NSS 3.13.3 has been relessed and it's built for Rawhide/F-17-alpha/F-16/F15.
A push to update-testing for f17 will be coming shortly - to f16/f15 som time
later.
You can find the new features and bug fixes in NSS 3.13.2 and 3.13.3 with these
Bugzilla queries:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 22:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-03-12
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Official Meeting Announcement Errata:
Yes, I forgot to
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 2:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #699 Proposal to remove the
That really should be a releng ticket not an infrastructure one.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:46:03 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out
commit 6b30f5eee8e32a60cefeeceb82e5b547d245d6eb
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Mar 12 05:50:49 2012 -0600
update to 0.2
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Path-Tiny.spec |8 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4
On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
(noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I need to remove
this tarball from the lookaside cache? If so
Summary of changes:
03c2751... Update to 0.21 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free
(noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only
been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Hash-MultiValue:
8a38d45faa630f27292e84c99f3c411b Hash-MultiValue-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/10/2012 03:31 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
Regarding this bug in particular, I'll just note that it there is
already a precedent. In a default Fedora installation, traffic to the
DHCPv4 client (which is the same binary as the DHCPv6 client) is allowed
from the entire internet. From a security
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:47:36 -0500,
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
That really should be a releng ticket not an infrastructure one.
I have filed the following ticket for this issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5124
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
Elio Maldonado wrote:
If you can, could you set the
SSL_CBC_RANDOM_IV SSL option to PR_TRUE and try it and send us feedback on
remaining sites or apps that syill break?
IIRC, Office Communicator broke with this update when I tried to use the
Pidgin plugin. Better send in the patch to
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
IIRC, Office Communicator broke with this update when I tried to use the
Pidgin plugin. Better send in the patch to Microsoft, too.
Ah, yes, here it is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770682
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 19:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 18:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt couldn't
handle
the other 60 though...) It
There will be a GNOME Shell and Extensions Test Day on Thursday!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-15_Gnome_Shell_and_Extensions
Here's an introduction from Vitezslav Humpa, who's in charge of this event from
QA perspective:
While Fedora 17 Test Day cycle is starting to take
On 03/12/2012 01:41 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
With zone support in firewalld I'd like to start a discussion on the
zones that should enable DHCPv6 client support.
For now DHCPv6-client support is enabled in 'work' and 'home', but not
in the default zone 'public'.
Should we enable
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Jiri Popelka wrote:
On 03/12/2012 01:41 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
With zone support in firewalld I'd like to start a discussion on the zones
that should enable DHCPv6 client support.
For now DHCPv6-client support is enabled in 'work' and 'home', but not in
the default
Summary of changes:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 10:07 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
There will be a GNOME Shell and Extensions Test Day on Thursday!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-15_Gnome_Shell_and_Extensions
Here's an introduction from Vitezslav Humpa, who's in charge of this
event from QA
Package ocaml-camlimages in Fedora devel is now owned by bruno
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ocaml-camlimages
___
ocaml-devel mailing list
ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.el5' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.el6' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc15' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc16' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc17' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2.fc18' was created pointing to:
17b55c3... Initial import (perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
I am not a sponsor so I can only swap with you if you already are a Fedora
packager.
--
Martin
On 03/12/2012 04:22 PM, Martin Preisler wrote:
Hi,
I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
I am not a sponsor so I can only swap with you if you
Shiver me timbers!
It's time for another Beefy Test Day, Argh! Tomorrow, 13 March, is the USB 3.0
Test Day!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-13_USB_3.0
Testing is easy; just use your favourite up-to-date Fedora 17 image (Live or
Install); everything
is included! The testing
working since many motnhs with:
subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=752
all the 1.7 packages are removed for F15/F16 now
so after distro-sync to F16 downgradded to
subversion-1.6.17-5.fc16.x86_64
and now?
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:46:56 -0600
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network is
using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and other
small networks.
This may be the case for the network that you or I run, but
Summary of changes:
0b06b74... Import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Looks interesting, I am reviewing your package.
