On Thursday 03 June 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:05 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
It doesn't even know all English words. In one review I did recently
rpmlint flagged the word decryption as a spelling error. Which I
didn't believe, so I looked it up. It's a valid noun
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 23:52, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
The obvious response here is 'so, package CruiseControl too!' If you
can't package CruiseControl, then you shouldn't package phpUnderControl;
it's frowned upon / not allowed (I can never remember which) to package
On 06/02/10 22:33, Jon Masters wrote:
A recovery initramfs could be used. It could just basically be the
rescue mode anaconda bits in one image shoved in place to start.
That would be a good idea anyway: Zap the two-stage rescue system
loading. Just have a kernel + initramfs. That would
I've just built a new gnome-color-manager release for rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2226766
It's pretty different from the version in F13, as it is:
* Ported to GSettings
* Ported to GDBus
* Now supporting multiple profiles for devices
* Now supporting virtual
On 06/03/2010 02:39 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
I've just built a new gnome-color-manager release for rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2226766
It's pretty different from the version in F13, as it is:
* Ported to GSettings
* Ported to GDBus
* Now supporting multiple
Hello,
I'm orphaning the following packages.
Petr Pisar (ppisar) is interested in taking them, but according to
the formal processes we are advertising this anyway.
pcre, html2ps, sharutils, in rawhide and Fedora 12, 13
Petr Pisar
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/06/10 10:16, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/03/2010 02:39 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
I've just built a new gnome-color-manager release for rawhide:
If anyone is wondering what to test, refer to the test cases at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-02-18_Color_management
Hello, I wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:15:03AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
I'm orphaning the following packages.
Petr Pisar (ppisar) is interested in taking them, but according to
the formal processes we are advertising this anyway.
pcre, html2ps, sharutils, in rawhide and
On 3 June 2010 10:26, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it ok to test on an XFCE?
it only pulls in 4pkgs.
I assume so, I've never tested. If it fails, it would be good to know
what other runtime packages we need.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/06/10 10:37, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 3 June 2010 10:26, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it ok to test on an XFCE?
it only pulls in 4pkgs.
I assume so, I've never tested. If it fails, it would be good to know
what other runtime packages we need.
Richard.
Got the
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:04:18PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Is it better to have a separate volume for this, or to just have a sort
of rescue initramfs ...?
Seems like the latter is more flexible but then I'm no boot process wizard.
Good suggestion.
Compose started at Thu Jun 3 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
bugzilla-3.6-1.fc14.noarch
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Alpha 4 of
version 1.2.6. This release contains a new replication session API,
auto DN index upgrade, and several bug fixes.
***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is an
Alpha release, so it may have a few
R 2.11.1 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in updates-testing
(or it will be within the next 24 hours).
It will likely be the last R update for Fedora 11.
In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new
packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either
Hello, I'm from ISPRAS and we have created an experimental system for
monitoring and analyzing of upstream libraries development. It may be
helpful for analyzing risks of library updating in the distribution.
The web page of upstream-tracker is:
http://linuxtesting.org/upstream-tracker/
It now
On 06/03/2010 09:04 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Hello, I'm from ISPRAS and we have created an experimental system for
monitoring and analyzing of upstream libraries development. It may be
helpful for analyzing risks of library updating in the distribution.
The web page of upstream-tracker
On 06/03/2010 05:48 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 03/06/10 10:37, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 3 June 2010 10:26, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it ok to test on an XFCE?
it only pulls in 4pkgs.
I assume so, I've never tested. If it fails, it would be good to know
what other runtime
On 03/06/10 14:26, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
--slim--
Richard.
Got the expected results from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_colormanagement_apply_profile
Do I need to update that anywhere?
Did you the xsane call that is causing login programs (gdm) to try to
communicate with
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:25:56AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
In recent times some stupid (IMHO) ideas have been adopted in Linux
just to copy what others do. Just as examples: the control of desktop
widgets in KDE4 (functional GUI elements
gcm-prefs SIGSEGVs for me. My system is dual-monitor DELL F12 freshly
upgraded to f13, with gnome-color-management installed after upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599543
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Is it reasonable for a package owner to exclude themselves on bugzilla
email when they are the assignee of the bug? How would they know when
a new bug is reported, or when new comments are added?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:52 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Is it reasonable for a package owner to exclude themselves on bugzilla
email when they are the assignee of the bug? How would they know when
a new bug is reported, or when new comments are added?
It can be reasonable-ish. I use
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:05:49AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:52 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Is it reasonable for a package owner to exclude themselves on bugzilla
email when they are the assignee of the bug? How would they know when
a new bug is reported, or
On 3 June 2010 14:41, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
gcm-prefs SIGSEGVs for me. My system is dual-monitor DELL F12 freshly
upgraded to f13, with gnome-color-management installed after upgrade
It looks like the GConf schema failed to be installed correctly. If
you grab the
On 3 June 2010 14:26, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
Did you the xsane call that is causing login programs (gdm) to try to
communicate with cups, causing AVC errors?
This should be fixed in both f13 (via updates-testing) and now rawhide.
Richard
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 15:10 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:05:49AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:52 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Is it reasonable for a package owner to exclude themselves on bugzilla
email when they are the assignee of
On 06/01/2010 05:09 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 05/29/2010 07:25 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ?
I'm pretty sure JBoss is still a no-go because of poor licensing,
specifically:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:33 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
JBoss is stalled because it depends on a package with:
- incompatible license
- six years old
- dead upstream
How is this different from what is on the bug report ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2010-06-01
This run continues from the previous run, rebuilding those packages
that failed during the earlier run, or that changed between 2010-05-27
and 06-01. This picks up a few fixes:
* a newer pkgconfig that doesn't
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for i386
using rawhide from 2010-06-01
This run continues from the previous run, rebuilding those packages
that failed during the earlier run, or that changed between 2010-05-27
and 06-01. This picks up a few fixes:
* a newer pkgconfig that doesn't
On 06/03/2010 10:33 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
On 06/01/2010 05:09 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 05/29/2010 07:25 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ?
I'm pretty sure JBoss is still a no-go because of poor licensing,
specifically:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
When the shebang is to allow running some sort of unittest I generally just
leave it alone (the end user won't want to run it and upstream does want to
run the code when they're testing).
There is still no reason to have a shebang on a
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:14 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:35 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/03/2010 03:28 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
That is just making things complicated, for minimal gain.
Yes and no. Purely as a desktop user, there isn't
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 18:31 +0200, Christof Damian wrote:
Second question: I would love to have a meta package which brings all
of these packages ( phpunit, phpmd, phpcpd, phpdoc, phpcs, Mockery,
...) together and allows installation
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:57 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
When the shebang is to allow running some sort of unittest I generally just
leave it alone (the end user won't want to run it and upstream does want to
run the code when
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/03/2010 10:33 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
On 06/01/2010 05:09 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 05/29/2010 07:25 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ?
I'm
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:31 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Ah. It's a shame it wasn't put up for consideration as a release
blocker. Obviously the rather peremptory response from Jakub didn't help
with that...
Would
Rescue environment aside, it'd be nice to avoid failing the upgrade
because of insufficient space in /boot. I think 200 MB default /boot
prove to be too small---perhaps 500 MB should be the new default?
Of course, it already is:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:57 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
When the shebang is to allow running some sort of unittest I generally just
leave it alone (the end
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-DSA/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3296
Modified Files:
perl-Crypt-DSA.spec
Added Files:
perl-Crypt-DSA-1.16-meta.patch
Log Message:
META.yml should specify perl = 5.006 due to use of 3-arg open
On 05/30/2010 04:26 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
Current status
* Targeted release: Fedora 13
* Last updated: Sat Jan 9 2009
* Percentage of completion: 60%
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.1
Current status
*
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
michael.silva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
This is true (well, the problem is that there is no applicable and valid
license, not so much that it is incompatible), no
On 3 June 2010 20:12, Matt Domsch wrote:
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2010-06-01
Small enhancement request for your scripts: I have two packages in
list (one maintainer and another co-maintainer) and both are mentioned
at the bottom, but I get mail
On 3 June 2010 21:29, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 3 June 2010 20:12, Matt Domsch wrote:
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2010-06-01
Small enhancement request for your scripts: I have two packages in
list (one maintainer and another co-maintainer) and both
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564664
Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 06/03/2010 11:54 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
michael.silva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
This is true (well, the problem is that there is no applicable and valid
license,
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:43:26AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
libguestfs-1.3.17-1.fc14 (build/make) rjones,mdbooth,virtmaint
Gnulib problem. This should be fixed in the next release.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for
Author: eponyme
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-WWW-Curl/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10420
Modified Files:
perl-WWW-Curl.spec
Log Message:
Remove a test that requires network
Index: perl-WWW-Curl.spec
On 06/03/2010 11:49 AM, Chris Lumens wrote:
Rescue environment aside, it'd be nice to avoid failing the upgrade
because of insufficient space in /boot. I think 200 MB default /boot
prove to be too small---perhaps 500 MB should be the new default?
Of course, it already is:
Author: eponyme
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-WWW-Curl/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11641
Modified Files:
perl-WWW-Curl.spec
Log Message:
Remove a test that requires network
Index: perl-WWW-Curl.spec
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:58 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
It's a bit intangible and not entirely predicated on whether we're using
the keyword or flag setup, I think. Currently when we're considering
bugs we use a
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:55:53AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
FYI, FESCo decided on this particular issue that a provenpackager can fix
tor to comply with our initscripts guidelines for released Fedoras. (As far
as I know, the maintainer already fixed the Rawhide package.)
It's true; it is
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:29:15PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I can't speak on what Red Hat does on a larger scale. I do know that it
is important to me and Fedora that we do it properly, or not at all.
Yes please. This is why I trust Fedora.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
Senior
On 06/03/2010 01:01 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:29:15PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I can't speak on what Red Hat does on a larger scale. I do know that it
is important to me and Fedora that we do it properly, or not at all.
Yes please. This is why I
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:02:21PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Hm. I can see the use of this, but I can also see issues with how you
do updates for it sanely (if at all.)
Yea. I think you don't do updates for it in general. I think I agree
with Seth that this is something Anaconda stuffs in
On 06/03/2010 09:59 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I can't speak on what Red Hat does on a larger scale. I do know that it
is important to me and Fedora that we do it properly, or not at all.
Yep. Red Hat can do what is necessary for the commercial success of
free software. Meanwhile,
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 14:05 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:02:21PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Hm. I can see the use of this, but I can also see issues with how you
do updates for it sanely (if at all.)
Yea. I think you don't do updates for it in general. I think I
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 11:09 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:57 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
When the shebang is to allow running some sort of unittest I generally
just
leave it alone (the end user won't want
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 06/03/2010 11:54 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
And slightly weird that it's okay for Red Hat to distribute it
themselves, both commercially and as open source from jboss.org, but
it's questionable for Fedora.
I can't speak on what
On 06/03/2010 02:31 PM, Alex Hudson wrote:
If everyone else is distributing JBoss, though, that calls into question
whether it's Fedora doing it properly.
Worrying about a set of rights which are unwaivable seems on the face of
it to be exhibiting an abundance of over-caution, and it seems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=419482action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=419482action=edit
Fix Description:
1) When a backend is removed, the db instance directory was removed
as well (See also 463774 - index files for database should be deleted
when db is
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 15:09 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
The argument that everyone else is doing it, so it must be fine is
also completely false. As my mother eloquently put it to me at age 6,
If everyone jumped off a bridge, would you?.
That's not the argument I'm putting forward.
The
On 06/03/2010 03:24 PM, Alex Hudson wrote:
That's not the argument I'm putting forward.
The French cannot waive copyright argument brings you to the
conclusion you stated; [The license] is not valid, we can't use it.
That same argument holds, as far as I can see, for every other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599732
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=419510action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=419510action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Here's another run of the sources file
checker. Thats against a 2010-05-31 cvs checkout seed.
