Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the person > making the change, because of the use of globs. So I agree it is good practice > to explicitly list files without globs whereever it is practical

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "OO" == Orcan Ogetbil writes: OO> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? OO> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? You could argue whether they're useful without a compiler, but they are certainly useful without gcc.

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:53:19AM -0700, stan wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:04:41 -0500 > "Jared K. Smith" wrote: > > > ... Even if we didn't have > > this rule, it would be common courtesy to announce any change that > > causes others to have to do work, even if

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the > > person > > making the change, because of the use of globs. So I agree it is good >

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:49:09PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > >

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 13:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the > > person > > making the change, because of the use of globs. So I agree it is good > >

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-02)

2018-02-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-03-02 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: march VFAD for the atomic working group

2018-02-28 Thread chicago
Hi Dusty, I'm very excited for atomic workstation. Sincerely, signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Dusty Mabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/28/2018 01:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

2018-02-28 Thread mcatanzaro
I have an update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/epiphany-3.26.6-1.fc27 that is blocked due to some harmless translation-related warnings from desktop-file-validate. I'm not the translation police and do not plan to make any changes to the desktop file. * Who can help unblock

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On 28 February 2018 at 10:03, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : >> >> On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > >> These are all _very_ edge use-cases. > > > Those are *not* edge-cases. We have a few thousand build failures. If you cannot find as

Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee

2018-02-28 Thread James Antill
 The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC. The FPC would like to thank Ralf Corsepius, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski, and Thomas Spura for their service. This position involves not only reviewing Packaging

Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes (was: Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21))

2018-02-28 Thread Kevin Kofler
Fabio Valentini wrote: > AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a > compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so > breakage is sometimes allowed to sit unnoticed (and grow increasingly > worse) for very long. Isn't that the real issue to

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On 28 February 2018 at 11:37, Björn Persson wrote: > Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? >> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? >> This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

2018-02-28 Thread Randy Barlow
On 02/28/2018 07:05 PM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > I have an update here: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/epiphany-3.26.6-1.fc27 > > that is blocked due to some harmless translation-related warnings from > desktop-file-validate. It does not appear to be blocked currently.

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-03-01 17:00 UTC)

2018-02-28 Thread James Antill
 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-03-01 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-03-01 09:00 PST  US/Pacific 2018-03-01

Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee

2018-02-28 Thread James Antill
 The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.  The FPC would like to thank Ralf Corsepius, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski, and Thomas Spura for their service.  This position involves not only reviewing Packaging

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:32:19PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > > > On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > > > >

Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they > need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code. > > That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty much any kind of > compiler, so it's

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/28/2018 11:28 AM, Rafal Luzynski wrote: 28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? What good is a header package without a

Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 02/28/2018 04:28 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code. That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > The requirement to announce soname bumps to begin with is unreasonable > bureaucracy in the first place. If your package shows up in the broken > dependency report, you rebuild it and move on, where is the problem? >

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On 28 February 2018 at 05:28, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > 28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : >> > >> > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? >> > What good is a header package without a

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 28.2.2018 v 13:46 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > Richard Shaw wrote: >> Unannounced soname bumps are a pain :) > The requirement to announce soname bumps to begin with is unreasonable > bureaucracy in the first place. If your package shows up in the broken > dependency report, you rebuild it

Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code. That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty much any kind of compiler, so it's *completely useless* to try to make C/C++ devel packages pull

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Susi Lehtola
On 02/18/2018 07:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to random reasons and I grepped all logs for some

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: These are all _very_ edge use-cases. Those are *not* edge-cases. Most system libraries are written in C/C++ so pretty much all the language toolchains we ship (except for toy languages not

Re: News in net-snmp package

2018-02-28 Thread Josef Ridky
Hi thanks a lot for your review. | On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 09:02 -0500, Josef Ridky wrote: | > Hi folks, | > | > I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package | > instead of Python2. | > With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to | > python3-net-snmp

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > xchat-ruby was retired. ruby and rubygem-bcrypt are fixed (at least in git). Vít signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

packmol license change

2018-02-28 Thread Susi Lehtola
Hi, I've updated packmol to version 18.013. This carries a license change from GPLv2+ to MIT. No other packages are affected, since packmol is executable only. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ devel

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-02-28 16:03, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Most system libraries are written in C/C++ so pretty much all the language toolchains we ship (except for toy languages not intended to produce complex apps) will read C/C++ header files from their compilers to use those system libraries, and will

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? > What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? > This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of > these failed builds. > gcc

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-02-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Can the logs actually contain timestamps with timezone? And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log it probably was, but it is not obvious from the log. Vít Dne

