Re: What to I have to do....

On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 10:31 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > What do I have to do to stop random people > from making random changes to packages I maintain? > > How do people get this type of permission? > > Case in point; > > commit 358a8fff974f0e124527a3281c90fa04cb7c7a7f (HEAD ->

Re: What to I have to do....

> because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches. Not true at all - you’d be surprised how well git deals with cherry picks across diverse branches. And even when it doesn’t there’s very rarely anything in a spec file that would be a difficult conflict to resolve. At work I often cherry

Re: Reminder: upcoming retirement of webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 packages

On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 00:04 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > hum Markdown plugin is build with GTK3 , the plus of GTK+ is > > confusing > > me > > GTK+ is the correct name of the project and the product. It is not > called GTK. "GTK+

Re: Autumn Elections 2017 are cancelled

Jan Kurik wrote: > During the Autumn 2017 Election cycle we wanted to try a new approach > in the way how Elections are organized [1]. Unfortunately, at the > beginning of the Voting period we realized the new way does not work > as expected [2] and even we tried to put some mitigation plan in

Re: Autumn Elections 2017 are cancelled

On Thursday, 07 December 2017 at 18:54, Jan Kurik wrote: > During the Autumn 2017 Election cycle we wanted to try a new approach > in the way how Elections are organized [1]. Unfortunately, at the > beginning of the Voting period we realized the new way does not work > as expected [2] and even we

Re: What to I have to do....

Steve Dickson wrote: > Where committed to the master branch and not to any other > branch make the maintenance of those branches a pain > because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches. > I have to make multiple commits to multiple branches > which sucks... Something random people do not

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Voting period is in progress

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Voting period is in progress on 2017-12-09 from 00:00:00 to 00:00:00 UTC The meeting will be about: The Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections in progress. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1], Mindshare[2] and

Re: Autumn Elections 2017 are cancelled

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Who is "we" that "decided" to cancel the running elections? What were the > reasons for this "decision"? I object to this strongly. It doesn't look > like this "decision" was made through an open process as is the

Re: What to I have to do....

On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 10:31 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > Where committed to the master branch and not to any other > branch make the maintenance of those branches a pain > because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches. > I have to make multiple commits to multiple branches > which

Re: Help Reviewing a FreeOTP (Android) Pull Request in Korean

6.12.2017 15:47 Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > > Do you speak (I think) Korean and English? Can you code? If so, I > could use your help. > > The Fedora-associated FreeOTP project has received this pull request: > https://github.com/freeotp/freeotp-android/pull/165 > > The

is there logstash alternative in Fedora?

Hello, I am looking for an alternative for Java logstash application (not in Fedora) that can parse logs (e.g. httpd access.log) and collect stats about number of occurrences for a given search pattern (basically it can e.g. group by IP and give number of lines for each IP and then post it to

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171204.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171204.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171204.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: excess automated emails from Fedora

On 06/12/17 00:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sorry to reply to myself here, but I meant to reply to this part and > forgot: > > On 12/05/2017 02:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 12/05/2017 01:56 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >>> My observation is that the people who "like" email are simply not aware >>>

Re: excess automated emails from Fedora

On 05/12/17 23:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 12/05/2017 01:56 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> When somebody writes a comment in Bugzilla, I am receiving an email from >> Bugzilla and another email from FMN: two emails for each comment. I >> haven't seen this type of behavior in any other project. >

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2017-12-06 10:26 GMT+01:00 Matthias Runge : > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote: > >> On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > Maybe a Fedora Change

New "tests" namespace to share test code

Hi! While working on adding CI tests [0] using the Standard Test Interface a need arose to have a shared git repository where tests could be stored: * A large number of test files makes a dist-git repository more difficult to maintain * Tests might follow a different branching pattern than

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 10:26:11AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote: > > On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice? > > probably a good idea. To follow-up on this, I'm

Re: Retrace failed. Try again later and if the problem persists report this issue please.

Hello, This happens to me when I try to report dnfdragora crashes in Gnome. It doesn't happen in KDE mainly because dnfdragora doesn't crash there. Regards, Silvia 2017-11-28 7:46 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson : > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 22:10 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >

What to I have to do....

Hello, What do I have to do to stop random people from making random changes to packages I maintain? How do people get this type of permission? Case in point; commit 358a8fff974f0e124527a3281c90fa04cb7c7a7f (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Igor Gnatenko

Autumn Elections 2017 are cancelled

During the Autumn 2017 Election cycle we wanted to try a new approach in the way how Elections are organized [1]. Unfortunately, at the beginning of the Voting period we realized the new way does not work as expected [2] and even we tried to put some mitigation plan in place [3], we have not

Re: What to I have to do....

On 2017-12-07 09:31, Steve Dickson wrote: > What do I have to do to stop random people > from making random changes to packages I maintain? > > How do people get this type of permission? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy > Case in point; [snip] These were properly

Re: Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: changes

On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 16:01 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 12/02/2017 01:15 PM, Fedora Rawhide Report sent this report, quoted > in its entirety: > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question

On 6 December 2017 at 05:33, Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >> We have solved this years ago. man alternatives > > alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in > /etc/alternatives

Re: What to I have to do....

On 12/07/2017 04:31 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: Where committed to the master branch and not to any other branch make the maintenance of those branches a pain because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches. Maybe you can elaborate on how this causes problems for your development process,

Re: What to I have to do....

On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy > These were properly announced: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RJYQNLIWBAVQPGLIGUT77WGY5D4TK334/ >

[Bug 1523427] perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523427 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1364570 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1364570=edit [patch] Update to 0.07 (#1523427) -- You are

[Bug 1523427] New: perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523427 Bug ID: 1523427 Summary: perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Iterator-Simple Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1523427] perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523427 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[EPEL-devel] package overlap between EPEL and RHEL server extra

Hi, I find some packages in EPEL are also available from RHEL server extra repo, and kdreyer told me that EPEL's policy is to not overlap, maybe this is something need to be fixed? Packages which are available from both RHEL server extra and EPEL: WALinuxAgent python-passlib python2-crypto

[Bug 1523427] perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523427 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2c59d7248e -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1523427] perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523427 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b4277f16f9 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1523427] perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523427 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1aef2547f7 -- You are receiving this

Re: Autumn Elections 2017 are cancelled

On Thursday, 07 December 2017 at 18:54, Jan Kurik wrote: > During the Autumn 2017 Election cycle we wanted to try a new approach > in the way how Elections are organized [1]. Unfortunately, at the > beginning of the Voting period we realized the new way does not work > as expected [2] and even we

Re: Autumn Elections 2017 are cancelled

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Who is "we" that "decided" to cancel the running elections? What were the > reasons for this "decision"? I object to this strongly. It doesn't look > like this "decision" was made through an open process as is the

[Bug 1523427] perl-Iterator-Simple-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523427 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1522696] Upgrade perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors to 0.032

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522696 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1522699] Upgrade perl-experimental to 0.019

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522699 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1522709] Upgrade perl-BibTeX-Parser to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522709 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1522699] Upgrade perl-experimental to 0.019

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522699 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.019-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bb7f68cfa7 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1522699] Upgrade perl-experimental to 0.019

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522699 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.019-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-99702e925c -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1522699] Upgrade perl-experimental to 0.019

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522699 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.019-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-120341939f -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1522709] Upgrade perl-BibTeX-Parser to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522709 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.01-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-65a2bcaaed -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1522709] Upgrade perl-BibTeX-Parser to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522709 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.01-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-19c15a7e6e -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1520949] Upgrade perl-Test2-Suite to 0.000094

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520949 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED

[Bug 1522688] Upgrade perl-Catalyst-Action-REST to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522688 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1522701] Upgrade perl-Future to 0.37

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522701 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

ppisar pushed to perl-Params-ValidationCompiler (master). "Control optional test with a build condition"

From c013089dad8dc010339a26c19ebdea0aa1e9b28a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Dec 07 2017 11:43:56 + Subject: Control optional test with a build condition --- diff --git a/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec b/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec index

[Bug 1520945] Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 7.58

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520945 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1522709] Upgrade perl-BibTeX-Parser to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522709 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.01-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-101cddfd01 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1522696] Upgrade perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors to 0.032

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522696 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.032-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9d4213887b -- You

[Bug 1520944] Upgrade perl-Moo to 2.003004

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520944 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

ppisar pushed to perl-Specio (master). "Control optional test with a build-condition"

From e3e46441e8655ce73f235f2370a68291244662f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Dec 07 2017 12:46:18 + Subject: Control optional test with a build-condition --- diff --git a/perl-Specio.spec b/perl-Specio.spec index 30cea0c..ded6579 100644 ---

Autumn Elections 2017 are cancelled

During the Autumn 2017 Election cycle we wanted to try a new approach in the way how Elections are organized [1]. Unfortunately, at the beginning of the Voting period we realized the new way does not work as expected [2] and even we tried to put some mitigation plan in place [3], we have not