This sourcecheck script takes a full checkout of all Fedora packages
in the devel branch and runs 'spectool -g' on each spec file to
download any sources that contain a valid URI. It then checks any
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
thomasj:BADURL:glob2-0.9.4.4.tar.gz:glob2
Thanks, fixed in cvs.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:16:56PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Agreed. But it is the same problem as what if there's an exploit in a
library Anaconda uses to download repos during install?. There would
still be a lot of media out there and I'm not sure we've ever respun the
main images post GA
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:42:04AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2010-06-01
This run continues from the previous run, rebuilding those packages
that failed during the earlier run, or that changed between 2010-05-27
and
On 06/04/2010 05:02 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
cheeselee:BADSOURCE:kchmviewer-5.2.tar.gz:kchmviewer
Thanks! Fixed in Rawhide.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
You might feel that way, but the simple fact is that French citizens can
not abandon copyright (aka put works into the Public Domain). This is
the only license that we've been given, but since it is not valid, we
can't use it. Without a license, we cannot include this
Chen Lei wrote:
I found the maintainer violates fedora package/naming guideline many
times, we need a people to persuade him to obey those guideline.
IMHO we need to unsponsor him and orphan his packages. There are way too
many guideline violations and bizarre nonstandard stuff in his
On 06/04/2010 08:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Right, in this case the Version tag is a blatant violation of our guidelines
and shows that the maintainer either doesn't understand them at all or
doesn't care about them at all. Either way, he needs to get unsponsored.
Would you mind filing
There will be an outage starting at 2010-06-04 14:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-06-04 14:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Updating some vpn settings. I hope
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'm not going to oppose you on the ground that enrico has written good
packages; I'll oppose you on the groupnd that it's not the job of Fedora
to prevent people from providing functionality above the minimum.
The problem is that the mandatory functionality (SysV-style
James Antill wrote:
2. There's no way to do the groupremove operation, easily.
The groupremove operation is completely and utterly broken by design anyway:
1. It doesn't remove stuff which was independently dragged in by
dependencies of the packages in the group. So you'll be removing only the
2010/6/4 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
The problem is that the mandatory functionality (SysV-style initscripts
compliant to our guidelines) gets pushed to a subpackage to make room for
the optional and completely unneccessary junk, and that in some cases yum
prefers the nonstandard
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:50:39AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'm not going to oppose you on the ground that enrico has written good
packages; I'll oppose you on the groupnd that it's not the job of Fedora
to prevent people from providing functionality above the
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 05:04 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
James Antill wrote:
2. There's no way to do the groupremove operation, easily.
The groupremove operation is completely and utterly broken by design anyway:
It doesn't act perfectly, in all cases, no.
[...]
Try groupremoving
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-LibYAML:
001a21618af05ee3a12dbb8cd6bd9b13 YAML-LibYAML-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SOAP-Lite:
8b833aedcb8256320438a7b163c3e2a9 SOAP-Lite-0.711.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-SOAP-Lite/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8297
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-SOAP-Lite.spec sources
Added Files:
SOAP-Lite-defined_hash.patch
Log Message:
* Thu Jan 3 2010 Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14204
Modified Files:
perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C.spec
Added Files:
WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C-0.2-rt33039.patch
Log Message:
* Fri
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598989
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598989
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: eponyme
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-WWW-Curl/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10780
Modified Files:
perl-WWW-Curl.spec
Log Message:
Remove a test that requires network
Index: perl-WWW-Curl.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-GSSAPI-0.26-4.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599788
Summary: FTBFS perl-GSSAPI-0.26-4.fc13
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-3.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599817
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.13-1.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599858
Summary: FTBFS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599859
Summary: FTBFS perl-Archive-RPM-0.05-1.fc13
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.70-3.fc14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599917
Summary: FTBFS perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.70-3.fc14
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-WWW-Curl-4.11-1.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599919
Summary: FTBFS perl-WWW-Curl-4.11-1.fc13
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Padre-0.50-4.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599945
Summary: FTBFS perl-Padre-0.50-4.fc13
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip-0.04-5.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599942
Summary: FTBFS perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip-0.04-5.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600026
Summary: FTBFS perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.13-2.fc13
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.85-3.fc11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600022
Summary: FTBFS perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.85-3.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-2.fc13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600018
Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-2.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599919
Nicoleau Fabien nicoleau.fab...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599858
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600018
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599817
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
100 matches
Mail list logo
