On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 19:25 -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
The way we deploy LUKS, a single password guess takes one second on a
comparable hardware, so the fuzz factor is not actually as large as it might
seem.
Wow, I had no clue it was that good. OK, so making one guess at the user
account
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
It is a two way street. You own the device. They make the OS. Each is
their own 'ball' if I am using your original metaphor appropriately. Each
sees the other as the field the ball gets played on. If you don't like the
field that your ball is playing on you are free
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 12:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* The workstation folks think this change could drive away some of
their potential users for not much gain. In their case, sshd is not
enabled/running and additional security for a device that sits in
your home isn't worth the
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:01 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
or if the attacker snuck into your room when you left it to fetch some
coffee, and needs to unlock your console, implant a backdoor and sneak
back out before you return, or otherwise can't reboot your computer
because you would
On 6 March 2015 at 17:11, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
It is a two way street. You own the device. They make the OS. Each is
their own 'ball' if I am using your original metaphor appropriately. Each
sees the other as the field the ball gets played
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:43:33AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
As resolved by FESCO in our meeting on 4 March 2015, FESCO requests that
anaconda revert a password behaviour change in the UI from F22,
restoring the double-click to confirm weak password behaviour from F21
and earlier.
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 19:35 -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
There is another very important case where this falls down: the computer is
enrolled into AD/IPA and the password is used throughout the organization.
Just looking at a local machine does not necessarily tell you what the needed
Note that in upstream bug #735578 I have failed to build consensus on
any form of password strength checking, let alone the strict checking
that is done by libpwquality, so there is little chance at this point of
GNOME upstream adhering to any policy you come up with. The status quo
is that
I have no
clue why VNC passwords are limited/truncated to eight characters, but it
seems like that limitation makes the protocol not worth supporting at
all, let alone worth promoting in System Settings.
The only VNC authentication mechanism standardized in RFC 6143 uses the
password as a
Hello,
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 12:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* The workstation folks think this change could drive away some of
their potential users for not much gain. In their case, sshd is not
enabled/running and additional security for a device that sits in
your home isn't worth
On 6 March 2015 at 19:13, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 19:35 -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Eh, well by my logic they are both so closely-related that it's nonsense
to treat them differently... but that comment was more a wishful
somebody please fix VNC
David Cantrell wrote:
From what I'm reading in the meeting logs and the ticket comments, it
appears the revert decision is basically a temporary solution and a more
formal security policy will be discussed later. We had technical
arguments in favor of the change originally, but I have yet to
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 19:40 -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Consider a client enrolled in AD/IPA.
I agree. We can meet both sets of goals with modifications to
libpwquality to allow a *dramatically* weaker default configuration, and
then a corporate deployment can set of pwquality.conf however it
As resolved by FESCO in our meeting on 4 March 2015, FESCO requests that
anaconda revert a password behaviour change in the UI from F22,
restoring the double-click to confirm weak password behaviour from F21
and earlier.
As for how that's realized: I'm not picky. If it makes more sense from
a
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 13:10 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 00:45 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
What better solutions? What password I pick should be none of the
installer's business.
False. It's entirely
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:48:26 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
The other one was:
Subject: pkgdb created branch 'el6' for the 'mingw-zlib' package
But actually I think that was is correct, since that branch *was*
created a little earlier than the email.
Yeah, so the
Hi,
I'm planning to become a Fedora packager so am introducing myself
here.
I started using Red Hat Linux in about 1996 or 1997 and have used
GNU/Linux for all my personal computers ever since (moving from RHL to
Fedora Core and then to Fedora). I've used a variety of unix-like
systems at work,
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in
the case something goes wrong.
Like the ones attached (and not just for libguestfs, but for other
packages too). AFAIK no one is creating branches ..
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:22:43 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Like the ones attached (and not just for libguestfs, but for other
packages too). AFAIK no one is creating branches ..
I saw the error about libguestfs this morning and was going to
investigate.
I've filed:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:31:10AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:22:43 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Like the ones attached (and not just for libguestfs, but for other
packages too). AFAIK no one is creating branches ..
I saw the error about
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 15:54 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 03/05/2015 03:52 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 09:06 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
An typical outcome from a group of individuals that do not know what
they are doing and are making decisions based
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in the
case
something goes wrong.
First attempt fails [1] with:
pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : InIn
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
I think we are much better off shipping the unhinted version then, letting the
Freetype autohinter do its job.
Agreed. So that takes care of the question of including the HTML file
with the comparison of the two.
As far
perl-Text-Template users, please note the license tag was corrected
from (GPL+ or Artistic) to ((GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or
Artistic)).
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 6 March 2015 at 03:18, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
That may not be possible if the minimiser upstream is using is not, or
maybe even cannot be, packaged for Fedora.
Unfortunately, the popular minifier JSMin is non-Free (it contains the no
evil clause, see
Hello.
