On 09/17/2011 08:00 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
Hi developers of NM and Fedora,
We are trying to get DNSSEC validation on the end nodes. One way of doing
that is to run a caching resolver on every host, but that strains the
DNS infrastructure because all DNS caches would be circumvented. Since
On 09/20/2011 05:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Hi developers of NM and Fedora,
We are trying to get DNSSEC validation on the end nodes. One way of doing
that is to run a caching resolver on every host, but that strains the
DNS
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will
disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:21 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 9/20/11 11:43 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Of course, the accounts system _still_ doesn't have groups, five years
later, so provenpackager is the big hammer we have. We could get
perl-Test-Version has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:25 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 05:52 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
When you have a closer look, you'll notice that such mass rebuilts
were being delayed by QA's delay queue and now are stuck.
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:29 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build
On 09/21/2011 01:14 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
That
Dne 21.9.2011 13:45, Honza Horak napsal(a):
On 09/21/2011 01:14 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
upgrade
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:01:10 +0200,
Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
It's unclear to me why this would need to be the case. Creating a build
root for what we perceive as Rawhide should be just the same as
Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages
built.
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 12:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/21/2011 10:21 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
Another argument for enforcing DNSSEC is that in future (well, I believe
:) ) DNS will be used as storage for X.509 certs, SSHFP records and
other stuff. If we adopt leisure approach
On 09/21/2011 01:00 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
You probably did not understand the meaning of removing the ability for
disabling dnssec in the Adam's e-mail. It is not meant to disable the
ability to not use of dnssec completely but that it should not be
possible to simply click away any failures
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.49-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.2.28
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.49-1.fc17.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.2.28
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On 2011-09-21, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:01:10 +0200,
Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
It's unclear to me why this would need to be the case. Creating a build
root for what we perceive as Rawhide should be just the same as
Chain building is
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:43:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
cduce-0.5.3-8.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(Unixqueue) =
0:5f2882e466b57c733efe14816d08229e
All these ocaml broken deps are because of the update to ocamlnet
noted on this list a couple of days ago. I will attempt to push new
On 09/21/2011 01:25 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:25 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 05:52 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
When you have a closer look, you'll notice that such mass rebuilts
were being
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will
disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM
support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB and other
packages (Perl, Python and similar) get
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Adam Tkac wrote:
this is a great idea and work. We talked (inside Red Hat) about similar
approach how to secure the clients but this proposal is better, ready
for use, and I like it.
Great. Please test and give us feedback :)
The only one question for discussion is if
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:01:10 +0200
Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 13:53 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21.9.2011 13:45, Honza Horak napsal(a):
I understand that buildroot override in bodhi works for f16 and
lower only, am I wrong? I wanted to create a new
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages
built.
The chain-build facility is very useful. But when you've got a chain
of 3 packages to build, and the build of the second one fails, then
you're
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Tomas Mraz wrote:
solve a part of the problem how can you even consider removing the
ability for disabling dnssec when implementing and deploying and running
dnssec increases the complexity times hundred and people and isp's alike
cant even implement and properly run a
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 21:55, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:08:56 +0300,
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
With my proposal, Branched and rawhide would have exactly the same
package set during the Alpha Freeze -
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:43:38PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
And that's always fine and dandy if these issues are resolved in a
reasonable amount of time. Right now Rawhide has packages with
dependencies broken since pre-F15. This isn't acceptable.
If you notice this, ask FESCo to ask FES
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:23:52 -0600
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages
built.
The chain-build facility is very useful. But when you've got a
Greetings.
Just a reminder that I am going to try and run a meetup of
proventesters in #fedora-meeting at 19:00 UTC today on
irc.freenode.net.
If you are a proventester I hope you can drop by. If you are not, but
are interested in whats involved in becoming one and helping test, also
please
Greetings all.
I'm working toward becoming a package maintainer for project vios-proxy.
Currently I'm working at Red Hat in the Enterprise MRG Messaging team where I
support the Windows .NET messaging client binding. I am a committer for the
Apache Qpid project where most of my work resides.
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root
On 09/21/2011 04:43 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 15:51 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/21/2011 01:25 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:25 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 05:52 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 15:19 +0200,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:39:24PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 18:48 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Remember that the incompatibility isn't between libguestfs and the
guest, it's between the host grub and the guest grub. Both of those
can change without libguestfs's
On 09/21/2011 03:39 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 18:48 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:30:58PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 20:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
The grub package (as provided in Fedora) is not designed for that.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:54:28PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
Yes, but this will hardly help the situation, which right now is that the
distro pulls in grub 2, because that's what we've collectively chosen to do,
and libguestfs pulls in grub on the host, even though it isn't really using
it
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:10:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:54:28PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
Yes, but this will hardly help the situation, which right now is that the
distro pulls in grub 2, because that's what we've collectively chosen to do,
and
Hello all!
Just a reminder that today is input methods support test day.
This test day will focus on a new feature [1] that will debut in Fedora
16 and will improve the usage of input methods in the overall desktop.
Please join us in #fedora-test-day at freenode and post your results on
the
Given the grub1/grub2 discussion that is going on, I could use some info
about the state of grubby's support for grub1. The virtual machine
images that the Cloud SIG publishes on Amazon EC2 do not require
bootloaders, but they do require valid grub1 *configuration files* to
start. So while
Dne 21.9.2011 16:52, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Its strange to me. There are concerns to have Rawhide usable but at
the end, if somebody wants to prevents problems using dedicated
build root, it is denied by Rel-Engs, because it is probably to
much work. This is disappointing.
Every target added
commit f45c59a4f4f24385f60ce7a3d78ec7d49e0622c5
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Sep 21 15:11:02 2011 +0800
Do not build on ppc64.
perl-Socket-Netlink.spec |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Classic-Perl-0.03 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740223
Summary: perl-Classic-Perl-0.03 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740223
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSLeay:
d0a0b92d4ca2d8e7c50a4b232d5861a7 Net-SSLeay-1.39.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-SSLeay-1.39-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
e9fab83... Update to 1.39
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
commit d7b856f82f4cfc1d32d937f062397afa37881831
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Sep 21 15:20:21 2011 +0100
Rebuild for libdb 5.2.36 in Rawhide
perl-BerkeleyDB.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-BerkeleyDB.spec
Summary of changes:
a51705d... Update to 0.49. BR Cwd (not in core now). (*)
d7b856f... Rebuild for libdb 5.2.36 in Rawhide (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-BerkeleyDB-0.49-2.fc16' was created pointing to:
d7b856f... Rebuild for libdb 5.2.36 in Rawhide
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739881
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
45 matches
Mail list logo
