days ago
Chris Ball told me about the performance testing suite
12 matches
Mail list logo