--
Martin Preisler
- Original Message -
From: Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:26:34 PM
Subject: Re: Review swap: Summoning Wars
On 03/12/2012 04:22 PM, Martin
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/271
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/271/0001-Ticket-271-Slow-shutdown-when-you-have-100-replicati.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallaghersgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I checked in a
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote:
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallaghersgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52 -0500,
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it
wrote:
And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are not
installed in the final rpm (ex. deleted in the %setup
Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth:
On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
working since many motnhs with:
subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=752
all the 1.7 packages are removed for
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it
wrote:
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
Stephen Gallaghersgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth:
On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
working since many motnhs with:
subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Martin Erik Werner
martinerikwer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:21 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it
wrote:
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52 -0500,
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it
wrote:
And what about for pre-built binary files contained in
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 10:07 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
There will be a GNOME Shell and Extensions Test Day on Thursday!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-15_Gnome_Shell_and_Extensions
Here's an
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:46:56 -0600
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network is
using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and other
small networks.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 19:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 18:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:22:05 -0400,
Martin Preisler mprei...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
I am not a
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was
updated. I don't see where it was ever in
On 12.3.2012 03:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
You could do that in about ten seconds with python-bugzilla, I think.
Huh. I take that back. Seems neither python-bugzilla nor Bugzilla's own
'modify several bugs at once' page is capable of marking multiple bugs
as duplicates of one other bug. You
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 15:31 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Adam Williamson
At the meeting, we made the call that IPv6-only networks are becoming
a configuration sufficiently important that a serious breach of the
criteria in the context of an IPv6-only network is significant enough
to
Am 12.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was
updated. I don't see where it was ever in stable.
Am 12.03.2012 19:16, schrieb Paul W. Frields:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 19:16, schrieb Paul W. Frields:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with rpmbuild --rebuild
on F16 because BuildRequirements - so i am f**ed up because
tessted and expected after all is running fine this was
pushed to stable updates long ago
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-12)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 18:02:05 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-03-12/fesco.2012-03-12-18.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:08:24 -0500
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
Comcast require DHCPv6 (otherwise they can't delegate /64 automatically).
Do they send RAs at all? If so, which (if either) of the other and
managed flags are set? If they don't, do they just expect DHCPv6 to
be
On the FESCo meeting today the deprecated package policy was adjusted.
We agreed on the following proposal:
Packages may be unretired without review up to 2 weeks after
retirement providing that the package has ever previously been
reviewed.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road
... from (GPL+ or Artistic). All Fedora users of these packages are
GPLv2 or GPLv2+.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 18:53:16 +0100,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
IANAL but I would call the odt source code and the pdf binary but
just use the term documentation for either.
It is not a binary in the sense of compiled code.
The GPL requires you to to provide the preferred source
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/285
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/285/0001-TIcket-285-compilation-fixes-for-format-security.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Il 10/03/2012 20:29, Itamar Reis Peixoto ha scritto:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Caterpillar caterpilla...@gmail.com wrote:
I opened a bugreport about the nonresponsive package mantainer of emesene.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797260
This is the third point of procedure
Am 12.03.2012 20:33, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
He expected that it /would/ be pushed to stable.
Well, yes. And I can understand that. But as you said, that's no
guarantee it'll ever hit stable.
but what should i do now a half year later
i need subversion = 1.7.0, this was installed
until
Am 12.03.2012 20:43, schrieb drago01:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with rpmbuild --rebuild
on F16 because BuildRequirements - so i am f**ed up because
tessted and expected after all is running fine this
On 3/12/12 12:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I'm not sure. Install the build deps needed to rebuild the f17 SRPMs?
they are NOT solveable for the available src.rpms on F16
that is why it makes me so crazy that once built and
working packages are removed in the meantime
don't do the testing
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 20:43, schrieb drago01:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with rpmbuild --rebuild
on F16 because BuildRequirements -
Am 12.03.2012 22:49, schrieb Jesse Keating:
Every package is different. While the subversion update required
hand management to bring up to date, the dbmail may not have (note
I do not know if this is true or not)
what i meant here is why the maintainer does not update to
stable release
User switching between different users on X is broken.
It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
same problem:
Clicking Switch user will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen.
