On 10/25/2011 07:23 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Yet as long as it is not done, encrypting /usr is no improvement. And
even if it is done, you would also need to verify that nobody installed
a keyboard logger on your device if your fear attackers that have easily
physical access to the device in
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36:57PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
[...] but /bin/mount won't mount it even if I own both the image and the
mount point.
You can mount things that the administrator has set up for you in
/etc/fstab.
Having said that, the split between /sbin and /bin is not a truly
I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files, but it's probably
easier to compile every package.
Is
Dne 25.10.2011 20:24, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a):
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
har...@redhat.com napisał:
On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
In any case
On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files,
Reindl Harald wrote:
but with subversion 1.7 the format in teh working directory
is changed and the kde-kontextmenu will no longer offer
display of history and missing some other entries
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#wc-ng
The release notes also say that working
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 06:26:13PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:59:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:18 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
bodhi v0.8.3
Yesterday I pushed out a new bugfix release of bodhi into production. The
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm not convinced yet this is a glibc issue. It could be a problem in
the threaded work-queue code in git-grep which is just exposed by the
change in glibc. No one will know until we finally diagnose the bug.
The analysis in the bug is now that this is indeed a bug
Zoltan Kota wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone?
Bibus, pybliographer?
There's also KBibTex (which was recently ported from kdelibs 3 to kdelibs 4,
the current Fedora 14
Compose started at Wed Oct 26 08:16:04 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PackageKit-zif-0.6.19-2.fc16.x86_64 requires zif = 0:0.2.5
bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)
Adam Williamson wrote:
In case you hadn't noticed, response to this has so far been pretty
negative. It seems people liked being able to tell from the URL what the
update actually *was*. I must admit I do to. I've resorted to creating
the 'old-style' URLs manually when I do lists of updates on
On 26/10/11 12:45, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Maybe we could do what some sites like kde-apps.org do and default to URLs
which include BOTH the ID and the packagename-version list, but have Bodhi
only actually use the ID and ignore the packagename-version entirely.
See e.g.:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
If an update has the n-e-v-r changed, the n-e-v-r being replaced is not
likely to ever be used in a different future update. So each update could
maintain a list of all n-e-v-r's that have ever been associated with it.
Then make bodhi support URLs for all n-e-v-r's
commit 7c24ebef3933a78ca2b7178a7fb3cd25f860b577
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 26 14:05:22 2011 +0200
own only man pages of this packages (conflict with Perl package)
perl-MIME-tools.spec | 14 --
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com said:
Having said that, the split between /sbin and /bin is not a truly
historical one, ie. it didn't exist in V7. I think it was added by
System V which did a lot of other strange stuff too.
Well, historically, a bunch of system
Once upon a time, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com said:
For daemons, which should not be called directly on the command line, I
would suggest to move them to /usr/lib/packagename/ anyway.
That's what /usr/libexec is for. /usr/lib{,64} is for libraries and
such, not executables.
--
Chris
On 10/26/2011 03:18 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/26/2011 03:07 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com said:
Having said that, the split between /sbin and /bin is not a truly
historical one, ie. it didn't exist in V7. I think it was added by
System V
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that
On 10/24/2011 08:05 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24)
===
* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
(t8m, 17:26:45)
Sometimes you have to clean up your room and
Once upon a time, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com said:
About sbin: How exactly does hiding stuff prevent users, who open a
_shell_, to use those tools? They cannot do any bad stuff with it anyway.
It isn't about hiding, it is about not putting tools in your PATH that
you generally can't
On 10/26/2011 03:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Harald Hoyerharald.ho...@gmail.com said:
For daemons, which should not be called directly on the command line, I
would suggest to move them to /usr/lib/packagename/ anyway.
That's what /usr/libexec is for. /usr/lib{,64} is for
On 10/26/2011 03:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Harald Hoyerharald.ho...@gmail.com said:
For daemons, which should not be called directly on the command line, I
would suggest to move them to /usr/lib/packagename/ anyway.
That's what /usr/libexec is for. /usr/lib{,64} is for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello -
I've been waiting for someone to review my package submission for
about a week now.
Request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747050
I'd be happy to do a review swap or make some other deal to get my
package reviewed.
On 10/26/2011 03:40 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/24/2011 08:05 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24)
===
* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
(t8m, 17:26:45)
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
BTW, if this is the case, why is 2.14.90-13 still in rawhide?
Shouldn't we assume that every build done recently in rawhide is
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:06:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:32:2: error: #error Only glib.h can
be included directly.
or close variants of that. I assume this is another manifestation of
the same bug being discussed here ... or have the glibc guys managed
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Brett Lentz ble...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello -
I've been waiting for someone to review my package submission for
about a week now.
