On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do,
but don't
forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
feel
free
* Dan Mashal [10/12/2013 11:29] :
Can we get a my packages button? Or am I blind and not seeing one?
There's a Restrict to owner: form where you can enter your FAS username.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 09:55 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Dan Mashal [10/12/2013 11:29] :
Can we get a my packages button? Or am I blind and not seeing one?
There's a Restrict to owner: form where you can enter your FAS username.
Also works if you just click on your nick on the top
Compose started at Wed Dec 11 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
Hi all,
I wonder if there are some reasonable explanations of package
pacemaker in the repo.
I checked the package and the result returned is:
Fedora: pacemaker-1.1.9-3.fc20 in rawhide.
RHEL: pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6.
The latest version is 1.1.11RC1(1.1.10 Final stable).
Why is the package in
On 6.12.2013 10:56, Jakub Filak wrote:
I'd like to add abrt-cli package to the comps group 'standard'.
Regarding the discussion, there are two main concernes about adding
abrt-cli to Standard comps group:
1) There will be some notifications popping up which can confuse users.
Not true.
- Original Message -
From: Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 12:54:27 PM
Subject: Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'
On
Hi!
I've been using Fedora for about two years now, and I appreciate both
its technical and political choices, among which the policy of following
closely upstream (and especially GNOME -- you know what I mean... :-).
Regarding to my free software activities, I've been involved in GNOME
On 12/11/2013 09:19 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do,
but don't
forget to report how you did it afterward)
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:56:15PM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I've been using Fedora for quite a few years as my main desktop OS,
and I think it's time I contributed back by writing some packages.
(Also, there are packages I want -- I might as well create them.)
Hi Andrew, and welcome to
tflink created this task.
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a project: blockerbugs
TASK DESCRIPTION
Currently, there are two anaconda updates displayed in the blocker tracking
app. One is current, one is a phantom update that no longer exists in bodhi.
The phantom update
On Dec. 10, 2013, 5:58 p.m., Tim Flink wrote:
blockerbugs/models/update.py, line 55
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/diff/1/?file=1607#file1607line55
Why is this sort order change an improvement? If an older update is
pending while a newer update is stable, we'd want to
On Dec. 10, 2013, 5:58 p.m., Tim Flink wrote:
blockerbugs/models/update.py, line 55
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/diff/1/?file=1607#file1607line55
Why is this sort order change an improvement? If an older update is
pending while a newer update is stable, we'd want to
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:42:16 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Hi
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=483733
[root@testserver:~]$ rpm -qa | grep gcc
gcc-c++-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
gcc-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
are these packages are
New release of Copr is available at:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org
It has:
* nicer URL - http://copr.fedoraproject.org/ which is alias for
http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
* extended API. See:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/api/
* faster builds - previously builds for various
Am 11.12.2013 17:46, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:42:16 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Hi
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=483733
[root@testserver:~]$ rpm -qa | grep gcc
gcc-c++-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:42:16PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=483733
[root@testserver:~]$ rpm -qa | grep gcc
gcc-c++-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
gcc-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
are these packages are missing on bodhi?
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-12-12 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-12-12 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2013-12-12 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2013-12-12
Am 11.12.2013 17:50, schrieb Jakub Jelinek:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:42:16PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=483733
[root@testserver:~]$ rpm -qa | grep gcc
gcc-c++-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
libgcc-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
gcc-4.8.2-5.fc19.x86_64
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:56:15PM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I've been using Fedora for quite a few years as my main desktop OS,
and I think it's time I contributed back by writing some packages.
(Also, there
On 12/11/2013 06:09 PM, James Antill wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-12-12 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Due to other obligations, I'll likely not be able to attend.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
Last night someone asked me about a package that they were working on that
had a pem file in it. Looking closer, it seems that the pem file is
a cacert bundle. Looking around, there's not currently documentation on
what to do with these. I did find some information on the wiki, though:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2013 12:59 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Should we allow packages to ship automatically trusted certificates?
We need to be cognizant of the potential risk inherent in allowing
packagers to drop new trusted CA certificates onto the
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm by no means an expert in this area but my impression is that the
PackagingDraft is made obsolete by the Shared System Certificates Feature.
Shared system certificates are unrelated to application-specific
certificates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2013 01:07 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Toshio Kuratomi
a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm by no means an expert in this area but my impression is that
the PackagingDraft is made obsolete by the Shared System
Dne 11.12.2013 18:09, James Antill napsal(a):
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics
Hi,
I have read in RHEL 7 beta release notes that ecryptfs will be deprecated
in this release. The problem is that I've got a system on Fedora19 (which I
want to move to EL7 after release) with some encrypted data. I'm looking
for realiable alternative to ecryptfs that will work on EL7 out of box
2013/12/11 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have read in RHEL 7 beta release notes that ecryptfs will be deprecated in
this release. The problem is that I've got a system on Fedora19 (which I
want to move to EL7 after release) with some encrypted data. I'm looking for
realiable
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-12-11)
===
Meeting started by mattdm at 18:00:46 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-12-11/fesco.2013-12-11-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Hi,
2013/12/11 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com
2013/12/11 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have read in RHEL 7 beta release notes that ecryptfs will be
deprecated in
this release. The problem is that I've got a system on Fedora19 (which I
want to move to EL7 after
Brendan Jones wrote:
What is the best way to handle this case:
qWarning(QObject::tr(Client name '%1' occupied.).arg(name).toUtf8());
something like, or can I make it simpler:
qWarning(%s,qPrintable(QObject::tr(Client name '%1'
occupied.).arg(name).toUtf8()));
Use one of:
qWarning()
Can be also extended for Mono snk key file stored in /etc/pki.
We should also let packagers to use the system shipped key file instead of
using the bundled anymore.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Sorry I didn't do more of these, but mostly, the people who've had work
to do have known about it, and we've just been trying to get it all
done...
We have an RC1 compose running at the moment. Go/No-Go is tomorrow
(12-12), and RC1 is substantially different from TC5, so we really need
to run
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Sorry I didn't do more of these, but mostly, the people who've had work
to do have known about it, and we've just been trying to get it all
done...
We have an RC1 compose running at the moment. Go/No-Go is tomorrow
(12-12), and RC1
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
The idea behind is:
you have some application with an issue/error. You'll do rpm -qf
filename and will get a package name, not necessarily the source
package name.
When filing a bug against a package, you'll need to know the source
On 11/12/13 06:36, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder if there are some reasonable explanations of package
pacemaker in the repo.
I checked the package and the result returned is:
Fedora: pacemaker-1.1.9-3.fc20 in rawhide.
RHEL: pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6.
The latest version is
NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:15 . Please see the
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
598
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
113
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
55
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040195
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-PlanePath:
4fda4d575dd7288511a48d2957135ce0 Math-PlanePath-112.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 674cd2bc806d8a4928d7aed2872469d69b3adcdf
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Wed Dec 11 11:12:29 2013 +0100
New version 112 (#1039713)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Math-PlanePath.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default:
346c127faf7b74bc4cfc29fa3e8e6f8d ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 36884546ba1711bf567b8e69c7994c65d1923c92
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Wed Dec 11 11:27:13 2013 +0100
New upstream release 1.05 (#1039710)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default.spec | 14 +++---
sources
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
Summary of changes:
3688454... New upstream release 1.05 (#1039710) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039713
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039710
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.05-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.05-1.fc20
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040414
Bug ID: 1040414
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.017 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040416
Bug ID: 1040416
Summary: perl-Gtk2-1.249 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Gtk2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-pmtools:
1a83a0209f3fde110f65647a9741c442 pmtools-1.54.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 75727465c57368c90293ea9d128f3cd36035c10a
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Wed Dec 11 14:57:46 2013 +
Update to 1.54.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-pmtools.spec | 12 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4
commit 086b402456cf375378a3a2d2dcef08c42bf0
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Wed Dec 11 15:25:37 2013 +
The test suite also needs the less command in the build root.
perl-pmtools.spec | 14 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
Summary of changes:
7f9ed28... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
0b77434... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
2e0ad0a... Update to version 1.30. (*)
7572746... Update to 1.54. (*)
086b402... The test suite also needs the less command in the build roo (*)
(*) This
Summary of changes:
2e0ad0a... Update to version 1.30. (*)
7572746... Update to 1.54. (*)
086b402... The test suite also needs the less command in the build roo (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
0a5c0ed... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass (*)
7f9ed28... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
0b77434... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
2e0ad0a... Update to version 1.30. (*)
7572746... Update to 1.54. (*)
086b402...
commit fd5371f8dd298a3354b219c02b45f1eac5f2269f
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Wed Dec 11 15:47:20 2013 +
Update to version 1.54.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-pmtools.spec | 63 +++---
pmtools-1.01-pman2pmman.patch | 189
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032571
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037520
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.42-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037520
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.42-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47627
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47627/0001-Ticket-47627-changelog-iteration-should-ignore-clean.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
autogen.sh still needs to be run for this patch...
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47601
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47601/0001-Ticket-47601-Plugin-library-path-validation-prevents.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47617
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47617/0001-Ticket-47617-allow-configuring-changelog-trim-interv.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12/11/2013 7:08 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47606
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47606/0001-Ticket-47606-replica-init-bulk-import-errors-should-.patch
Looks good to me. Pitty about the struct definition accessibility --
presumably that's
On 12/12/2013 01:18 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Well yeah, my point is that there is no upstream-acceptable way other than
checking the file hashes by ensurepip, is there? If I wouldn't want to check
file hashes, I'd have to query RPM for release - or is there some other way
you're thinking
#446: [rpmguard] preun/postun scripts change
--+--
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone: Rpmguard
Component: tests| Keywords:
Blocked By: |
mkrizek closed this task as Resolved.
mkrizek added a comment.
Fixed in develop [[
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=0618ae3bc89431f9d00a3cc103b19fc0376697ed
| 0618ae3bc89431f9d00a3cc103b19fc0376697ed ]]
TASK DETAIL
On Dec. 10, 2013, 5:58 p.m., Tim Flink wrote:
blockerbugs/__init__.py, line 162
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/diff/1/?file=1605#file1605line162
Bah, have we really been running this whole time with unclosed span
tags on the update status labels?
Yes :)
On Dec.
On Dec. 10, 2013, 5:58 p.m., Tim Flink wrote:
blockerbugs/models/update.py, line 55
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/diff/1/?file=1607#file1607line55
Why is this sort order change an improvement? If an older update is
pending while a newer update is stable, we'd want to
tflink closed this task as Invalid.
tflink claimed this task.
tflink added a comment.
This is a duplicate of T21 - closing.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T27
To: tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a comment.
T27 was filed as a duplicate
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T21
To: mkrizek, tflink
Cc: qa-devel, mkrizek, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20.
Thursday, December 12, 2013 17:00 UTC (12 PM EST, 9 AM PST, 18:00 CET)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if
72 matches
Mail list logo
