- Original Message -
From: Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 10:43:16 PM
Subject: Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be
listed in software center
On 02/14/2014 01:41 PM,
On 17 February 2014 08:45, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
That said we should list the Developer Assistant in the Software center (or
even have it installed by default)
and that should be the tool IMHO to install these and other developer tools.
It's already in the software
are such changes allowed within a stable release?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit :
are such changes allowed within a stable release?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563
As lot of package are using a bad virtual provides / requires with a
double dash in EVR, and as a
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit :
are such changes allowed within a stable release?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563
As lot of package
Am 17.02.2014 11:37, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit :
are such changes allowed within a stable release?
On 02/17/2014 11:37 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit :
are such changes allowed within a stable release?
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
I don't think this calls for a mass rebuild or any kind of a rebuild
actually, nor should it be rawhide only. AFAIU this doesn't affect
runtime at all, only build time, and affected packages can be just
fixed at the same time if
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by
subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64
rubygem(minitest) is needed by
subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64
On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by
subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64
rubygem(minitest) is needed by
On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by
subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64
rubygem(minitest) is needed by
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:08:53 +0100, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by
subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64
Am 17.02.2014 12:10, schrieb Paul Howarth:
On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by
subversion-1.8.5-2.fc20.20140217.rh.x86_64
On 17/02/14 11:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2014 12:10, schrieb Paul Howarth:
On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058220
Cheers,
what happened below is typing rpmü followed by a backspace
interesting is that it results in a error message and in
the history you have to press backspace again to get rid
of a invisible char
INTERESTING:
* normally the machine is german
* this happens only after LANG=C
On 02/17/2014 12:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what happened below is typing rpmü followed by a backspace
interesting is that it results in a error message and in
the history you have to press backspace again to get rid
of a invisible char
INTERESTING:
* normally the machine is german
* this
On 02/17/2014 12:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2014 12:10, schrieb Paul Howarth:
On 17/02/14 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062968
--- Comment #12 from Miroslav Grepl mgr...@redhat.com ---
This works on F20 because of
initrc_t - unconfined_t
transition which has been removed in F20.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Many of you use regular expressions. Many of the expression are more
than regular. They can be called Perl-Compatible Regular Expressions
(PCRE). Those who need to support PCRE in their code use usually the
well-known PCRE library http://www.pcre.org/.
PCRE library maintainers decided to design
Jan,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stu Tomlinson s...@nosnilmot.com wrote:
Jan,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu
Hi,
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259
Regards,
Hans
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2014 01:57 PM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
Jan,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to
Summary of changes:
6349ee2... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
a33e831... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
55d78df... Update to 0.61 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On 17 February 2014 08:45, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
Well with GCC we are assuming people will read docs and figure out the command
line parameters needed to use gcc. So expecting people to read the docs on how
to use yum or 'yum search' is not expecting to much in my
commit d7fd0c9ad397bb4cd13e5e36d9be41b64c18bf0e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 14:50:17 2014 +0100
Declare run-time dependency on File::Find
perl-Test-Pod.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod.spec
commit 9680f0175314fe48ee9528586641d387f595d04f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 17 13:50:55 2014 +
Bootstrap of EPEL-7 done
perl-Log-Any.spec |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Log-Any.spec b/perl-Log-Any.spec
On 02/12/2014 04:58 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Yesterday we spoke at Env and Stacks WG about Fedora additional
repository. I was wondering what might other products need to put there.
Will be the content experimental? Would it be the content just
developing (not good for main Fedora
- Original Message -
Hi,
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259
It's not, and it's probably just an oversight. Feel free to cherry-pick the
updates
from F20 into master.
Cheers
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:17:18AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259
It's not, and it's probably just an oversight. Feel free to cherry-pick the
updates
from F20 into master.
If it's not, the
The lightweight tag 'perl-Log-Any-0.15-3.fc21' was created pointing to:
9680f01... Bootstrap of EPEL-7 done
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Log-Any-0.15-2.el7' was created pointing to:
c19badf... Bootstrap EPEL-7 build
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 02/17/2014 02:58 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
On 02/12/2014 04:58 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Yesterday we spoke at Env and Stacks WG about Fedora additional
repository. I was wondering what might other products need to put there.
Will be the content experimental? Would it be the content just
On Sex, 2014-02-14 at 09:18 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 19:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 12:56 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
With a companion libraries. ;)
↗ libmbim-1.6.0
↗ libqmi-1.8.0
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
57 packages were orphaned
-
ghc-arrows [devel,f19] was orphaned by shakthimaan
Classes that extend the Arrow class
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ghc-arrows
WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
# additional repository
fedora-{incubator,ugly}
* prepare proposal for additional repository based on discussion from
mailing list
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2014-February/000173.html
Summary of changes:
f7f557f... Fixed a few packages to properly provide virtual Perl packa (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:11:54PM +0100, Martin Briza wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:08:53 +0100, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(ExtUtils::Embed) is needed
On 17 February 2014 15:45, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
rhughes just bumped it to 3.11.0, so this is fixed now, I'll go
and close the bug.
Actually, mclazy picked it up automatically, I can't claim credit :)
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 17.02.2014 17:42, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:11:54PM +0100, Martin Briza wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:08:53 +0100, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
[builduser@buildserver64:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bb subversion.spec
error: Failed build
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:56:14AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
I don't think this calls for a mass rebuild or any kind of a rebuild
actually, nor should it be rawhide only. AFAIU this doesn't affect
runtime at all, only build time,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/02/2014 18:02, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
I think this depends on what rpm and yum are currently doing with
the dependencies. As Panu says here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563#c1 if - is
used in version or release then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820663
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Finance-Quote-1.20-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Finance-Quote-1.20-1.el6
--
You are
Hi all,
What would be a good (as in, relatively painless) video card for driving
as many 1080p monitors as possible? I'm not concerned about 3D
performance at all... It will be to display terminals/rarely-changing
web pages only.
I know Matrox sort of specializes in multi-monitor setups,
Sorry, I meant to post this to the general user's list.
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 14:43 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm using a minimal netinstall version of fedora20 for testing using
KVM. We very often cycle these machines (once per test, we run hundreds
of tests)
Regularly, we get tests failing because the VM does not boot within 60
seconds, and
Compose started at Mon Feb 17 08:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC)
1:NetworkManager-openvpn-gnome-0.9.8.2-4.el7.x86_64 requires
NetworkManager-gnome
ocaml-findlib does not appear to be available on rhel7/ppc64, although I
see it on x86_64:
ocaml-findlib.x86_64
1.3.3-4.el7
rhel-7-public-beta-rpms
So, I think we need to build it in epel7 if we want to support ppc64,
right?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 05:48:24PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
(Optional channel). So I shouldn't be needed in EPEL 7, and indeed
hmm ... s/I/it/
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to
On 02/17/2014 10:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:42:04AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
ocaml-findlib does not appear to be available on rhel7/ppc64, although I
see it on x86_64:
ocaml-findlib.x86_64
1.3.3-4.el7
rhel-7-public-beta-rpms
So, I think we
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:53:05AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Well, it isn't in
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ppc64/os/Packages/ so it does
appear to be on RedHat's side. Other ocaml packages are there though.
There should be enough ocaml packages that you can at least rebuild
On 02/17/2014 11:03 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:53:05AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Well, it isn't in
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ppc64/os/Packages/ so it does
appear to be on RedHat's side. Other ocaml packages are there though.
There should be
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:17:32AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 02/17/2014 11:03 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:53:05AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Well, it isn't in
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ppc64/os/Packages/ so it does
appear to be on
commit 07c1a82b541e40cd02acd8f9e1872babc3c75548
Author: Juan Orti Alcaine j.orti.alca...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 09:21:16 2014 +0100
Move clamd socket to /var/run/clamd.amavisd/clamd.sock
Move clamd socket and allow freshclam to notify the running daemon
amavis-clamd.conf
perl-Unicode-LineBreak has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2013.11-1.el7.x86_64 requires
perl(Unicode::LineBreak::Constants)
On ppc64:
perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2013.11-1.el7.ppc64 requires
perl(Unicode::LineBreak::Constants)
Please
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.x86_64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.5-4.el7.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
dspam has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On ppc64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.ppc64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
stompclt has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
stompclt-1.1-1.el7.noarch requires perl(Net::STOMP::Client) = 0:2.0
On ppc64:
stompclt-1.1-1.el7.noarch requires perl(Net::STOMP::Client) = 0:2.0
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Env-Sanctify:
d84cbd3edb45584d074684e4d8114e64 Env-Sanctify-1.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3879a5c0f9640ca0c6fdbb1aaac91b199eb2b4e6
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 17 10:19:58 2014 +
Update to 1.12
- New upstream release 1.12
- Added test for sanctification plus adding an env variable
- Don't run the Pod tests for EL-5/EL-6
Summary of changes:
3879a5c... Update to 1.12 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.12-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
3879a5c... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Env-Sanctify-1.12-1.el7' was created pointing to:
3879a5c... Update to 1.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062968
Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062968
Miroslav Grepl mgr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062968
--- Comment #11 from Miroslav Grepl mgr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Miroslav Grepl from comment #10)
This is really weird issue. Basically it is caused by
ExecStartPre=/bin/sh -c '/usr/bin/vncserver -kill %i /dev/null 21 || :'
which
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for ctstream:
ee75490936cf8a559ba649cf54fee50c ctstream-15
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f6f39a1e95928d6528909946e53d739decc737a7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 12:40:15 2014 +0100
Version 15 bump
.gitignore|1 +
ctstream.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 3968c07ec1940427fde7c332e5d94da409a01869
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 12:40:15 2014 +0100
Version 15 bump
.gitignore|1 +
ctstream.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
f6f39a1... Version 15 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065277
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065277
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ctstream-15-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ctstream-15-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065277
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ctstream-15-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ctstream-15-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
commit dd48560cbf9e288abb8fdc76c987b489d93b79f3
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 17 13:12:21 2014 +
This is an EPEL limited-arch support package
Prefix release with 0. for EPEL-7 limited-arch support package
(package is in RHEL-7 but not for ppc64)
commit 40ff1ff7a1dcd2c16cf36fc13492aad08c282823
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 17 13:07:28 2014 +
Sync with EL-7 package for ppc64 support
perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5.spec | 58 ++---
sources |2 +-
2 files
Summary of changes:
e7f0c6b... Update to 2.061 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-0.16.el7' was created pointing to:
dd48560... This is an EPEL limited-arch support package
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
43a7f44... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
e7ed75a... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
8c69ea4... Update to 0.15 (*)
c19badf... Bootstrap EPEL-7 build (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Multiplex-1.13-6.el7' was created pointing to:
e249df9... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-IPC-Shareable-0.61-1.el7' was created pointing to:
55d78df... Update to 0.61
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066021
Bug ID: 1066021
Summary: Fix package specifications in qpid_proton.pm and
ExceptionHandling.pm
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-qpid_proton
Hi,
I need perl-Guard in EPEL-7 as a dependency of perl-Log-Any-Adapter.
Would one of you please branch and build it? I'm happy to do it myself
if you're busy. I'm also happy to take the package myself if you're not
interested in EPEL-7. Please let me know anyway.
The Rawhide package builds
Feel free to request the branch
I'm notre interested un perl module anymore. So feel free to request acl on
the Fedora package also.
Thx for asking
Nicolas (kwizart)
Le 17 févr. 2014 15:17, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org a écrit :
Hi,
I need perl-Guard in EPEL-7 as a dependency of
commit f7f557fc09d4aaa6ae580f533b4109bc9f9708ee
Author: Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 09:30:46 2014 -0500
Fixed a few packages to properly provide virtual Perl packages.
- Removed the Provides that are now fixed.
- Resolves: BZ#1066021
commit 3ce7a62632cba470ac4608b843a926f921de2d55
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 16:05:12 2014 +0100
Correct changelog
perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec
commit 3eef745f52a19cfd0f0445855ee76d4db929d318
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 16:03:34 2014 +0100
Modernize spec file
perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec | 43 +++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
f7f557f... Fixed a few packages to properly provide virtual Perl packa (*)
87440c3... Merge branch 'master' into f20
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
commit 87440c36687ca9adbcb19418a81ad9d85b9a34e9
Merge: 9ac958d f7f557f
Author: Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 10:15:09 2014 -0500
Merge branch 'master' into f20
...Updated-Perl-modules-to-provide-missing-p.patch | 52
perl-qpid_proton.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066021
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-qpid_proton-0.6-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this
Summary of changes:
f7f557f... Fixed a few packages to properly provide virtual Perl packa (*)
87440c3... Merge branch 'master' into f20 (*)
91ae5ef... Merge branch 'f20' into f19
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 91ae5ef41975c62e2b465f6c3ce0c4cd3bba3309
Merge: ca5acb9 87440c3
Author: Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 10:30:19 2014 -0500
Merge branch 'f20' into f19
...Updated-Perl-modules-to-provide-missing-p.patch | 52
perl-qpid_proton.spec
commit dc1b4673e1539302c0583803f93cd78897b719f8
Author: Andrea Veri a...@gnome.org
Date: Mon Feb 17 16:35:02 2014 +0100
Add a Build Dependency on perl(Time::HiRes) to prevent the package to FTBFS.
perl-FCGI-Client.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066021
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-qpid_proton-0.6-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this
commit cc7793902eff72c65e9ff9f7bf1627a6752645fa
Author: Andrea Veri a...@gnome.org
Date: Mon Feb 17 16:40:31 2014 +0100
Drop the circular build dependency through the perl_bootstrap flag. We will
build perl-Plack as soon as the other B-Ds will be satisfied
perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI.spec |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060360
--- Comment #1 from Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca ---
Sorry to bother but this is the last package in my dependency chain. Did you
not want to maintain this in epel7 or perhaps the bug got lost in a bunch of
others?
--
You are receiving
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