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-02-28 Thread Lubomír Sedlář
Vít Ondruch píše v St 28. 02. 2018 v 10:35 +0100: > Can the logs actually contain timestamps with timezone? There's a timezone offset at the beginning of the log: 2018-02-28 00:33:30 [INFO] Current timezone offset: +00:00 > And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at > >

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote:     Once again, folks, *please*

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Feb 28, 2018 12:35, "Ralf Corsepius" wrote: On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > >> On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson >>>

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 16:51 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > > > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > > Igor, you will fix my packages isn't it ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M.

march VFAD for the atomic working group

2018-02-28 Thread Dusty Mabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429 In the Atomic working group in Fedora we have occasionally used virtual Fedora Activity Days (VFADs) to get the community together to discuss in a high bandwidth setting (video conference) some techical issues

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-02-28 Thread Dennis Gilmore
l/pungi.global.log > > it probably was, but it is not obvious from the log. > the status of the compose can always be found in the STATUS file of the root of the compose https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/ Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/STATUS is todays for instance Dennis

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread stan
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:04:41 -0500 "Jared K. Smith" wrote: > ... Even if we didn't have > this rule, it would be common courtesy to announce any change that > causes others to have to do work, even if it's only for a few users. What about an email list called

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El mié, 28-02-2018 a las 12:32 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió: > On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > > > On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > > > >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Björn Persson
Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? > What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? > This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of > these failed builds. Do you mean that maintainers

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 12:14 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > > > Once again, folks, *please* announce your

Re: News in net-snmp package

2018-02-28 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 27 February 2018 at 14:02, Josef Ridky wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package > instead of Python2. > With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to > python3-net-snmp package. > This change will be

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 02/27/2018 06:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:41 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler >> wrote: >> >>> Richard Shaw wrote: Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:51:49AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 02/27/2018 06:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:41 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Richard Shaw wrote: > Is

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-02-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:35:11 +0100, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log it probably was, but it is not obviou

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-02-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 28.2.2018 v 10:52 Lubomír Sedlář napsal(a): > Vít Ondruch píše v St 28. 02. 2018 v 10:35 +0100: >> Can the logs actually contain timestamps with timezone? > There's a timezone offset at the beginning of the log: > > 2018-02-28 00:33:30 [INFO] Current timezone offset: +00:00 A bit hard

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-28 Thread Rafal Luzynski
28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > > > > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? > > What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? > > This would also

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi, I'm deeply sorry, I thought cups-filters will be rebuilt with new qpdf during next mass rebuild - I forgot about 'rawhide is alpha' policy so dependent packages need to be rebuild immediately with rebased package. Again, I'm deeply sorry and thank you Adam and Rex for fixing it! On

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/28/2018 02:41 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler > wrote: Richard Shaw wrote: > Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a > "%global sover " and using it in

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson >> > wrote: >> >> >>     Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

2018-02-28 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Shaw wrote: > Unannounced soname bumps are a pain :) The requirement to announce soname bumps to begin with is unreasonable bureaucracy in the first place. If your package shows up in the broken dependency report, you rebuild it and move on, where is the problem? I can see the point of

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49584 - Fix issues with paged_results test suite

2018-02-28 Thread Simon Pichugin
Hi team, please, review a small fix: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49584 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49590 Thanks, Simon ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1549556] perl-libwww-perl-6.33 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549556 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2018-02-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 960 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 850 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 821

[Bug 1550056] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1550055] perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1549884] perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RDF-NS-20180227-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2018-02-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1087 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 850 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 432

[Bug 1550305] New: perl-Net-FTPSSL-0.40 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550305 Bug ID: 1550305 Summary: perl-Net-FTPSSL-0.40 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-FTPSSL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee

2018-02-28 Thread James Antill
 The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.  The FPC would like to thank Ralf Corsepius, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski, and Thomas Spura for their service.  This position involves not only reviewing Packaging

[Bug 1550055] perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-675bf97721 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1550056] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1550055] perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7cb24f9fcf -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1550056] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.

[Bug 1550056] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2ff63a0451 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1550056] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-43ecd9b72e -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1549884] perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1550049] New: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.56 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550049 Bug ID: 1550049 Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.56 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBD-SQLite Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1547165] perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[EPEL-devel] No meeting today. Next meeting 2018-03-??

2018-02-28 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Due to conflicts and lack of planning on my part.. I am cancelling today's meeting. Please send agenda items for next weeks meeting to the list -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[Bug 1550055] perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1550056] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1549884] perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1549884] perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RDF-NS-20180227-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-11d26d0837 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1549884] perl-RDF-NS-20180227 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RDF-NS-20180227-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9d85899558 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1550055] New: perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055 Bug ID: 1550055 Summary: perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Harness Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1550056] New: perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056 Bug ID: 1550056 Summary: perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-RT-Client-REST Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1544589] perl-SNMP-Info-3.47 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544589 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1550055] perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1550055] perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available

2018-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc