Hi All,
Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they
would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not
seen any comment as to the state of them other than they already
support mac80211. These are quite a common device and I think it would
be nice to
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:16 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they
would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not
seen any comment as to the state of them other than they
pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they
would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not
seen any comment as to the state of them other than they already
support mac80211. These are
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone know if the new Broadcom drivers are in a state where they
would be in the Fedora 14 kernel? I've seen the release but i've not
seen any comment
heyyas,
ogre3d, one of the most important 3d engines we have in fedora is
already lagging behind over half a year in rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576286
would be nice to see it finally updated atleast in rawhide so it can
go atleast in f15... which means we are only 1
Christopher Aillon venit, vidit, dixit 14.09.2010 00:49:
On 09/12/2010 08:39 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
On 09/12/2010 12:50 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
How did this slip through the cracks? Isn't that a security related
update?
No, it didn't slip trough the cracks. Some problems with the nss
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute
unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though.
That's still true of the b43 firmware for older (pre-802.11n) devices,
but the firmware to go with
On 09/14/2010 12:18 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ralph Lange wrote:
Hi,
Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to
request a build, does not support proxies.
In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever, with an
Compose started at Tue Sep 14 08:15:26 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
I don't think it would have been too late for Fedora 14. It isn't a core
package that needs to be available in a spin, afaik...
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
heyyas,
ogre3d, one of the most important 3d engines we have in fedora is
already lagging
commit fa6df7dc7af1ba736cb2c9ee809b8d367e1ae3f9
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 14 15:11:21 2010 +0200
New release, 0.23
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Most.spec | 17 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633719
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633751
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ralph Lange ralph.la...@bessy.de writes:
Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to
request a build, does not support proxies.
yes; like most python programs it does not have proper proxy support.
In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PAR:
789a0768881cd051ad7bc2b9d89a56fb PAR-1.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5306c715b4e1f3c44bbcae0a17feaf9fb5cf2115
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 14 15:37:50 2010 +0200
New version, v1.002
perl-PAR.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PAR.spec b/perl-PAR.spec
index
commit 80ad7fb2c468a71a74efb568caacf6d8ec8bba87
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 14 15:39:41 2010 +0200
Sources file change
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633738
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Checksums:
c977fc3a10855d1d48f2b0a78a91467b CPAN-Checksums-2.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot
distribute
unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though.
That's still true of the b43
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:43:03 +0200,
Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
heyyas,
ogre3d, one of the most important 3d engines we have in fedora is
already lagging behind over half a year in rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576286
would be nice to see it finally
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:21:33 -0500,
Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it would have been too late for Fedora 14. It isn't a core
package that needs to be available in a spin, afaik...
It wasn't when I was going to try to work on it, but I got swamped with
Spins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633720
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 02e8358d8813b23e137d240b5ed11f235c1e872c
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 14 16:32:05 2010 +0200
New release, v0.20
perl-Pod-Abstract.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Abstract.spec
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:13 PM, John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot
distribute
unlike say
Compose started at Tue Sep 14 13:15:38 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
On 09/14/2010 08:33 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the
norm for vendor code dumps.
It is nevertheless a massive step forward. I heard OEM systems were
favouring other, even slightly more expensive wireless cards because of
the
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/14/2010 08:33 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the
norm for vendor code dumps.
It is nevertheless a massive step forward. I heard OEM systems were
favouring other, even slightly
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part?
Seriously. I will go buy their stuff right now.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional Research Computing Services
On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part?
Seriously. I will go buy their stuff right now.
I read that HP was doing this but haven't verified.
Rahul
--
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part?
Seriously. I will go buy their stuff
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/14/2010 08:33 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the update. That's what I suspected as it seems to be the
norm for vendor code dumps.
It is nevertheless a massive step forward. I heard OEM systems were
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457760
Bug 457760 depends on bug 457759, which changed state.
Bug 457759 Summary: perl-Font-AFM not available for EL-4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457759
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Folks,
Just did an install of rawhide from today using mirrors.kernel.org and
F14-Alpha installer media for the Anaconda runtime.