Request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747050
I'd be
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 16:12 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:06:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:32:2: error: #error Only glib.h can
be included directly.
or close variants of that. I assume this is another manifestation of
the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749167
Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 16:12 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:06:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:32:2: error: #error Only glib.h can
be included directly.
You are confusing glibc with glib here,
It was pointed out that some changes in GLib 2.31 may cause some fallout
and may be worth calling out explicitly:
- it is no longer possible to include individual headers. If your
package runs into this problem, just replace the problematic includes
with #include glib.h
- a number of
On Wed 26 Oct 2011 10:14:06 AM EDT, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Brett Lentz ble...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello -
I've been waiting for someone to review my package submission for
about a week now.
Request is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If people do start to randomly move executables around to locations
like /usr/lib/PACKAGENAME/PACKAGED or from /sbin to /usr/bin
Make sure the SELinux team knows.
As a matter of fact, any time you move the location of a network
daemon check to make
I've got 3 packages languishing in the review queue that I need for a
package update. Would someone swap reviews with me for these?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719150
flocq - Formalization of floating point numbers for Coq
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719152
Hi,
The way we currently install Eclipse plugins in Fedora is incorrect and
somewhat fragile.
RPM places all the plugin artifacts in the proper directories. However
that does not update the eclipse metadata. This means that until the
next time eclipse starts it is unaware of the newly
On 10/26/2011 11:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/26/2011 09:20 AM, sami wagiaalla wrote:
To add support for this in your eclipse package you have to add the
following line to your rpm spec file:
%_eclipse_pkg [package name]
For what Fedora versions is this applicable to?
rawhide (f17)
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:30:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
package that was compiled against the -13 glibc
Hi,
Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some
problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on
this box doesn't work anymore.
I use NetworkManager and dhcp. During the update NetworkManager and
NetworkManager-glib was updated from
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:18:42PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/26/2011 03:07 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com said:
Having said that, the split between /sbin and /bin is not a truly
historical one, ie. it didn't exist in V7. I think it was
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/682
I've made another attempt to reach out the the glibc maintainer
directly again this morning to hopefully answer the questions in that
ticket as soon as possible, and remind him
On 2011-10-25 15:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's not just the updates-testing list, though. When I go to the web
interface, search for updates to, say, grub2, get a list, and click on
one of the results, I get an ID-based URL, not a package name-based one.
I then paste that into an email, IRC
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:20:46AM -0400, sami wagiaalla wrote:
Hi,
The way we currently install Eclipse plugins in Fedora is incorrect and
somewhat fragile.
RPM places all the plugin artifacts in the proper directories. However
that does not update the eclipse metadata. This means that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk breaking LibreOffice java
detection?
On my machine LO only found java-1.5.0 after installing
java-1.7.0-openjdk. Neither java-1.6.0 nor java-1.7.0 were found by
LO. After removing java-1.7.0-openjdk LO
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:56:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 16:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
FAS and bodhi are single sign on (iirc, everything on
admin.fedoraproject.org).
Well, Bodhi seems to do a damn good job of forgetting you're signed in.
I've never
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk breaking LibreOffice java
detection?
Sounds like it might be related to bug 748585.
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
W dniu 26 października 2011 18:18 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Hi,
Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some
problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on
this box doesn't work anymore.
Sorry for the noise. This
On 10/26/2011 06:18 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some
problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on
this box doesn't work anymore.
I use NetworkManager and dhcp. During the update NetworkManager
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 18:18 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some
problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on
this box doesn't work anymore.
I use NetworkManager and dhcp. During the update
Summary of changes:
733c84d... initial import (rhbz#742559) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 26.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk breaking LibreOffice java
detection?
Sounds like it might be related to bug 748585.
That would explain why java-1.7.0
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:18:55 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
The first two should be dead easy. From Fedora's point of view,
they're just data packages; no libraries or binaries are involved.
The third one is a bit complex. I had to tweak a lot of pathnames to
match existing Fedora practice, as
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Thomas Spura
toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Do you consider this an easy or a hard one: ;)
espresso - Extensible Simulation Package for Research on Soft matter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740846
Molecular dynamics simulations! Wow, I
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 13:45 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Really this is just a tooling question of whether it's overall more
convenient to have Bodhi use IDs and then implement convenience
scripts/tools wherever we refer to the updates which can identify them -
like a
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 15:40 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 10/24/2011 08:05 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24)
===
* Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
(t8m,
Or perhaps even:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA--N/package1-1.1.fc16,package2-1.1.fc16
where anything after the FEDORA--N doesn't matter, but could
contain all the current packages in the update.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:11:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 09:57 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:56:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 16:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
FAS and bodhi are single sign on (iirc,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Next step: could you copy /lib/systemd/system/systemd-tmpfiles.service
to /etc/systemd/system/ and prefix the ExecStart with /usr/bin/strace
-o /run/tmpfiles.strace, and then paste the output that generates in
that
Hey, folks. This mail brought to you by my ever-increasing empty liquor
bottle collection and ever-receding hairline.
