Hi,
The upcoming release of Askbot (used for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of additional
dependencies. Django-registration is already in the repository and was
packaged in advance of this but there are still quite a few ones left
* akismet - Praveen Kumar has filed a
On 09/20/2011 11:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
The upcoming release of Askbot (used for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of additional
dependencies. Django-registration is already in the repository and was
packaged in advance of this but there are still quite a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/09/11 08:11, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
The upcoming release of Askbot (used for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of
additional dependencies. Django-registration is already in the
repository and was packaged in
Yesterdays meeting minutes were waiting for moderators approval.
Resending without html log, which is available at:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2011-09-19-17.01.log.html
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-09-19)
Summary of changes:
05bee47... Initial packaging of perl-ExtUtils-H2PM. (*)
880113c... Fixes based on Remi's review feedback. (*)
dc6fb47... Update to latest upstream version. (*)
d379eea... Remove the --optimize build option as per Remi's suggestion (*)
7c2cb9d... The package was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/09/11 08:11, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
The upcoming release of Askbot (used for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of
additional dependencies. Django-registration is already in the
repository and was packaged in
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07:34PM +0200, Nicoleau Fabien wrote:
Hi,
Due to a lack of time, and to focus on the pacakges I use, I'm
orphaning some of my packages :
perl-WWW-Curl
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-WWW-Curl?_csrf_token=407467ba7d127d6459b785cab7ed113a5011e8f0
What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild
against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all this mess. I
mean the release of F16 is not that far away and the amount of broken deps
is quite big imho.
I would be glad helping out if this is due to some orphaned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/09/11 09:53, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 20/09/11 08:11, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
The upcoming release of Askbot (used for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of
additional dependencies. Django-registration is already
On 09/20/2011 12:53 PM, Johannes Lips wrote:
What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild
against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all this mess.
I mean the release of F16 is not that far away and the amount of broken
deps is quite big imho.
I would be
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:53 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild
against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all this
mess. I mean the release of F16 is not that far away and the amount
of broken deps is quite big imho.
On 09/20/2011 03:01 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:53 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild
against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all this
mess. I mean the release of F16 is not that far away and
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:19:17PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
When you have a closer look, you'll notice that such mass rebuilts
were being delayed by QA's delay queue and now are stuck.
Yeah. I rebuilt maatkit on the 1st of September and it still hasn't made
it to the -stable repository.
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 18:11 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:46 PM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Debian policy is that any virtual dependencies
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:01:06 +0200,
Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to see a discussion about how we can ensure -- within
reasonable limits -- that e.g. bumping a library's SONAME is followed by
dependent components being rebuilt and included with the providing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739887
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 9/20/11 9:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Currently
I only see mails of maintainers who plan updating the library, but the
rest of it pretty much depends on the maintainers of the depending
components rebuilding them quickly enough, and the original maintainer
to include them in the F-16
2011/9/20 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:53 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild
against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all this
mess. I mean the release of F16 is not that far away and the
On 09/20/2011 03:47 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:01:06 +0200,
Nils Philippsenn...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to see a discussion about how we can ensure -- within
reasonable limits -- that e.g. bumping a library's SONAME is followed by
dependent components being
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:13:27PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 04:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into
the OS so close to a release.
Maintainers on vacation, non-trivial changes?
In my case, a major change was
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:03 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into
the OS so close to a release. In the absence of a very good motivation,
that's not good engineering practice, and it's not consistent with the
feature process.
On 9/20/11 10:13 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 04:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into
the OS so close to a release.
Maintainers on vacation, non-trivial changes?
In my case, a major change was introduced into rawhide many
On 09/20/2011 04:16 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:13:27PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 04:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into
the OS so close to a release.