The switcher doesn't show the correct virtual terminal. Killing the
switcher with
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:04 +0100, nodata wrote:
User switching between different users on X is broken.
It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
same problem:
Clicking Switch user will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen.
The switcher doesn't show the
On Mon, 12.03.12 23:04, nodata (l...@nodata.co.uk) wrote:
User switching between different users on X is broken.
It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
same problem:
Clicking Switch user will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen.
The switcher doesn't
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:04 +0100, nodata wrote:
User switching between different users on X is broken.
It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
same problem:
Clicking Switch user will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen.
The switcher doesn't show the
* Thomas Woerner
For now DHCPv6-client support is enabled in 'work' and 'home', but
not in the default zone 'public'.
Should we enable dhcpv6-client in the default zone and maybe others
also?
Hi Thomas,
In my humble opinion...
Considering that the DHCPv6 protocol is almost an exact IPv6
* Dan Williams
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
This may be the case for the network that you or I run, but not for
providers. Comcast require DHCPv6 (otherwise they can't delegate
/64 automatically).
Do they send RAs at all? If so, which (if either) of the other
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 11:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I know this should most likely be directed at upstream Gnome, but would
it be possible to redesign extensions.gnome.org so that it's... usable?
I mean, it's a list of extensions, ten to a page, ordered by popularity,
name or number
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Caterpillar caterpilla...@gmail.com wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5730
No, what about stable updates?
look at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
its pushed into updates-testing if you add some karma it will become
2012/3/12 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 23:04 +0100, nodata wrote:
User switching between different users on X is broken.
It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the
same problem:
Clicking Switch user will often or sometimes lead to a
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-LeakTrace:
d53953f442cf782c30f843df677db210 Test-LeakTrace-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9597a0be45222d9efacb8fbc83d4c5c3a2886e17
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Mar 12 10:57:39 2012 +
Update to 0.14 and clean up package
- New upstream release 0.14
- Fix Test::Valgrind failures
- Drop tests subpackage; move tests to main package
Summary of changes:
9597a0b... Update to 0.14 and clean up package (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.14-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
9597a0b... Update to 0.14 and clean up package
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.14-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
9597a0b... Update to 0.14 and clean up package
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-B-Utils:
b231d09deb80b0633b14317dc8e36aa2 B-Utils-0.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0e9b6ecb4385cb743e5b6ca364a8208f43ac731a
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Mar 12 05:40:59 2012 -0600
update to 0.19
.gitignore|1 +
perl-B-Utils.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
Summary of changes:
0e9b6ec... update to 0.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
0cdcd8c... update to 0.17 (*)
0e9b6ec... update to 0.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
3b4e9bc... update to 0.14 (*)
47d8ca0... update to 0.15 (*)
963194a... Perl mass rebuild (*)
0cdcd8c... update to 0.17 (*)
0e9b6ec... update to 0.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Path-Tiny:
2c4c23a5c673c94d86cdb82fd4069f7e File-Path-Tiny-0.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-ChangeNotify:
bd8f8f32faed6aba5353b8f270898935 File-ChangeNotify-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 03c27513e9f2e0648521e2f303ee16e3a06ef352
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Mar 12 19:54:22 2012 +0800
Update to 0.21
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-ChangeNotify.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.14-1.el5' was created pointing to:
9597a0b... Update to 0.14 and clean up package
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Hash-MultiValue:
a8016cd3e90b21e759703e248ae83c26 Hash-MultiValue-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8e4a3fca858e45a5e37b4bc916f3ab200e5ccafe
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Mar 12 20:50:36 2012 +0800
Update to 0.12
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Hash-MultiValue.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
8e4a3fc... Update to 0.12 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Install:
89a7f82dd840bc2401f281b5f24732b9 Sub-Install-0.926.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c4c274c8697ff61c6eff3e6f9202471e6a763730
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Mar 12 21:10:09 2012 +0800
Update to 0.926
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Sub-Install.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4
Summary of changes:
c4c274c... Update to 0.926 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797866
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789975
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787638
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IPTables-Parse:
195aafe496fd8c350bc68175110e46a7 IPTables-Parse-1.1.tar.bz2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
