On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:15:31 +0100
Milan Crha mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 16:40 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:33:48AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Trying to build cmake, getting:
In F23, all C++ packages need to be rebuilt, most likely you
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
I think the F22 and Rawhide (Is it F23 at this point), should both use dnf
not yum. We need to get more testing on dnf in containers.
I'm ready to start testing F22 containers either way and would prefer
dnf. What's the
Sandro Mani wrote:
I'm close to having a small test case for the Qt5 crash - hope I can
file a bug by this evening/tomorrow
Gcc bug filed with test case:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65057 . In short, this
appears to be a linker issue when building the Qt shared libraries
Thanks! Are there tracking bugs in Bugzilla I can subscribe to?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/16/2015 12:31 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
I think the F22 and Rawhide
On 16 February 2015 at 15:12, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Christopher Meng wrote:
Maintaining several version of the same library is not easy as you think,
basically once a developer wants to install version X while then another
people want to deploy things based on version
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
tl;dr Shall we consider requiring a lesser package review for packages
that are not present on Product or Spin install media?
TL;DR: No, at least not in the form you propose (allowing bundled
libraries). See also my counterproposal below (voiced already in the oral
On 02/16/2015 05:10 PM, Martyn Foster wrote:
On 16 February 2015 at 15:12, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Christopher Meng wrote:
Maintaining several version of the same library is not easy as you think,
basically once a developer wants
On 16 February 2015 at 01:34, Alexander Ploumistos
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have upgraded 3 systems to a nonproduct F21 and I have installed F21
to a couple of others using the x86_64 Live Workstation image. They
all suffer from intermittent losses of bash history. When the
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 16:40 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:33:48AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Trying to build cmake, getting:
In F23, all C++ packages need to be rebuilt, most likely you have a
dependency, that hasn't been rebuilt yet (libjsoncpp)?
So talk to
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you see if either of these are set?
#export HISTCONTROL=ignoredups:erasedups
#export HISTTIMEFORMAT=%h %d %H:%M:%S
Nope, nowhere. I have only a few aliases set and that's it. Fedora
defaults always worked for
On 16.02.2015 19:59, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:48 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What is the reason for this?
Hi poma,
We don't have unity desktop/shell (from ubuntu) and back then we
didn't have a working lightdm either, so that why I removed
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:48 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What is the reason for this?
Hi poma,
We don't have unity desktop/shell (from ubuntu) and back then we
didn't have a working lightdm either, so that why I removed them.
I guess the current maintainer can enable
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:03:51 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
So, for my counterproposal:
I propose that packagers with a sufficient level of trust (packager
sponsors, provenpackagers, or a new, yet-to-be-defined group (maybe
packagers with at least N packages)) be allowed to import new packages
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:08:23 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/16/2015 06:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Probibly in the next few weeks as soon as gcc5 is ready
I do not understand.
- A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to
push GCC-5 to F22) and
On 02/16/2015 06:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Probibly in the next few weeks as soon as gcc5 is ready
I do not understand.
- A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
- A GCC-5 has been pushed to rawhide and
On 02/15/2015 01:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:59:06 +0100
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Freitag, den 13.02.2015, 13:53 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Can you expand on the breakage? Is it that they no longer rebuild?
Or that they no longer run?
I think, he's
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:56:59AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 02/14/2015 04:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL package of mock to disable the
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' option in the shipped version of the
Rawhide configs.
But then you will not
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:05:35 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 02/14/2015 04:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL package of mock to disable the
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' option in the shipped version of
the
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
They decided to push GCC 5 to F22, but with the GCC 4 C++ ABI as the default
C++ ABI to avoid having to rebuild everything C++ this late in the
On 02/17/2015 05:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Right now, we are facing packages whose (non-gcc related) F22-bugs are
unfixable because the issues w/ GCC-5 F23 are propagating through.
Time to revert GCC (with Epoch bump) to 4.9 in F22?
No, though I believe pushing GCC-5
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:26:57AM -0500, David Airlie wrote:
Just kicked off an Xserver build in rawhide,
and it appears gcc ICE.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=8960146name=build.log
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -DHAVE_DIX_CONFIG_H
-Wall
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:14:43AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:26:57AM -0500, David Airlie wrote:
Just kicked off an Xserver build in rawhide,
and it appears gcc ICE.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=8960146name=build.log
libtool: compile:
Clark Williams wrote:
If the above are correct and the only issue here is that we have
different depsolving with yum versus dnf, let's detect that we're
building a Fedora package on EPEL and print a warning to that effect. I
don't think it does us any good to ship a configuration that won't
- Original Message -
From: Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February, 2015 4:31:36 PM
Subject: Re: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:14:43AM +0100, Marek Polacek
I used to contact with him for Lazarus version in 2013 before that it
didn't get any update. It tooks me several months before I got any response.
Maybe you can contact him directly via his email, but don't expect too
much. He is always busy as a developer of Free Pascal.