Maintainers on vacation, non-trivial
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:21:52AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
We've set our freezes as if we expect all major development to be done
at that point, but we've aligned our schedules in a way that guarantees
that (at least for GNOME) major development is still happening at the
time of
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That said, a reasonable QA would cherry-pick such solution
candidates from *-testing and integrate them. Simply flooding
maintainers with complaint mails about broken deps, maintainers
believe to already have fixed doesn't help
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739887
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 09/20/2011 04:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That said, a reasonable QA would cherry-pick such solution
candidates from *-testing and integrate them. Simply flooding
maintainers with complaint mails about broken deps,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:52:28PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 04:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What the maintainers could have done is not upload a package that breaks
binary compatibility into a distribution that's attempting to stabalise
for release.
That's a way too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/2011 04:01 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Eric Paris epa...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
If so... why use chcon versus the semanage/restorecon
technique? or if my
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:52:28PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 04:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
What the maintainers could have done is not upload a package that breaks
binary compatibility into a
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 16:01 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Eric Paris epa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
If so... why use chcon versus the semanage/restorecon technique?
or if my assesement is wrong... can someone point
commit eba565f6f3d1b46d6fcda20b17fb9632888c1733
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 20 17:16:33 2011 +0200
0.002 bump
...nzip2-output-argument-as-file-name-string.patch | 25
...2-Remove-Test-DBICSchemaLoaderDigest-test.patch | 65
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739887
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 16:06 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2011/9/20 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:53 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild
against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all this
- Original Message -
I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into
the OS so close to a release. In the absence of a very good
motivation,
that's not good engineering practice, and it's not consistent with
the
feature process.
Perhaps you're not clear on
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Classic-Perl:
7bc0b2abb50f58f0adf014ae3f9e219a Classic-Perl-0.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YUM-RepoQuery:
912c9df5a25f0fb3c051e1a9db5ede00 YUM-RepoQuery-0.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5f90f6b2e0c312d1b895dfd33f5830bb72f6676a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 20 17:36:02 2011 +0200
Cache source tar ball
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 16:07 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 03:47 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:01:06 +0200,
Nils Philippsenn...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to see a discussion about how we can ensure -- within
reasonable limits -- that e.g. bumping
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Of course, the accounts system _still_ doesn't have groups, five years
later, so provenpackager is the big hammer we have. We could get groups
any day now, that'd be just fine.
Do you mean groups of groups, like in provenpackager-kde,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Listing:
ad56d06a719503198c02188995f32c9e File-Listing-6.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
So when _is_ a good time to do binary-incompatible changes to
libraries?
* It's not after beta freeze, because they are unwanted at that time
* It's not 14 days before beta freeze, because they won't get out of
updates-testing in time
* It's not 14 days + 3
commit 20c3cd49bf0a22edce1a275979df14ad4a8bb30d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 20 17:44:56 2011 +0200
6.03 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Listing.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 03:01 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:53 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild
against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all
commit d6851da18310de4ddbf9a2e0e550398ef7e153aa
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 20 17:53:45 2011 +0200
Build-require perl(Test::More) needed for tests
perl-File-Listing.spec |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:45 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
- Original Message -
So when _is_ a good time to do binary-incompatible changes to
libraries?
* It's not after beta freeze, because they are unwanted at that time
* It's not 14 days before beta freeze, because they won't
Hello All,
I would personally like to see Nathan Owe's packages for C-ICAP and
C-ICAP Classify reviewed and included if at all possible in Fedora. I
have used C-ICAP for many years. I also am the author of MOST of C-ICAP
Classify (thanks to Bob Jenkins for his lookup3.c hash functions).
I know
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739882
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 9/20/11 11:43 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Of course, the accounts system _still_ doesn't have groups, five years
later, so provenpackager is the big hammer we have. We could get groups
any day now, that'd be just fine.
Do you mean
Kevin Kofler wrote:
I have put up a repository with an updated zif snapshot for Fedora 15 at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/kkofler/zif-backport/fedora-zif-backport.repo
So, I found several issues, mostly in zif or PackageKit-zif, but also one in
KPackageKit/Apper:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
I hope we can get all the annoyances in zif sorted out soon.
Kevin, were you able to reproduce my problem with the official adobe
repository? I'm still not sure if my multiple issues with zif depsolving
are a problem
- Original Message -
I'd like to mention that an upstream source getting bumped doesn't
mean
anything per se, so we should rather have criteria agnostic of
arbitrary
parameters like this. For instance, it shouldn't make a shred of
difference whether I apply a patch in the spec file,
Le mardi 20 septembre 2011 à 17:10 +0200, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
So when _is_ a good time to do binary-incompatible changes to libraries?
The answer is obvious - in rawhide, before branching point. Anything
after branching will interact with various groups schedules and crash
into the
* What if there are two layers of users that need to be rebuilt?
The delays just pile one upon another...
You can update rawhide at any time and accomplish that work without
delays. Then it shows up in the next Fedora version.
Yes, but then we have align the schedules, so have a new gnome
Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Sven Lankes:
Didn't we have the time an update had to stay in -testing changed to
three days during the F15 stabilization phase? Could we implement this
again for F16 to mitigate the issue?
I think we should. Please file a bug against bodhi
Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Chauvet:
I'm the maintainer of opencv here.
quick answear: I have no right to submit a bodhi update for packages I
do not own. Given that I'm no in the provenpackager group.
So as I cannot expect every single maintainers to respond in
On 09/20/2011 08:19 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mardi 20 septembre 2011 à 17:10 +0200, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
So when _is_ a good time to do binary-incompatible changes to libraries?
The answer is obvious - in rawhide, before branching point. Anything
after branching will interact with
On Sep 20, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
Instead, I think we ought to revamp the process like this:
Maintainer A builds new package B
Maintainer A files a bodhi ticket for package B
In that ticket, the maintainer is responsible for list each item of change
from the previous
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
My personal pet-peeve with the current branching policy is that the
mass-branching happens way way too early for packages where there are no
significant new development to be introduced in rawhide during branched
state. So for every
- Original Message -
This is essentially what we had a while ago, only with trac tickets
instead of bodhi requests.
Bodhi is definitely a better place to track this stuff, regardless of how
decisions are made.
There were a couple of problems with
this.
1) Nowhere near enough
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular
release. This meeting is
On 09/20/2011 09:18 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
My personal pet-peeve with the current branching policy is that
the mass-branching happens way way too early for packages where
there are no significant new development to be introduced in
Hi,
i would like to offer a review swap for phoronix-test-suite
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737263)
Regards,
Markus
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 09/20/2011 05:52 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
When you have a closer look, you'll notice that such mass rebuilts
were being delayed by QA's delay queue and now are stuck.
I didn't want to (re)start that particular discussion ;-).
On 09/20/2011 05:30 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
- Original Message -
I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into
the OS so close to a release. In the absence of a very good
motivation,
that's not good engineering practice, and it's not consistent with
the
On 09/20/2011 04:33 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Of course, you had the option of not pulling the new OpenSceneGraph back
to F16, or simply not doing so yet.
Correct. I could have opted to ship the distro which embraces novelty
with outdated, upstream unmaintained and upstream dead packages, no
Kevin Kofler wrote:
I'm building a new snapshot of zif, which should fix #739980 (but I have
to test that), and will be pushing it to the repository (no matter whether
it actually fixes #739980 or not).
There's now zif-0.2.4-0.93.20110920git.fc15 in the repository, but you'll
probably have to
On Sep 20, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
- Original Message -
This is essentially what we had a while ago, only with trac tickets
instead of bodhi requests.
Bodhi is definitely a better place to track this stuff, regardless of how
decisions are made.
There were a couple
On Sep 20, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 05:30 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
- Original Message -
I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into
the OS so close to a release. In the absence of a very good
motivation,
that's not good
Jef Spaleta wrote:
Kevin, were you able to reproduce my problem with the official adobe
repository?
To be honest, I haven't tried it, I've been busy enough filing the bugs for
the issues I found myself and retesting them with today's snapshot.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:18:18 -0700,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
One change to make this better might be to move the inheritance point to
updates-testing so that things built from the fresh branch are immediately
inherited into rawhide.
