W dniu 25 października 2011 08:32 użytkownik Matej Cepl
mc...@redhat.com napisał:
Dne 24.10.2011 22:27, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a):
Yeah, this solution has its drawbacks, but it also has undoubted
advantages.
I am probably dumb, but could you tell me some *undoubted* advantage of
using
2011/10/25 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
Dne 24.10.2011 22:48, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a):
For example - you can switch to different version of language
interpreter with different configuration without modification of the
script and without the hassle for server admin.
So, because you
On 10/25/2011 09:02 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/24/2011 08:05 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24)
===
* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
(t8m, 17:26:45)
On 10/24/2011 08:27 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2011/10/24 Michał Piotrowskimkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2011/10/24 Chris Adamscmad...@hiwaay.net:
* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
(t8m, 17:26:45)
Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using
/bin
/sbin
/lib
On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
In any case
#!/usr/bin/env sh
seems to be more portable solution.
please :) you can propose this as a separate feature for F18 :) Let's
see, if it gets accepted :)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2011/10/25 Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com:
[ ... ]
- mount /usr ro and keep the rootfs writeable
Which problem does this actually solve? People keep repeating that
like forever as if it is a magic bullet to solve something.
But it is a nice gimmick not more. And no it does not add any
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
not doable before.
- snapshot /usr (with btrfs)
- hot swap the OS (/usr) with another version
- mount /usr ro and keep the rootfs writeable
- share the _whole_ OS with other
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
har...@redhat.com napisał:
On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
In any case
#!/usr/bin/env sh
seems to be more portable solution.
please :) you can propose this as a separate feature for F18 :) Let's
see, if it gets
That's strange: the only two occasion I had a failed OTP were:
1) A configuration problem: (Yubikey not enabled, yubikey prefix not
correct, using unburned key)
2) In a two slot configuration, whenever I press the button too long
and it generates an OTP from the second slot
If you are sure
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46:31AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 18:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
We have lots of suggestions. As I've said at least fifty times, it's
pointless going too far with the slapping of band-aids on the current
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
not doable before.
...
- mount rootfs encrypted
- mount /usr not encrypted (no secrets here)
this is already possible, I use this
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:34:46PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
... The only breakage
in one which was approved was to do with compiling things - which, sure,
is a pain in the ass, but it's not the kind of problem critpath was
introduced to deal
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
not doable before.
...
- mount rootfs encrypted
- mount /usr not encrypted (no
On 2011-10-25, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/25 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
Dne 24.10.2011 22:48, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a):
For example - you can switch to different version of language
interpreter with different configuration without modification of the
script and
Francois: you should already be able to use yubikey for FAS, bodhi and
ssh. You don't need the yubikey prompt: just put your username, go to
the password field and then press the key's button.
Regards,
Mario
On 25 October 2011 10:13, François Kooman fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
On 10/24/11 3:34
On 10/25/11 10:23 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Francois: you should already be able to use yubikey for FAS, bodhi and
ssh. You don't need the yubikey prompt: just put your username, go to
the password field and then press the key's button.
Really? That seems weird. If someone takes my key they
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:46 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote:
My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages
around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they
can't even install the package.
Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm, it can
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:56:19AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were
not doable before.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20111025 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748771
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20111025 is available
Product
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.011 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748770
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.011 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities,
which were not doable before.
...
- mount rootfs encrypted
- mount /usr not encrypted (no
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mozilla-CA:
74026b1a7aa0de8fc17d81efb3629195 Mozilla-CA-20111025.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
69afc77..33952a1 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
/Mozilla-CA-20110409.tar.gz
/Mozilla-CA-20110904.tar.gz
/Mozilla-CA-20110914.tar.gz
+/Mozilla-CA-20111025.tar.gz
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index bc55b2f..9186574 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748770
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
2011/10/25 Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com:
If anything, wouldn't it make more sense to move stuff in the opposite
direction, from /usr/bin to /bin ? usr doesn't really mean anything
- originally it was used because the filesystem format couldn't
support more than 64MB(?) in a single
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone?
Bibus, pybliographer?
Zoltan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 25.10.2011 13:45 schrieb Christoph Trassl fed...@trassl.net:
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities,
which were not doable
Am 24.10.2011 12:45, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Linux rawhide.vmware.local 3.1.0-0.rc9.git0.0.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 5
14:37:47
this is the last kernel booting in vmware for me
all following see screenshot
Make
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:45:45PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities,
which were not doable
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40:29AM +0200, François Kooman wrote:
On 10/25/11 10:23 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Francois: you should already be able to use yubikey for FAS, bodhi and
ssh. You don't need the yubikey prompt: just put your username, go to
the password field and then press the key's
Thanks Toshio for the correction!
Best,
Mario
On 25 October 2011 18:22, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40:29AM +0200, François Kooman wrote:
On 10/25/11 10:23 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Francois: you should already be able to use yubikey for FAS, bodhi and
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:41:21PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
On 10/25/2011 05:30 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:45:45PM +0200, Christoph Trassl wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM,
Good news everyone!
At long last the Fedora Secondary Arch Team for Power proudly presents
the Fedora 16 Alpha release.
It's still hot, so grab it while you can from here (in case you have
appropriate hardware, obviously):
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/16-Alpha/ppc64/
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Mario Ceresa wrote:
That's strange: the only two occasion I had a failed OTP were:
1) A configuration problem: (Yubikey not enabled, yubikey prefix not
correct, using unburned key)
2) In a two slot configuration, whenever I press the button too long
and it generates
It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
you go and read these first:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184209
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747377#c22
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
har...@redhat.com napisał:
On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
In any case
#!/usr/bin/env sh
seems to be more portable solution.
On 10/25/2011 11:24 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
har...@redhat.com napisał:
On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
In any case
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I created feature page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
I strongly object to this feature. /bin/sh is a Unix standard back to
IIRC around 7th Edition,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I created feature page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
I strongly object to this
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I created feature page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
I strongly object to this
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I created feature page
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
What is wrong with
#!/usr/bin/env interpreter
from technical POV?
It's more wordy.
It makes it impossible to pass an interpreter argument.
It will execute slower.
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:39:25PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I created feature page
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load:
f1bb822ffb509b5f96b17237f318ab70 Class-Load-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
2011/10/25 Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com:
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
What is wrong with
#!/usr/bin/env interpreter
from technical POV?
It's more wordy.
Yes.
It makes it impossible to pass an interpreter argument.
This actually may be a
commit 7a438a539122da2b15bf0e4e55300d4cb1bbeebd
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Oct 25 19:52:30 2011 +0100
Update to 0.12
- New upstream release 0.12:
- Require Module::Runtime ≥ 0.011, which fixes problems with Catalyst
under
Perl 5.8 and 5.10
-
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 08:32 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
You snipped the part where Kevin wrote [...] if the maintainer
demonstrates incompetence at taking these decisions, the offending
maintainer needs to be replaced. The problem here appears to be a
human one, not something that
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.12-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
7a438a5... Update to 0.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On 21:59:40 Tuesday 25 October 2011 Josh Stone wrote:
On 10/25/2011 11:24 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
har...@redhat.com napisał:
On
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct -- it's not currently two-factor (it's either this or that). We've
been kicking around whether we want to make it two-factor, how we'd do that,
who we'd enforce it upon, etc, for a while... it's hard because we
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
you go and read these first:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184209
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I
2011/10/25 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:17:54PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
you go and read these first:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 12:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2011 03:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski
wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adams
2011/10/25 Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2011 03:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200,
Alexander Kurtakov (akurt...@redhat.com) said:
Someone would have to find a killer feature to justify touching this amount
of packages :). Not to mention that such changes should happen upstream and I
(probably a number of other maintainers too) would not maintain local patches
for smth
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
I'm not sure why this would even be discussed.
ln -s /usr/bin /bin, and move along to other business.
I think someone proposed (as an addition to UsrMove) having the /bin,
/sbin, etc. symlinks deprecated and to remove them in a couple
So do I. So let's come back to the original discussion.
Am 25.10.2011 22:11 schrieb Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
I'm not sure why this would even be discussed.
ln -s /usr/bin /bin, and move along to other business.
I think
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net writes:
Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
What is wrong with
#!/usr/bin/env interpreter
from technical POV?
It is an unnecessary hack,
Even if it were not a hack, and not significantly slower, it would still
be completely
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all releases.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
I raced to get this out before the infrastructure freeze today, and since
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
you go and read these first:
On 24 October 2011 01:20, Vincent Beers wrote:
[..]
If there is no package maintainer, I'm willing to try and be one, since
I'm a bit of a fan of the software. (Though I'll have to study up on
package maintaining.)
Nice. You may want to have a look at:
Tomas Mraz wrote:
If there were any commands in
sbin that are usable also for regular users then they should have been
moved to bin.
Some examples of commands that are usable to unprivileged users:
ip route
ifconfig -a
lspci
lsusb
lsmod
ldconfig -p
mkfs ~/my_disk_image
fuser
lsof
mksock
=?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_Persson?= bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se writes:
It's particularly odd that I can use /sbin/mkfs to make a disk image without
privileges, but /bin/mount won't mount it even if I own both the image and
the
mount point. The division into bin and sbin seems rater arbitrary
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all releases.
Server fixes
- Default to update ID-based
2011/10/25 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se:
It's particularly odd that I can use /sbin/mkfs to make a disk image without
privileges, but /bin/mount won't mount it even if I own both the image and the
mount point.
You could create a setuid-root executable on the disk image and then
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:59:51 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into
production. The bodhi-client is currently on it's way to
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 16:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:59:51 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:59:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all
Luke Macken wrote:
In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
negative. It seems people liked being able to tell from the URL what the
update actually*was*. I must admit I do to. I've resorted to creating
the 'old-style' URLs manually when I do lists of updates
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 6:32:26 PM, Michael wrote:
Luke Macken wrote:
In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
negative. It seems people liked being able to tell from the URL what the
update actually*was*. I must admit I do to. I've resorted to creating
Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
2011/10/25 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se:
It's particularly odd that I can use /sbin/mkfs to make a disk image
without privileges, but /bin/mount won't mount it even if I own both the
image and the mount point.
You could create a setuid-root executable on
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
So do I. So let's come back to the original discussion.
I've added some points from re-reading the FHS and from this thread onto the
Feature page. The immediate suggestion I have is that you should consider
splitting the / = /usr
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:17:39PM +0200, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct -- it's not currently two-factor (it's either this or that). We've
been kicking around whether we want to make it two-factor, how we'd do
Hey, folks. Just thought I'd send out an overview of remaining
unaddressed F16 blockers, in case anyone can help with them. We were
scheduled to do the F16 RC compose today, but with these unaddressed, we
can't. We hope we'll be able to do the compose tomorrow, but if blockers
remain unaddressed,
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 19:03 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Think about how bugzilla bugs are handled in IRC. Bugs all have ID
numbers. Why should updates be different? I vote for static IDs because
I have run into the case of modified updates and broken URLs.
Adam, can you not pursue an
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 16:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
FAS and bodhi are single sign on (iirc, everything on
admin.fedoraproject.org).
Well, Bodhi seems to do a damn good job of forgetting you're signed in.
I've never tried to analyze this carefully, it's just a subjective
feeling that I
hi
well, suversion 1.7 was not pushed until now and that is
why i think it's a good moment for my questions:
as far as i can see there are different maintainers for
subversion and kdesvn, upgrade to subversion 1.7
(including svn upgrade in the working-dir) works fine
but with subversion 1.7 the
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
bodhi-client is currently on it's way to updates-testing for all
releases.
Server fixes
-
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:30 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
negative.
Coming from someone (me) who often does updates involving 1 pkg that
sometimes require removing/adding components after initial submission, I
very much
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
for testing updates.
* Intro/gather more agenda items
* Recruiting more proventesters/testers.
* One stop page for
On 10/25/2011 08:33 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/10/25 Chris Adamscmad...@hiwaay.net:
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowskimkkp...@gmail.com said:
I created feature page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters
I strongly object to this feature. /bin/sh is a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:08:14PM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:03:10AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
Steven, I cannot see corresponding ticket for rel-engs. This error still
pops up in regualar repository summaries.
Sorry, I wasn't aware of the proper procedure to
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Runtime:
d0d2ab338c5bb2769a8f7db200cfdb2b Module-Runtime-0.011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
commit 93f67aa0ac7241a6027a5c3eac2eea223d907b24
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 25 13:39:00 2011 +0200
0.011 bump
Fixes compatibility with perl-5.10 and older, so no need to back-port
it.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Runtime.spec |5
commit e2bab7b265570a19e45e4b11ae7105fdd1c2c5e8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 25 13:48:32 2011 +0200
20111025 bump
perl-Mozilla-CA.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-CA.spec b/perl-Mozilla-CA.spec
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution||RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version||perl-Mozilla-CA-20111025-1.
||fc17
Last
92 matches
Mail list logo
