Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: JJ> Strangely, --enable-network to mock was really needed so that the JJ> first testsuite passes. That's absolutely bizarre. JJ> I can now get the coredumps, but I'm afraid I really need a way to JJ> reproduce it under gdb, from the core

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: > > JJ> Well, I'm seeing > [...] > > So that's the first of the two test suites, which I've seen fail before > but I haven't invested any time into debugging it. It's

Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34

2018-02-23 Thread Rafal Luzynski
23.02.2018 13:58 Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On 22/02/18 16:47 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > >15.02.2018 12:02 Rafal Luzynski wrote: > >> > >> > >> 9.02.2018 11:34 Rafal Luzynski wrote: > >> > [...] >

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
I'm sorry, for the first time in decades I actually hit the send key sequence (Ctrl-C Ctrl-C) accidentally. > "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: JJ> Strangely, --enable-network to mock was really needed so that the JJ> first testsuite passes. That's absolutely bizarre. JJ> I

Re: Pagure - Can't remove yourself from a project if not an admin?

2018-02-23 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Maybe I could help you in the mean time, feel free to ask. Thanks for the offer but I emailed one of the admins and got myself removed. Thanks, Richard ___ devel

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
Some more information: I looked through the Koschei logs for this package and it seemed it actually started failing before gcc8 went in. Specifically, the first failed build was on January 22, and the changes for that run were: mariadb-devel 3:10.2.12-2.fc28 -> 3:10.2.12-3.fc28

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
I'm sorry, for the first time in decades I actually hit the send key sequence (Ctrl-C Ctrl-C) accidentally. > "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: JJ> Strangely, --enable-network to mock was really needed so that the JJ> first testsuite passes. That's absolutely bizarre. JJ> I

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

2018-02-23 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > The fact that the 389-ds code works on other architectures does not > allow us to draw any conclusions at this point. > Can you give any more details on 32-bit ARM in particular -- is it just i686 that is experiencing issues,

Re: unresponsive maintainer procedure for konradm (Conrad Meyer)

2018-02-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 08:34:34AM -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:16 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > If anyone knows how to contact Conrad Meyer / konradm, please do so. > > > > Today one package owned by konradm, xchat-ruby, was retired as

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: JJ> Can I get detailed info on how to reproduce this (most importantly, JJ> which src.rpm you are trying to build)? Sorry, that was all in the original message. The package is cyrus-imapd; all you have to do is check it out and do fedpkg

Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection

2018-02-23 Thread Philip Kovacs
My particular concern is not "missing" bind now flags in the elf objects.  I am concerned aboutmaking sure bind now is omitted because the package cannot operate with that flag. On Friday, February 23, 2018 11:35 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 02/23/2018 05:16 PM,

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

2018-02-23 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On pe, 23 helmi 2018, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/23/2018 09:58 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: Greetings gcc maintainers! A FESCo issue[0] has been filed due to the dropping of 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches for Fedora 28. This was done without a change request being filed, so FESCo is trying to

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

2018-02-23 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/23/2018 10:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On pe, 23 helmi 2018, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 02/23/2018 09:58 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: >>> Greetings gcc maintainers! >>> >>> A FESCo issue[0] has been filed due to the dropping of 389-ds-base and >>> freeipa on 32 bit arches for Fedora 28. This was

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:54:28AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: > > JJ> Haven't managed to reproduce it, while there are some testsuite > JJ> failures, they are due to timeouts and e.g. dmesg doesn't show any > JJ> segvs nor traps. >

389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

2018-02-23 Thread Randy Barlow
Greetings gcc maintainers! A FESCo issue[0] has been filed due to the dropping of 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches for Fedora 28. This was done without a change request being filed, so FESCo is trying to decide how best to handle it. It seems there are some concerns about whether the C

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:56:47AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: > > JJ> Can I get detailed info on how to reproduce this (most importantly, > JJ> which src.rpm you are trying to build)? > > Sorry, that was all in the original

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

2018-02-23 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/23/2018 09:58 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings gcc maintainers! > > A FESCo issue[0] has been filed due to the dropping of 389-ds-base and > freeipa on 32 bit arches for Fedora 28. This was done without a change > request being filed, so FESCo is trying to decide how best to handle it. >

Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection

2018-02-23 Thread John Reiser
Philip Kovacs wrote: My particular concern is not "missing" bind now flags in the elf objects.  I am concerned about making sure bind now is omitted because the package cannot operate with that flag. Please tell us the name of the packages, and some indication of why the package does not

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

2018-02-23 Thread Marek Polacek
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 04:09:26PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:49:02PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > libguestfs-1.37.35-2.fc28.src.rpm > > I'm not sure about these failures, but they don't seem to be GCC bugs. > > Is there a log file? The one I have says

Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection

2018-02-23 Thread Philip Kovacs
The package is slurm and the issue is their plugins.  It's a deep architectural problem unfortunately,To summarize the issue briefly:  When designing a plugin system, the services a plugin providesought not depend on the environment that loads it.  That is not the case for slurm.   Their

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: JJ> Haven't managed to reproduce it, while there are some testsuite JJ> failures, they are due to timeouts and e.g. dmesg doesn't show any JJ> segvs nor traps. Of course I can reproduce this easily and it also happens in the buildsystem.

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

2018-02-23 Thread Guido Aulisi
2018-02-22 21:47 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer : > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: >> As many of you know, every year we (the GCC team) rebuild all the Fedora >> packages with the upcoming GCC, so as to reveal as many bugs as possible

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

2018-02-23 Thread Todd Zullinger
Tom Hughes wrote: > On 23/02/18 14:33, Paul Howarth wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:49:02 +0100 >> Marek Polacek wrote: >>> proftpd: timeouts in tests, but in koji it's fine >> >> I get this too. If I build with mock --old-chroot then it works fine. > > So the obvious

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-23)

2018-02-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-02-23) === Meeting started by nirik at 15:08:16 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-02-23/fesco.2018-02-23-15.08.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection

2018-02-23 Thread Philip Kovacs
The bind now issue is a real problem for some packages.  I have interacted with upstream countlesstimes on it and simply lost the fight.  Please, whatever you do, leave some route to disable bind now. On Friday, February 23, 2018 10:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

2018-02-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:49:02PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > libguestfs-1.37.35-2.fc28.src.rpm > I'm not sure about these failures, but they don't seem to be GCC bugs. Is there a log file? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my

unresponsive maintainer procedure for konradm (Conrad Meyer)

2018-02-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, If anyone knows how to contact Conrad Meyer / konradm, please do so. Today one package owned by konradm, xchat-ruby, was retired as a result of a FESCo ticket [1]. The remaining ones will be orphaned in two weeks if there is no response. [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1847 Zbyszek

libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection

2018-02-23 Thread Florian Weimer
I've seen a fair amount of LDFLAGS injection failures related to libtool. For the most part, -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld is dropped, leading to a lack of BIND_NOW in the resulting binary. Is there a way we can fix this in libtool or the auto* tools? I'm also considering

Re: libtool and LDFLAGS build flags injection

2018-02-23 Thread Florian Weimer
On 02/23/2018 05:16 PM, Philip Kovacs wrote: The bind now issue is a real problem for some packages.  I have interacted with upstream countlesstimes on it and simply lost the fight.  Please, whatever you do, leave some route to disable bind now. Disable it for what? The vast majority of

Re: unresponsive maintainer procedure for konradm (Conrad Meyer)

2018-02-23 Thread Conrad Meyer
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:16 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > If anyone knows how to contact Conrad Meyer / konradm, please do so. > > Today one package owned by konradm, xchat-ruby, was retired as a result > of a FESCo ticket [1]. The remaining ones will be orphaned in

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Enable dbus-broker

2018-02-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:13:15PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > Proposed System Wide Change: Enable dbus-broker > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableDbusBroker What about renaming this to DbusBrokerAsTheDefaultDbusImplementation? "Enable" correctly describes the technical operation

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: JJ> Well, I'm seeing [...] So that's the first of the two test suites, which I've seen fail before but I haven't invested any time into debugging it. It's completely unrelated to any of the failures I'm talking about. You can just remove

Re: [modularity] fedora/linux/modular 404

2018-02-23 Thread milanisko k
Kevin, Langdon, thanks guys! I'll keep an eye on this so we won't miss this feature. Cheers, milan pá 23. 2. 2018 v 2:21 odesílatel Langdon White napsal: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:51 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On 02/22/2018 10:33 AM, milanisko k wrote:

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

2018-02-23 Thread Petr Šplíchal
On 22 February 2018 at 15:50, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote: >> Hi! >> >> During the last days there have been concerns raised regarding >> what is an appropriate content for the tests namespace. [1] My >> original

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

2018-02-23 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:50:38 PM CET Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote: > > When, for a particular package, it is the most efficient way to > > maintain tests in a separate repo why should we discourage from > > this approach? There

How to package a gnome-shell-extension default on?