1). There is no default runlevel
2). I'm dropped into a confused shell on boot.
3). User accounts such as root are not recognized after init 3
4). init 5 starts gdm
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:23 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
1). There is no default runlevel
2). I'm dropped into a confused shell on boot.
3). User accounts such as root are not recognized after init 3
4). init 5 starts gdm and I can then login as normal.
It might just be broken deps or
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 01:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/15/2010 12:49 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Which OEMs care enough about Linux support to use a more expensive part?
Seriously. I will go buy their stuff right now.
I read that HP was doing this but haven't verified.
Ones who pre-load Linux could presumably calculate that shipping a
better supported chip may cost them slightly more initially but save
them maintenance headaches and hence eventually work out cheaper, so
that would be Dell and HP. I think
Hi all,
If I try to update F12 I get the following error:
# yum update
Plugin abilitati:presto, refresh-packagekit
Impostazione processo di aggiornamento
Risoluzione dipendenze
-- Esecuzione del controllo di transazione
--- Pacchetto firefox.x86_64 0:3.5.12-1.fc12 settato per essere
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Why xulrunner has been built against this and pushed to stable?
Because Firefox/Thunderbird maintainers have the ability to
Push-To-Stable regardless of what the Fedora package policies say. Harrumph.
I have previously complained of this fact before when these packages
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-09-14)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-14/fesco.2010-09-14-19.30.log.html
Meeting summary
Folks,
I was going to file an automated bug report, but it wants to file
against 15, which doesn't exist, rather than Rawhide (which obviously
does). I can email and ask for a version 15 to be added to Bugzilla,
etc. but is that the solution, or should ABRT be always realizing to use
rawhide and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457760
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 22:39 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 13 September 2010 21:49, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So Seth spent half a day implementing a proof of concept:
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/fedora-app-market-proof-of-concept/
Translations?
They were
A last minute blocker bug meeting was held in #fedora-bugzappers to
review the state of the open Fedora 14 Beta Blocker bugs. In order to
create the Fedora 14 Beta Release Candidate on Thursday (2010-09-16),
test, and release on time, this list MUST be empty by 2010-09-15
(tomorrow)!
On 09/14/2010 10:13 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot
distribute
unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be
On 09/14/2010 10:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* ACTION: : will defer systemd to f15 release to give more time to fix
small issues and docs and general polish. (nirik, 21:12:43)
What are you kidding me!
Gnome-shell better be sparkling out of aunt Tilly pony eyes before we
ship it..sigh
On Tue, 14.09.10 16:01, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
* #461 F14 blessing for systemd (nirik, 20:12:29)
* LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic
and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools
(nirik, 20:38:06)
* ACTION: :
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* #461 F14 blessing for systemd (nirik, 20:12:29)
* LINK:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic
and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_tools
(nirik, 20:38:06)
* ACTION: : will
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote:
Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should
we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora 14?
I would agree with this. I certainly plan to run F14 with systemd in
anticipation of seeing
Jon Masters said the following on 09/14/2010 03:17 PM Pacific Time:
Folks,
I was going to file an automated bug report, but it wants to file
against 15, which doesn't exist, rather than Rawhide (which obviously
does). I can email and ask for a version 15 to be added to Bugzilla,
etc. but is
On 09/15/2010 12:01 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laskajla...@redhat.com wrote:
Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should
we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora 14?
I would agree with this. I certainly plan to
2010/9/15 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
Should gnome-shell (..) becoming the
default
I hope that there will be the option to disable this default and
return to classical gnome desktop.
Regards,
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2010/9/14 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
Should gnome-shell and every other feature fall under technology
preview and stay like that for sometime as well before becoming the
default or does this just applied to certain features maintained by
certain people. . .
I'm making lemonade
Am Dienstag, den 14.09.2010, 16:01 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Meeting summary
---
* init process (nirik, 19:30:01)
* pjones and ajax are traveling today, will not be able to attend.
