On Apr 20, 2012 5:34 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 20.4.2012 18:09, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Never. Nobody uses the code names. It's a waste of time and choosing
names like Beefy Miracle is a good way of making the distro look a
whole lot less professional.
Well, as far as I can
I started once again looking at ways to eliminate the unwanted provides
on private libs such as dlopen()'ed modules with minimal fuss and
breakage. Been down this route more than once but I suspect the last
time was before the major dependency generator changes in rpm-4.9.x,
which made
On 04/27/2012 09:13 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I started once again looking at ways to eliminate the unwanted provides
on private libs such as dlopen()'ed modules with minimal fuss and
breakage. Been down this route more than once but I suspect the last
time was before the major dependency
On 04/27/2012 11:25 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 04/27/2012 09:13 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I started once again looking at ways to eliminate the unwanted provides
on private libs such as dlopen()'ed modules with minimal fuss and
breakage. Been down this route more than once but I suspect the
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:01:16 +0200, AL (Alec) wrote:
I am am a newbie, and although the overall wiki rule is Be Bold this
is not really the place for me to be that IMHO. So, I have prepared a
draft in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Common_Rpmlint_issues (the
Discussion tab). My plan
I filed a bug about this, but I've no idea what component to file it
against, so it's against something fairly random:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816764
After updating Fedora 17 to latest a couple of days ago, my keyboard
keeps dying.
In fact I found out that what's happening
On 27/04/12 11:16, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
* Provide a way to permanently disable accessibility features for
those who don't need them.
Rich.
I don't have an accessibility menu on Xfce F17 or Rawhide.
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
A workaround that makes the wifi bearable (but not pleasant) is:
modprobe iwlwifi wd_disable=1
Thanks. This is an improvement over what I was doing which was:
* Disable wireless in NetworkMangler.
* modprobe -r iwlwifi
*
On 04/27/2012 11:32 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:01:16 +0200, AL (Alec) wrote:
You
I am am a newbie, and although the overall wiki rule is Be Bold this
is not really the place for me to be that IMHO. So, I have prepared a
draft in
Hi,
On 04/27/2012 10:13 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I started once again looking at ways to eliminate the unwanted provides on
private libs such as dlopen()'ed modules with minimal fuss and breakage. Been
down this route more than once but I suspect the last time was before the major
Il giorno mer, 25/04/2012 alle 18.36 +0200, Mario Torre ha scritto:
Hello all!
I'm trying to package Fest for Fedora, and I need a sponsor for this
first package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816264
This is my first package, but I'm not new to Fedora, I recently joined
GREETINGS!
It is once again time for election season to begin. As noted in the
elections schedule[1], the elections questionnaire is now open to
populate with questions for candidates, and will close on May 8th. The
elections nomination period will begin AFTER the questionnaire period
has
Dne 26.4.2012 18:13, Alec Leamas napsal(a):
On 04/26/2012 05:49 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:32:17 +0200, AL (Alec) wrote:
OT? The question here isn't really what submitters do or don't, isn't
it what we could do to improve the process?.
The point is that not all
I want to publicly thank Jon Ciesla for helping me out and saving me lots
of time here. I had been requesting EPEL builds of rabbitvcs and
nautilus-python for many many months, but no one was responding to me. And
it was definitely not worth the effort to become a co-maintainer and
learning
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated
[1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names?_csrf_token=ed7209dc06f5c8c58528ac55251f52c8ffacdc40.
Just for reference for the future, the last part of your url
- Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated
[1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names?_csrf_token=ed7209dc06f5c8c58528ac55251f52c8ffacdc40.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:45 +0200, AT (Antonio) wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated
[1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names?_csrf_token=ed7209dc06f5c8c58528ac55251f52c8ffacdc40.
And now ?
Well, I've missed the announcement of this poll.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSH2:
0d18993d7783357b38e47212e64a1d96 Net-SSH2-0.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
There seems to be at least some consensus that:
* The notification, unless permanent, is not an ideal solution here
because once it goes away, the user is in the same situation of
confusion as to how to install the Live Image to disk.
* The extension as proposed is not an ideal solution
commit b7fd0588c35ccedfab9c1b7d864a61a1b1287373
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 27 15:22:41 2012 +0200
0.44 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-SSH2.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
The poll should really have run through the regular elections to reach a
wider user base.
-- Bob
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What do you mean with regular elections ?
--
devel mailing list
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166087.html
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:45 +0200, AT (Antonio) wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated
[1]
I have seen way too many problems caused by people installing such
*nonmaintained* packages to even think this will cause more troubles than it
will solve.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:23:31 +0100, JL (Johannes) wrote:
Well, I've missed the announcement of this poll.
