Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox

> On 02/17/2018 01:38 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > Where is this ISO? There have been questions at ask.fpo for two > releases looking for this and I couldn't find them anywhere. There hasn't been one for the last two releases due to build failures. However, here's a nightly:

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox

> On 02/17/2018 04:38 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > Since a VagrantBox is a deliverable, should this be a system wide change? Sure, I guess I can do that. I am not sure. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Lazarus vs. FPC updates

There's an "fpc" package, which is a compiler, and a "lazarus" package, which is a fancy IDE. Though not always, sometimes when compiling GUI applications, Lazarus recompiles parts of its codebase using FPC. Unfortunately, this makes the IDE dependent on a specific version of the compiler - if

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

On 26/02/18 08:25, Artur Iwicki wrote: Now, I have submitted an update for FPC. When this update is pushed to stable, it will probably break Lazarus for some use cases, as detailed above. Is there any way I can perform a koji build for Lazarus using the not-yet-stable version of FPC, so I

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

And for F28 now. пн, 26 февр. 2018 г. в 11:30, Vascom : > You should create new override for fpc and fpc-src to F27 and F26 koji > builds > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/new > > пн, 26 февр. 2018 г. в 11:25, Artur Iwicki : > >> There's an

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

You should create new override for fpc and fpc-src to F27 and F26 koji builds https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/new пн, 26 февр. 2018 г. в 11:25, Artur Iwicki : > There's an "fpc" package, which is a compiler, and a "lazarus" package, > which is a fancy IDE.

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On 11/08/2017 01:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not link to the newer version. On the other hand, libgcc switched to GPLv3+ with exceptions (but those exceptions

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? ;) V. Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random > reasons

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 26/02/2018 09:25, Artur Iwicki ha scritto: > >> As far as I can see, previously this wasn't an issue, since joost (fpc & >> lazarus maintainer) didn't usually perform FPC & Lazarus updates, >> preferring to build

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 05:40:23PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > It creates various search indices for the IMAP server (which is why it > wraps Xapian). The manpage is available from > https://cyrusimap.org/imap/reference/manpages/systemcommands/squatter.html > Technically the test suite

Re: Fwd: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] soxr-0.1.3-1.fc27

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 13:30 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > Why did my update get marked CRITPATH? It doesn't look like I can even > set that flag, much less by accident... Because pulseaudio depends on it. Try dnf remove soxr and notice what it drags down with it. - Yanko > > Thanks, > Richard

Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds

On 26 February 2018 at 16:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: [..] > > > Can you repeat above and show output of the command "size /var/tmp/inst-*"? > > After stripping: > 24808 /var/tmp/inst-O2 > 21060 /var/tmp/inst-O2-lto > 22240 /var/tmp/inst-O3

Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)

Hi there, I working on packaging the last missing (on Fedora repos) piece of user side Estonia ID card software stack: the web extension[1] for web signing I need some help in fixing %install section of spec file

Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)

Am Mon, 26 Feb 2018 19:05:55 +0100 schrieb Germano Massullo : > Hi there, I working on packaging the last missing (on Fedora repos) > piece of user side Estonia ID card software stack: the web > extension[1] for web signing > I need some help in fixing %install section

Fwd: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] soxr-0.1.3-1.fc27

Why did my update get marked CRITPATH? It doesn't look like I can even set that flag, much less by accident... Thanks, Richard -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:33 AM Subject: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment]

Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)

Il 26/02/2018 20:09, Jens Lody ha scritto: > Did you try "make -C host-linux install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" in > %install ? Thank you! Now compilation starts at least! [...] Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.s3F6YN + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + '['

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

> "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: JJ> Ok, so the problem is ignoring important warnings, in this case: JJ> imap/xapian_wrap.cpp: In function 'int JJ> stem_version_set(Xapian::WritableDatabase*, int)': JJ> imap/xapian_wrap.cpp:267:1: warning: no return statement in function

Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:42:40PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes: > > JJ> Ok, so the problem is ignoring important warnings, in this case: > JJ> imap/xapian_wrap.cpp: In function 'int > JJ> stem_version_set(Xapian::WritableDatabase*,

need sponsorship for package

Hello! I'd like to get some of my favorite packages into fedora and I'm okay with maintaining them. I've already been maintaining some of them on my personal copr ( https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/wyvie/) and building others for myself only. I've created my first review request on

Re: need sponsorship for package

I will take your review. *William Moreno Reyes* Colaborador Proyecto Fedora | Nicaragua IRC: williamjmorenor Canales: #fedora-latam ; #fedora-ni https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor 2018-02-26 14:51 GMT-06:00 Ilya Rum : > Hello! > > I'd like to get some of my

Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: > mkdir: cannot create directory '/etc/opt/chrome': Permission denied now you got this is the error -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-27 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us on

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-27 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us

Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)

Kevin Kofler wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: >>> mkdir: cannot create directory '/etc/opt/chrome': Permission denied >> >> now you got this is the error > > The makefile is not correctly honoring DESTDIR. Since it uses qmake, you could

Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)

Il 27/02/2018 01:16, Rex Dieter ha scritto: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: mkdir: cannot create directory '/etc/opt/chrome': Permission denied >>> now you got this is the error >> The makefile is not correctly

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Thank you! signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

COPR src.fp.o auto-rebuilds

Hello, you can now very easily setup auto-rebuilds for your src.fp.o package: 1) make a SCM package in COPR with Clone URL pointing to the src.fp.o fork (please, use the https:// cloning option) 2) make sure "Webhook Rebuild" checkbox is checked when you are creating the package 3) Go to

Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)

Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: >> mkdir: cannot create directory '/etc/opt/chrome': Permission denied > > now you got this is the error The makefile is not correctly honoring DESTDIR. Kevin Kofler

Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run

On 02/22/2018 07:34 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > If I understand correctly there was a new lorax build [1] that completed > at 01:11 UTC (02/23) that then made it into the runroot of a task [2] that > was part of a pungi compose [3] that started at 14:54 UTC (02/22). runroot is confusing here as we

Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/26/2018 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 02/22/2018 07:34 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> If I understand correctly there was a new lorax build [1] that completed >> at 01:11 UTC (02/23) that then made it into the runroot of a task [2] that >>

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

On 02/26/2018 06:02 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Does Firefox use the system wide crypto policy? I adjusted > /etc/crypto-policies/config to be set to LEGACY and ran > update-crypto-policies, but Firefox still won't let me access southwest.com: > > An error occurred during a connection to

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

Does Firefox use the system wide crypto policy? I adjusted /etc/crypto-policies/config to be set to LEGACY and ran update-crypto-policies, but Firefox still won't let me access southwest.com: An error occurred during a connection to southwest.com. SSL received a weak ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? > ;) My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I have to control this manually? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On 11/08/2017 04:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Well that page only refers to OpenSSL and even then it points out that other distros have differing opinions. Personally I think it is dubious even for OpenSSL, and if you start broadening it further to claim it applies to what are effectively

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

I believe that won't be necessary, as I took a look Lazarus's koji build for F28 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25292607) and on all arches root.log says that fpc 3.0.4 was used during the build. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > On 02/26/2018 10:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 11/08/2017 01:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple > >> exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board.

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Fixed smaclient. Att. -- Rafael Fonseca ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

fedora28 and strong crypto settings

Hi, regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have identified few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other tools. The main reason for this breakage is that these sites only support Diffie-Hellman with 1024-bit parameters which are considered too weak by this

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

I was bitten by this. To workaround the issues in FF and TB, it might help to change all the "dfe" options in about:config to False, which might break other sites, but it helped me to access my email again. Vít Dne 26.2.2018 v 16:37 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos napsal(a): > Hi, > regarding the

News in netpbm package.

Hi folks, I would like to inform you, that netpbm package will now require Python3 package. This change will be applied in Fedora Rawhide and Fedora 27. Regards Josef Ridky Associate Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. ___

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, Le 18/02/2018 à 18:09, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. I fixed : nsca openalchemist perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII perl-Linux-Pid perl-Unicode-LineBreak toppler Regards, Xavier

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, Le 18/02/2018 à 18:09, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. I've fixed : nsca openalchemist perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII perl-Linux-Pid perl-Unicode-LineBreak toppler Regards, Xavier

Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds

On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 13:19 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/25/2018 12:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > What's our current take on using LTO for Fedora package builds? > > systemd would like to use it. > > Why? What are the benefits? I've seen a couple of cases where LTO

Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds

On 02/26/2018 07:11 UTC, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: (Note, it's all unstripped.) It would be interesting to apply /usr/bin/size, then sum the columns. Similarly for the debuginfo, particularly the line numbers section. Optimizations which re-schedule, move, or merge instructions can

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 12:21 +, Vascom wrote: > You must control this manually. Until bodhi enablement for F28, this is not needed. Moreover, it won't work ;) - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 02/26/2018 12:53 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote: > > Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc > (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I > have to

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

On 02/26/2018 12:53 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote: > Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc > (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I > have to control this manually? You can define an RPM macro for the version in fpc, e.g., by

Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 21.02.2018 15:16, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 1:34:48 PM CET Sandro Mani wrote: >> >>> # dnf update >>> [...] >>> Problem 1: package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 requires apitrace =

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

You must control this manually. пн, 26 февр. 2018 г. в 14:54, Artur Iwicki : > Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc > (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I > have to control this manually? >

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

Thanks Louis! On 02/21/2018 11:15 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 10:42 +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> Hi, >> >> CUPS upstream changed license of project to Apache license 2.0, which >> is >> now incompatible with GPLv2. This change will be in new minor release >> of >> CUPS -

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On 02/26/2018 10:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 11/08/2017 01:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple >> exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not >> link to the newer version. > > On the other hand, libgcc

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have identified few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other tools. The main reason for this breakage is that these sites only support

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > I believe however that we should gather as many data as we can related > to this security update in Fedora28, and decide after F28 beta is > released on whether to back this change off, or to ignore this >

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Alternatively, if you want to strengthen the system crypto policy, then it should not apply to web browsers at all. Or web browsers should automatically use the weak policy. (We'd need the weak policy in glib-networking, too.)

Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds

On 26 February 2018 at 07:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:24:28AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > But size is easy: > > > $ du -s /var/tmp/inst-O* > > > 74428 /var/tmp/inst-O3 > > > 56136

Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings

On 02/26/2018 11:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have identified few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other tools. The main reason for

Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates

Il 26/02/2018 09:25, Artur Iwicki ha scritto: As far as I can see, previously this wasn't an issue, since joost (fpc & lazarus maintainer) didn't usually perform FPC & Lazarus updates, preferring to build new versions in Rawhide / early branched and have them roll out with the next Fedora

Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:47:31PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 26 February 2018 at 07:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:24:28AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > But size is easy: > > > >

[Bug 1548597] perl-Class-C3-Componentised-1.001002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548597 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1548779] perl-Net-SSH2-0.69 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548779 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1548837] perl-App-cpm-0.960 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548837 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1085 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 848 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 430

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 958 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 848 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 819

[Bug 1549338] New: perl-Data-Peek-0.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549338 Bug ID: 1549338 Summary: perl-Data-Peek-0.48 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Data-Peek Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1549344] New: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549344 Bug ID: 1549344 Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase-0.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1549346] New: perl-Plack-Middleware-RemoveRedundantBody-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549346 Bug ID: 1549346 Summary: perl-Plack-Middleware-RemoveRedundantBody-0.07 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Plack-Middleware-RemoveRedundantBody

[Bug 1529811] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529811 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ti...@math.uh.edu

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49560 - Add a test case for extract-pemfiles

Hi team, please, review a new pull request: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49578 And a gentle reminder... https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49567 Thanks, Simon ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Bug 1479864] Upgrade perl-Net-SSH-Perl to 2.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479864 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1479860] perl-Net-SFTP-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479860 Bug 1479860 depends on bug 1479864, which changed state. Bug 1479864 Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-SSH-Perl to 2.12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479864 What|Removed |Added