On 11/04/2013 07:30 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> A media codec should not be a system wide component (I'd go as far as
> saying it should not be user-session wide, but application bundled).
???
Would you so apply the same reasoning to libjpeg and libtiff?
Security nightmare.
--
Roberto Ragusa
- Original Message -
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the
> > various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees
> > we want to offer? I'll stop short of paraphrasing you.
>
> The fact that bundling is
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:14:22PM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> I am looking to have the following package reviewed for inclusion into
> fedora.
I'll review it.
BUGNO or didn't happen? ;-)
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Am 06.11.2013 10:56, schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> - Original Message -
>> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>> Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the
>>> various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees
>>> we want to offer? I'll stop short of
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:14:22PM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> I have attached the SRPM of what I have created.
I just figured, that you are asking questions before actually
creating review request...
> Should the ifup/ifdown script generate the tayga.conf on the fly to
> say /var/run/tmp somewh
I'm trying to follow what's happening related to gnome-software and the
.appdata.xml files. There is a growing number of mails, but I cannot find
any message that points out what the file
# rpm -qf /usr/share/app-info/xmls/fedora-20.xml.gz
gnome-software-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64
does.
For "Audac
- Original Message -
> Am 06.11.2013 10:56, schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >>> Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the
> >>> various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees
>
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:18AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > The Fedora Workstation effort (not a great name, by the way), is brand
>
> It doesn't have to end up with that name, for the record. That's just a
> working title and indicative of the conversation
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:18AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> > The Fedora Workstation effort (not a great name, by the way), is brand
>>
>> It doesn't have to end up with that name, for the record. That
- Original Message -
> Howdy folks.
>
> Looking forward to getting to work on base design. Regarding the voting
> members I feel we have a great group. Everyone intersted (voting or not)
> should participate in our discussions. My vote will certainly be influenced
> by anyone in the commun
- Original Message -
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
> date -d '2013
Compose started at Wed Nov 6 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
Hello All!
I should have done this months ago - I'm removing myself from the
OpenSER maintainers. The upstream is dead for a very long time, and
everyone who's still using OpenSER must migrate to OpenSIPS (available
in Fedora/EPEL) or Kamailio (n/a in Fedora/EPEL).
Just for your info - I'll conti
Hello All.
I'm no longer using it so I'm going to retire it. Feel free to take it over.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-MySQL:
093ed74c3bd327d4e0d0bc70d1035ac3 DBD-mysql-4.025.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
Hello All!
Feel free to grab if interested. But I advise you to switch to transmission.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> #topic #1193 reboots for all updates -- are we ready for this?
> .fesco 1193
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1193
Didn't this terrible idea die already? Please don't do this.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group
On 11/04/2013 07:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Hi everyone.
A quick update from my side regarding the Base Design WG:
- My proposed committee was approved by FESCO last Wednesday. One
negative vote cam
Hello All!
I'm removing myself from the stratagus maintainers. It has two
co-maintainers but afaik automatic package re-assignment to a new
maintainer never worked. So if you interested then pick it up.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:18AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >> > The Fedora Workstation effort (not a great name, by the way), is brand
> >>
> >> It doesn't have to en
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 14:26:22 thierry bordaz wrote:
>for example log.level=info mean we log
> fatal/warning/debug ?
Yes. Check import logging documentation.
the verbose+log approach may have some performance advantage in webapp, but I
think that's not the case
see
- http://dound.com/201
On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013 12:01 PM, "Stephen Gallagher" mailto:sgall...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/04/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > A quick update from my side regarding the Base D
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:59:00AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> In short: Make the defaults as sane as possible, but still allow the user to
> change them if they disagree with you on what is "sane". The more options,
> the better.
The definition given by Frank Murphy is totally different and do
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:00:16AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the
> > various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees
> > we want to offer? I'll stop short of paraphrasing you.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
>> Another item I'd like to consider for the initial discussion is the
>> release cycle for the base design. My feeling is that base is small
>> enough and simple enough to allow a more frequent release, perha
- Original Message -
> > One request i also already got was if we in the Base WG could take a look
> > at
> > containers/sandboxes for applications as well. Basically so that the
> > technology could be used by any derived product built on top of Base. And
> > as
> > there are currently mul
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:23:01PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So let me step into my handy Tardis and bring back a vignette from the
> Real World after Fedora and other distributions bless upstream app
> distribution as a preferred channel:
Could you give some practical programs which are imp
We have a slight issue with the 3.12 kernel timing in that it is too
late to push it into Fedora 20, but too far away from the Fedora 20
release to just ignore the 3.13 development cycle until we can push
3.12. As a result, we will be tracking 3.12 and stable updates for it in
the rawhide-nodebug r
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:25:29AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But many of those concerns are inherent to the concept of "sandboxed
> applications" or the methods of delivery they'd enable and cannot possibly
> be addressed, ever. The whole concept is fatally flawed.