(nirik, 19:30:30)
So am I, sorry i didn't make note earlier. I will be back next Tuesday
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:28 PM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Ubuntu recently got high praise from LWN for Software Center in 10.10
betas. It doesn't use PackageKit at all AFAICS (no PackageKit packages
are installed in my VM). It integrates tightly with apt (you know, like
Hi FESCo members,
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-09-14)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:05:34 +0200
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 14.09.10 16:01, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
* #461 F14 blessing for systemd (nirik, 20:12:29)
* LINK:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_initialization_basic and
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:48:13 -0400
Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi FESCo members,
...snip...
Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted,
even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily
have enough votes for inclusion in F14. I
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard.
Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descriptive
subject like HEY VOTE ON THIS PLEASE BEFORE NEXT MEETING: or
something.
Hmm. Here's a couple ideas I
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 18:57 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I hope you still read it. I have some advice for you, which of course
you're welcome to take or leave:
Please don't take everything personally.
I don't see how Lennart is taking anything personally here.
He is merely expressing his
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:26:41 -0400,
Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hmm. Here's a couple ideas I could think of:
- If you don't place a vote by $DATE, your vote will be assumed to be
$POSITION can be scarily motivating.
- Nag emails sent out by trac daily until you
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:05:34AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
So, we closed all blocker bugs, we worked through the vast majority of
other bugs. I dealt with almost all issues raised in Bill's list, only
few small issues left. While there are some bugs open, we did our
homework. I was
Ric Wheeler (rwhee...@redhat.com) said:
Can we use the firmware that they have for the existing broadcom wireless
driver?
'No' is what I've been told.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/9/14 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 09/15/2010 12:01 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, James Laskajla...@redhat.com wrote:
Much like we introduced and communicated btrfs support in F-11, should
we communicate systemd as a technology preview in Fedora
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted,
even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily have
enough votes for inclusion in F14. I have a couple of questions for you,
FESCo, since I honestly don't
On 09/15/2010 05:50 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/9/15 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
Should gnome-shell (..) becoming the
default
I hope that there will be the option to disable this default and
return to classical gnome desktop
Yes. GNOME Panel will be available as a
Excuse me if this is the wrong place to send this.
As my fedora ambassador duties, I tend to show other students the neat
things you can do with Fedora with my trusty USB drive I always keep on my
keychain. More often than not, I'm booting up Fedora into some laptop or
university desktop with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-ORLite-1.45 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633736
Summary: perl-ORLite-1.45 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PAR-1.002 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633738
Summary: perl-PAR-1.002 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633720
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633727
Summary: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.06 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-ShareDir-1.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633726
Summary: perl-File-ShareDir-1.02 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-MooseX-CascadeClearing-0.03 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633734
Summary: perl-MooseX-CascadeClearing-0.03 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633729
Summary: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.11 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-pip-1.18 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633744
Summary: perl-pip-1.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Padre-0.70 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737
Summary: perl-Padre-0.70 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Test-Most-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633751
Summary: perl-Test-Most-0.23 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.010 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633748
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.010 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay-1.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633752
Summary: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay-1.07 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Devel-Dumpvar-1.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633721
Summary: perl-Devel-Dumpvar-1.06 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-Manifest-1.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633733
Summary: perl-Module-Manifest-1.08 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS-1.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633725
Summary: perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS-1.07 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633724
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.13 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633740
Summary: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.13 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Math-Symbolic-0.604 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633732
Summary: perl-Math-Symbolic-0.604 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633731
Summary: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.08 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633749
Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.06 is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Pod-Abstract-0.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633745
Summary: perl-Pod-Abstract-0.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Text-FindIndent-0.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633754
Summary: perl-Text-FindIndent-0.09 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633739
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.007 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Text-Table-1.116 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633756
Summary: perl-Text-Table-1.116 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-Filter-HTTP-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633747
Summary: perl-POE-Filter-HTTP-Parser-1.04 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.26 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633757
Summary: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.26 is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.86 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633750
Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.86 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Text-Aligner-0.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633753
Summary: perl-Text-Aligner-0.07 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-XXX-0.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633760
Summary: perl-XXX-0.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633739
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633738
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633746
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
