Re: State of Sparkleshare

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 01/08/17 01:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga >> wrote: >>> As a maintainer of Fedora Design Suite, the state of sparkleshare brought >>>

Re: Adding program to Software Center

Dne 3.8.2017 v 15:24 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 3 August 2017 at 14:07, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Well, the thing is you are looking at old data as far as I can tell, >> since this was fixed in the package several days ago [1]. > The metadata builder got stuck, and I was at

Re: State of Sparkleshare

On 01/08/17 01:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: >> As a maintainer of Fedora Design Suite, the state of sparkleshare brought >> attention with these outstanding report: >> *

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:36:32AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> > >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb >> > >> What

Re: one concrete ideas for fedora

There are updated ISOs available: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/ Not for Fedora 26 yet, but I guess they´ll be available soon. 2017-08-04 12:23 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > Do a stable release do Fedora 25.1 or 26.1 > > install a live disk and have 2 bg of

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:55:54AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > It is not yet deployed in production (I'm working on this today) so it is > > not > > yet available :) > Is it actually being deployed today? In the middle of the mass rebuild? Yeah; not ideal, but it was coordinated so Pierre's

one concrete ideas for fedora

Do a stable release do Fedora 25.1 or 26.1 install a live disk and have 2 bg of updates is a joke, you may take double of the time but do something that we can call it stable . -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:36:32AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb > > > What is the Pagure over dist-git URL? The linked document has everywhere > placeholder links

Re: Builds stuck in f27-pending

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Hello folks! > > I did some builds on Rawhide / fc27 yesterday and they are still stuck in > f27-pending. Is the signing queue blocked again? There's probably a backlog due to mass rebuild part two being

Builds stuck in f27-pending

Hello folks! I did some builds on Rawhide / fc27 yesterday and they are still stuck in f27-pending. Is the signing queue blocked again? Cheers, Björn ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb > What is the Pagure over dist-git URL? The linked document has everywhere placeholder links with src.fedoraproject.org domain and if I try any of them it returns

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I'm not particularly pleased with their decision. I think the path > they're going down is wrong, and they should really reconsider. > However, I'm reading over their Stratis whitepaper before I formulate > a response

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:51PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: >> On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser >> > wrote: >> >> On 2017-08-04 11:12

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 4 August 2017 at 16:46, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > ...it fails the most basic requirement of a filesystem -- to not > > eat data. > > Me also; I've tried btfs three times now -- in one case

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > boomaga > calligra > cups-filters > evas-generic-loaders > gambas3 > gdal > gdcm > inkscape >

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:51PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote: > >> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > >> > >> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On 4 August 2017 at 16:46, Solomon Peachy wrote: > ...it fails the most basic requirement of a filesystem -- to not > eat data. Me also; I've tried btfs three times now -- in one case telling me I had no free space after a few weeks when clearly there was tens GBs free, one

Re: Why Atomic Host should be built using Modularity

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:18:09PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > What next > - > > We're going to experiment with this! My humble plan is to create a very early PoC Atomic Host module that people could try out within the next two weeks. This will reveal the weak spots in the

Re: one concrete ideas for fedora

On 08/04/2017 06:04 AM, František Zatloukal wrote: There are updated ISOs available: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/ Not for Fedora 26 yet, but I guess they´ll be available soon. It's also very easy to create an updated ISO yourself.

Re: one concrete ideas for fedora

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:23:30AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Do a stable release do Fedora 25.1 or 26.1 > > install a live disk and have 2 bg of updates is a joke, > you may take double of the time but do something that we can call it > stable . Making a stable release like this would

Orphaning procedure for libpwiz

Hi all. I'm going to abandon 'libpwiz' package on f27. Feel free to claim ownership if you need it. Regards. -- -- Antonio Trande sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org See my vCard. <> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel

Orphaning: makedepf90

Dear All, I'm orphaning the package makedepf90. I originally packaged it only to be able to unbundle it from cp2k, where it was used during the build process, but it hasn't been used since release 2.6.0, when upstream switched to their own dependency generation script written in python. If anyone

Unified database for DNF

I noticed this FESCo topic: #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_database_for_DNF proposing a unified sqlite database for DNF. Recently there's been a discussion of replacing the RPM database with a custom database layer, where people asked why aren't we using something like

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:12:46AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > This is a pity---BTRFS features looked attractive: Regardless of the attractiveness of btr's feature sets, the RH annoucnement is an indication that they don't consider it supportable for the kinds of users that fork over

Re: Adding program to Software Center

On 4 August 2017 at 08:54, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Heh .. things always happens in the wrong time ;) Checking g-s with the > appstream-data-27-4.fc27, I can see "Amazon Cloud Player" listed under > Nuvola, so this looks promising. Good stuff. > BTW could you please take a look

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On 04/08/17 16:23, Fernando Nasser wrote: On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: Is it only RHEL? Yes, it is only RHEL. It does not have any effect on Fedora, that is entirely independent, Steve.

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: > >

BTRFS dropped by RedHat

The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.4_Release_Notes/chap-Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7.4_Release_Notes-Deprecated_Functionality.html Btrfs has been deprecated The Btrfs file

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: Is it only RHEL? What are other distros doing?

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote: >> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: >> >> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: >> >> >> Is it only RHEL? >> >> What are other distros

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: > >

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

Some insight why was BTRFS dropped by RH: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14907771 Also check out Stratis: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StratisStorage 2017-08-04 17:12 GMT+02:00 Przemek Klosowski : > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote: > On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: > > > Is it only RHEL? > > What are other distros doing? > It is only RHEL, but unfortunately

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-08-04)

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Stub python packages for EPEL

> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes: KF> I don't think we have any way to find out the version of a package KF> in all channels. At least I don't know of such a way. So, I think we KF> should concern ourselves with only the channels that EPEL says it KF> will try and not conflict

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 83 - Add an util for generating instance parameters

Hi team, please, review a new patch for big topology refactoring. I'll add a patch for 389-ds-base tests before the pushing it. https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/83

Discontinuing Phabricator

As you all probably know, we decided that keeping Phab up and running is not the best use of our - rather limited, and shrinking - resources, so we moved all our projects to Pagure. Yay! As of now, all (relevant) tickes are moved to Pagure, and we have the Differential revisions archived as html

Re: Discontinuing Phabricator

On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 22:41 +0200, Josef Skladanka wrote: > As you all probably know, we decided that keeping Phab up and running is > not the best use of our - rather limited, and shrinking - resources, so we > moved all our projects to Pagure. Yay! > > As of now, all (relevant) tickes are moved

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 879 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 642 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 224

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 758 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 752 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 642

[Bug 1469110] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469110 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- releng's perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.26-3.fc27 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=949748 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1354386] CVE-2016-6185 perl: XSLoader loads relative paths not included in @INC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354386 Cedric Buissart changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1354386] CVE-2016-6185 perl: XSLoader loads relative paths not included in @INC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354386 Cedric Buissart changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|impact=moderate,public=2016

[Bug 1238804] /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now and -pie, perl crashes with -pie

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804 --- Comment #14 from Harald Reindl --- BIND_NOW is -z now aka "Full RELRO" http://tk-blog.blogspot.co.at/2009/02/relro-not-so-well-known-memory.html it's peferred but not always possible -- You are receiving this

[389-devel] Re: Trying to understand entryrdn.db

Ok, thanks for the update. > > On Aug 4, 2017 at 08:08, mailto:stamatis.ili...@gmail.com)> > wrote: > > > > Okay, now that I have read and understood dbscan's code, I have a few more > questions. > > > > > 2017-08-03 10:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Krispenz

[Bug 1238804] /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now and -pie, perl crashes with -pie

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804 --- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar --- /usr/bin/perl is now built with all necessary options, but the resulting executable differs from other executables: $ readelf -d /usr/bin/rpm | grep NOW 0x0018 (BIND_NOW)

[389-devel] Re: Trying to understand entryrdn.db

On 08/04/2017 02:08 PM, Ilias Stamatis wrote: Okay, now that I have read and understood dbscan's code, I have a few more questions. 2017-08-03 10:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Krispenz >: Hi, now that I know the context here are some more

[389-devel] Please review 48081: CI test - password

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48081 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/38ccf56b0efaa7f9f38bdaa532e036f7f3fd92acb6e3e7a34eb09f7ca07b870e-0001-Password-accepts-sn-attr.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1238804] /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now and -pie, perl crashes with -pie

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 1238804] /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now and -pie, perl crashes with -pie

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804 --- Comment #15 from Petr Pisar --- I've already got response from Florian Weimer. Because the perl was built with -Wl,--enable-new-dtags, the way how binding metadata are expresses is a little bit different, but still

[389-devel] Please review 49342: CI test - password accepts sn attribute

Got it, thank you. > > On Aug 4, 2017 at 10:04, mailto:sraml...@redhat.com)> > wrote: > > > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49342 >

[389-devel] Please review 49342: CI test - password accepts sn attribute

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49342 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/c1c52646b4c79a1ffc1f16acd1a18ee43bbb863c9f8ca18433aa118866d654bd-0001-Password-accepts-sn-attr.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Trying to understand entryrdn.db

2017-08-04 16:03 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Krispenz : > > On 08/04/2017 02:08 PM, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > > Okay, now that I have read and understood dbscan's code, I have a few more > questions. > > 2017-08-03 10:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Krispenz : > > >> Hi, now that