-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
as the Fedora 20 schedule[1] states the Beta change freeze is upon
us. As of now all Beta freeze only accepted exceptions[2] will be
allowed in.
we are at the beta stage of release, so the Beta_to_Pre_Release[3]
stage of the updates policy
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:51:18 +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
$ rpm -V libreoffice-core
prelink: /tmp/#prelink#.TZlaPL: Recorded 92 dependencies, now seeing -1
Repeating for the third time in this thread:
This is a known prelink Bug and you can find the single line fix/workaround
there:
On 10/16/2013 12:51 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi,
This is one of these passionate threads I enjoy reading because I
usually learn something interesting, and I also enjoy people being
passionate about stuff. But this time I'm a bit disappointed about the
defaults for Fedora.
I'm a developer,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On 10/16/2013 12:51 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi,
This is one of these passionate threads I enjoy reading because I
usually learn something interesting, and I also enjoy people being
passionate about stuff.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:51:18 +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
$ rpm -V libreoffice-core
prelink: /tmp/#prelink#.TZlaPL: Recorded 92 dependencies, now seeing -1
Repeating for the third time in this thread:
This is
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:20:02 +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
I understand, but what bothers me isn't the prelink bug but prelink
itself being installed by default (for what it does regardless of the
bug).
What exactly bothers you? It (generally) speeds up programs startup.
As a summary I see
I'll review mod_scgi, if you're interested I need a review for this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=vcsh
Dridi
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
mod_scgi was orphaned quite a while back since it wouldn't build on new
releases, with
On 10/15/2013 10:01 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
I have tested a possibly real world script:
rm *;sync;(time for i in `seq 0 89`;do mplayer /dev/null -nosound -vo png
-ss $i -endpos 0 video.mp4;mv 0001.png $i.png;done) 21|grep ^real|tee -a
/tmp/times
without prelink:
6.220s 6.212s
On 10/16/2013 10:17 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On 10/16/2013 12:51 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi,
This is one of these passionate threads I enjoy reading because I
usually learn something interesting, and I
On 15. 10. 2013 at 09:40:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
Not to be only negative here, take a look at the COPR initiative, I expect
it will solve the problem you are talking about by offering external
repositories that will be easily
Dne 16.10.2013 10:04, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
On 15. 10. 2013 at 09:40:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
Not to be only negative here, take a look at the COPR initiative, I expect
it will solve the problem you are talking about by offering
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:13:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 15, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:04:28PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm happy to hear it argued I should instead use the LV space for a
regular partition
With the conversation we've been having and the persona developments, I
propose the following:
- create FAS groups for git-taskbot-core and git-taskbot-tasks which
will control access to the git repos
What will git-taskbot-tasks be used to? I thought we were going to have
decentralized
Resending since the last attempt bounced.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:21:31PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:27:36PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Do you really run gnome-open --help 1000 times per reasonable unit of
time (or ever)? Please stop using bogus
On 10/15/2013 10:04 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:10 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com said:
It depends, for example in this case prelink saves 33% of time (and
battery):
i=0;time while [ $i -lt 1000 ];do /usr/bin/gnome-open
All,
The (admittedly hacky) dracut-modules-growroot package installs a
dracut script that runs in the pre-pivot stage. It unmounts the root
partition, extends it to the maximum possible size and then tries to
remount it. What I noticed in F20 is that as soon as the
repartitioning finishes
On 16. 10. 2013 at 10:46:01, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 16.10.2013 10:04, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
On 15. 10. 2013 at 09:40:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
Not to be only negative here, take a look at the COPR initiative, I
expect
it will
Compose started at Wed Oct 16 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
04.10.2013 01:35, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and other
branches as other changes permit.
- There are 3067 lines in this run. Up from 1007 last run.
(Which was 2.5 years ago)
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2013 05:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/16/2013 08:24 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:56:44 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
So even in that totally artificial case, we gain very little,
considering the trouble that prelink is.
After all the discussion I have listed the current known issues:
prelink performance gains [summary]
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:42:37PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:56:44 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
So even in that totally artificial case, we gain very little,
considering the trouble that prelink is.
After all the discussion I have listed the current known issues:
Last Thursday was Gnome Test Day [1]. Thanks to all of you
who attended, whether you tested Gnome, helped people on
IRC or helped us with Test Day management. I want to
thank namely to Alexander Todorov, who helped us with
management and to Matthias Claasen for being on IRC for
people to help.
- Original Message -
Hi,
I apologize for escalating this to devel, but I think that after 6
months it is time this [1] finally got fixed: it is just a matter of
changing the icon name in the desktop file of qt-creator to reflect the
new icon name. This is one of those trivial to fix
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:04:55AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
I won't speak for Michael, but I think the answer is no. COPRs fills a
need, but it's _too_ wild west (no package signatures, for example). We
need to support multiple language runtimes and native upstream packaging
*in* Fedora.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:45:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
why waste time and energy to fix things with little to no benefit
IIRC compiler team spends 1.5 year to get 1% of performane gain.
Here you have almost ready feature with up to ... questionable but it is in
a range of percents in some real
On 16.10.2013 14:51, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
I apologize for escalating this to devel, but I think that after 6
months it is time this [1] finally got fixed: it is just a matter of
changing the icon name in the desktop file of qt-creator to reflect the
new icon
On 16/10/13 13:57, Matthew Miller wrote:
We have a mantra of upstream! upstream! upstream! for software development
and patches. In the olden days, we didn't do that for packaging, because
there was no consistent upstream packaging at all (just the occasional
upstream shipping terrible
On Oct. 14, 2013, 5:08 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
Overall, looks good other than my question about url munging vs. changing
how the settings are done. Thoughts?
I updated the diff according to conversation on IRC.
- Martin
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/55/
---
(Updated Oct. 16, 2013, 1:16 p.m.)
Review request for blockerbugs.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/55/
---
(Updated Oct. 16, 2013, 1:17 p.m.)
Review request for blockerbugs.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
What exactly bothers you? It (generally) speeds up programs startup.
As a summary I see prelink has some bugs:
* -y has false mismatches: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666143
* %preun does not
Sandro Mani wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Being a regular QtCreator user, I'm happy to help
out if help is needed (i.e., comaintain and handle smaller issues like
this one). Would that be appreciated?
yes! :)
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:17:25PM +0200, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
All,
The (admittedly hacky) dracut-modules-growroot package installs a
dracut script that runs in the pre-pivot stage. It unmounts the root
partition, extends it to the maximum possible size and then tries to
remount it.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
Ok then, talk to FPC about this. Personally I'd be against creating the wild
west from Fedora itself and I'd rather like to have have it in COPRs. Fedora
should keep its high standard of Software packaging (which usually
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919030
Karsten Hopp kars...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--- Comment #2
To finish usr-move, I'm going to change quota package in that way.
/sbin/quotacheck, /sbin/quotaoff, and /sbin/quotaon files will be moved
under /usr.
This may affect init scripts enabling quotas and SELinux file
auto-labeling.
This will be done in rawhide only.
Please speak now, or be quiet
On 16.10.2013 15:32, Rex Dieter wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Being a regular QtCreator user, I'm happy to help
out if help is needed (i.e., comaintain and handle smaller issues like
this one). Would that be appreciated?
yes! :)
Ok! acls requested.
Sandro
--
devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919030
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 89552
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019827
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993353
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bblas...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009919
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/16/2013 09:49 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
To finish usr-move, I'm going to change quota package in that way.
/sbin/quotacheck, /sbin/quotaoff, and /sbin/quotaon files will be moved
under /usr.
This may affect init scripts enabling quotas and
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 14:58 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:45:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
why waste time and energy to fix things with little to no benefit
IIRC compiler team spends 1.5 year to get 1% of performane gain.
Here you have almost ready feature with up to
Am 16.10.2013 14:42, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:56:44 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
So even in that totally artificial case, we gain very little,
considering the trouble that prelink is.
After all the discussion I have listed the current known issues:
prelink
Am 16.10.2013 14:58, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:45:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
why waste time and energy to fix things with little to no benefit
IIRC compiler team spends 1.5 year to get 1% of performane gain.
Here you have almost ready feature with up to ...
Am 16.10.2013 09:44, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:20:02 +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
I understand, but what bothers me isn't the prelink bug but prelink
itself being installed by default (for what it does regardless of the
bug).
What exactly bothers you? It
Am 16.10.2013 15:20, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:11:13 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
you really do not understand the difference between faster *running*
code and some micro-seconds at *startup* of the application?
You do not understand overall system performance is
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Patricia:
ef838f7512b050ca4b35d742f9565b3b Net-Patricia-1.22.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4a1f1c8bd81015f10cb873a6fa7f5870cb588e6e
Author: Orion Poplawski or...@nwra.com
Date: Wed Oct 16 09:54:51 2013 -0600
Update to 1.22
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-Patricia.spec |6 --
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019657
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job
because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
sope or something like that. Is that not the case?
For RHEL6 we're using sope 4.9 from
On 16.10.2013 18:13, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job
because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
sope or something like that. Is that not
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:57:37AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Yup, prelink screws up rpm -V pretty badly.
To me, this line _alone_ should end the conversation.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ mat...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
On Oct 16, 2013, at 3:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
You could try using one or more of these qcow2 options:
compat=1.1
preallocation=metadata
lazy_refcounts=on
eg:
qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b backing -o preallocation=metadata,compat=1.1
snapshot
I would
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-10-17 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-10-17 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-10-17 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-10-17
On Ter, 2013-10-15 at 15:19 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
In Debian distributions exist file:
/etc/dpkg/origins/default
which is symlink to
/etc/dpkg/origins/debian
with content:
Vendor: Debian
Vendor-URL: http://www.debian.org/
Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org
Hi, please
Hi,
The recent builds of docker-io and azureus never reach
updates-testing of Fedora 20
repoquery --releasever=20 --enablerepo=updates-testing docker-io
azureus
azureus-0:5.0.0.0-2.fc20.noarch
when we have azureus-5.1.0.0-1.fc20 built on 2013-10-05 19:17:29
and docker-io built 2013-10-05
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:09:25PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Caching mode was none in all prior cases.
Note that cache=none is almost never useful. It bypasses the host
cache so you don't get the benefit of having lots of free host memory,
plus causes endless pain because of filesystems that
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:13:45 -0400, James Antill wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 20:39 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
What I can do those packages enter in F20 ?
Bodhi updates have to be created by a human, and then other humans need
to provide sufficient karma.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Qua, 2013-10-16 at 15:53 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 20:39 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
What I can do those packages enter in F20 ?
Bodhi updates have to be created by a human, and then other humans need
to provide sufficient karma.
But since humans fail there ,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-10-16)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:00:18 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:09:25PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Caching mode was none in all prior cases.
Note that cache=none is almost never useful. It bypasses the host
cache so you don't get the benefit of having
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:24:59PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:09:25PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Caching mode was none in all prior cases.
Note that cache=none is almost never useful.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:05:52PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Mon, 14 Oct 2013 02:19:15 -0400 (EDT)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com escribió:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El
On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
I made the suggested cache change for both LVM and qcow2; and created the
qcow2 file as suggested (adding lazy_refcount):
Fedora 20 default standard partition guided install (ext4) to an LV takes
18m02s.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
FESCo met today to address the NSS BEAST patch that left all software using NSS
vulnerable to the BEAST[0] vulnerability. The decision was made to implement
the patch that fixes this vulnerablity in F19 and F20. There are some programs
that may
Ludovic, could you please comment on the status here? Can we build SOGo
and all it's dependencies from upstream gnustep, SOPE, etc.. or are
there special SOGo-versions of these we'll need? And what is the
relationship between SOPE 2.0.7 from
http://www.sogo.nu/files/downloads/SOGo/Sources/
and
- Original Message -
From: Eric H. Christensen spa...@fedoraproject.org
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:33:06 PM
Subject: BEAST to be patched in NSS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
FESCo met today to address the NSS BEAST
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
But since humans fail there , who or how can create Bodhi updates for
them ?