Some not useful but
On 02/16/2015 06:56 AM, Marek Skalický wrote:
Hello,
this change was in version 2.6.6-4.
I were cleaning config files, adding new options,... I didn't want to
change any default configuration.
Ah, makes sense. That mongod documentation is ripe for misinterpretation.
So bind_ip change
I got a complaint about this:
not ok - depcheck for Bodhi update vtk-6.1.0-23.fc21 # FAIL
---
arch: x86_64
details:
output: |-
Build vtk-6.1.0-23.fc21 failed depcheck
package vtk-qt-python-6.1.0-23.fc21.i686 requires vtk(x86-32) =
6.1.0-23.fc21, but none of
Updates seem to have been pushed out now, thanks!.
But I see a different problem with my update. Taskotron failure which
I don't understand:
not ok - depcheck for Bodhi update systemd-216-20.fc21# FAIL
---
arch: x86_64
details:
output: |-
Build
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:14:33 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:08:55PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:17:56 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
either package bugs, or GCC bugs. As things stand, just about 19
packages did
not build due to bugs
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of drago01
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 04:45
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: Which of the changes introduced in F21 might affect
Perhaps this post from AdamW would be related:
https://www.happyassassin.net/2015/01/16/bash-history-with-multiple-sessions/
kevin
pgpjbyO0C8DZC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I can't believe I had missed this, but one difference I've found is
that F21 has moved to bash-4.3, while F20 is using 4.2. Then I came
across this post by Chet Ramey, the maintainer of bash, and I got
confused:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2013-07/msg00096.html
--
devel mailing
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
IMO, this was a bad and non-helpful decision. They should not have
pushed any GCC-5 this late in the cycle and should have waited with
pushing GCC-5 to rawhide until F22 is release.
+1
We have never done a GCC bump without a mass rebuild before, not even where
there
On Seg, 2015-02-16 at 23:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
They decided to push GCC 5 to F22, but with the GCC 4 C++ ABI as the default
C++ ABI
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 02:33 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2015-02-16 at 23:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
They decided to push GCC 5
On 02/16/2015 11:33 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- A GCC-5 was pushed to F22 (I thought FESCO had decided _not_ to push
GCC-5 to F22) and already is causing FTBFSes there[1]
They decided to push GCC 5 to F22, but with the GCC 4 C++ ABI as the default
C++ ABI to avoid having
On 02/16/2015 07:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:35:17AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
FESCo decided to not do a mass rebuild for f22, but gcc-5 (with a
change to config from f23) was approved to land in f22.
- A GCC-5 has been pushed to rawhide and already _is_ being used
Hi,
I have repeatedly run into insane delays (hours) for my builds to happen
(read: to even start, i.e., to get out of the pending phase), because
lately, some automated nightly builds have been monopolizing the builders
every night. The worst are the Python 3 nightly builds from
On 02/16/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 14. 2. 2015 at 22:28:53, M. Edward Borasky wrote:
Right now, the fedora:rawhide image on Docker Hub uses yum instead of
dnf, as does the Fedora 21 release. Is there any plan to switch this
release over to dnf?
Not likely. Porting of the system
On 2015-02-12, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Feel free, however, to build SDL without aRts and esound support. The only
reason aRts is still in Fedora at all is for things that support ONLY aRts
for sound output (in particular, the knotify in kdelibs3 and the kdelibs3
game
I have two BZ tickets to update fpc and lazarus to more recent versions
which are needed by the cqrlog package I recently took over.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161178
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161177
Both of which are blocking this:
I have raised a bz related to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190763
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:45:12AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
but yum install vtk\*.i686 appears to work fine for me (although I
didn't go through with the transaction).
What's up?
It is most probably a bug in depcheck (or down the stack), I'm sorry. We
thought we fixed it already,
Hi,
new version of DNF and DNF-PLUGINS-CORE is available for F21 and F22. The
update fixes over 25 bugs,
exposes more API and enhances plugin options. Read more in release notes [1]
and [2].
[1] http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/release_notes.html#id41
[2]
Just kicked off an Xserver build in rawhide,
and it appears gcc ICE.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=8960146name=build.log
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -DHAVE_DIX_CONFIG_H
-Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-declarations -Wformat=2 -Wstrict-prototypes
Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2015-02-12, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Feel free, however, to build SDL without aRts and esound support. The
only reason aRts is still in Fedora at all is for things that support
ONLY aRts for sound output (in particular, the knotify in kdelibs3 and
the kdelibs3 game
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Fenzi
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 09:25
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Which of the changes introduced in F21 might affect bash
Christopher Meng wrote:
Maintaining several version of the same library is not easy as you think,
basically once a developer wants to install version X while then another
people want to deploy things based on version Y, how to crack this nut?
You can't just care about runtime.
Then you need
On 02/16/2015 02:12 PM, David Howells wrote:
Do you mean the locations of the
log/logs to be captured
This one.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Trying to build cmake, getting:
/usr/bin/g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic
CMakeFiles/ccmake.dir/CursesDialog/cmCursesOptionsWidget.cxx.o
On 2015-02-16, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Petr Pisar wrote:
You are missing the point that Fedora clients can be run against
non-Fedora servers.