I'd suggest trying a differ
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:35:59AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I think users will not understand why all the vendor repositories with non-
> free crap are there and the stuff they are actually looking for is not.
Whether or not proprietary is crap or not is offtopic.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
devel
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 14:41 +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:14:22PM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> > I have attached the SRPM of what I have created.
> I just figured, that you are asking questions before actually
> creating review request...
There is a different way to
On 11/06/2013 02:46 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
Another item I'd like to consider for the initial discussion is the
release cycle for the base design. My feeling is that base is small
enough and simple enough to a
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 17:30:48 +0400,
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
I'm removing myself from the stratagus maintainers. It has two
co-maintainers but afaik automatic package re-assignment to a new
maintainer never worked. So if you interested then pick it up.
Is this just a time issue o
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:46:56AM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> > I just figured, that you are asking questions before actually
> > creating review request...
> There is a different way to make an "official" request? (It's a learning
> process ...)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Pro
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:00:33 -0600,
"Justin M. Forbes" wrote:
We have a slight issue with the 3.12 kernel timing in that it is too
late to push it into Fedora 20, but too far away from the Fedora 20
release to just ignore the 3.13 development cycle until we can push
3.12. As a result, we w
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 02:46 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/06/2013 05:43 AM, Jon wrote:
Another item I'd like to consider for the initial discussion is the
release cycle for
Subject says it all, thanks to Jon for making it possible to come on
Friday at that time as well we now have our first official meeting time
and day.
The initial meeting agenda items went out with my previous email, but to
be sure here are recap:
- The main topics for the meeting agenda fro
2013/11/6 Bruno Wolff III :
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 17:30:48 +0400,
> Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>>
>> Hello All!
>> I'm removing myself from the stratagus maintainers. It has two
>> co-maintainers but afaik automatic package re-assignment to a new
>> maintainer never worked. So if you interested t
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 08:41:12 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 17:30:48 +0400,
>Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> >Hello All!
> >I'm removing myself from the stratagus maintainers. It has two
> >co-maintainers but afaik automatic package re-assignment to a new
> >maintainer never wo
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100,
Phil Knirsch wrote:
But i do like the idea of well "Overlap" releases? Where most of the
release would stay stable in a sense of API/ABI and we could still
bring out a newer release.
Since we have a system where multiple kernel types can be installe
# F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2013-11-06
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's time for another round of F20 beta blocker bug review! Please note
the time change to 17:00 UTC due to the recent change in standard time
for
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:38:18AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> Please, add also
>
> #topic #1191 Fedora 20 schedule adjustment
> .fesco 1191
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1191
>
Added.
I scheduled this in right after the OpenH264 ticket because it also needs to
be decided on in
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 09:36 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 07:30 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>
> > A media codec should not be a system wide component (I'd go as far as
> > saying it should not be user-session wide, but application bundled).
>
> ???
> Would you so apply the same reasoni
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Hmmm... http://stratagus.com/ lists version 2.2.7 from 2012-08-20,
> but Fedora only ships 2.2.4 from 2007-04-08.
Of course it needs an update. Many other packages are in the same situation.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
> >> So sure, we can have software that will pull things in if the user has
> >> done some manual intervention. We just cant, currently, do that thing
> >> for them.
> >
> > Right, that's exactly what I was saying. I just think this is all the
> > _original poster_ was talking about, not any kind
Am 06.11.2013 16:05, schrieb Adam Jackson:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 09:36 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> On 11/04/2013 07:30 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>>
>>> A media codec should not be a system wide component (I'd go as far as
>>> saying it should not be user-session wide, but application bundled).
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:05:22PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > #topic #1193 reboots for all updates -- are we ready for this?
> > .fesco 1193
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1193
>
> Didn't this terrible idea die
Hi all,
Being as the comaintainer of mldonkey, I'm willing to take it as the
lastest version update is pushed by myself.
However this is an ocaml package and I'm not familiar with ocaml, the
bug 640399 about bundling codes is not easy for me to fix.
If anyone is also interested in this famous so
> > I would actually like to go a little further, and make it easy to enable
> > 'clean' third-party repositories. If we imagine a future where e.g.
> > valve is hosting a repository with their steam client, or say, the
> > chromium web browser is available from the a fedora people page, I would
>
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Christian Schaller wrote:
>
>> > I would actually like to go a little further, and make it easy to enable
>> > 'clean' third-party repositories. If we imagine a future where e.g.
>> > valve is hosting a repository with their steam client, or say, the
>> > chromium
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Haven't read the whole thread yet, but in case it hasn't been said:
>
> "Build a way" would be great. I've said a few times that it'd be nice
> for there to be a cross-distro framework for third-party app
> distribution.
>
> "Promote as
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> #topic #1193 reboots for all updates -- are we ready for this?
>> .fesco 1193
>> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1193
>
> Didn't this terrible idea die already? Pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100, Phil Knirsch
> wrote:
>>
>> But i do like the idea of well "Overlap" releases? Where most of
>> the release would stay stable in a sense of API/ABI and we could
Am 06.11.2013 16:40, schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 16:15 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> It's only a nightmare because we've steadfastly refused to build the
>>> tools to a) track library bundling inside app-bundles b) automate bundle
>>> rebuilds c) force replacement of bundle co
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 16:15 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > It's only a nightmare because we've steadfastly refused to build the
> > tools to a) track library bundling inside app-bundles b) automate bundle
> > rebuilds c) force replacement of bundle contents either by sysadmin
> > action or by poli
Am 06.11.2013 16:43, schrieb drago01:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> #topic #1193 reboots for all updates -- are we ready for this?
>>> .fesco 1193
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1193
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.11.2013 16:43, schrieb drago01:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > >
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >>> #topic #1193 reboots for all updates -- are we ready f
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:16:23AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:05:22PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > #topic #1193 reboots for all updates -- are we ready for this?
> > > .fesco 1193
> > > ht
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:43:18PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >> #topic #1193 reboots for all updates -- are we ready for this?
> >> .fesco 1193
> >> https://fedorahosted.o
Hello All!
I'm going to stop further maintaining all EL branches of the following packages:
* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/peter?acls=owner
(sorry, but I don't know how to pick up only those who have EL5 and
EL6 branches so here is a full list).
Most notable packages are
Am 06.11.2013 16:50, schrieb drago01:
> On Wednesday, November 6, 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 06.11.2013 16:43, schrieb drago01:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >>> #topic
This review enhances the previous fix with the handling of non SELinux
platforms.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47578/0002-Ticket-47578-CI-tests-removal-of-sudo-and-absolute-p.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 16:40, Alberto Ruiz a écrit :
> Think about it for a moment, we are encouraging third party apps to mess
> with our entire system just because we don't have any other channel to
> deliver end user applications or third party extensions (codecs,
> fonts, ...) than the system
Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 16:05, Adam Jackson a écrit :
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 09:36 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> On 11/04/2013 07:30 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>>
>> > A media codec should not be a system wide component (I'd go as far as
>> > saying it should not be user-session wide, but applicati
On 11/06/2013 04:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100, Phil Knirsch
wrote:
But i do like the idea of well "Overlap" releases? Where most of
the release would stay st
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:52:11PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:16:23AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:05:22PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > > #topic #1193
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Christian Schaller
> wrote:
>>
>>> > I would actually like to go a little further, and make it easy to enable
>>> > 'clean' third-party repositories. If we imagine a future where e.g.
>>> > valve is hosting a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 11:09 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 04:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 15:38:10 +0100, Phil Knirs
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/06/2013 11:09 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > On 11/06/2013 04:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 11/06/2013 09:57 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >>> On
Thanks Roberto and Rich for reviewing this.
This second patch takes into account your recommendation to let the
logging mechanism to choose rather that to use 'verbose' flag.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47584/0002-Ticket-47584-CI-tests-add-backup-restore-of-an-insta.patch
--
You may consider replacing the whole function checkInstanceBackupFS
with the simpler:
backup_pattern = os.path.join(backupDir, "backup*.tar.gz")
return glob.glob(backup_pattern)
It should return an empty list in case of unexistent path
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 18:31:40 thierry bordaz wro
On 11/06/2013 04:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 09:36 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 11/04/2013 07:30 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
A media codec should not be a system wide component (I'd go as far as
saying it should not be user-session wide, but application bundled).
???
Woul
Hi Roberto,
Yes absolutely this is a better choice !! thanks for the tips, I
will change the fix
regards
thierry
On 11/06/2013 06:35 PM, Roberto Polli wrote:
You may consider replacing the whole function checkInstanceBackupFS
with the simpler:
backup_pattern = os.path.join(backupDir, "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 12:31 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/06/2013 11:09 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2013 04:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP S
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:23:01PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 23:50 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Le lundi 04 novembre 2013 à 21:02 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> > >
> > > Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> In this situation what we should do is carefully consider the relative
> possibilities of the good, bad and mixed outcomes with as much precision
> as we can, and try to come up with a path forward which makes the
> likelihood of a good outc
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> This highlights a concern, not a "fatal flaw". The flaw IMO is within
> the distribution method.
No, the fatal flaw is that we don't really have an OS one can build
applications on: the ABI is unstable and insufficient. So the choices
are eit
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
563
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
78
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
38
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
563
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
78
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
54
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I'm just having trouble wrapping my head around the intense focus on a
> new app packaging technology when the entire distro is making massive
> changes to how it's produced.
I think the trouble here is that the Linux Apps proposal (which is
bei
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, November 6th) at 4PM EST (9PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Kernel Status Update
2) Aarch64 - Status Update
- Koji Shadow
- fixing build failures
3) Fedora
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
> proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
> principles, but I have included some concrete examples at time
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> I'm just having trouble wrapping my head around the intense focus on a
>> new app packaging technology when the entire distro is making massive
>> changes to how it's produced.
>
> I think
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 13:24 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > In this situation what we should do is carefully consider the relative
> > possibilities of the good, bad and mixed outcomes with as much precision
> > as we can, and try to come up wi
On 6 November 2013 10:41, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> # rpm -qf /usr/share/app-info/xmls/fedora-20.xml.gz
> gnome-software-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64
> does.
It's AppStream metadata.
> For "Audacious" it specifies several details, such as an icon included
> in the gnome-software package and MIME typ
On 6 November 2013 03:20, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> Well, the example on http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/
>> has the .desktop extension, as did the gimp appdata file that I looked
>> at while doing this.
> Indeed, you are right.
> Sorry about that.
It's got a .desktop extension as
Hi
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I'm still slightly out of sync with the fedora.next stuff (REALLY picked
> a bad time to go on vacation), but it does seem to me that a decent
> amount of 'mature reflection' was done on it before it was approved, at
> least.
>
I don
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 19:10 +0100, Michael scherer wrote:
> > > So if that's the problem, then the solution is to demonstrate the value
> > > of packaging and rpm rather than restricting all others alternatives.
> >
> > So to me this is the nub of the debate, and it's both fantastically
> > inte
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 13:24 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > In this situation what we should do is carefully consider the relative
>> > possibilities of the good, bad and mixed outcome
On 5 November 2013 21:25, Jerry James wrote:
> But those screenshots are not the right aspect ratio. What is the
> right thing to do here? Just use this anyway and let the GUIs decide
> how to resize the screenshots?
drago01 already pointed you to the correct link, but a more general
point is t
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 17:08 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 16:05, Adam Jackson a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 09:36 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> >> On 11/04/2013 07:30 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> >>
> >> > A media codec should not be a system wide component (I'd go as f
On 6 November 2013 15:14, Christian Schaller wrote:
> so if they also do the work of putting in an appdata file there...
Note, we can easily ship a google-chrome.appdata.xml file in the
fedora-appstream project. This has a quite a few appdata files for
important applications that are awaiting ups
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 16:33 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Haven't read the whole thread yet, but in case it hasn't been said:
> >
> > "Build a way" would be great. I've said a few times that it'd be nice
> > for there to be a cross-distr
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-11-07 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-11-07 08:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2013-11-07 11:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2013-11-07 1
Hey, folks. So here's a Beta status update: Beta RC4 was *almost* a go,
but we have one blocker in it. I have just filed the request for Beta
RC5, which should resolve that single blocker
( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026466 ).
Please, when RC5 lands, help out with testing if you
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 08:31 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > And
> > the KDE one
> > didn't really worked in the end everyone just calls it (the desktop) "KDE".
>
> I'm aware of that but as I said - it was due to communication/marketing
> mistakes.
Eh, I wouldn't agree with that. I got the re-n
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 08:00 -0600, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> We have a slight issue with the 3.12 kernel timing in that it is too
> late to push it into Fedora 20, but too far away from the Fedora 20
> release to just ignore the 3.13 development cycle until we can push
> 3.12. As a result, we will
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 08:31 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
>> > And
>> > the KDE one
>> > didn't really worked in the end everyone just calls it (the desktop) "KDE".
>>
>> I'm aware of that but as I said - it was due to communication/market
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 08:00 -0600, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
>> We have a slight issue with the 3.12 kernel timing in that it is too
>> late to push it into Fedora 20, but too far away from the Fedora 20
>> release to just ignore the 3.13 deve
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:30:37 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
FWIW the ship has probably sailed now, but I really don't think it'd be
much of a problem to have 3.12 in F20 at release time. It's what I've
been running on my F20 box here for the last several weeks anyway, and
based on my testi
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
