Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:14:32AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194167 Basically everything in Rawhide which uses the normal RPM opt flags will now have to be compiled with -fPIC, otherwise you get errors like: /usr/bin/ld:

So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194167 Basically everything in Rawhide which uses the normal RPM opt flags will now have to be compiled with -fPIC, otherwise you get errors like: /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccqyK5ia.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `virConnectOpen' can not be used when

Re: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]

2015-02-19 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:51:38 +0100 Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I were trying to compile f22 mongoDB package with enabled _hardened_build . And it always failed with: collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] compilation terminated. scons: ***

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:58:10PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 19.02.2015 um 19:48 schrieb Till Maas: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Even on x86_64 it was quite a measurable slowdown last time I've benchmarked it, now in F22+ we might have smaller

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.02.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Jakub Jelinek: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:58:10PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 19.02.2015 um 19:48 schrieb Till Maas: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Even on x86_64 it was quite a measurable slowdown last time I've benchmarked

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Johansen
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:15:19PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network aware services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and myself)

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:15:19PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network aware services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and myself) add the PIE support into the toolchain otherwise? I'm just not convinced

libuv soname bump

2015-02-19 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
I have just updated libuv in F22 and rawhide to the 1.x series (1.4.0 to be exact) which introduces a proper soname upstream that is bumped from the previous Fedora package. libuv currently only has two dependencies in Fedora. One dependent, moarvm, has already been rebuilt. The other, nodejs,

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:30:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: info gcc, of course yes. -DPIC is not documented at all, and the various pie/pic options are obscure to say the least. Why should -DPIC be documented? -D is

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:37:46AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:30:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: info gcc, of course yes. -DPIC is not documented at all, and the various pie/pic options

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:22:03AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:14:32AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194167 Basically everything in Rawhide which uses the normal RPM opt flags will now have to be compiled with

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I'm still no closer to being able to fix the problem. I have to add -fPIE (or is that -pie or -fpie or -DPIE) to every executable? Upstream? Will that break on some platforms/architectures? And indeed what is the difference between -fPIE / -pie / -fpie / -fPIC / -fpic / -DPIC / etc? Where is

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:23:18AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:11:07AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I'm still no closer to being able to fix the problem. I have to add -fPIE (or is that -pie or -fpie or -DPIE) to every executable? Upstream? Will that

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
And in another case I had (qemu), it's not predictable. If you just compile part of qemu twice, the first time it gives the error and the second time not. I had to add this hack to qemu.spec: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qemu.git/commit/?id=6c3741c2769a21542a34716fa9188e520887a803 Rich.

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:42:02AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:37:16AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: The thing is, I'm not adding -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld explicitly in the real program. It's being added to everything by something in RPM.

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:51:33AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: There is definitely new/different behaviour in Rawhide, and recently. Also I was only able to see the new behaviour by updating from gcc 4.x - gcc 5. ie. Updating redhat-rpm-config isn't what causes the problem. Well, gcc

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:11:07AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I'm still no closer to being able to fix the problem. I have to add -fPIE (or is that -pie or -fpie or -DPIE) to every executable? Upstream? Will that break on some platforms/architectures? It really should be just about

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:30:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: info gcc, of course yes. -DPIC is not documented at all, and the various pie/pic options are obscure to say the least. Why should -DPIC be documented? -D is documented. -DPIC means define macro PIC to 1. There is no magic

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:37:46AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:30:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: info gcc, of course yes.

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:37:16AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: The thing is, I'm not adding -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld explicitly in the real program. It's being added to everything by something in RPM. I'm not exactly sure what, maybe %{configure}? So I don't know

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:37:46AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:30:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: info gcc, of course yes. -DPIC is not documented at all, and the various pie/pic options

Re: Easiest way to debug build failures on rawhide?

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Johansen
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On 18/02/15 15:12, Dave Johansen wrote: I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447 ) and I need to be able to take a look at the config.log file

Re: Easiest way to debug build failures on rawhide?

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Johansen
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote: On 18.02.2015 16:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 02/18/2015 04:12 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447

ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]

2015-02-19 Thread Marek Skalický
Hi, I were trying to compile f22 mongoDB package with enabled _hardened_build . And it always failed with: collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] compilation terminated. scons: *** [build/linux2/ssl/use-system-all/usev8/mongo/mongod] Error 1 scons: building terminated because

Minutes from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-02-19)

2015-02-19 Thread Honza Horak
== #fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-02-19) == Meeting started by hhorak at 18:02:53 UTC. The full logs are available at

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Even on x86_64 it was quite a measurable slowdown last time I've benchmarked it, now in F22+ we might have smaller slowdown with the x86_64 copyreloc for Which packages are there that do not process untrusted data and are slowed

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.02.2015 um 19:48 schrieb Till Maas: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Even on x86_64 it was quite a measurable slowdown last time I've benchmarked it, now in F22+ we might have smaller slowdown with the x86_64 copyreloc for Which packages are there that do

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:48:30PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Even on x86_64 it was quite a measurable slowdown last time I've benchmarked it, now in F22+ we might have smaller slowdown with the x86_64 copyreloc for Which

Re: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]

2015-02-19 Thread Marek Skalický
Dan Horák píše v Čt 19. 02. 2015 v 20:12 +0100: On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:51:38 +0100 Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I were trying to compile f22 mongoDB package with enabled _hardened_build . And it always failed with: collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 9

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Christopher Meng
I'd like to know the performance loss estimated/examined by FESCO, or I think it's a bad idea on i686 systems, it's already slow enough. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-5.0.0-0.5.fc22

2015-02-19 Thread Frantisek Kluknavsky
Hi, a list of things that usually break with each new gcc (like fortran modules) would be nice to avoid a lot of pain with debugging. Does it already exist? WxGTK keeps a string WX_BUILD_OPTIONS_SIGNATURE currently saying 2.8 (no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 1002,wx

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Branched 20150218 nightly compose nominated for testing

2015-02-19 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 02/18/2015 01:21 PM, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Installation Text-mode installation does not work - noted in the matrix. The installation source spoke does not work. No matter what I choose, even specifying a

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-5.0.0-0.5.fc22

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:12:43PM +0100, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote: a list of things that usually break with each new gcc (like fortran modules) would be nice to avoid a lot of pain with debugging. Does it already exist? WxGTK keeps a string WX_BUILD_OPTIONS_SIGNATURE currently saying 2.8

Re: How to install Rawhide?

2015-02-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:24:47 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: Today's - 2015-02-18 - F22 nightlies seem not to have any anaconda showstoppers, so for now probably using one of them is the best way to install F22. Thanks! Fetched it. Also the -02-18 one for Rawhide x86_64 Live Workstation,

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:42:02AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:37:16AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: The thing is, I'm not adding -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld explicitly in the real program. It's being added to everything by something in RPM.

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:00:41PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:42:02AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:37:16AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: The thing is, I'm not adding -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld explicitly in the real

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 18:05 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:00:41PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: I plan to change this to 1 now in Rawhide for the upcoming Fedora 23 feature: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192183 Since I did not get any feedback from the

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:02:29PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 18:05 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:00:41PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: I plan to change this to 1 now in Rawhide for the upcoming Fedora 23 feature:

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Branched 20150218 nightly compose nominated for testing

2015-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 08:38 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 02/18/2015 01:21 PM, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Installation Text-mode installation does not work - noted in the matrix. Thanks! Failure

[Bug 1192824] F20 PPC64 Perl: Now 5.18.2 but primary is now 5.18.4 - updated noarch package deps prevent network installs

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192824 --- Comment #7 from Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca --- Petr, The reason the secondary arch network install now fails is *because* this is now in primary updates-testing, but *not* in the secondary arch (ppc64) updates-testing. That's

Broken dependencies: polymake

2015-02-19 Thread buildsys
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1 On i386: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1 On armhfp: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl =

[Bug 1188538] perl-Fsdb-2.55-1.fc22 FTBFS: t/test_command.t tests fail

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188538 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Fsdb-2.56-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Fsdb-2.56-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1180498] perl-WebService-Linode-0.26 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180498 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-WebService-Linode-0.26

File Getopt-Long-2.44.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Getopt-Long: f12497b9d8109e2b9b939512af8ddef7 Getopt-Long-2.44.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2015-02-19 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 98 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0610/qpid-cpp-0.30-9.el7 13

Re: [Fedora QA] #462: wrong TestdayApp event

2015-02-19 Thread Fedora QA
#462: wrong TestdayApp event ---+--- Reporter: tagoh | Owner: tflink Type: defect| Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component:

Broken dependencies: polymake

2015-02-19 Thread buildsys
polymake has broken dependencies in the F-22 tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1 On i386: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1 On armhfp: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl =

[Bug 1194256] New: perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 Bug ID: 1194256 Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Getopt-Long Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[perl-Getopt-Long] 2.44 bump

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 73e0f2cce4c29a5a6468f1d09dde1caddb2a0f45 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 19 10:40:05 2015 +0100 2.44 bump .gitignore| 1 + perl-Getopt-Long.spec | 7 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-Getopt-Long-2.44-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612973 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-Getopt-Long-2.44-1.fc21 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612979 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1194255] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194255 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612985 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8994923 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1194265] perl-List-Compare-0.46 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194265 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8994961 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[perl-Compress-Bzip2/f21] 2.22 bump

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 86b6cc331e903c3594dc486b9017d057b11aea05 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 19 13:58:05 2015 +0100 2.22 bump .gitignore | 1 + perl-Compress-Bzip2.spec | 10 +- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2

[Bug 1194255] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194255 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22-1.fc22 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612986 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[perl-List-Compare] 0.46 bump, more performance enhancements

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Šabata
commit 9bb224c20d125d171695b5dd66db0c379a68fd74 Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 19 14:00:26 2015 +0100 0.46 bump, more performance enhancements .gitignore | 1 + perl-List-Compare.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

[perl-List-Compare/f22] 0.46 bump, more performance enhancements

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Šabata
Summary of changes: 9bb224c... 0.46 bump, more performance enhancements (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-List-Compare/f21] 0.46 bump, more performance enhancements

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Šabata
Summary of changes: 9bb224c... 0.46 bump, more performance enhancements (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-Getopt-Long-2.44-1.fc22 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612975 -- You are receiving this mail

File Compress-Bzip2-2.22.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Bzip2: 0d01b86c3efa74e29bb975aea46b666f Compress-Bzip2-2.22.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Getopt-Long-2.44-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Getopt-Long-2.44-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1194265] perl-List-Compare-0.46 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194265 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- psabata's perl-List-Compare-0.46-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612990 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1194255] New: perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194255 Bug ID: 1194255 Summary: perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Compress-Bzip2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1194255] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194255 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8994905 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1194265] New: perl-List-Compare-0.46 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194265 Bug ID: 1194265 Summary: perl-List-Compare-0.46 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-List-Compare Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1194255] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194255 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Bug-fix release suitable for F≥21. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[perl-Getopt-Long/f20] 2.44 bump

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
commit b72793dfaa6609e243a0013b6b070b314d815679 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 19 10:40:05 2015 +0100 2.44 bump .gitignore| 1 + perl-Getopt-Long.spec | 7 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[perl-Getopt-Long/f22] 2.44 bump

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
Summary of changes: 73e0f2c... 2.44 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Getopt-Long/f21] 2.44 bump

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 08c3e97ef5f11ef72b2dcafd29f33ff9bb0963fb Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 19 10:40:05 2015 +0100 2.44 bump .gitignore| 1 + perl-Getopt-Long.spec | 7 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-Getopt-Long-2.44-1.fc20 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612978 -- You are receiving this mail

[PkgDB] kevin:perl-Filesys-Df watchbugzilla set to Approved

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: kevin set for msuchy acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Filesys-Df from: to: Approved on branch: epel7 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filesys-Df -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1194256] perl-Getopt-Long-2.44 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194256 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Getopt-Long-2.44-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Getopt-Long-2.44-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this

[PkgDB] kevin updated perl-Filesys-Df

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: kevin created branch epel7 on package perl-Filesys-Df To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filesys-Df -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[PkgDB] kevin:perl-Filesys-Df watchcommits set to Approved

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: kevin set for msuchy acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Filesys-Df from: to: Approved on branch: epel7 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filesys-Df -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[PkgDB] kevin:perl-Filesys-Df approveacls set to Approved

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: kevin set for msuchy acl: approveacls of package: perl-Filesys-Df from: to: Approved on branch: epel7 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filesys-Df -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[PkgDB] kevin:perl-Filesys-Df commit set to Approved

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: kevin set for msuchy acl: commit of package: perl-Filesys-Df from: to: Approved on branch: epel7 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filesys-Df -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[perl-Compress-Bzip2] 2.22 bump

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 2ec1d59c2575d30ca347d69b2ca3730819fa03a7 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Thu Feb 19 13:58:05 2015 +0100 2.22 bump .gitignore | 1 + perl-Compress-Bzip2.spec | 10 +- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2

[perl-Compress-Bzip2/f22] 2.22 bump

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
Summary of changes: 2ec1d59... 2.22 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1194255] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194255 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22-1.fc21 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612987 -- You are receiving this mail

File List-Compare-0.46.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-List-Compare: a6259ac9dd19741a38f8e3bd6190dc48 List-Compare-0.46.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1194255] perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22 is available

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194255 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.22-1.fc21 -- You are

Re: [EPEL-devel] How to formalize and finish the Py3 proposal?

2015-02-19 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - On Feb 19 04:54, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Hi all, so I think everyone was able to express their opinions about my Python 3 proposal for EPEL [1] and I think it's time for me to formalize it, get it approved and actually do it. I'm however unsure about how this

Re: Fedora Beaker instance

2015-02-19 Thread Honza Horak
Thank you both, I've forwarded this status and vision to the Env Stacks crew on today's meeting. Honza On 02/16/2015 02:48 PM, Tim Flink wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:14:12 +1000 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Honza, Excerpts from Honza Horak's message of 2015-02-13 00:44

[PkgDB] ppisar updated perl-Module-Install-Authority

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: ppisar created branch f22 on package perl-Module-Install-Authority To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Install-Authority -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[PkgDB] ppisar:perl-Module-Install-Authority watchbugzilla set to Obsolete

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: ppisar set for ppisar acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Module-Install-Authority from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Install-Authority -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] ppisar:perl-Module-Install-Authority watchbugzilla set to Obsolete

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: ppisar set for ppisar acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Module-Install-Authority from: to: Obsolete on branch: f21 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Install-Authority -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] ppisar:perl-Module-Install-Authority watchbugzilla set to Obsolete

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: ppisar set for ppisar acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Module-Install-Authority from: to: Obsolete on branch: f20 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Install-Authority -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[dspam/epel7] fix for bug #1193177

2015-02-19 Thread Nathanael Noblet
commit 5c59161ddb065986a94a97e6d2275e6cc86718a5 Author: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca Date: Thu Feb 19 22:58:04 2015 -0700 fix for bug #1193177 dspam-sqlite3_drv.patch | 51 + dspam.spec | 7 ++- 2 files changed,

[dspam/el6] fix #1193177

2015-02-19 Thread Nathanael Noblet
commit 2b5cd1d6eafb5324e8f600ba78bf31f4af557958 Author: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca Date: Thu Feb 19 23:02:59 2015 -0700 fix #1193177 dspam-sqlite3_drv.patch | 51 + dspam.spec | 8 +++- 2 files changed, 58

[perl-Module-Install-Authority] Import

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 52dcf3370c1cd2cd445524f6bbba7945cbef47f2 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Feb 20 08:08:17 2015 +0100 Import .gitignore | 1 + ...e-M-I-Authority-under-build-when-building.patch | 30 + perl-Module-Install-Authority.spec

File Module-Install-Authority-0.03.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2015-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Install-Authority: 0695d0b3c572fa0a53ec26846622e6ff Module-Install-Authority-0.03.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[dspam/f21] (2 commits) ...fix for bug #1193177

2015-02-19 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Summary of changes: c812025... suid on dspamc (*) 4c051d2... fix for bug #1193177 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[dspam/f20] (2 commits) ...fix for bug #1193177

2015-02-19 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Summary of changes: c812025... suid on dspamc (*) 4c051d2... fix for bug #1193177 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[dspam] fix for bug #1193177

2015-02-19 Thread Nathanael Noblet
commit 4c051d2c99954df459397a9f83762f7bad7fbcf0 Author: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca Date: Thu Feb 19 22:52:10 2015 -0700 fix for bug #1193177 dspam-sqlite3_drv.patch | 51 + dspam.spec | 7 ++- 2 files changed,

[dspam/f22] fix for bug #1193177

2015-02-19 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Summary of changes: 4c051d2... fix for bug #1193177 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[PkgDB] ppisar:perl-Module-Install-Authority watchbugzilla set to Obsolete

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: ppisar set for ppisar acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Module-Install-Authority from: to: Obsolete on branch: f22 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Install-Authority -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[PkgDB] ppisar:perl-Module-Install-Authority watchcommits set to Obsolete

2015-02-19 Thread pkgdb
user: ppisar set for ppisar acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Module-Install-Authority from: to: Obsolete on branch: f20 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Install-Authority -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

  1   2   >