Hi,
Imagination/MIPS is hiring Fedora engineers. Please see:
http://www.imgtec.com/corporate/vacancy_detail.asp?VacancyID=2286
for details, and feel free to pm me if you have any questions.
All applications have to go via the website.
The role presently says location 'Leeds,UK', but should say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2014 07:31 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote:
where are you planning to host the final stable listing or blog
beyond this mailing list? if it in a dev minded or dev friendly
arena jsut make a quick 2-3 lines in a FAQ like page with futher
reading
= Proposed Self Contained Change: KDE Frameworks 5 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KDE_Frameworks_5
Change owner(s): Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com
KDE Frameworks 5 is a set of libraries and technologies developed in the KDE
project over the past 18 years. Most of the frameworks
On 1 April 2014 21:11, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-04-01/
This is the third installment of this series, and I'm still calibrating
a few things. I'm aiming at a wide audience, but I'm not quite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2014 03:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-04-01/
5tFTW note --
This is the third installment of this series, and I'm still
calibrating a few things.
I will build ntl 6.1.0 for Rawhide today. This involves an soname
bump, so I will also rebuild dependent packages, namely:
- eclib
- flint
- latte-integrale
- linbox
- Macaulay2
- polybori
- sagemath
- Singular
I have already been in contact with maintainers of these packages
about the rebuilds.
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 11:48 +0100, Graham Whaley wrote:
Imagination/MIPS is hiring Fedora engineers. Please see:
http://www.imgtec.com/corporate/vacancy_detail.asp?VacancyID=2286
for details, and feel free to pm me if you have any questions.
All applications have to go via the website.
I
= Proposed System Wide Change: GHC 7.8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_7.8
Change owner(s): Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com, Ricky Elrod
rel...@redhat.com, Haskell_SIG hask...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Update the GHC Haskell compiler to the major new 7.8 release, and
Graham,
I've been interested to revive the fedora-mips project myself, mostly
to get Fedora usable on my home firewall/router.
Very excited to see Imagination get involved!
Do you have any recommendations for cheap MIPS dev boards? [1]
I've been eyeing the Ubiquity board.
[1]
Hi Jon.
The Ubiquiti boards are some of the cheapest bang-per-buck right now,
but don't really have local storage (there is some NAND, and they do
have USB) - so network boot and NFS to start with (or the hassle of
USB dongle for development). They released some new ones a week or two
back I
[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
All the info has been sitting here @
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
since March 20th.
Did I mess something up? Or is there just a backlog?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please join us today (Wednesday, April 2nd) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Fedora.Next
2) Fedora ARM Remixes
3) Deployment Tool to Customize Disk Images
4) Open Floor
If there is
On 04/02/2014 04:12 PM, quickbooks office wrote:
[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
All the info has been sitting here @
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
since March 20th.
Did I mess something up? Or is there just a backlog?
I
Hello,
I'm working on getting a package (mandos) included in Fedora/EPEL.
Currently its heavily focused on debian based distros so I'm not ready
for a review. However I have it working in a few situations but have
some issues in others. I'm hoping someone here may be able to shed light
on what
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on getting a package (mandos) included in Fedora/EPEL.
Currently its heavily focused on debian based distros so I'm not ready
for a review. However I have it working in a few situations but have
some issues
- Original Message -
[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
All the info has been sitting here @
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
since March 20th.
Did I mess something up? Or is there just a backlog?
Backlog. But for
= Proposed System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/lbzip2
Change owner(s): Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
This change aims at making lbzip2 [1] default bzip2 implementation used in
Fedora.
== Detailed Description ==
lbzip2 is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:19:13PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/02/2014 05:15 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
#topic #1244 F21 System Wide Change: cron to systemd time units -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cron-to-systemd-time-units
Why is this being added to the meeting
On 04/02/2014 05:27 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
And there are only two votes in the ticket.
I thought everybody just wanted FPC to deal with this and were waiting
until they did like me hence the ticket I created and it wont be dealt
with until first time tomorrow as in their next meeting.
Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com said:
- Original Message -
[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
All the info has been sitting here @
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
since March 20th.
Did I
Am 02.04.2014 19:29, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com said:
- Original Message -
[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
All the info has been sitting here @
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, have you tried the 'obvious' - building the newer gnutls on CentOS
6 (or the older on Fedora 20) and building mandos against that, to see
if the issue is in gnutls or somewhere else in the 'base system'? That'd
narrow it down at
= Proposed System Wide Change: RPM-4.12 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
Change owner(s): Florian Festi, Panu Matilainen rpm-ma...@rpm.org
Update RPM to the upcoming 4.12 release.
== Detailed Description ==
The current upstream repository contains several improvements that
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/lbzip2
Change owner(s): Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
This change aims at making lbzip2 [1] default bzip2 implementation used
On 02/04/14 18:24, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
== Detailed Description ==
lbzip2 is an independent implementation of bzip2 compression tool. It provides
interface strictly compatible with bzip2, but also adds several new features
and improvements, such as:
* multi-threaded operation for both
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 09:12 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
All the info has been sitting here @
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
since March 20th.
Did I mess something up? Or is there just a
On 04/02/2014 08:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/lbzip2
Change owner(s): Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
This change aims at making
On 04/02/2014 08:10 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 02/04/14 18:24, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
== Detailed Description ==
lbzip2 is an independent implementation of bzip2 compression tool. It
provides
interface strictly compatible with bzip2, but also adds several new
features
and improvements, such
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
710
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
57
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
52
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
710
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
165
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
45
= Proposed Self Contained Change: MATE Desktop 1.8 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MATE_1.8
Change owner(s): Dan Mashal dan.mas...@fedoraproject.org, Wolfgang Ulbrich
chat-to...@raveit.de
Update MATE Desktop to version 1.8
== Detailed Description ==
Release 1.8
* New features
-
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 11:53 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, have you tried the 'obvious' - building the newer gnutls on CentOS
6 (or the older on Fedora 20) and building mandos against that, to see
if the issue is in gnutls
Am 02.04.2014 20:18, schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski:
lbzip2 is a mature project and it has been used in production for years. It
is
already packaged for Fedora and it is also available in EPEL.
A quick check shows lbzip2 doesn't provide a library interface, much less
one compatible with
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: NFS Ganesha File Server =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NFSGanesha
Change owner(s): Jim Lieb l...@sea-troll.net
NFS Ganesha is a user mode file server that supports NFSv3, NFSv4, and
NFSv4.1
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:42:57 +0100
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: NFS Ganesha File Server =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NFSGanesha
Change owner(s): Jim Lieb l...@sea-troll.net
NFS Ganesha is a user mode file server that supports
On 02/04/14 19:22, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
lbzip2 creates only *one* stream per compressed file, even when using
multiple threads. Such files can be decompressed with all versions of
bzip2, libbz2 and other tools, such as Apache Commons Compress.
This is a difference between lbzip2 and
On 04/02/2014 11:33 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
packages using the library (output of yum remove
bzip2-libs-1.0.6-9.fc20.x86_64)
Try: repoquery --whatrequires 'libbz2.so.1()(64bit)'
We'll certainly need to keep the library around.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/02/2014 11:33 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
packages using the library (output of yum remove
bzip2-libs-1.0.6-9.fc20.x86_64)
Try: repoquery --whatrequires 'libbz2.so.1()(64bit)'
We'll certainly need to keep the library around.
Yes, but we can have /usr/bin/bzip2 (and other commands)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
#fedora-meeting Meeting
===
Meeting started by dgilmore at 18:01:02 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-04-02/fesco.2014-04-02-18.01.log.html
.
I've been a software developer for 30 years and at Red Hat for 14 years. I've
done a lot of kernel development and other software development, and currently
work in kernel support.
I've written python bindings and classes for the hwloc (Portable Hardware
Locality) library, and I have submitted a
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-04-3 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
NOTE: UTC is now 1 hour _later_ than last week, due to DST changes.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-04-03 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:10:23PM -0400, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 04/02/2014 11:33 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
packages using the library (output of yum remove
bzip2-libs-1.0.6-9.fc20.x86_64)
Try: repoquery --whatrequires 'libbz2.so.1()(64bit)'
We'll certainly need to keep the
** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
bzip2.
Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2 Provide bzip2
or something so that updating all those packages is not necessary,
and also that people who prefer normal bzip2 can still use it?
Zbyszek
--
Thanks to everyone who made it, due to low attendance we've decided to
postpone the meeting.
Paul
- Original Message -
Please join us today (Wednesday, April 2nd) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
bzip2.
Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2 Provide bzip2
or something so that updating all those packages is not
On 2 April 2014 21:46, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
bzip2.
Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2 Provide
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, 4:27:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
bzip2.
Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2 Provide bzip2
or something so that updating all those packages is not
** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
bzip2.
Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2 Provide bzip2
or something so that updating all those packages is not necessary,
and also that people who prefer normal bzip2 can still use it?
You
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 04:20:16PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
(too big to fail vote?)
#topic #391 Exception for bundled libraries in icecat
.fpc 391
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/391
Yep, there's four separate new exception criteria posted on:
On 2 April 2014 21:46, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead
of
bzip2.
Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:14:53PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
This implementation has been built and extensively tested using the
current release of the real bzip2 library. Substituting a completely
different library implementation without going through extensive and
explicit validating
Hello Al,
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, 5:14:53 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, 4:27:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
bzip2.
Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2 Provide
This implementation has been built and extensively tested using the
current release of the real bzip2 library. Substituting a completely
different library implementation without going through extensive and
explicit validating and testing is risky and unreasonable. At best, it
would
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com said:
lbzip2 does not (at least not yet) provide interfaces of libbz2 library,
only command line tools. This Change does *not* affect users of libbz2.
Is there enough
Once upon a time, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com said:
lbzip2 does not (at least not yet) provide interfaces of libbz2 library,
only command line tools. This Change does *not* affect users of libbz2.
Is there enough of a gain to the system to only partially replace a core
program like
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com said:
lbzip2 does not (at least not yet) provide interfaces of libbz2 library,
only command line tools. This Change does *not* affect users of libbz2.
Is there
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, 2:03:38 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/lbzip2
Change owner(s): Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
This
This clarification is significant. The change proposal text needs to
be updated to reflect this.
I will add a clarification tomorrow.
As long as the encoding is guaranteed to be byte-for-byte identical to
that produced by the original bzip2 (and libbz2) implementation, the
risks are
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:12:50PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
How does someone express strong disagreement to this change ?
Posting here is a good start. You can also add a note in the FESCo ticket
for approval once one is filed, and if you are incredibly passionate you can
come to the FESCo
On 2 April 2014 17:15, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:12:50PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
How does someone express strong disagreement to this change ?
Posting here is a good start. You can also add a note in the FESCo ticket
for approval once one is
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
* Open Questions - Playground: Signing (mmaslano, 12:04:12)
I saw that this got voted on in the meeting even though it didn't get
recorded as such for the meeting minutes. The proposal seemed to be:
use obs-sign to
Once upon a time, drago01 drag...@gmail.com said:
Well the change says multi-threaded operation for both compression
and decompression, with almost linear scalability linear scalability
means speed ups on the range of 2-8x on current desktop / laptop
systems.
Which I'd call a significant
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:47:11PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
I think the right way to move forward is to make a library that is at
least API-compatible with the current libbz2.so.1, make all the tools
use it, and just replace bzip2 with lbzip2.
Although I'm still on the fence about whether
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:26:59PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:47:11PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
I think the right way to move forward is to make a library that is at
least API-compatible with the current libbz2.so.1, make all the tools
use it, and just
My plan is to retire these two xorg input drivers in rawhide in a week or
two. They are superseded by the evdev driver which is the default driver for
input devices in Linux. Both drivers are still maintained upstream to get
them to work you have to use custom xorg.conf files that disable other
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:48:03AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:26:59PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:47:11PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
I think the right way to move forward is to make a library that is at
least
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.netwrote:
My plan is to retire these two xorg input drivers in rawhide in a week or
two. They are superseded by the evdev driver which is the default driver
for
input devices in Linux.
Speak up now, or forever hold yada
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Just wanted to mention this in case other fedora users have optimus laptops
they use with the nvidia drivers? bumblebee is a solution that has been
invented for hybrid graphics laptops with intel and Nvidia GPUs. It runs
Hi,
Just a heads up that ghc-7.6.3 (Haskell compiler) from F20 was built
for EPEL 7 Beta last week. Lot of building of Haskell packages still
to be done there.
Current EPEL versions are:
EPEL5: ghc-7.0.4 (recently updated)
EPEL6: ghc-7.0.4 (updated in 2012; update to 7.4.2 planned)
EPEL7:
hi guys,
can we get cloud-init in epel7beta bumped to match epel6 @ 0.7.4 ?
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
epel-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914310
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083392
Bug ID: 1083392
Summary: perl-HTTP-Request-Params FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-HTTP-Request-Params
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083396
Bug ID: 1083396
Summary: perl-Padre-0.90-10.fc21 FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Padre
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083392
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit ff829d867c314bafe84a862a4cdda1b26776a00f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Apr 2 09:35:09 2014 +0200
Correct Email::MIME usage
HTTP-Request-Params-1.01-RT86635.patch | 28
perl-HTTP-Request-Params.spec |9 -
2 files
Summary of changes:
ff829d8... Correct Email::MIME usage (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083392
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-HTTP-Request-Params-1.01-16.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Request-Params-1.01-16.fc20
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083392
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083418
Bug ID: 1083418
Summary: perl-Log-Dispatch-2.41-1.fc21 FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Log-Dispatch
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083418
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
It's because emitting TAP messages after undefining Log::Dispatch object. E.g.
here:
# Log::Dispatch::Email::MIMELite
SKIP:
{
skip Cannot do MIMELite tests, 1
unless
commit 95708e6741936c545097d69fd1148b4fac5b5e2b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Apr 2 10:51:56 2014 +0200
Remove more debuginfo remnants before running tests
perl-CPAN-Checksums.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
95708e6... Remove more debuginfo remnants before running tests (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077585
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
1452f0c298b2278f7a0a95550c0228ce IO-Socket-SSL-1.974.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061003
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
commit 6156255fa49651d58f920abe139eee3b2831d9bb
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Apr 2 10:09:58 2014 +0100
Update to 1.974
- New upstream release 1.974
- New function peer_certificates to get the whole certificate chain; needs
Net::SSLeay ≥ 1.58
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.974-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
6156255... Update to 1.974
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077585
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Class-MethodMaker-2.21
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Glib-Object-Introspection:
e3e5d150658b11f8313bc97a4986a0bf Glib-Object-Introspection-0.022.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040414
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 90c77730df09b6078cc25c2e20674a73c6923477
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Apr 2 12:38:51 2014 +0200
0.022 bump
.rpmlint|2 ++
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection.spec | 26 +++---
sources |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
aff1da9c2bda589024c9147c6a3ae33a IO-Socket-SSL-1.975.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 70cd5c8b43aaec192539c9486c96e424459654fe
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Apr 2 12:02:56 2014 +0100
Update to 1.975
- New upstream release 1.975
- BEHAVIOR CHANGE: work around TEA misfeature on OS X built-in openssl,
e.g.
guarantee that only
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.975-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
70cd5c8... Update to 1.975
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040414
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-GnuPG-Interface has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
On i386:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
On armhfp:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
