On 09/22/2012 09:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 07:37:13PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Does it mean Fedora will stop shipping the latest FF/TB and stick to ESR
instead? Or is it for parallel-installation purposes?
Assuming RHEL will have ESR (which is reasonable), either
Hi,
My name is Erwin Waterlander. I intend to maintain the package wcd for
Fedora, of which I am also the upstream maintainer. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
Wcd is a mature package, already part of Debian, Ubuntu and Cygwin
(packaged by others).
I provided wcd RPM
This doesn't look right ...
DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-6.fc18.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: gcc = 4.7.1
DEBUG util.py:257: Installed: gcc-4.7.2-2.fc18.x86_64
(@build/$releasever)
DEBUG util.py:257: gcc = 4.7.2-2.fc18
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:12:51AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This doesn't look right ...
DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-6.fc18.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: gcc = 4.7.1
DEBUG util.py:257: Installed: gcc-4.7.2-2.fc18.x86_64
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:12:51AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This doesn't look right ...
DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-6.fc18.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: gcc =
On 23/09/12 10:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
$ grep /usr/lib/gcc /usr/bin/libtool
sys_lib_search_path_spec=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1 /usr/lib64 /lib64
compiler_lib_search_dirs=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1/../../../../lib64
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:25:25AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/09/12 10:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
$ grep /usr/lib/gcc /usr/bin/libtool
sys_lib_search_path_spec=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1 /usr/lib64
/lib64
compiler_lib_search_dirs=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.1
On 22.09.2012 13:02, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2012 15:33, Martin Stransky pisze:
as the subject says there are test packages available for your beloved
Fedora's. Especially Thunderbird 17 (Earlybird now) needs some love from
you (the 17ESR line is going to be a background for the
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 01:06:53PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Has anybody considered to package the ESR releases for Fedora or is the
general consensus that doesn't make much sense, just leads to confusion
and is not worth the trouble. I now and then could need a parallel
It's too bad we
Compose started at Sun Sep 23 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires
On 09/23/2012 02:58 PM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sun Sep 23 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for i386
--
[gnome-contacts]
gnome-contacts-3.5.92-2.fc18.i686 requires libcheese.so.7
On 09/19/2012 12:34 AM, Brendan Jones wrote:
1.9.1 pushed to rawhide,f18,f17
Excellent. However, the broken deps still remain. From latest rawhide
report:
[pytrainer]
pytrainer-1.9.1-1.fc19.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkmozembed
Can you also fix it up to not depend on a package
Hi,
Ankur Sinha wrote:
We set up a page about this (The link was sent to the list too iirc)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_enable_touchpad_click#KDE
It still misses the KDE method. Could someone please add it? Please add
info about gdm etc also if you think it should be present
drago01 wrote:
Because some people that can actually use it (i.e I never accidentally
click when trying to move the mouse; maybe you just have a crappy
touchpad?).
On my notebook, touchpad tapping is off of course. I have this problem each
time I try to use somebody else's touchpad which has
Álvaro Castillo wrote:
If you do not like touchpad. Can disable on your laptop with Fn keys.
1. not all laptops have this and 2. what if I want to use the touchpad, just
not with tapping?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Chris Murphy wrote:
I would use the word RELEASE instead of TC1, TC2, RC1, RC2. So Fedora
18 Alpha RC3 became Fedora 18 Alpha Release. It was after all a
release candidate and once no longer a candidate, it is a release.
I think release is even more confusing to the average user than gold.
Hi,
in its Bugzilla comments for the bugs related to:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14137
Bodhi suggested to upgrade using the following monster command:
su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kde-workspace-4.9.1-5.fc17
akonadi-1.8.0-1.fc17 analitza-4.9.1-1.fc17
Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
How is that going to work? The current release will become the previous
version at some time, and you cannot just downgrade to the ESR at that
time.
How about upgrading until the next ESR-supported branch and then switching
to the ESR releases? (Just floating the idea. I
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
No surprises that the build system of libtool is as crazy as the
program itself. I can't even find how the 'libtool' script
is created ...
Sigh, libtool is probably the most braindead of the autocrap. Good luck with
it, you'll need it! ;-)
Kevin Kofler
--
Il 23/09/2012 17:06, Kevin Kofler ha scritto:
yum --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2012-14137 update
I strongly agree with Kevin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I wrote:
3. If the user did not have some of the packages in the group installed,
explicitly listing them installs them, which is usually not what the user
wants.
Oops, sorry, I just tested this, I was wrong about that one. But that in
turn means that if the user had only subpackages
Am 23.09.2012 13:06, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
Has anybody considered to package the ESR releases for Fedora or is the
general consensus that doesn't make much sense, just leads to confusion
and is not worth the trouble. I now and then could need a parallel
installed Firefox ESR for a
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:33:56 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
I wrote:
3. If the user did not have some of the packages in the group
installed, explicitly listing them installs them, which is usually
not what the user wants.
Oops, sorry, I just tested this, I was wrong
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Sounds nice...
Could you file a bodhi ticket on this?
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/newticket
Filed: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/695
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 23.09.2012 13:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.09.2012 13:06, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
Has anybody considered to package the ESR releases for Fedora or is the
general consensus that doesn't make much sense, just leads to confusion
and is not worth the trouble. I now and then could need a
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 01:10:45PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
you can not have BOTH in the repos in a way that
the installation doses not conflict and you are
Sure we can. It's not pretty, but definitely possible.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Random:
f09b1e469a132d5c58fce4aeacdb2786 Data-Random-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Validate-Type:
cb82617afa5ea36ae65e2d4739f4a745 Data-Validate-Type-1.3.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b76b42fb802f5de740050f3b2352a1f5e8714c45
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sun Sep 23 11:56:09 2012 +0200
Update to 1.3.1
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Data-Validate-Type.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
63014685181466e25d257ec18368ab30 Mojolicious-3.43.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b25cabcb6874016251e5fc734af8b2c16a7e8b15
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sun Sep 23 12:12:44 2012 +0200
Update to 0.08, remove upstreamed patch
.gitignore |1 +
commit 2e4d959f71487d154a54dc3fb4ade5b2c6c69f42
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sun Sep 23 12:18:12 2012 +0200
Update to 3.43
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
34 matches
Mail list logo