06.03.2015 16:51, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
So this entire thing is about you reading as a verb something clearly
syntactically an adjective? I'm not sure how I can respond to that.
Do you acknowledge it's a historical fact that the user password for a
local device
At the Fedora 22 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2 that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 22 Alpha by Fedora QA, Release Engineering
and Development.
Fedora 22 Alpha will be publicly available on Tuesday, March 10, 2015.
Meeting details can be seen here:
Minutes: http://bit.ly/17Y8Je5
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23.
There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather
than later as rawhide is
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 10:52 -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
I wish a formal distribution and/or per-variant security policy would come
from FESCo (or a committee directed by FESCo) so we could resolve the
concerns now and going forward. I don't see the revert decision as being a
good step in
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru
wrote:
According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5 there no
planned mass-rebuild for GCC5.
There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora Base Design Working Group (2015-03-06)
==
Meeting started by haraldh at 14:08:05 UTC. The full logs
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:43:33AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
As resolved by FESCO in our meeting on 4 March 2015, FESCO requests that
anaconda revert a password behaviour change in the UI from F22,
restoring the double-click to confirm weak password behaviour from F21
and earlier.
From what
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Dead and all builds obsoleted:
--
python-twisted-conch
obsoleted by: python-twisted
python-twisted-lore
obsoleted by: python-twisted
python-twisted-mail
obsoleted by:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
05.03.2015 15:52, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 02:09:00 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello.
I have long outstanding update of ImageMagick[1] and plan do it in
rawhide in 1-3 days.
...
Affected packages needs to
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300
Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello.
ImageMagick itself built in rawhide.
pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : InIn functionfunction
``writeFrames(readFramesint(,int ,char* *char)**)': /builddir/'build:/
On 6 March 2015 at 10:13, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
So this entire thing is about you reading as a verb something clearly
syntactically an adjective? I'm not sure how I can respond to that.
Do you
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:08:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:48:26 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
The other one was:
Subject: pkgdb created branch 'el6' for the 'mingw-zlib' package
But actually I think that was is correct, since that
On 02/24/2015 06:44 PM, Jerry James wrote:
How is this really supposed to be done? If I'm doing it the right
way, then the current method is broken.
%undefine _hardened_build
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:52:34 -0500
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com wrote:
From what I'm reading in the meeting logs and the ticket comments, it
appears the revert decision is basically a temporary solution and a
more formal security policy will be discussed later. We had
technical
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you acknowledge it's a historical fact that the user password for a
local device has been exclusively user domain? If no, give
counterfactual examples.
You need to dial back the dialogue a bit. The original
hi
after the latest update (qt , systemd, ...) i have this problem
E: [pulseaudio] main.c: Starting the daemon failed.
no audio only some buzz or click
any ideas?
regards
gil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 12:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* The workstation folks think this change could drive away some of
their potential users for not much gain. In their case, sshd is not
enabled/running and additional security for a device that sits in
your home isn't worth the
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 15:14 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 12:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* The workstation folks think this change could drive away some of
their potential users for not much gain. In their case, sshd is not
enabled/running and additional
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
FESCO is prepared to work with anaconda and other stakeholders
to define security models for the various Fedora products. By
clarifying our needs we hope to avoid this kind of contention
in the future.
On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I hope https://xkcd.com/936/will be among the inputs to that
discussion.
I'm fond of noting that pwquality has not yet blacklisted any variant
of correcthorsebatterystaple. I've been
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-03-09
# Time: ** 15:00 UTC ** NOTE TIME CHANGE
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again! Daylight savings kicks in in North America
(at
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing.
No, you didn't miss RC1 and RC2 - RC1 was aborted when we found a new
blocker soon after it was started, and the RC2 compose failed due to
some kind of conflict with the RC1 process. So
On 05.03.2015 20:08, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 12:50 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time.
US doesn't go into Daylight Savings Time until Sunday, FYI.
Yeah, my bad... anyway, I would like to stick with that time for today.
--
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
which package is this again? I can try experimenting a bit.
The one that worked for me was lightdm, fwiw.
Oops, sorry, got distracted. It is polymake. That package has
multiple problems.
First, it invokes undefined
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
If the attacker is unskilled and doesn't know how to boot a live image,
or if the attacker snuck into your room when you left it to fetch some
coffee, and needs to unlock your console, implant a backdoor and sneak
back out before you return, or otherwise can't reboot
I just tried to create an update for F-22, for the bliss package.
After pressing the Save Update button, the orange bar at the top
changed to the text in the subject line. A second push of the button
worked, but maybe somebody wants to take a look to see what happened
the first time. Regards,
--
Adam Jackson wrote:
FESCO is prepared to work with anaconda and other stakeholders to define
security models for the various Fedora products. By clarifying our
needs we hope to avoid this kind of contention in the future.
The discussion for this might as well start now -or- at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195862
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.fc22
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195862
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199680
Bug ID: 1199680
Summary: perl-DBD-MySQL-4.031 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-MySQL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199687
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9162268
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196784
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195862
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195862
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195862
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Virtual-0.07-1.el7
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199687
Bug ID: 1199687
Summary: perl-threads-1.99 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-threads
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199680
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9161745
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
#31: Broken EPEL 7 ppc64 koji
--+
Reporter: ellert | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: blocker | Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199537
Bug ID: 1199537
Summary: perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic
(only) license
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Version: 5.11
Component: perl-DBI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199540
Bug ID: 1199540
Summary: perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic
(only) license
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.1
Component: perl-DBI
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.065-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
dee36f8... Update to 0.065
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Path-Tiny-0.065-1.fc23' was created pointing to:
dee36f8... Update to 0.065
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit beac3f9442cac4607d5d214d5a8cdb0cb37094a5
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Mar 6 15:15:28 2015 +
Correct license tagging (#1199491)
perl-Exporter-Tiny.spec | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199538
Bug ID: 1199538
Summary: perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic
(only) license
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Version: 6.7
Component: perl-DBI
user: limb created branch el6 on package perl-SOAP-Lite
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
user: limb set for eseyman acl: approveacls of package: perl-SOAP-Lite from:
to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199491
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Exporter-Tiny-0.042-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Exporter-Tiny-0.042-2.fc22
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199532
Bug ID: 1199532
Summary: perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic
(only) license
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-DBI
Severity: urgent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199491
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
I can't find anything that rpmlint is completely happy with so I'm going to go
with:
(GPL+ or Artistic) and Public Domain and (GPL+ or Artistic or CC-BY-SA)
--
You are receiving this
user: limb set for eseyman acl: commit of package: perl-SOAP-Lite from: to:
Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: limb set for eseyman acl: watchcommits of package: perl-SOAP-Lite from:
to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb set for eseyman acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-SOAP-Lite from:
to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
Summary of changes:
beac3f9... Correct license tagging (#1199491) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199543
Bug ID: 1199543
Summary: perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic
(only) license
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
Version: rh-perl520
Component: perl-DBI
The lightweight tag 'perl-Exporter-Tiny-0.042-2.fc23' was created pointing to:
beac3f9... Correct license tagging (#1199491)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Exporter-Tiny-0.042-2.fc22' was created pointing to:
beac3f9... Correct license tagging (#1199491)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-Tiny:
d0cc4ebe40e639c5c2942fe3abb27fc8 Path-Tiny-0.065.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199331
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199491
Bug ID: 1199491
Summary: Incorrect license tag for perl-Exporter-Tiny
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Exporter-Tiny
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-GitHub:
f77f9cfdf230912efafbb0f79f4558da Net-GitHub-0.73.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 39abf577ec8d83281ac75b7db2f68698c3c15966
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Mar 6 13:29:55 2015 +0100
0.73 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Net-GitHub.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit dee36f85d16b0271f4adac26134cedf21083908a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Mar 6 12:31:03 2015 +
Update to 0.065
- New upstream release 0.065
- Added 'assert' method
- Added 'visit' method
- Added support for a negative count for 'lines'
commit 6b6264f16521af3d73fdd207fa93adc1630c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Mar 6 13:33:44 2015 +0100
Correct license declaration to ((GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic))
perl-Text-Template.spec | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Summary of changes:
dee36f8... Update to 0.065 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199491
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198991
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199491
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #2)
I can't find anything that rpmlint is completely happy with so I'm going to
go with:
(GPL+ or Artistic) and Public Domain and (GPL+ or
commit 0bec7a0d16606a9e87edf6f315c49c74709f4774
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Mar 6 17:10:57 2015 +0100
Comment on the misleading license header in XS
perl-DateTime.spec | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
---
diff --git a/perl-DateTime.spec b/perl-DateTime.spec
At the Fedora 22 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2 that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 22 Alpha by Fedora QA, Release Engineering
and Development.
Fedora 22 Alpha will be publicly available on Tuesday, March 10, 2015.
Meeting details can be seen here:
Minutes: http://bit.ly/17Y8Je5
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48102
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48102/0001-Ticket-48102-allow-replacing-event-framework-memory-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
commit 5645476577f1a09ea5f16e304e00591528cc8485
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Fri Mar 6 17:36:23 2015 +0100
Branch version 0.716 for EPEL6
filter-requires.sh| 3 -
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.715-IO-modules.patch | 425 ++
The branch 'el6' was created pointing to:
340a568... 1.13 bugfix bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
- Original Message -
Sorry for the delay in getting this out. We will be continuing the EPEL
Python discussion
We will be in #epel on Freenode for our weekly EPEL Steering
Committee meeting Friday 06-Mar-2015 at 17:00 UTC.
Proposed Agenda items:
1.) Python 3.X Discussion
- Dual
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