I think this would be a change
Am Dienstag, den 20.09.2011, 22:25 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
In a nutshell: Fedora's QA process is cause of many of these broken
deps complaints.
Please make a proposal to improve the situation and submit it to FESCo.
TIA,
Christoph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Jef Spaleta wrote:
Kevin, were you able to reproduce my problem with the official adobe
repository?
To be honest, I haven't tried it, I've been busy enough filing the bugs for
the issues I found myself and
On 09/21/2011 12:47 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 22:38:32 +0300,
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
I would also like to move everybody who has been on the rawhide branch
to Branched at Alpha time, in order to get the maximum amount of testing
for the new
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 16:06, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Jef Spaleta wrote:
Kevin, were you able to reproduce my problem with the official adobe
repository?
To be honest, I haven't tried it, I've
2011/9/20 Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net:
...
thus we have bodhi
and updates-testing as a gateway to get into the release.
It's a gateway, I just don't think it serves as useful a purpose as it was
intended to.
The question though really is whether or not it is more useful than a
Jef Spaleta wrote:
you have systems with just KDE and no GNOME installed yes? zif install
paprefs
with kpackagekit not installed does zif do the more optimal thing and pull
kpackagekit in as a dep to fill PackageKit-session-service requirement?
I'm not sure why you're asking that. It was
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:08:56 +0300,
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
As it is right now, it is somewhat difficult to get off the rawhide
track and to continue on Branched. For example, if a person that's
yum downgrade works pretty reasonably if you haven't moved too far past.
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:08:56 +0300,
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
With my proposal, Branched and rawhide would have exactly the same
package set during the Alpha Freeze - Beta Freeze time frame. That way,
we'd have a month to let users
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-H2PM:
5217b33bb8ae8f7725fa1dd3c13197ed ExtUtils-H2PM-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 05bee47ba6a23f985a085526a99d2db32fb0f54a
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Sep 15 13:22:04 2011 +0800
Initial packaging of perl-ExtUtils-H2PM.
This package was submitted for review in Fedora on Thu Sep 15 2011:
commit 880113c94b0375b1924ae149986ab6696c060a7d
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Sep 19 11:07:41 2011 +0800
Fixes based on Remi's review feedback.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738525#c1
perl-ExtUtils-H2PM.spec |8 +---
1 files
commit dc6fb47ceb993a4ec71b159591c01bf65fb8b3b2
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Sep 19 11:08:22 2011 +0800
Update to latest upstream version.
This new package was submitted in Fedora on Mon Sep 19 2011:
commit 7c2cb9d57c00c3cc3b391c25c4ae3effe10e62ea
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Sep 20 15:22:26 2011 +0800
The package was approved in Fedora.
Sources were uploaded to the lookaside cache with fedpkg. This commit
reflects the change in the sources
commit d379eea4ab7d50442f1a07abe48a61263505cdd7
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Sep 19 13:39:36 2011 +0800
Remove the --optimize build option as per Remi's suggestion.
This updated package has been submitted in Fedora on Mon Sep 19 2011:
Summary of changes:
05bee47... Initial packaging of perl-ExtUtils-H2PM. (*)
880113c... Fixes based on Remi's review feedback. (*)
dc6fb47... Update to latest upstream version. (*)
d379eea... Remove the --optimize build option as per Remi's suggestion (*)
7c2cb9d... The package was
Package perl-WWW-Curl in Fedora devel is now owned by psabata
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-WWW-Curl
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods-0.13 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739885
Summary: perl-MooseX-MarkAsMethods-0.13 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-YUM-RepoQuery-0.002 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739887
Summary: perl-YUM-RepoQuery-0.002 is available
Product:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables has broken dependencies in the F-16
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl-Test-Version has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8 has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.38 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739881
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.38 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-Listing-6.03 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739882
Summary: perl-File-Listing-6.03 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739885
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-20
19:57:57 EDT ---
dspam-3.10.1-1.fc14 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