A remote aRts sound server? Sure, it's possible in theory
(http://lists.kde.org/?l=kdem=101656194718836w=2), but in practice:
*
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:33:48AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Trying to build cmake, getting:
In F23, all C++ packages need to be rebuilt, most likely you have a
dependency, that hasn't been rebuilt yet (libjsoncpp)?
So talk to the maintainer to rebuild it first.
Jakub
--
devel
On 02/16/2015 09:34 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
I have upgraded 3 systems to a nonproduct F21 and I have installed F21
to a couple of others using the x86_64 Live Workstation image. They
all suffer from intermittent losses of bash history. When the machines
are booted or rebooted, more
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:21:17PM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Summary: I have a proposal to make it easier for maintainers to have
multiple versions of the same library in distro (by making it *naturally*
Mageia has something, but only meant to transition from one library
version to the
Hello,
I have upgraded 3 systems to a nonproduct F21 and I have installed F21
to a couple of others using the x86_64 Live Workstation image. They
all suffer from intermittent losses of bash history. When the machines
are booted or rebooted, more than half the times, there are commands
missing
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Alexander Ploumistos
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have upgraded 3 systems to a nonproduct F21 and I have installed F21
to a couple of others using the x86_64 Live Workstation image. They
all suffer from intermittent losses of bash history. When
Am 16.02.2015 um 10:44 schrieb drago01:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
I have upgraded 3 systems to a nonproduct F21 and I have installed F21
to a couple of others using the x86_64 Live Workstation image. They
all suffer from intermittent losses of bash history.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:34:48AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
There was a bug filed against systemd during F21 testing (#1170765),
where I followed up, but I have no idea if systemd really is to blame
or if there is something else that could be touching history files. I
have read the
OCaml is a fast, type-safe practical language that compiles to native
binaries.
I'm going to update the OCaml compiler to 4.02.1 (the latest
upstream). This change will only affect Rawhide, *not* Fedora 22.
This update is a simple progression along the upstream stable branch,
so I don't expect
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Bash ... the last closes session wins so if you have multiple shells
open one might overwrite the history of the other one.
Up to F20, no matter how many terminals or tabs I had open, everything
found its way to bash history.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-CoreList:
1bf3245ea55dcac74999c9af9cbbb790 Module-CoreList-5.20150214.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit cf36c89ec915fd19f72ed4c9e7e80e4b7340f42c
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Feb 16 11:15:23 2015 -0500
5.20150214 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Module-CoreList.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193177
Bug ID: 1193177
Summary: sqlite3_drv bad memory free and severe performance bug
- with patch
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: dspam
Severity: medium
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48029
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48029/0001-Ticket-48029-Add-missing-replication-related-functio.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
liblockfile is installed with CentOS 7 and it gets updated by EPEL 7.
Is that supposed to happen?
# yum info liblockfile
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: centos.mirror.constant.com
* epel: mirrors.mit.edu
* extras: centos.mirror.constant.com
*
user: cicku set for cicku acl: commit of package: perl-BDB from: Approved to:
Obsolete on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku changed point of contact of package: perl-BDB from: cicku to:
orphan on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku set for cicku acl: approveacls of package: perl-BDB from: Approved
to: Obsolete on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: cicku changed point of contact of package: perl-BDB from: cicku to:
orphan on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-BDB from: Approved
to: Obsolete on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-BDB from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-BDB from: to:
Obsolete on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-BDB from: Approved
to: Obsolete on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-BDB from: Approved
to: Obsolete on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-BDB from: Approved
to: Obsolete on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-BDB from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: cicku set for cicku acl: commit of package: perl-BDB from: Approved to:
Obsolete on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku changed point of contact of package: perl-BDB from: cicku to:
orphan on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku set for cicku acl: approveacls of package: perl-BDB from: Approved
to: Obsolete on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-BDB from: to:
Obsolete on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-BDB from: to:
Obsolete on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-BDB from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-BDB from: to:
Obsolete on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-BDB from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Date-HolidayParser
from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Date-HolidayParser
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: cicku set for cicku acl: commit of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku changed point of contact of package: perl-Email-Find from: cicku
to: orphan on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku set for cicku acl: commit of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Date-HolidayParser from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Date-HolidayParser
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: cicku set for cicku acl: commit of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Date-HolidayParser from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Date-HolidayParser
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: cicku set for cicku acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: cicku changed point of contact of package: perl-Email-Find from: cicku
to: orphan on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku changed point of contact of package: perl-Email-Find from: cicku
to: orphan on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku set for cicku acl: commit of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku set for cicku acl: approveacls of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: cicku changed point of contact of package: perl-Email-Find from: cicku
to: orphan on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: cicku set for cicku acl: approveacls of package: perl-Email-Find from:
Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Email-Find
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
