Re: [HEADS UP] poppler-qt4 going away

David Tardon wrote: > * diffpdf > - apparently not OSS anymore, so an update is unlikely The Debian package: https://packages.debian.org/sid/utils/diffpdf has a patch to build diffpdf against poppler-qt5. > * krop > - uses python-poppler-qt4 > - unknown status There's a fork with Qt 5 and

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for s390x

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:20:09PM +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > > Not yet. We are working on packaging podman which would give users the same > > experience as Docker CLI without requiring a Daemon. That would be the > >

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

De: "Przemek Klosowski" Hi, > Many environments (corporate, government) actually require keeping track > of this stuff, so addressing it would help the acceptance of Fedora and > Redhat in such environments Then have Koji or Bohdi insert accurate changelogs at build time. Can't be less

Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working

- Mail original - De: "Terry Barnaby" >If >it was important to get the data to disk it would have been using >fsync(), FS sync, or some other transaction based app ??? Many people use NFS NAS because doing RAID+Backup on every client is too expensive. So yes, they *are* using NFS

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 08:57 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 5:02:10 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever in > > their > > changelog

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:25:33 AM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 08:57 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 5:02:10 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever in

Re: Clean up your spec files

On 02/08/2018 04:53 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Brett Lentz wrote: On 08/02/18 14:09 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT rpmdev-newspec still inserts this. It may be worthwhile to file a bug to get it to stop. The only

unresponsive maintainer 'jamatos'

Hi José, are you still around? You activity suddenly stops around May 28th 2017, I hope nothing serious happened. grace package needs attention: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471223, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243. Zbyszek

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

Dne 9.2.2018 v 09:21 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > Matthew Miller wrote: >> Second, there's package maintainer changelogs. These are really >> redundant with the dist-git log. We don't really need this anymore. >> It's just a chore. > My %changelog entries are not identical to the dist-git commit

Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34

9.02.2018 09:50 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > > > > > > Rafal Luzynski wrote: > > > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6 > > > > > > That needs to be

Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > I'm exploring possibilities on how to track usage of a particular library > symbol via rpm dependencies. > > In particular, whenever a package is built that includes a dependency on > library symbol: >

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 13:32 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever > > in their changelog section. > > Is there any

Package review - test builds for OpenVPN 3 Client

Hi, This week I've started poking at packaging pre-release builds of the new OpenVPN 3 based client for Linux (sorry, no server support yet). I've started a Copr build/repo for it and I'd appreciate some help reviewing the packaging and otherwise hints (or pathces) how to improve things.

Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?

I've tried two builds over the past couple hours that result in failures. Other architectures are building. Is there something wrong in glibc/gcc/makefile for armv7hl? build.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/408/24900408/build.log root.log

Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34

On Friday, 09 February 2018 at 09:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > > > > > > Rafal Luzynski wrote: > > > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6 > > > > > > That needs to be

vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version

Hi, vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version, something changed on F27 and rawhide, program make[1]: Entering directory '/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128/epglv' gcc -c -I/usr/include/mysql -fPIC -L/usr/lib64/mysql -L/usr/lib64/ -lmariadb

Was APLM accidently enabled in Fedora 27?

Hi, Since a week or so my laptop has severe SATA issues when running on battery-only. Was APLM enabled by accident in Fedora-27 (I know there are currently experiments going on for Rawhide / F28): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543493 Best regards, Clemens

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On 09/02/18 08:34 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: Someone else suggested changelogs could be inserted during koji build time. That would be interesting to look into. If a koji build page just showed the Git commit logs since the last build that could be far more useful than showing hundreds of lines

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > Koji, or fedpkg, or better yet some hook in rpm itself. It's not exactly > rocket science we're talking about here if people are ready to give it a go. > > Neal, doesn't Mageia (and Mandriva) pull package changelogs

inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?

I'm exploring possibilities on how to track usage of a particular library symbol via rpm dependencies. In particular, whenever a package is built that includes a dependency on library symbol: libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5_PRIVATE_API) I'd like to inject additional dependencies, something like:

Re: vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version

On 09/02/18 15:01 -, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version, something changed on F27 and rawhide, program make[1]: Entering directory '/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128/epglv' gcc -c -I/usr/include/mysql

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On 09/02/18 16:53 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 09/02/18 08:34 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: Someone else suggested changelogs could be inserted during koji build time. That would be interesting to look into. If a koji build page just showed the Git commit logs since the last build that could

Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:55:26PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 09 February 2018 at 09:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > > > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?

Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> I'm exploring possibilities on how to track usage of a particular library >> symbol via rpm dependencies. >> >> In particular, whenever a package is built that includes a dependency on >> library

Outage: Switch Outage - 2018-02-11 15:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2018-02-11 15:00 UTC, which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-02-11 15:00 UTC' Reason for outage: The network switches in our PHX2 colocation

Re: Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?

On 02/09/2018 02:19 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: You need to reference the root task, it's hard to get back to that from the .log files, and it allows people to see other things that isn't just pure logs which are useful for debug. The task ID is in the URL.

Re: Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?

On 02/09/2018 12:33 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I've tried two builds over the past couple hours that result in failures. Other architectures are building. Is there something wrong in glibc/gcc/makefile for armv7hl? build.log

Re: Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I've tried two builds over the past couple hours that result in failures. > Other architectures are building. You need to reference the root task, it's hard to get back to that from the .log files, and it allows people

Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?

Rex Dieter wrote: > (I know this would be handled automatically if the Qt_5_PRIVATE_API symbol > was versioned, but that's an option we'd rather avoid if reasonably > possible) IMHO, the right approach is to do just that. There is already a patch that does this:

Atomic Host/Workstation Interview for Linux Unplugged Podcast

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 A couple of us went on the LUP podcast this week to talk about Atomic Host/Workstation. Check it out: https://twitter.com/jupitersignal/status/961283877883977728. We start around minute 16:20. Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Rawhide armv7hl buildroot busted?

On 02/09/2018 03:54 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Well, it doesn't appear to be completely broken as lots of builds are succeeding.  I think you'll need the contents of config.log to see what is happening here. Thanks, Orion. It was a Wine configure bug. Introduced by:

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

Hello, On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 02/09/2018 03:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >>>

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On 09/02/18 23:09, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kamil Dudka wrote: >> Would not it be then better to work on this in a staging branch and rework >> those commits before they are pushed to a production branch? I am myself >> not interested in going through commits like "fix a typo", "forgot to bump >>

Re: inject rpm dependency depending on library symbol?

On 9 February 2018 at 15:33, Rex Dieter wrote: > I'm exploring possibilities on how to track usage of a particular library > symbol via rpm dependencies. > > In particular, whenever a package is built that includes a dependency on > library symbol: >

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

Kamil Dudka wrote: > Would not it be then better to work on this in a staging branch and rework > those commits before they are pushed to a production branch? I am myself > not interested in going through commits like "fix a typo", "forgot to bump > release", "add missing BR", "revert the

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

Neal Gompa wrote: > Mageia, OpenMandriva, and PLD all generate their changelogs from the > source control system. [snip] > SUSE uses the Open Build Service VCS export to changes files which are > converted into changelog entries at package build time. All these distros have in common that their

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On 09/02/18 23:46, Kevin Kofler wrote: > David Sommerseth wrote: >> Doesn't 'fedpkg mockbuild' resolve those test builds? To my knowledge, >> this is fairly close to what koji does under the hood. Then you'll have >> everything tested locally, git tree can be cleaned up and be in a >> reasonable

Re: Atomic Host/Workstation Interview for Linux Unplugged Podcast

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks, Dusty! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQI6BAEBCgAkHRxDaGljYWdvIDxjaGljYWdvQGFpcm1haWwuY2M+BQJafjgSAAoJ ENL3SmB5LsIajfkQALNdt8hFDY0eMoMuneS0mZjpAEnwZGcHRp2dnGrGZUDg0Nu7 QRL8UikK+uGteQy27ybQsXwBfsNGpLNpELgu4ObevjBoqx+D0bSrbp/H3ZkJY861

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-12 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. It's a public holiday here in Canada, and I don't think there are any urgent topics at this time. We'll definitely catch up with a meeting next week. If anyone would like to have a meeting, and is willing to run it in my place, please

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-12 blocker review meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for Monday. Once again there are no proposed blockers for Beta or Final at this time, so nothing to talk about. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin .

-Werror (or any alternatives in different languages)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, - From time to time I see upstreams using -Werror (or, #[deny(warnings)] in Rust) which is definitely causing problems when gcc or any other compiler adds new warnings. Unfortunately, some upstreams reject removing -Werror and use it just

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

David Sommerseth wrote: > Doesn't 'fedpkg mockbuild' resolve those test builds? To my knowledge, > this is fairly close to what koji does under the hood. Then you'll have > everything tested locally, git tree can be cleaned up and be in a > reasonable shape before being pushed out. I'm surely

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: VA-API 1.0.0

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:06:05PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: VA-API 1.0.0 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VA-API_1.0.0 > > Change owner(s): > * Nicolas Chauvet > > This change is about upgrading libva and others to version 2.0. This > change affects

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

Matthew Miller wrote: > Second, there's package maintainer changelogs. These are really > redundant with the dist-git log. We don't really need this anymore. > It's just a chore. My %changelog entries are not identical to the dist-git commit messages: 1. It often takes me several git commits to

Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > > > Rafal Luzynski wrote: > > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6 > > > > That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit multilib > > architectures

[HEADS UP] Mass-macro-escape in %changelog (was: Escaping macros in %changelog)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I've went and fixed 493 packages (listed below). If it broke something, please let me know. I checked diff briefly and don't think that I broke anything… Maintainers by package: 389-console mreynolds nhosoi nkinder rmeggins 389-ds-base

Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34

9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Rafal Luzynski wrote: > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6 > > That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit multilib > architectures though. I know and this was going to be my next question: what magic operator to

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - xing, noriko, aortega, jcholast, mzatko

Hi, I know Noriko, I can contact her if you want. I think she retired from the project for personal, but I can ask her. Regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah On 7 February 2018 at 19:27, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package >

Re: [HEADS UP] Mass-macro-escape in %changelog

On 02/09/2018 09:18 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I've went and fixed 493 packages (listed below). If it broke something, please let me know. I checked diff briefly and don't think that I broke anything… Did you ask FESCO? If not you, have abused

Re: [HEADS UP] Mass-macro-escape in %changelog

> zdohnal    cups-filters net-tools system-config-printer I checked system-config-printer and there are only '% ' and '%,' in changelog, which aren't rpm macros. Others are escaped in changelog, no need to fixing it. -- Zdenek Dohnal Associate Software Engineer Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:21:27 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Second, there's package maintainer changelogs. These are really > > redundant with the dist-git log. We don't really need this anymore. > > It's just a chore. > > > My %changelog entries are not

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On 02/09/2018 03:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever in their changelog section. Is there

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever >> in their changelog section. >> Is there any reason I should not go and

[Bug 1543215] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180380 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543215 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1543215] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180380 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543215 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 941 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 831 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 802

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1068 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 831 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 413

[Bug 1544044] New: perl-App-cpm-0.958 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544044 Bug ID: 1544044 Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.958 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-cpm Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1544065] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544065 Bug ID: 1544065 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.15 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1544068] New: perl-Test-Strict-0.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544068 Bug ID: 1544068 Summary: perl-Test-Strict-0.41 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Strict Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1532539] [PATCH] Invalid definitions in macros.perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532539 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.24.3-396.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9ef65cf422 -- You are receiving this mail

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Issue 49043 - Add a test suite

Final version. All tests from other tickets were added. Please, review. https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49558 - Original Message - > From: "Simon Pichugin" > To: "389 Directory server developer discussion." > <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent:

[Bug 1543675] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.055 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543675 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1543662] perl-DBD-MySQL-4.046 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543662 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1543662] perl-DBD-MySQL-4.046 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543662 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1543899] perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.21-4.fc28 FTBFS : t/53_driver_dbi.t test fails with sqlite 3.22.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543899 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Debian provided a fix to the upstream . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1543288] perl-Lucy-0.6.1-6.fc28 FTBFS: t/core/035-json.t aborts: cfcore/Lucy/Util/Json/JsonParser.c:681: yy_find_shift_action: Assertion `iLookAhead < YYNTOKEN' failed.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543288 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1543288] perl-Lucy-0.6.1-6.fc28 FTBFS: t/core/035-json.t aborts: cfcore/Lucy/Util/Json/JsonParser.c:681: yy_find_shift_action: Assertion `iLookAhead < YYNTOKEN' failed.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543288 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1543899] New: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.21-4.fc28 FTBFS: t/ 53_driver_dbi.t test fails with sqlite 3.22.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543899 Bug ID: 1543899 Summary: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.21-4.fc28 FTBFS: t/53_driver_dbi.t test fails with sqlite 3.22.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide