Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s) -- please let me know. Fixed: util-linux-2.32-0.2.fc29 Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

On 20 February 2018 at 13:11, Igor Gnatenko wrote: [..] > today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm- > sign-libs. [root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs error: Failed dependencies: librpmbuild.so.8()(64bit) is needed by

Schedule for Wednesday's FPC Meeting (2018-02-21 18:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-02-21 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Wednesday = 2018-02-21 10:00 PST  US/Pacific 2018-02-21

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:36 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild, > The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found > here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3]

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview hydrogen jaaa lensfun libgnomecanvasmm26 libiec61883 liblo liblrdf

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Well, with some delay, the waiver worked and I was able to push the > f26 package to batched. > > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >>> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to >

libsamplerate license change

Hi there, version 0.1.9 of libsamplerate which I've recently built in all branches changed its license from GPLv2+ to BSD (2-clause). Nils -- Nils Philippsen"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to Software Engineer purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Red Hat

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 00:03 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > > nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview > >

Fedora 28 Mass Branching

Hi All, Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f28 you also have to do in the master branch and do a

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >> I am asking because the rpm documentation leaves quite a lot to be >> desired. If I went and changed all my "Requires: foo" to "Requires: >> foo%{_isa}" in all my non-noarch packages, would

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > So this may not be all the packages which would need a > BuildRequires:gcc in them. I had two packages without >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages > in list > or anything else -- please let me know. Done: boost-gdb-printers cppunit libabw libcdr libcmis libcss libe-book libeot libepubgen libetonyek

Re: Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 09:01 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 08:44 +0100, Vít Ondruch a écrit : > > > > Dne 19.2.2018 v 17:16 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > > > redhat-rpm-config taht is needed has grown dependencies, as > > > language > > > specifc macros have

Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)

On Feb 20, 2018 08:54, "Adam Williamson" wrote: On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Well, true, but then just

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 08:44 +0100, Vít Ondruch a écrit : > > Dne 19.2.2018 v 17:16 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > > redhat-rpm-config taht is needed has grown dependencies, as language > > specifc macros have moved into their own space > > So we removed Perl from buildroot, but there is

Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 10:02] : > > I am not aware that the email addresses are different. Your FAS account has the email mgans...@online.de but your bugzilla account uses mgans...@alice.de . Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list --

Re: to batch or not to batch?

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 02/19/2018 03:40 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On 02/19/2018 06:34 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> But anyway, why don't we > >> have "updates-testing", "updates-batched" and "updates" repositories? > >> "updates-batched" could be

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > zdohnalc2esp cups cups-filters enscript foomatic hplip jbigkit mgetty > openobex pnm2ppa ptouch-driver python-cups python-smbc qpdf

new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

i get this message from limb in the pagure ticket [1] The Bugzilla review bug creator could not be found in FAS. Make sure your FAS email address is the same as in Bugzilla. I am not aware that the email addresses are different. [1] pagure ticket:

Re: Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)

BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both for the two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that succeeded but has broken auth which is sort of needed for an imap server) -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing list --

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove GCC from BuildRoot

On 18/02/18 16:22 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Fedora decided to use gcc as *the* compiler [1], and frankly, we have enough trouble getting packages to compile without trying to support more than one compiler (vide the lass mass rebuild). Also a *lot* of core GCC devs work on

Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 12:30] : > > where can I see in bugzilla the wrong email address ? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email You can see it in the banner (the red bar at the very top) of that page. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Make authselect default tool instead of authconfig

On 01/05/2018 02:50 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: = System Wide Change: Make authselect default tool instead of authconfig = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AuthselectAsDefault Change owner(s): * Pavel Březina Replace authconfig with authselect and make authselect a default tool to configure

Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 13:30] : > > When I hover over your name in bug #1377631, I see mgansser (at) alice.de > in the tooltip. Are you sure you don't have two Bugzilla accounts? > > Emmanuel It may be that I have 2 Bugzilla accounts, but the email address mgansser (at) alice.de does not

Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 10:02] : > > Your FAS account has the email mgansser(a)online.de but > your bugzilla account uses mgansser(a)alice.de . > > Emmanuel where can I see in bugzilla the wrong email address ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 08:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I was updating my mythtv box and I saw that it was pulling in some mysql > community packages as a dependency but I looked through the options and I > couldn't

Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 12:30] : > > You can see it in the banner (the red bar at the very top) of that page. > > Emmanuel the email address is already mgansser(a)online.de on the top of page see: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Pictures/bugzilla.png

Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 14:17] : > > It may be that I have 2 Bugzilla accounts, but the email address > mgansser (at) alice.de does not exist anymore. > How can I delete this old email account? You can file a bug against the Bugzilla product:

REMINDER: F28 Software String Freeze in one week

According to the Fedora 28 schedule [1] we are going to reach the "Software String Freeze" deadline in one week on 2018-Feb-27. Beyond this deadline there should not be any changes in strings, ideally. If you want to help with translations then, please check the packages that follow Fedora

rpm-ostree v2018.3 and ostree v2018.2

A new release of rpm-ostree, a hybrid transactional image/package system is now available: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/ostree-2018.2-1.fc27%20rpm-ostree-2018.3-1.fc27 Direct link to main release notes: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/releases/tag/v2018.2 In this release

Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)

Greetings! Today, on 2018-Feb-20, we have reached Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1]. At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by default, it must be enabled at Change Completion

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/20/2018 01:02 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: List of packages and respective maintainers: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt Done in packages where I am admin. TY! J. ___

Modularity Working Group IRC Meeting Minutes (2018-02-20)

= #fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two weeks) = Meeting started by nils at 15:00:10 UTC.

Fedora Rawhide-20180220.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 30/129 (x86_64), 8/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 194274 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/194274 ID: 194275 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso

Re: Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem

Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi, > > I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages > with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is > architecture specific, so I want to remove it. > > This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so files. I >

Add link to cvedetail.com in CVE bugs?

I'm probably in the minority, but I wasn't even aware of this sight and I found it very helpful in addressing some CVE's for one of my packages. It provides links to bug trackers, links to other distros, and links to commits that address the CVE. It would be really helpful to provide a link in

Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator

Hi all, I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts. I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides and Requires for sonames because ROS does not use proper sonames (and therefore they

Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem

Hi, I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is architecture specific, so I want to remove it. This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so files. I made repo queries, if any package puts

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

Hi, I've been having a problem with dist.rpmdeplint checks for one of my packages (molsketch). This is a new package and it has a run-time dependency on OpenBabel: Requires: openbabel%{?_isa} The failure is the same on both f26 & f27: results: - arch: x86_64 item: molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc26

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hi, > > I've been having a problem with dist.rpmdeplint checks for one of my > packages (molsketch). > This is a new package and it has a run-time dependency on OpenBabel: > > Requires: openbabel%{?_isa} > > The failure is the same on both f26 & f27: > > results:

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. I've added the missing BuildRequires to the following packages: elog gfm hyperrogue

Re: Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)

> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes: NM> BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both NM> for the two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that NM> succeeded but has broken auth which is sort of needed for an imap NM> server)

Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hey, > > today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm- > sign-libs. Does this mean that the python bindings no longer

Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump

Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2018-02-20 11:21, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to >> rawhide, includes a soname bump affecting > > The soname bump appears to have been a mistake; 7.6.4 reverts it. That's very good news, thanks! -- Rex

Re: Vim: removing %{_libdir}/vim from vim-filesystem

On 02/20/2018 05:40 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages > with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is > architecture specific, so I want to remove it. > > This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so

Re: dnf: Can't tell me what is pulling in a dependency?

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 07:08 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 08:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I was updating my mythtv box and I saw that it was pulling in > > > some mysql community packages as

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >> First question, why "arch" and "scenario" are x86_64, but the error >> concerns the 32-bit build? Since OpenBabel exists on all arches, why >> do I get this particular error message? > > Your

gc-7.6.2 to rawhide, abi bump

Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to rawhide, includes a soname bump affecting $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires gc --repoid=rawhide ... Macaulay2-0:1.9.2-8.fc28.x86_64 aisleriot-1:3.22.4-3.fc28.x86_64 asymptote-0:2.41-1.fc27.x86_64 autogen-0:5.18.12-6.fc28.x86_64

Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8

On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing > > > > a lot of > > > > the spadework

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:15 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > > First question, why "arch" and "scenario" are x86_64, but the error > > > concerns the 32-bit build? Since OpenBabel

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. Fixed in rawhide: aspell exempi gpxsee groff joe jpilot libcgroup libpng12 libpng15 libtiff man-db pilot-link Also

Re: gc-7.6.2 to rawhide, abi bump

On 2018-02-20 11:21, Rex Dieter wrote: > Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to rawhide, > includes a soname bump affecting The soname bump appears to have been a mistake; 7.6.4 reverts it. -- Yaakov Selkowitz Software Engineer - Platform Enablement Group Red Hat,

Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 13:30] : > > the email address is already mgansser(a)online.de on the top of page see: When I hover over your name in bug #1377631, I see mgansser (at) alice.de in the tooltip. Are you sure you don't have two Bugzilla accounts? Emmanuel

[HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey, today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm- sign-libs. This resulted into 8 packages disappearing from buildroot¹². This should not be a problem, but still useful to know. ⁰

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

Well, with some delay, the waiver worked and I was able to push the f26 package to batched. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional features of >> Molsketch. The %{_isa} macro

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional features of > Molsketch. The %{_isa} macro got added during the review I think the reviewer in this case was wrong to suggest that, just use Requires: openbabel FYI, the package is multilib'd because it has a

Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Hey, > > > > today I've split⁰

[Bug 1547303] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547303 Bug ID: 1547303 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180220 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1547296] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547296 Bug ID: 1547296 Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.32 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-libwww-perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1547297] New: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.102 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547297 Bug ID: 1547297 Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.102 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1547288] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 Bug ID: 1547288 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Fedora 28 Mass Branching

Hi All, Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f28 you also have to do in the master branch and do a

[Bug 1547290] New: perl-File-Slurper-0.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547290 Bug ID: 1547290 Summary: perl-File-Slurper-0.012 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-Slurper Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1547308] New: perltidy-20180220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547308 Bug ID: 1547308 Summary: perltidy-20180220 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perltidy Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 1547327] New: perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.50 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547327 Bug ID: 1547327 Summary: perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.50 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Scalar-List-Utils Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1547321] New: perl-Test-Strict-0.43 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547321 Bug ID: 1547321 Summary: perl-Test-Strict-0.43 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Strict Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1547288] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 1547288] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.4

[Bug 1547288] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dfcf7fbede -- You are receiving

[389-devel] Please review: 49571 perl subpackage

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49571 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/047304c49649993c733777115 ee9042f8fe9c381cd29e35f5863118a965024f2-0001-Ticket-49571-perl- subpackage-and-python-installer-by.patch -- Thanks, William Brown ___

[Bug 1525990] [RFE] please provide in EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525990 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mojolicious-7.67-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-4a3b2cd2dd -- You are receiving

[Bug 1546961] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1546963] perl-SVG-2.84 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546963 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1544162] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7e2cb0696f -- You are receiving

[Bug 1546961] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7e2cb0696f -- You are receiving

[Bug 1544162] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9d4d306336 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1546961] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9d4d306336 -- You are receiving

[HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey, today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm- sign-libs. This resulted into 8 packages disappearing from buildroot¹². This should not be a problem, but still useful to know. ⁰

[EPEL-devel] Intent to update openjpeg2 from 2.1.0 to 2.3.0

Openjpeg2 has MANY CVE bugs reported against it and most are fixed with the current release. I have run abi-compliance-checker on the packages and it shows 100% binary compatibility so there should not be a problem. Thanks, Richard ___ epel-devel

[Bug 1547165] New: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 Bug ID: 1547165 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1542774] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180370 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542774 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1543215] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180380 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543215 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1544287] perl-System-Info-0.057 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544287 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-System-Info-0.057-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1544162] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1546961] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1544162] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1546961] perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Re: Intent to update openjpeg2 from 2.1.0 to 2.3.0

Thank you for this alert. I will mention it in the coming meeting but I think it should be fine. On 20 February 2018 at 08:30, Richard Shaw wrote: > Openjpeg2 has MANY CVE bugs reported against it and most are fixed with the > current release. I have run

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-02-21 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks and problems needed to keep EPEL

[Bug 1543215] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180380 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543215 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1542774] perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180370 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542774 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1079 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 842 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 424

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 952 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 842 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 813

[Bug 1542721] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1470030] perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.16-1.fc27 FTBFS: Failed test ' UninitCondition' on ppc64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470030 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED ---