Hi,
the packages are in Rawhide now. Should move to F20 next week too.
There's the protected_packages plugin now.
Release notes:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf-plugins-core/release_notes.html
Release announcement:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but it's just dangerous to assume that will be forever true
Agreed with this, but:
and as you can see below with gzip you have *always*
different results for the same data
This is not true, see below.
Am 03.07.2014 10:22, schrieb Ales Kozumplik:
the packages are in Rawhide now. Should move to F20 next week too. There's
the protected_packages plugin now.
Release notes:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf-plugins-core/release_notes.html
Hi everyone,
I am having a small issue with the pygrib package that I am maintaining.
The package depends on pyproj, but when I install it with yum it also
pulls in python3-pyproj.
All python3 related things are wrapped in %if 0%{?with_python3}
macros, so this should not happen I think.
Clearly I
On Jul 2, 2014 11:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:55:42PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless
someone
adopts them. If you know
- Original Message -
From: Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 12:07:28 PM
Subject: request for pygrib packaging debug help
Hi everyone,
I am having a small issue with the
- Original Message -
Hi everyone,
I am having a small issue with the pygrib package that I am maintaining.
The package depends on pyproj, but when I install it with yum it also
pulls in python3-pyproj.
All python3 related things are wrapped in %if 0%{?with_python3}
macros, so this
On 07/02/2014 04:15 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there's a standard way of solving package conflicts
that arise from arch specific doc files. An example is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565676
The conflict is because the docs are generated during the
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/02/2014 03:15 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I was wondering if there's a standard way of solving package conflicts
that arise from arch specific doc files. An example is here:
Am 03.07.2014 12:56, schrieb drago01:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/02/2014 03:15 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I was wondering if there's a standard way of solving package conflicts
that arise from arch specific doc files. An example is here:
On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
total 44K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 36K 2014-07-02 22:44 x86_64
Thanks, this actually backs up what I claimed -- that it's uncommon to
build i686
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 12:56 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
2. zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell
(This package is pretty
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Jason Taylor jason.tay...@secure-24.com wrote:
Hi Christopher,
I grabbed the zsh-lovers for a formal review.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/03/2014 12:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
dnf remove python ends in remove dnf and yum too
as weel as dnf remove kernel still offers to remove both
protected_packages.py is missing from the package.
Looks like an upstream bug - it's not referenced in plugins/CMakeLists.txt
Michal
--
devel
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
total 44K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 36K 2014-07-02 22:44 x86_64
Thanks,
Am 03.07.2014 13:20, schrieb Kalev Lember:
On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
total 44K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 36K 2014-07-02 22:44 x86_64
Thanks, this actually backs up what
Am 03.07.2014 13:33, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
total 44K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser
Am 03.07.2014 13:32, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On 07/03/2014 12:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
dnf remove python ends in remove dnf and yum too
as weel as dnf remove kernel still offers to remove both
protected_packages.py is missing from the package.
Looks like an upstream bug - it's not
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.07.2014 13:33, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
total 44K
drwxr-xr-x 2
On 07/03/2014 01:32 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
protected_packages.py is missing from the package.
Looks like an upstream bug - it's not referenced in plugins/CMakeLists.txt
Michal
Thanks for the notice, should be good now:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7103767
Ales
--
Robert, Bohuslav,
Thanks a lot!
I've been staring at this for a long time, but sometimes you just don't
notice your own silly mistakes...
Best regards,
Jos
On 07/03/2014 12:27 PM, Robert Kuska wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com
To: Development
Am 03.07.2014 14:09, schrieb Ales Kozumplik:
On 07/03/2014 01:32 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
protected_packages.py is missing from the package.
Looks like an upstream bug - it's not referenced in plugins/CMakeLists.txt
Michal
Thanks for the notice, should be good now:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 07/02/2014 04:15 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there's a standard way of solving package conflicts
that arise from arch specific doc files. An example is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565676
The conflict is because the docs
I'm looking into providing a predefined firewalld service definition for
kde-connect, per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115547
Looks like it's as easy as dropping an xml snippet into
/usr/lib/firewalld/services/
I'm also noticing currently that the only package besides fallwalld
Hi everybody, I'd like to introduce a new project of Slavek Kabrda and mine:
Copr repository with nightly builds of development version of Python 3.
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/churchyard/python3-nightly/
How does it work?
=
Each night, at 00:01 CET/CEST, dgroc [1] is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2014 01:42 AM, William wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 20:40 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 07/02/2014 06:55 PM, William wrote:
First of all, I'd like to formally propose that each of the
products will have a fedora-release-$PRODUCT (and
* 1) Kernel Status Update (pwhalen, 20:07:46)
* Peter's '3.15 Fedora ARM kernel status' (pwhalen, 20:08:13)
* LINK: http://nullr0ute.com/2014/06/3-15-fedora-arm-kernel-status/
(pwhalen, 20:08:13)
The beaglebone patchset was rebased for this release so please test.
* kernel
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2014 01:42 AM, William wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 20:40 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 07/02/2014 06:55 PM, William wrote:
First of all, I'd like to formally
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
I'll take it.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- https://plus.google.com/+AlexeyFroloff
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
I'll take it.
Thank
Hi Michael,
Detecting soname bumps and doing real rebuilds
instead of scratch build should be possible. Koschei could automatically start
rebuilding dependent packages AFTER you update the library in rawhide.
That's the goal.
But if
you want to know what will break before you do the update
On 07/03/2014 01:45 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
BTW:
how do we handle the protection for systemd which is
in case of YUM provided by the systemd package but
DNF is not mandatory in F21 - so /etc/dnf/protected.d/
is only conditional available
The dnf plugins looks at /etc/yum/protected.d/ too,
is there any way to set the two options below in .rpmmacros
to use multi-threading? the shell-script below works in case
of tar but XZ_OPT env is ignored by rpmbuild and seeking
two hours the internet don't give any answer
in case of tar --threads=0 improves performance dramatically
on a modern
On 03.07.2014 15:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm looking into providing a predefined firewalld service definition for
kde-connect, per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115547
Looks like it's as easy as dropping an xml snippet into
/usr/lib/firewalld/services/
I'm also noticing
A koji rawhide build [1] just failed with:
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.39
Start: chroot ['fedpkg', 'sources']
Start: device setup
Finish: device setup
Finish: chroot ['fedpkg', 'sources']
ERROR: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/var/lib/mock/f21-build-2179813-398918/root/etc/mtab'
Traceback
Hey folks! Just a note that we've put up the validation matrices for July
2014. Thanks to satellit for the reminder, and to roshi for creating the
Install page - I've just added the Base page, and sent out this
reminder.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:14:52PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
In a sense, there's a certain amount of this definition that every
Fedora install will have. The Products then add to this definition. A
basic piece of it is mandatory, but the outer edges are add-ons.
I am not sure this is
On Mon, 23.06.14 16:23, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hello all,
there is currently not so much things to configure in PostgreSQL from
systemd's service point of view (not taking postgresql.conf into account),
concretely, we configure PGPORT and PGDATA, from which the later is
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:26:04 -0700
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
A koji rawhide build [1] just failed with:
...snip...
It might have something to do with yesterday's util-linux update in
rawhide? [2] But /etc/mtab still shows up on that build's filelist in
koji, so I'm
On Thu, 03.07.14 19:11, Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
Please migrate away from .include, please use .d/ drop-ins instead. We
kinda are deprecating .include, only support it for compatibility
instead. ...
Unit files are
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 03:55:51PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Other than the packaging reasons: Fedora might attract Python
enthusiasts and developers as it is most likely the only Linux distro
that has development version of Python packaged nightly. Developers and
powerusers can play with new
I tried to install R.x86_64 (R-core) on RHEL7
But blas-devel and lapack-devel texinfo-tex unavailable in EPEL
repositories.
--- Package R-core-devel.x86_64 0:3.1.0-5.el7 will be installed
--More--Error: Package: R-core-devel-3.1.0-5.el7.x86_64 (epel)
Requires: *blas-devel* = 3.0
Hi there,
I want to setup a test system with clamav and amavisd-new, but I can't
find clamav:
[root@mail1 ~]# yum install amavisd-new
Geladene Plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* epel: mirror.vutbr.cz
11 packages excluded due to repository priority
I think that requires the 'optional' repo in RHEL7
From: epel-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:epel-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Semi
Sent: 02 July 2014 12:59
To: epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: EPEL R.x86_64 (R-core) yum installation problem
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112609
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112571
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115913
Bug ID: 1115913
Summary: Can't call method get_value on an undefined value at
/bin/mimeopen line 162
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-File-MimeInfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055054
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055054
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115971
Bug ID: 1115971
Summary: perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.002-7.fc21 FTBFS:
'Test::Apocalypse::Dependencies loaded ok'
t/00-compile.t test fails with YAML 0.95
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115971
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115971
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is about YAML::Any. The version has been removed. It was:
package YAML::Any;
$YAML::Any::VERSION = '0.94';
There is no $YAML::Any::VERSION in YAML::Any 0.95.
This looks like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115971
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115971
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|st...@silug.org |ppi...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115971
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029710
Juan Orti Alcaine juan.o...@miceliux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029710
Steve Tindall s10...@elrepo.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(s10...@elrepo.org |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029710
--- Comment #7 from Steve Tindall s10...@elrepo.org ---
Starting at the bottom of your comments...
The requested amavisd.conf is attached above.
As suggested, I removed the local amavisd policy, relabeled the filesystem and
rebooted. A test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115913
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
62 matches
Mail list logo