2018-02-23 Thread Christopher
Is it possible, and if so, how do I package a gnome-shell-extension that is defaulted to on for all users? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Tom Hughes
On 23/02/18 13:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 01:34:00PM -0800, John Reiser wrote: Looking at the code: = gcc/libgcc/unwind.inc _Unwind_ForcedUnwind_Phase2 (struct _Unwind_Exception *exc, struct _Unwind_Context *context,

Re: "libcryptopp update to 6.1.0 with ABI change"

2018-02-23 Thread Rex Dieter
Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to update cryptopp to 6.1.0 release for f28+ later today. ... > The good news, is that upstream accepted my patch to freeze the ABI > with .6, with this lts version. So for more safety, there is a need to > rebuild the few packages using this library: > >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-23 Thread Florian Weimer
On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: The grep output is located here: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal.txt fbset should be taken care of because I had to touch the package anyway, and it has seen few actual changes over the years. Thanks, Florian

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-23 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > > adeltonmod_auth_openidc mod_authnz_pam mod_intercept_form_submit > mod_lookup_identity perl-Cache-Mmap

Re: Pull requests for compat-gcc-34

2018-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 22/02/18 16:47 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote: 15.02.2018 12:02 Rafal Luzynski wrote: 9.02.2018 11:34 Rafal Luzynski wrote: > [...] > Please: > - backport the solution to F26 and F27 as well, this should be much > easier than

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

2018-02-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 01:34:00PM -0800, John Reiser wrote: > Looking at the code: > = gcc/libgcc/unwind.inc > _Unwind_ForcedUnwind_Phase2 (struct _Unwind_Exception *exc, > struct _Unwind_Context *context, > unsigned long *frames_p)

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

2018-02-23 Thread Paul Howarth
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:49:02 +0100 Marek Polacek wrote: > proftpd: timeouts in tests, but in koji it's fine I get this too. If I build with mock --old-chroot then it works fine. Paul. ___ devel mailing list --

cfitsio update to 3.420 with so version bump

2018-02-23 Thread Christian Dersch
Hi folks, I'm going to update cfitsio to new version 3.420 this weekend on F28+, this includes a library version bump to 5. As there were no API changes, everything should rebuild fine, I made some test builds so far. I'll take care of the required rebuilds. Affected packages (many of these

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

2018-02-23 Thread Tom Hughes
On 23/02/18 14:33, Paul Howarth wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:49:02 +0100 Marek Polacek wrote: proftpd: timeouts in tests, but in koji it's fine I get this too. If I build with mock --old-chroot then it works fine. So the obvious difference is that mock with

[Bug 1548597] New: perl-Class-C3-Componentised-1.001002 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548597 Bug ID: 1548597 Summary: perl-Class-C3-Componentised-1.001002 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Class-C3-Componentised Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1548609] New: perl-Mojolicious-7.68 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548609 Bug ID: 1548609 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-7.68 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1380983] Package metadata for perl-Gtk2-Unique lists the wrong URL, and the package itself is apparently deprecated.

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380983 Andrew Toskin changed: What|Removed |Added Version|26 |rawhide --- Comment

[Bug 1548600] New: perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.17 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548600 Bug ID: 1548600 Summary: perl-DBIx-RunSQL-0.17 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBIx-RunSQL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1548611] New: perl-Net-GitHub-0.94 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548611 Bug ID: 1548611 Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.94 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-GitHub Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1548207] perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.29 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548207 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.29-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2018-02-23 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1082 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 845 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 427

[Bug 1548207] perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.29 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548207 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2018-02-23 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 954 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 845 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 816

[Bug 1547165] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar --- I did some tests and if we want perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder to require gcc, we need to remove dependency on ExtUtils::CBuilder from perl-Module-Build. That will break 36 packages in Fedora.

[Bug 1548207] perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.29 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548207 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1548207] perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.29 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548207 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.29-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2ccdb4a06f -- You are

[Bug 1548207] perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.29 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548207 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.29-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5ea674b664 -- You are

[Bug 1547165] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- Compare to cmake bug #923024. cmake does not run-require any compiler although it defaults to C++ and dies if it cannot find g++. I will probably add both compilers as a hard dependency.

Re: Adapting Perl packages to GCC removal from Fedora 29 build root

2018-02-23 Thread Paul Howarth
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:56:58 +0100 Petr Pisar wrote: > It's a long time I sent a message here. And because your read my new > message, it means something is wrong. Here it is: > > GCC won't be in the minimal build root >

Re: Adapting Perl packages to GCC removal from Fedora 29 build root

2018-02-23 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:22:38PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > What about packages that use perl(XSLoader) but not perl(Module::Build)? > Shouldn't they require gcc too? > If you mean build-requiring gcc because your package run-requires XSLoader because it packages an XS code the is

Adapting Perl packages to GCC removal from Fedora 29 build root

2018-02-23 Thread Petr Pisar
It's a long time I sent a message here. And because your read my new message, it means something is wrong. Here it is: GCC won't be in the minimal build root since Fedora 29. That affects Perl packages that executes gcc at build

[Bug 1547165] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar --- The perl-devel message . -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Adapting Perl packages to GCC removal from Fedora 29 build root

2018-02-23 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On vendredi 23 février 2018 13:56:58 CET Petr Pisar wrote: > It's a long time I sent a message here. And because your read my new > message, it means something is wrong. Here it is: > > GCC won't be in the minimal build root >

[Bug 1547327] perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.50 is available

2018-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547327 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED