Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:24 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 02/21/2018 10:12 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-02-20

Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey,

Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

On 02/21/2018 10:47 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:24 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 02/21/2018 10:12 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256

Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

>> > > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > > > > Hash: SHA256 >> > > > > >> > > > > Hey, >> > > > > >> > > > > today

Re: [HEADS UP] No more gnupg2 in buildroot

On 02/21/2018 10:12 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 02/20/2018 10:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

Dne 21.2.2018 v 02:35 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > Hi All, > > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder > rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so > this means that anything you do for

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 21 February 2018 at 02:08, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> > List of packages and respective maintainers: >> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt >> So this may not be all

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:17:20PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On mercredi 21 février 2018 02:35:02 CET Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > > --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder > >

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to

Re: Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)

Le 2018-02-20 19:51, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes: NM> BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both NM> for the two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that NM> succeeded but has broken auth

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. libbytesize fixed in rawhide ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27

On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 1:34:48 PM CET Sandro Mani wrote: > # dnf update > [...] > Problem 1: package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 requires apitrace = > 7.1-7.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed >- cannot install both apitrace-7.1-9.fc27.x86_64 and >

orphaned ath_info

Hello, I orphaned ath_info, a tool to read and write EEPROM on Atheros wireless cards. It only worked with ath5k cards, which I no longer have. Michal ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27

On 21.02.2018 15:16, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 1:34:48 PM CET Sandro Mani wrote: # dnf update [...] Problem 1: package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 requires apitrace = 7.1-7.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On mercredi 21 février 2018 02:35:02 CET Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder > rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so > this means that

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Le 2018-02-21 15:28, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit : I guess the problem I am having is I have no idea what we are "fixing". It all seems like needless form filling for no benefit. If XYZ-a is always going to pull in ABC.. why are we are explicitely saying we need ABC. Is the end goal to have

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 10:42 +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi, > > CUPS upstream changed license of project to Apache license 2.0, which > is > now incompatible with GPLv2. This change will be in new minor release > of > CUPS - 2.3.0, which is currently in developing phase (not in Fedora > for >

Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now

> > 3) package the LTS version for python 2 and the new version for python 3. > > +1 to this one. something similar will happen with django that is dropping python2 support https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django20 > In the third case, wihich consider the best approach, do I need to

Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now

On 02/21/2018 04:18 PM, Sergio Pascual wrote: > 3) package the LTS version for python 2 and the new version for python 3. > > In the third case, wihich consider the best approach, do I need to > create a new package and go through the review process? I believe Django did option 3, since Django 3

Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now

>1) package the version with support of python 3 and forget about python >2 I like this one because it sounds easier for you. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:51 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > > > > > it's pretty easy: > > > > when you don't list your BuildRequires properly you depend on

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, 16:39 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini

Re: BSD 2-Clause license

On 2018-02-19 11:33 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:22:56AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to add: BSD 2-clause to our table of valid licenses? Which table are you referring to ? The main list of licenses in the following page already

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > it's pretty easy: > > when you don't list your BuildRequires properly you depend on luck that they > are pulled by something else in the buildroot > OK I understand that, but where is the cutoff. Where as a

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: >

Outdated rawhide packages

Hi, procps-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1251736 flexhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/1389575 coffee-script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1405120 mercurial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150491 iptableshttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/1417323 Thank you.

Re: new pagure repo is not accepted due to different e-mail addresses.

> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 14:17] : > > You can file a bug against the Bugzilla product: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla > > I doubt the account will be deleted (that would break the database) > but the Bugzilla admins might be able to merge the two accounts or >

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > --rebase to pick up the new branch, One of my packages (syncthing) didn't get the new "f28" branch, is there a reason why? (It's not retired in

Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27

Hi I've received a bug report from a user reporting broken dependencies when updating apitrace in F27. Upon closer investigation I found out that on F27 # dnf install --refresh apitrace-libs.i686 will give you apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686, whereas # dnf install --refresh apitrace-libs

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > > --rebase to pick up the new branch, > > One of my packages

Orphaning procedure for mMass

Hello everyone. This is part of the "orphaning" procedure of mMass according to guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Orphaning_Procedure mMass development has been officially ended. There will be no further updates, bug fixes or support from

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s) -- please let me know. Fixed: util-linux-2.32-0.2.fc29 -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Outdated rawhide packages

On 02/21/2018 04:35 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > procps-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1251736 > flexhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/1389575 > coffee-script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1405120 > mercurial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150491 > iptables

Orphening ncftp

Hello, I'm planing to orphan ncftp, since the new version did not include IPv6 support (patch from OpenBSD) [1], plus I'm not using it anymore. NB. scripts using ncftp for mirroring can be switched to lftp, which includes similar features and more. Best regards. [1]

Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now

Hello all, python package astropy as ceased to support python 2.7 in its latest version, 3.0. It still provides a LTS version that supports both python 2 and 3. As astropy packagers, we seek advice on how to manage this situation. So the posibilities are: 1) package the version with support of

[Bug 1547321] perl-Test-Strict-0.43 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547321 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1547308] perltidy-20180220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547308 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1547288] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3efdbaaaea -- You are receiving

[Bug 1547290] perl-File-Slurper-0.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547290 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

[Bug 1547290] perl-File-Slurper-0.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547290 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1547297] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.102 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547297 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1547462] perl-Term-Chrome-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547462 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Term-Chrome-2.01-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ffd17b219f -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1547462] perl-Term-Chrome-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547462 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Term-Chrome-2.01-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8d941fccb8 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1547462] New: perl-Term-Chrome-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547462 Bug ID: 1547462 Summary: perl-Term-Chrome-2.01 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Term-Chrome Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1547165] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- CBuilder::Base::compile() does: my @cc = $self->split_like_shell($args{'C++'} ? $cf->{cxx} : $cf->{cc}); $self->do_system(@cc, @flags, $args{source}) Should we also hard-require

[Bug 1547165] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1) > Also Perl guidelines states that archfull packages should > build-require perl-devel. I do not want tell people that they should >

[Bug 1543181] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Version|28 |rawhide --

[Bug 1547296] perl-libwww-perl-6.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547296 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-libwww-perl-6.32-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e9e19ba764 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1547303] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547303 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1547303] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547303 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1547303] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547303 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- Waiting for resolving . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 1547462] perl-Term-Chrome-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547462 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1547462] perl-Term-Chrome-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547462 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Term-Chrome-2.01-1.fc2

qa-ansible - repo for PRs against fedora infra ansible

Hello, I've created a new project and cloned all Fedora Infra ansible into it: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/qa-ansible The idea is to have a repo against which we can create a PR and review it comfortably. Once reviewed, the patch of course needs to go to the real infra ansible repo. But this

[Bug 1547462] perl-Term-Chrome-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1547288] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1546268] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546268 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Lite-2.44-12.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2b6a247182 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1543181] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Both missing dependencies have been push to EPEL7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 1525990] [RFE] please provide in EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525990 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1080 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 843 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 425

[Bug 1547491] New: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.96 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547491 Bug ID: 1547491 Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.96 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-LibXSLT Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1547296] perl-libwww-perl-6.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547296 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1543181] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543181 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Component|perl-Data-Entropy |perl-Data-Entropy

[Bug 1547165] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

[Bug 1546962] perl-Mojolicious-7.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546962 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1547165] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth --- Looking at the gcc-removal.txt file, all of the failures mentioning EU::CB are failing when trying to run gcc rather than g++. So I'm inclined to add a hard dependency on gcc (the

[Bug 1547491] perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.96 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547491 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1547461] New: Upgrade perl-IO-AIO to 4.4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547461 Bug ID: 1547461 Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-AIO to 4.4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-IO-AIO Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1546268] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546268 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Version|28 |rawhide --

[Bug 1547461] Upgrade perl-IO-AIO to 4.4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547461 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1546268] Please provide a package for EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546268 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- EPEL7 branch requested (https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4660). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1547296] perl-libwww-perl-6.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547296 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-libwww-perl-6.32-1.fc2

[Bug 1547296] perl-libwww-perl-6.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547296 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1547288] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1547462] perl-Term-Chrome-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547462 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Term-Chrome-2.01-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Add a test suite for ds-replcheck tool RFE

Please, review the full version of the RFE test suite. https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49567 - Original Message - > From: "Simon Pichugin" > To: "389 Directory server developer discussion." > <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Wednesday,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 953 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 843 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 814

Re: qa-ansible - repo for PRs against fedora infra ansible

On 02/21/2018 05:54 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > Hello, > > I've created a new project and cloned all Fedora Infra ansible into it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/qa-ansible > > The idea is to have a repo against which we can create a PR and review it > comfortably. Once reviewed, the patch of course

Orphaning packages

I am going to orphan the following packages. If anybody wants to take my place, I will add him as main admin so the packages will not be retired https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django-model-utils https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django-netjsongraph