Hi,
I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it is no
coincidence, but the new policy - many thanks for the change :)
--
Best regards,
Michal
On 06/02/12 09:27, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
I'm guessing Branched in a couple of days, would need some stability.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of
2012/2/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it is no
coincidence, but the new policy - many thanks for the
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, John Reiser wrote:
Examining with gparted and Disk Utility, I see an Apple partition label
that designates partitions:
HFS (not plus) 1 MB boot
HFS+ journalled 25.6 GB
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
I need help adding systemd support into xrdp.
someone can take a look and tell me what is wrong ?
Are you seeing any actual problems with the service?
I have not tried to run the service, but here's what comes
to mind:
- It is pointless to declare both
in A:
Think MOL? I've never used it, but I would hate to block its use on
Fedora. I'm planning to use it someday.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:45 PM, John Reiser wrote:
Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]?
Plain HFS
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 06:11 -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote:
2012/2/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it
hi
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
most questions on mailing-lists and boards is how can
i boot a different kernel and it makes really really tired
to see that no new user is realizing that Fedora has a boot
manager
this results a) in needless questions and b) new
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:10 PM, darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote:
If you continue to repeat the eating babies myth then it will become
self-fulfilling.
I would humbly suggest that use of future tense is that
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
It was F10 feature: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterStartup
I believe showing GRUB2 menu is a regression which will be
fixed before F17 release.
--
Tomasz
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:22:14PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
[libguestfs]
[...]
This should be fixed by the current build going through Koji at the
moment.
[ocaml-augeas]
Needs upstream attention still.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #690 F17 Feature: move all to /usr
Hi Pavel,
Ok :-)
On Feb 5, 2012 8:16 PM, Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello, Nikos.
I'm ready swap to httpd-itk package -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860
04.02.2012 00:42, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I'd like a review about sparkleshare package:
Hi all,
Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made it into Rawhide, there are still few more packages
that need to be built, but otherwise the transitions was successful.
Please note again, that soname has been bumped to 1.9.1 and license is changed
from GPLv2 or Ruby to BSD or Ruby, as already announced.
--
A friendly reminder as we move towards a miraculous, beefy release:
* Feature freeze is tomorrow, February 7, 2012. At this point, all
accepted features should be substantially complete, and testable.
Additionally, if a feature is to be enabled by default, it must be so
enabled at Feature
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.rc1. No new features were added between alpha 8 and
rc1, just many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and
389-dsgw packages in Testing.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:51:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
We're running close to the wire on this but it looks like Chris will
have fsck out for btrfs tomorrow, so I'd like to get fesco's opinion
on the viability of moving forward with the Btrfs as default feature,
whether we actually want
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:16:40PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
It was F10 feature:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
It was F10 feature:
Am 06.02.2012 17:10, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:16:40PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
It was F10
PIDA, in f16 and beyond, has broken deps:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754673
So to fix this, I need to update to the latest upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651853
But this release need python-flatland and pygtkhelpers. I got
python-flatland into Fedora.
Hi,
with evolution-data-server 3.3.5 release is also bumped soname version
for libcamel. I realized just now, when building eds for rawhide.
Bye,
Milan
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
There have been quite a few approved changes to the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines since the previous announcement, but this is mostly because I
have not had time to actually apply the approved updates to the wiki
until recently. These updates actually were approved over a period of
several months. I
Am 06.02.2012 17:16, schrieb drago01:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
It was F10
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 17:22:52 +0100,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
GRUB2 menu is shown in F16. This is a regression compared to F10÷15.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757487 and linked
bugs #737339 and #727831.
this is a behavior that should never
Am 06.02.2012 17:25, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 17:22:52 +0100,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
GRUB2 menu is shown in F16. This is a regression compared to F10÷15.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757487 and linked
bugs #737339 and
On 02/06/2012 10:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it was refreshed for me with the question below
without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
would simply not exist and people would learn to
use their OS instead obfuscate all options from
the users like windows
what does this user if
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why are there so many noobs with questions like after a kernel
update my machine does no longer boot if this decision would
be smart?