The easies way to create an update is to go to your working directory
and ensure, that you are in the correct branch. After then you can
call fedpkg
On Qua, 2013-10-16 at 23:57 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
But since humans fail there , who or how can create Bodhi updates for
them ?
The easies way to create an update is to go to your working directory
and ensure, that you
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:12:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2013-10-16 at 23:57 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
But since humans fail there , who or how can create Bodhi updates for
them ?
The easies way to create an
Tom Hughes wrote:
That hasn't stopped us saying that they don't provide a good experience
to Fedora users however, and that it is better to repackage things as
RPMs so that our users only have to deal with a single interface to
installing and updating packages and that they will get a set of
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Sorry, this has nothing to do with FPC yet. RPM/YUM/DNF should first
provide reasonable support. For example this issue [1] could take us
closer as a first approximation.
Vít
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845247
Parallel-installing multiple versions
On Qui, 2013-10-17 at 00:37 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:12:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2013-10-16 at 23:57 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:59:17PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
But since humans fail there , who or how can
Oops, I pasted too much is hard to read. The diff lines that matter are
# This patch is currently meant for stable branches
-# Patch29: nss-ssl-cbc-random-iv-off-by-default.patch
+Patch29: nss-ssl-cbc-random-iv-off-by-default.patch
.
# activate for stable and beta
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:50:34AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Why docker-io, don't have any Bodhi request ?
This is by request of Docker upstream. The initial version we built was
heavily patched in an experimental way. That experiment was merged upstream
into the upcoming 0.7 release, but
On 10/13/2013 1:34 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
some time ago several bugs regarding aarch64 support were opened.
According to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922257#c1
most of the bugs seem to be wrong. Nevertheless, there was no status
update at least in the bugs created for my
On 10/16/2013 07:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
If your package uses the %configure macro, I would feel free to close
them as either invalid or fixed as that macro handles it. If your
package doesn't, you have more checking/work to do.
Thanks for replying- this slipped through my inbox. You
Hello developers and packagers,
I recently received an email from the reporter[1] from rhbz #913289.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289
related to the sponsorship. The review was done. One of sponsors
promised to take care of that step
which never came to fruition. It has been
Rich, Matthew, and Richard
Thanks for your guys' input. It's good to know that I can turn here,
when I have to and not have it seem that I'm asking a silly question. I
will try to keep everyone abreast of progress and once I'm ready for
review, I'll let you all know.
Thanks again.
M
--
devel
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 19:08 -0700, Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
Oops, I pasted too much is hard to read. The diff lines that matter
are
# This patch is currently meant for stable branches
-# Patch29: nss-ssl-cbc-random-iv-off-by-default.patch
+Patch29:
On 10/03/2013 03:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and other
branches as other changes permit.
Lines in the output are of three forms:
- BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME
This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967719
--- Comment #9 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com ---
This problem still occurs in F20.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019653
Bug ID: 1019653
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.80 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019657
Bug ID: 1019657
Summary: perl-Net-Patricia-1.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Patricia
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914295
--- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org ---
The test failures are related to MIME::Lite update from 3.028 to 3.029, which
happened for f18, this is not related to perl 5.16.
The changelog says : Allow the MIME-Version header to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019661
Bug ID: 1019661
Summary: perl-Sub-Install-0.927 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sub-Install
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker:
8bab69a513182890e5c5cd5cdc948a51 ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.80.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d2fa16176b217cd8d4a39a0903b9a71e5a017094
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 16 11:12:03 2013 +0200
6.80 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...-6.80-Link-to-libperl-explicitly-on-Linux.patch | 10 +-
commit 56ed5dd8b4c6589d0e382456975042a49c022527
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Wed Oct 16 11:54:57 2013 +0200
Add BR: perl(CPAN)
perl-MIME-Charset.spec |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MIME-Charset.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019653
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