We unfortunately still have open blockers today, which means we will
likely do a TC3 compose tonight instead of RC1. The remaining
unaddressed blockers are:
1.
On 19:58 Wed 26 Oct , Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 26.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk breaking LibreOffice java
detection?
Sounds like it might be related
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 23:58 +0100, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 19:58 Wed 26 Oct , Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 26.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk breaking
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:58:30PM +0100, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 19:58 Wed 26 Oct , Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 26.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Heiko Adams
fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de wrote:
is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:04:12PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Or perhaps even:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA--N/package1-1.1.fc16,package2-1.1.fc16
where anything after the
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 07:17:10PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:04:12PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Or perhaps even:
On 10/26/2011 05:27 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
Many CMS systems and the like work in that way. It's also what things
like stackoverflow do, for example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7901782/war-does-not-start-on-tomcat5-on-redhat-enterprise-server
where only the question number really
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetAddr-IP:
703eedbb46ea57330a20b94c07430923 NetAddr-IP-4.052.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 712fd1da14bf14ab166eac9fcdd16cf103cda9da
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 26 09:27:42 2011 +0100
Update to 4.052
- New upstream release 4.052
- In InetBase.pm v0.03:
- Socket6 prior to version 0.23 does not have AF_INET6 in the EXPORT_OK
The lightweight tag 'perl-NetAddr-IP-4.052-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
712fd1d... Update to 4.052
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748130
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3080 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749157
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3080 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.012.4 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749158
Summary: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.012.4 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749163
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.74 is available
Product: Fedora
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cpanspec cannot allocate memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749167
Summary: cpanspec cannot allocate memory
Product: Fedora
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dancer:
0c8545adbd76266c15c009cec2cc3bea Dancer-1.3080.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0a2742a8e28bd6323e48a7efa31083e1ef3924b2
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 26 13:16:48 2011 +0200
1.3080 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Dancer.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749163
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXSLT:
f0682d791dcf3391776b3e983f8bd328 XML-LibXSLT-1.74.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit eb157dd6dcd6f528d44cb2eab0efb7519bfa10d2
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 26 14:25:00 2011 +0200
1.74 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
commit 13ea9f5d7ca5ebe04ae549343472df4add6b832f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 26 13:40:58 2011 +0100
Spec file clean-up
- Use patch rather than scripted iconv to fix character encoding
- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
- Nobody else likes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749163
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
The lightweight tag 'perl-MIME-tools-5.502-4.fc17' was created pointing to:
13ea9f5... Spec file clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749167
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-10-26 10:30:51 EDT ---
I see, the sentence
In the two-argument (and
Summary of changes:
733c84d... initial import (rhbz#742559) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit fa11cf0c506a794d4b550fbc93128c62899327ab
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Oct 26 19:44:23 2011 +0100
Update to 1.48
- New upstream release 1.48:
- Further fix for readline fix in 1.45: if the pending data were false
(like
'0'), it failed to
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.48-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
fa11cf0... Update to 1.48
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Pod-Content:
425854a493e10fbc90584417bf212aea Test-Pod-Content-v0.0.6.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 98811797cd7199f237e114b64154d96378f37987
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Wed Oct 26 23:58:28 2011 +0200
Update to 0.0.6, add perl default filter and more BuildRequires
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Pod-Content.spec | 18
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Alien-SeleniumRC:
7349d93c58ced2f747ef6a0cbf8bd510 Alien-SeleniumRC-2.90.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
c56029c... update to 4.02 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton:
e4045c9ee82b3b44c48dd64660884d9a Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton-0.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742671
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-26
23:55:55 EDT ---
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-1.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742671
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 9c46d17a653ca521d5001d2a4f37183136ab73d7
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Oct 27 06:23:16 2011 +0200
Upstream has deprecated this package
.gitignore |1 -
dead.package|1 +
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton.spec |
Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton in Fedora devel has been retired by
iarnell
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Hey, folks. This mail brought to you by my ever-increasing empty liquor
bottle collection and ever-receding hairline.
We unfortunately still have open blockers today, which means we will
likely do a TC3 compose tonight instead of RC1. The remaining
unaddressed blockers are:
1.
96 matches
Mail list logo
