Wes Shull wrote:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
NEVER do that!!!
You probably have way more Rawhide packages than just Firefox now. At least
xulrunner and all the stuff using its unstable API, probably also sqlite
and a lot more stuff. Each time your package depends on a newer
Mail Lists wrote:
I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new api
anyway is it?
The IcedTea plugin is in Fedora (as java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin). Fedora does
not and will not ship proprietary software such as the Sun Java plugin (from
the non-open JDK or JRE).
A new
Frank Murphy wrote:
You can update to 3.6
from Rawhide,
then disable rawhide again.
Which is what I have done,
no problems yet.
NEVER do that!!!
You probably have way more Rawhide packages than just Firefox now. At least
xulrunner and all the stuff using its unstable API, probably also
Frank Büttner wrote:
I have done some like at my first package, and then to my was spoken,
that I use local mock and not the infrastructure. But after some updates
of mock, mock it now dead. The no response from them maintainer.
Don't worry, even I get away with my intensive use of Koji. ;-) I
Victor Vasilyev wrote:
I'm trying to complete the step 3 of the Claiming Ownership of an
Orphaned Package Procedure [1] that says:
3. Press the Take Ownership button for each active branch that you
want to maintain.
However, I don't see such buttons associated with the rawhide for all
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Wes Shull wrote:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
NEVER do that!!!
If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it sucks in
a grand total of sqlite and xulrunner. Yeehaw.
If anything, you
On 31 January 2010 08:14, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Christopher Brown wrote:
This is because 3.5.7 doesn't affect us. Stability issue is for
Windows people and update notification is patched out for obvious
reasons.
On 28/01/10 12:18, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/27/2010 10:57 PM, nodata wrote:
On 27/01/10 09:29, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/26/2010 10:02 PM, nodata wrote:
Hi,
When I disable abrtd, I get a tray applet complaining about this.
Is there any precedent for this? I have bluetooth disabled,
On 01/31/2010 12:46 PM, nodata wrote:
On 28/01/10 12:18, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/27/2010 10:57 PM, nodata wrote:
On 27/01/10 09:29, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/26/2010 10:02 PM, nodata wrote:
Hi,
When I disable abrtd, I get a tray applet complaining about this.
Is there any precedent
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Wes Shull wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Wes Shull wrote:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
NEVER do that!!!
If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it sucks in
a grand total
On 31/01/10 12:59, M A Young wrote:
--snipped--
If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it
sucks in
a grand total of sqlite and xulrunner. Yeehaw.
At the moment it does for you, though more updates may be required
depending on what you have installed, but you
Compose started at Sun Jan 31 08:15:06 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-5.2.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
PySolFC-music-4.40-5.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires
Is any one interested in the following packages:
glade3 -- User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
ldtp -- Desktop testing framework
pida -- A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an
imaginary part.
--
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
True, but if necessary.
You can always yum downgrade x
Especially if you just need to check out package x.
In such scenarios you might find the ``yum history'' command useful
since it can easily undo upgrades that include
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:00 PM, John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
A friendly reminder that yesterday, January 26, 2010, we reached the
Feature and Spin submission deadline.
Where is the list of accepted spins?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/13/Spins
says it's a placeholder,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 22:32:57 +0100,
Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:00 PM, John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
A friendly reminder that yesterday, January 26, 2010, we reached the
Feature and Spin submission deadline.
Where is the list of
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Spins_Fedora_13
Some of those are kickstart only and won't have prebuilt isos for download.
Great thanks. So I've updated the Spins page with the info gathered
from your link.
I
Hi Adam,
I would be interested in comaintaining pida.
Thanks and Regards,
Vivek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'm trying to debug an issue for the upstream author of ocp and am
running into an issue where gdb is showing value optimized out for
variables even though I've compiled the program with gcc -g -O0. Are
there any gcc/gdb gurus who can help?
Compiler excerpts:
gcc -g -O0 -fPIC -Wall -I.././
19 matches
Mail list logo
