On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will
disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM
support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB
On 09/28/2011 11:00 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I checked the source code, and unison sends a header which contains
the current major version number of the software (where major
version is a string, currently 2.40). If the major versions of
each end don't exactly match, unison aborts. It
Hi,
I'm working on bringing OLPC up-to-date with all the great efforts
with GNOME 3, systemd, etc.
On the OLPC XO laptops we have quite a strange screen - it is small
(152mm x 114mm) but very high resolution (1200x900 i.e. 201 dots per
inch).
Previously, on Fedora 14, we had to adjust the
On 2011/09/30 11:00 (GMT+0100) Daniel Drake composed:
I'm working on bringing OLPC up-to-date with all the great efforts
with GNOME 3, systemd, etc.
On the OLPC XO laptops we have quite a strange screen - it is small
(152mm x 114mm) but very high resolution (1200x900 i.e. 201 dots per
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-LibYAML:
8ce120ca473c58eb0abf28fa19fdb460 YAML-LibYAML-0.37.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3638c5f428d5ae33d0a1d35ae8166288b0eddf77
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Sep 30 13:15:07 2011 +0200
0.37 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec | 40 +++-
sources|2 +-
3 files changed,
Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 11:10:27 schrieb Tom Callaway:
On 09/28/2011 11:00 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I checked the source code, and unison sends a header which contains
the current major version number of the software (where major
version is a string, currently 2.40). If the
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
Sounds to me like your F14 is using correct DPI while your F16 is forced to
96. Does your F14 have /etc/X11/xorg.conf file or a non-empty
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/?
Bad DPI could certainly be a cause. However, xdpyinfo
On 2011/09/30 13:14 (GMT+0100) Daniel Drake composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
Sounds to me like your F14 is using correct DPI while your F16 is forced to
96. Does your F14 have /etc/X11/xorg.conf file or a non-empty
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/?
Bad DPI could certainly be a cause. However,
Compose started at Fri Sep 30 08:16:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686
On 09/30/2011 11:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
Perl has been rebuilt _without_ GDBM in F17 as perl-5.14.1-191.fc17 and
it's available in build root now.
-- Petr
The new gdbm-1.9.1-1 has just landed in Fedora Rawhide. Please, re-build
your package(s) if depends on gdbm.
Also python and perl can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2011 01:38 PM, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
so many creative ideas ;)
But I think such a program would be confusing to users: When
someone wants to install unison, he expects the package will
install unison and a menu entry. And not a unison
Le Ven 30 septembre 2011 12:00, Daniel Drake a écrit :
Can anyone help me understand this behaviour?
rant
There's nothing to understand – this is a new major GNOME release, with
developers that know better than everyone else, and solve problems by ignoring
past experience and hardcoding their
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Someone Gnome-side decided to not trust xorg dpi and added a new heuristic to
'correct' it
I know this is part of a rant.. but any chance you could quantify that
point with a link to a commit, blog post, mailing
# F16 Final Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-09-30
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
I apologize for the late notice on this - we usually don't start on the
blocker review meetings until the week after beta. However, we already
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the
people in charge get past their reality denial phase.
/rant
This thread could have let to something constructive... but not so much
anymore now, I guess.
I'm trying to package moonlight for possible inclusion at RPM Fusion
but I'm having some issues.
1. pkg-config problem:
I'm currently working on version 2.4.1 moonlight since it's the latest
stable. It apparently is supposed to work with mono 2.6 but 2.10 is
what F15 has, hopefully 2.6 is only a
There's also a mono list::
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mono
-Toshio
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:53:02AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm trying to package moonlight for possible inclusion at RPM Fusion
but I'm having some issues.
1. pkg-config problem:
I'm currently
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the
people in charge get past their reality denial phase.
/rant
This thread could
At the Fedora 16 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting yesterday, the Fedora 16 Beta
release was declared GOLD! Fedora 16 beta will be released on Tuesday,
October 4, 2011.
Major thanks to everyone who made this happen. There is no way that we
could have gotten all this done without everyone's hard work and
I'll be introducing exiv2-0.22 to rawhide next week, testing of affected
packages is underday, and so far, so good... so I don't anticipate problems.
repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src \
--whatrequires exiv2-devel | sort
darktable-0:0.9.2-1.fc17.src
geeqie-0:1.0-11.fc17.src
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
There's also a mono list::
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mono
-Toshio
I was afraid that would be the answer :) Ah, another mailing list to
subscribe to... If it weren't for gmail I'd already be
On 2011/09/30 11:09 (GMT-0400) Peter Robinson composed:
can you provide an
explanation of the changes and the rationale behind them?
I think it's become clear over the past couple of years that the Gnome and
KDE devs have decided they're controlling a playgound rather than software
for
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:12:45PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I think it's become clear over the past couple of years that the Gnome and
KDE devs have decided they're controlling a playgound rather than software
for users to be productive with, expecting those who don't like their silly
On 30/09/11 17:12, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/09/30 11:09 (GMT-0400) Peter Robinson composed:
can you provide an
explanation of the changes and the rationale behind them?
I think it's become clear over the past couple of years that the Gnome and
KDE devs have decided they're controlling a
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Someone Gnome-side decided to not trust xorg dpi and added a new heuristic
to
'correct' it
I know this is part of a rant.. but any chance
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
At the Fedora 16 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting yesterday, the Fedora 16 Beta
release was declared GOLD! Fedora 16 beta will be released on Tuesday,
October 4, 2011.
Major thanks to everyone who made this happen. There is no way that we
could have gotten all this
Hi,
Can somebody help me figure out how to do a smolt query for filesystem
device information? The question has come up on bug 54 whether
/boot on md is a corner case or not. Smolt seems ready-made to answer
questions like this. If I print my desktop's smolt profile I get:
/dev/md0
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Or
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-settings-daemon/branches/gnome-2-24/plugins/xsettings/gsd-xsettings-manager.c?view=markup#249
(line 249)?
I'm not sure that's relevant for the current codebase. But even so if
you
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Or
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-settings-daemon/branches/gnome-2-24/plugins/xsettings/gsd-xsettings-manager.c?view=markup#249
(line 249)?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
However, it now has a text scaling factor in gsettings that I was not
aware of. So I guess I just need to find an appropriate factor that
makes fonts look OK on the XO.
One problem faced here is that (as noted earlier)
Felix Miata wrote:
I think it's become clear over the past couple of years that the Gnome and
KDE devs have decided they're controlling a playgound rather than software
for users to be productive with
What does KDE have to do with this? KDE honors your screen's physical DPI by
default. (It
Daniel Drake wrote:
Summary: GNOME hardcodes DPI to 96 regardless of X configuration.
This is very broken.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Richard Shaw wrote:
I was afraid that would be the answer :) Ah, another mailing list to
subscribe to... If it weren't for gmail I'd already be buried under a
mountain of emails!
http://www.gmane.org/
Connect with your favorite NNTP (Usenet newsgroup) client. (I use KNode.
Gmane mailing list
rant
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Daniel Drake wrote:
Summary: GNOME hardcodes DPI to 96 regardless of X configuration.
This is very broken.
Gnome: Reliving Window's horrible past, one emulated bug at a time.
At least we can be thankful that
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts:
f9e48d36dcb81794af69cb324edf0979 MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.005.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742188
Bug 742188 depends on bug 742221, which changed state.
Bug 742221 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.37 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742502
Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.37 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742502
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8 has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Devel-CallChecker has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc15.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Test-Version has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742502
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715745
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715745
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-30 14:35:05 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-30 14:54:00 EDT ---
dspam-3.10.1-1.fc16 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247253
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-30 15:06:31 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247253
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734469
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-30 15:17:26 EDT ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.2-1.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734469
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737885
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-30
15:16:21 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737885
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738599
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-30
15:23:33 EDT ---
perl-Mozilla-CA-20110914-2.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738383
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-30 15:23:38 EDT ---
perl-Mozilla-CA-20110914-2.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738383
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738599
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736612
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-30
15:41:28 EDT ---
fcgi-2.4.0-17.fc16 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736612
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740942
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525854action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
I'll be introducing exiv2-0.22 to rawhide next week, testing of affected
packages is underday, and so far, so good... so I don't anticipate problems.
repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src \
--whatrequires exiv2-devel | sort
darktable-0:0.9.2-1.fc17.src
geeqie-0:1.0-11.fc17.src
64 matches
Mail list logo