Where has it been announced?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166087.html
I haven't received that mail. I've tracked down the announcement in
the list
* Michael Schwendt [27/04/2012 15:31] :
Well, I've missed the announcement of this poll.
Where has it been announced?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2012-April/003060.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2012-April/000919.html
Emmanuel
--
devel
- Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
The poll should really have run through the regular elections to reach
a wider user base.
What do you mean with regular elections ?
The board, FESCo and FAMSCo elections that happen regularly with every release.
-- Bob
--
devel mailing
Hi Kamil,
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 09:22 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
but they don't push on any other solutions.
A link from the http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora page directly
to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/Installation_Quick_Start_Guide/Fedora_Live_Desktop.html
?
To be
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBI:
2dfcff5b3b7afc53be402ef5f133da00 DBI-1.620.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 687a29a9c26d3ea0b9704b6c5cf9e03d2373904b
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 27 15:57:31 2012 +0200
1.620 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBI.spec | 12 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
The whole thing is clearly a mess that needs some high level
streamlining, from the entire process of download from web page (or
receive CD from friend) to the on-disk install first boot.
While I certainly wouldn't
Quoting Michael Schwendt (2012-04-26 18:36:51)
So, what has been proposed before (years ago even) is for advanced
packagers (aka provenpackagers or experienced packagers) to lower the
hurdle and trust them more in that they know their stuff. They would not
need to wait for somebody else
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Caghan Demirci cagh...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to publicly thank Jon Ciesla for helping me out and saving me lots
of time here. I had been requesting EPEL builds of rabbitvcs and
nautilus-python for many many months, but no one was responding to me. And
it
but they don't push on any other solutions.
A link from the http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora page directly
to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/Installation_Quick_Start_Guide/Fedora_Live_Desktop.html
?
I've spent 5 minutes looking for that direct link and I haven't
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:10:53 +0200, SO (Stanislav) wrote:
Quoting Michael Schwendt (2012-04-26 18:36:51)
So, what has been proposed before (years ago even) is for advanced
packagers (aka provenpackagers or experienced packagers) to lower the
hurdle and trust them more in that they know
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 10:26 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
but they don't push on any other solutions.
A link from the http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora page directly
to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/Installation_Quick_Start_Guide/Fedora_Live_Desktop.html
?
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 21:27 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm still seeing the wifi lockup issues on 3.3.2-1.fc17.x86_64.
The logs show:
Apr 26 21:02:53 thinkpad kernel: [262822.181984] iwlwifi :02:00.0: Queue
2 stuck for 2000 ms.
Apr 26 21:02:53 thinkpad kernel: [262822.181992]
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:16:34 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I filed a bug about this, but I've no idea what component to file it
against, so it's against something fairly random:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816764
After updating Fedora 17 to latest a
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:10:45PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated [1].
And now ?
The Board will look at the results and decide whether to stop having release
namees for Fedora 19 or to start the process of revising how they are
chosen.
- Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
The Board will look at the results and decide whether to stop having
release
namees for Fedora 19 or to start the process of revising how they are
chosen.
If the latter, I'm hoping we'll organize that as a working group
outside of
the Board
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen
b...@fedoraunity.org wrote:
- Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
The Board will look at the results and decide whether to stop having
release
namees for Fedora 19 or to start the process of revising how they are
chosen.
If
Dear all,
Following a previous thread debate about Unknown Horizons:
1) I'm available to maintain unknown-horizons (UH) in Fedora and EPEL (RHEL6);
2) For 1) to happen I would like to maintain also FIFE, which doesn't
seem to see much love for quite some time; I ask this because FIFE
flagship
- Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
A link to the results was in the first message in this thread.
Here it is again, just in case:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names
Thanks Josh, I overlooked it.
-- Bob
--
devel mailing list
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com writes:
Normally top reports CPU line, sy at 0.4% when idle. If I format an
external Firewire disk as btrfs and mount it, it remains at 0.4%. If I
reformat as XFS and mount it, again top reports sy at 0.4%. However,
if I reformat as ext4 and mount it, sy
On 04/27/2012 10:50 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
Hi Kamil,
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 09:22 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
but they don't push on any other solutions.
A link from the http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora page directly
to
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 13:34 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
(Note: *DO NOT* run the installer that is on this image. You'll probably
end up with a broken grub. Should be fixed soon)
I've put a test image up at
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-05-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be re-scheduled to
Tuesday 2012-05-02 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers, as most regular
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:08:20PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote:
No dia 26 de Abril de 2012 21:35, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com
escreveu:
1) That there was no reason for you to stop your efforts at packaging the
software for Fedora.
Toshio, I've dropped that package in particular
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/207
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/207/0001-Ticket-207-RFE-enable-attribute-that-tracks-when-a-p.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13:47AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I'm going to add a switch to allow packages to control the behavior
anyway. Whether rpm upstream defaults to the traditional behavior for
compatibility reasons or not is another question, but Fedora is
obviously free to
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear all,
Following a previous thread debate about Unknown Horizons:
1) I'm available to maintain unknown-horizons (UH) in Fedora and EPEL
(RHEL6);
2) For 1) to happen I would like to maintain also FIFE, which
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:44:01PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) How to check who currently maintains those packages;
You can use the fedora pkgdb at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb. To get
into
Summary of changes:
387342c... Upgrade to 3.18002 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[resent another time because the list automatically rejected my mail]
On 27/04/12 10:13, Panu Matilainen wrote:
[...]
The short background is that for libraries which dont have a SONAME,
rpmbuild fakes one based on the file name. The rationale for this has
been that since the linker
No dia 27 de Abril de 2012 18:44, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com escreveu:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:44:01PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) How to check who currently maintains those packages;
You can
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 22:08:20 +0100,
Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
FIFE wasn't maintained for quite some time when that request was
filed. Not pointing fingers, but from the packages I've maintained on
other waters I've always kept my stuff updated and in the shape
possible.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:49:58 -0700,
Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
So the big question is -- where did this break down? How can we update our
documentation to guide people in this direction?
One thing people can do for things obviously covered by a SIG (games in
this case)
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora Kernel meeting
==
Meeting started by jwb at 17:59:30 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-04-27/fedora-kernel.2012-04-27-17.59.log.html
.
Kamil Paral (kpa...@redhat.com) said:
I find it sad how desktop guys try to veto solutions they don't like,
but they don't push on any other solutions.
I don't know how proposing and implementing a notification method of doing
the same isn't providing a solution, but you're welcome to your own
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 20:05:50 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any serious known problems with apache, python, php, mysql,
postgresql?
I am using F17 on a machine that use postgres and perl scripts (not
mod_perl though) to generate web pages using apache.
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 19:50 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Has anyone tried to preupgrade from F16 to F17? Are there any problems
related to UsrMove (or anything else)?
I made the jump via preupgrade and had quite a bit of trouble. A number
of packages didn't get upgraded while some of their
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't know how proposing and implementing a notification method of doing
the same isn't providing a solution, but you're welcome to your own cross.
Sorry Bill -- I'm confused here. Was a notification method actually
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5163 . Please
see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
testing
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction:
e99ef189e9f85549e42c32b5168f7f47 Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 99282210101eab75400937c9514dbc79efd45249
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Apr 27 11:38:02 2012 +0100
Update to 0.05
- New upstream release 0.05
- Add pure-perl implementation for situations where neither
${^GLOBAL_PHASE}
nor XS are available
Summary of changes:
9928221... Update to 0.05 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.05-1.fc17' was created
pointing to:
9928221... Update to 0.05
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.05-1.fc18' was created
pointing to:
9928221... Update to 0.05
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Debug-Client:
d5250a44e0753bc975e9afba7a63e8b6 Debug-Client-0.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Moose-More:
1545212890dd575341e03b6317f41c6e Test-Moose-More-0.009.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7ff1451642f52720101191265750d6599cc652ba
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 27 13:09:37 2012 +0200
0.009 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Test-Moose-More.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
commit 7b0f0f525a6628fd1b19be9dfc1636153715e8b5
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 27 13:19:24 2012 +0200
0.20 bump
- apply changed patch for tests
.gitignore |1 +
...Client-0.18-Do-not-use-Term-ReadLine-Perl.patch
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CPAN-Meta:
949b5867708c1fe5a3ac51cdcb25eaea Test-CPAN-Meta-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 56d74b890c2b142305445081693d7245ba01d216
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 27 13:32:44 2012 +0200
apply patch from MozBug for fixing encoding of utf-8 files 816809,
cpan#76843
File-DesktopEntry-encode.patch | 19 +++
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Role-Tiny:
a496d29d811ad19640f504aeca3d348c Role-Tiny-1.001001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
387342c... Upgrade to 3.18002 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
387342c... Upgrade to 3.18002 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1019d3ed2d094b29b7479250cdde97bbcc36febe
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Apr 27 18:32:23 2012 -0600
update to 1.001001
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Role-Tiny.spec | 11 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5
GREETINGS!
It is once again time for election season to begin. As noted in the
elections schedule[1], the elections questionnaire is now open to
populate with questions for candidates, and will close on May 8th. The
elections nomination period will begin AFTER the questionnaire period
has
78 matches
Mail list logo