The solution to My kernel update doesn't boot should be Automatically
detect that that
Reindl Harald wrote:
it was refreshed for me with the question below
without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
would simply not exist and people would learn to
use their OS instead obfuscate all options from
the users like windows
what does this user if he has no other computer
for his
On 02/06/2012 09:25 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:51:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
We're running close to the wire on this but it looks like Chris will
have fsck out for btrfs tomorrow, so I'd like to get fesco's opinion
on the viability of moving forward with the
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:51:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
We're running close to the wire on this but it looks like Chris will
have fsck out for btrfs tomorrow, so I'd like to get fesco's opinion
on the viability
Am 06.02.2012 17:35, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 02/06/2012 10:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it was refreshed for me with the question below
without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
would simply not exist and people would learn to
use their OS instead obfuscate all options from
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why are there so many noobs with questions like after a kernel
update my machine does no longer boot if this decision would
be smart?
The solution
Am 06.02.2012 17:37, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
Reindl Harald wrote:
it was refreshed for me with the question below
without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
would simply not exist and people would learn to
use their OS instead obfuscate all options from
the users like windows
On 02/06/2012 10:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it is a Fedora development discussion and no there is not
a bugreport the right answer because it is a WRONG desicion
made in Fedora some releases ago to hide the boot-menu
why a CentOS user wants to boot into a alternative kernel is not a
Fedora
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.02.2012 17:35, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 02/06/2012 10:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it was refreshed for me with the question below
without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
would simply not exist and
Am 06.02.2012 17:44, schrieb Petr Šabata:
I am completely happy with a hidden menu and if it wasn't like that by
default,
I'd just change my grub settings. That's my opinion and taste, different from
yours. Ha.
no problem, configure it
the new user does know nothing about it!
Teach
Am 06.02.2012 17:42, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 02/06/2012 10:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it is a Fedora development discussion and no there is not
a bugreport the right answer because it is a WRONG desicion
made in Fedora some releases ago to hide the boot-menu
why a CentOS user wants
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:40:28AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
The solution to My kernel update doesn't boot should be Automatically
detect that that happened, give the user that information and fall back
to the old
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:50:59PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.02.2012 17:44, schrieb Petr Šabata:
I am completely happy with a hidden menu and if it wasn't like that by
default,
I'd just change my grub settings. That's my opinion and taste, different
from
yours. Ha.
no
On 02/06/2012 11:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Matthew Garrettmj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why are there so many noobs with questions like after a kernel
update my machine does no longer boot if this
Hi,
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2012-02-06, o godz. 17:55, przez Reindl
Harald:
in your arguments if you have any.
why do you not read the arguments?
* a new user does not know anything about the menu
* a new user fall into a boot problem after update
If we are considering such a newbie
On 02/06/2012 10:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it is a GENERAL discussion affecting fedora too and was
introduced in CentOS from fedora
If Fedora users are affected, . be more direct. CentOS or RHEL
discussions here are not appropriate.
why do you not read the arguments?
Because it was mixed
Am 06.02.2012 18:02, schrieb Jarosław Górny:
Hi,
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2012-02-06, o godz. 17:55, przez Reindl Harald:
in your arguments if you have any.
why do you not read the arguments?
* a new user does not know anything about the menu
* a new user fall into a boot problem
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175/0001-Ticket-175-logconv.pl-improvements.patch
There might be another duplicate email coming through. Having mail server
issues(again)...
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175/0001-Ticket-175-logconv.pl-improvements.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 02/06/2012 11:58 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
grubby, and something would have to provide a systemd service. Here's the
basic algorithm:
1) kernel's %post/%posttrans adds the new stanza using new-kernel-package/
grubby, but doesn't make the new kernel default.
2) kernel's %post saves new
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-02-06)
===
Meeting started by mjg59 at 18:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-02-06/fesco.2012-02-06-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
About a year ago Harald had a talk about a smart initrd /
integrated rescue mode along similar lines. Is this still under
development?
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 02/06/2012 02:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 02/06/2012 11:58 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
grubby, and something would have to provide a systemd service. Here's the
basic algorithm:
1) kernel's %post/%posttrans adds the new stanza using new-kernel-package/
grubby, but doesn't make the new
As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
adaptx
ario
asa
autodafe
avant-window-navigator
avl
awn-extras-applets
bit
blam
camstream
ccsm
compiz
compiz-bcop
compizconfig-backend-gconf
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 18:02 +0100, Jarosław Górny wrote:
Hi,
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2012-02-06, o godz. 17:55, przez Reindl
Harald:
in your arguments if you have any.
why do you not read the arguments?
* a new user does not know anything about the menu
* a new user fall into
Hi All,
This was a side project of mine for some time, and I just ported it to
DS 389. It basically parses the dse.ldif into a readable format. It
groups all the backend info together. So each backend lists its own
indexes, config, replication info, etc. It checks for non default
config
On Feb 6, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
retro computing? Maintaining access to pre-historic data?
The only suggestion is dropping the ability to *create* HFS volumes using
hfsplus-tools. Not dropping read support for existing HFS volumes.
But, no, HFS isn't really dead. Old formats
In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new
installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to Lenovo hardware, we found
that some BIOS's would not boot from GPT. We blacklisted Lenovo, falling
back to msdos labels in order to solve this.
Thanks to Matthew Garrett we found that
Hello,
My name is Jamie Nguyen. I'm a student in the UK and part-time Linux
system administrator.
I am an active contributer to the TOMOYO Linux security project [1]
and provide a binary repository containing RPMS/SRPMS for TOMOYO Linux
kernels for Enterprise Linux 6 and Fedora 16 [2]. I also
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Renaming current Virtualization to Virtualization Client makes sense.
I would put new Boxes into both Virt.Client and GNOME groups, list of
packages are not exclusive.
Got a patch for this?
v2 attached, it renames just
On Feb 6, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
In anaconda-17.6 I have reverted the Lenovo blacklist and changed things
so that pmbr_boot is always set on GPT labeled installs. This should
ensure that thing boot correctly.
Is this happening only for Lenovo hardware? Or all hardware? I ask
On 02/06/2012 10:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new
installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to Lenovo hardware, we found
that some BIOS's would not boot from GPT. We blacklisted Lenovo, falling
back to msdos labels in order to
On 02/06/2012 04:41 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
In the new scheme, glibc packages will be based on stable releases,
with bug-fixes back-ported as necessary. I'll throw out a huge thank
you to Jeff Law for being willing to step up and take over maintenance
of the glibc packages in Fedora, and
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:19 +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 02/06/2012 10:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new
installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to Lenovo hardware, we found
that some BIOS's would not boot from GPT. We
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:54:01PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:19 +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 02/06/2012 10:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new
installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to Lenovo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried kseifr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried kseifr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried kseifr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
...
junit4
...
Whoa there.. .this one wasn't in any of the
On 02/06/2012 08:44 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
...
junit4
...
Whoa
Hi,
In our efforts to push DNSSEC to the enduser, we have packaged our
initial DNSSEC reconfiguration utility.
Basically, this makes it possible to use DNSSEC on your laptop, while
moving between networks of which some are friendly man in the middle
attacks on DNS via hotspots and sign-ons. Some
Hi Tom,
- Original Message -
---
The section of the Packaging Guidelines covering /srv was amended to
include /opt and /usr/local. Specifically, the following sentence was
added:
In addition, no Fedora package can have any files or directories
under /opt or /usr/local, as
On 02/07/2012 07:38 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi Tom,
- Original Message -
---
The section of the Packaging Guidelines covering /srv was amended to
include /opt and /usr/local. Specifically, the following sentence was
added:
In addition, no Fedora package can have any files or
- Original Message -
On 02/07/2012 07:38 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi Tom,
- Original Message -
---
The section of the Packaging Guidelines covering /srv was amended
to
include /opt and /usr/local. Specifically, the following sentence
was
added:
In
Hi all,
due to license change in Ruby, I have updated the license of rubygem-open4
after clarification with its author.
Previous license was GPLv2+ or Ruby, current license is BSD or Ruby.
--
Regards,
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 77ada2bfc86d374b0f791d21f9a4bbbc0328404a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 6 09:58:18 2012 +0100
Enable Test::Kwalitee tests
perl-RT-Client-REST.spec |9 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-RT-Client-REST.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Log-Dispatch:
781a4b5a9db2b617d2487dadecf65081 Log-Dispatch-2.29.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786849
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit f97f3bec9c0d9afc4b77dc8f8da99e03ff9b649b
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 6 10:16:42 2012 +0100
Upstream update.
- Remove --with mailtests build option (unnecessary).
- Remove Log-Dispatch-2.11-enable-mail-tests.patch (rotten, obsolete).
Summary of changes:
fb788f7... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
f97f3be... Upstream update. (*)
cf1ba42... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 5aa238bf679b952a5f051ccae19fa2f2e11d
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 6 10:33:42 2012 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Log-Dispatch.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Want:
0cc9f169a2ca44bf1527d2e2ef74d56c Want-0.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9764c855d9f997debdf89a02c7b5dc4a2516ef37
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 6 12:18:54 2012 +0100
Upstream update.
- Modernize spec.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Want.spec | 10 ++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 8
Summary of changes:
5a9b747... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
9616361... Add %{?perl_default_filter}. Modernize spec. (*)
9764c85... Upstream update. (*)
6723478... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
commit 67234784f2779b33f702289244a69a5374589b8a
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 6 12:27:32 2012 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Want.spec |7 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Want.spec b/perl-Want.spec
index
Summary of changes:
4b05746... Perl mass rebuild (*)
5a9b747... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
9616361... Add %{?perl_default_filter}. Modernize spec. (*)
9764c85... Upstream update. (*)
6723478... Merge cleanup. (*)
f3d3fea... Merge cleanup.
(*) This
commit f3d3fea16746e025829e88de6ded86fa79664d95
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 6 12:35:24 2012 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Want.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Want.spec b/perl-Want.spec
index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787638
Summary: perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.21 is available
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Params-Validate:
7d825054b9dddf42a3411a64e8421516 Params-Validate-1.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0bc0c7a41d57622e62e5ffe33db4b52ace293a07
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 6 15:55:30 2012 +0100
Upstream update.
- Drop Params-Validate-1.00-no-pod-coverage.patch.
- Spec file cleanup.
.gitignore |2 +-
Summary of changes:
7163385... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
a6119c3... Add %{perl_default_filter}. (*)
0bc0c7a... Upstream update. (*)
f8ff343... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras
commit f8ff343c1c6745dbe85bd8e41009d0d329a79b79
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 6 15:57:24 2012 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Params-Validate.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Params-Validate.spec
Summary of changes:
df4ca85... Perl mass rebuild add macro perl_bootstrap remove unneeded (*)
2f30b0a... Fix up bogus Tue Jun 28 2011 changelog entry. Fix License ( (*)
4d569fa... Upstream update. Deactivate t/release-pod-coverage.t (Add P (*)
2dd27c4... Perl mass rebuild (*)
Package vim-perl-tt2 in Fedora devel has been retired by notting
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/vim-perl-tt2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases:
b99bf77f07a809ab48bc2b50b0ae09bd CPAN-Perl-Releases-0.42.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 28bfab9c0da70eaa9a42c5269eff7a39988443ce
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Feb 7 06:21:46 2012 +0100
initial import (rhbz#787344)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases.spec | 55 ++
sources
commit f09674fa0a5bb25961668c603ccd8210e2b6bb41
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Feb 7 06:22:51 2012 +0100
tweak BuildRequires following review
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases.spec |9 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
28bfab9... initial import (rhbz#787344) (*)
f09674f... tweak BuildRequires following review (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
28bfab9... initial import (rhbz#787344) (*)
f09674f... tweak BuildRequires following review (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 7ca9612fa6bd939c3dc757b855bc500c08ee9f57
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Feb 7 07:08:15 2012 +0100
update to 0.41
.gitignore|1 +
perlbrew.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784256
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
99 matches
Mail list logo
