On 22/03/18 08:47, Artur Iwicki wrote:
1) mmgui can work with a couple of backends (different modem managers and connection
managers). Each backend module is compiled into a different .so and they're all included in
the package. mmgui is smart enough to recognize that a module cannot be used
On 2018-03-22, 06:51 GMT, Till Maas wrote:
> I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the
> java openstreetmap editor on request by the original
> maintainer. Please adopt it. It needs to be updated regularly
> to follow the current openstreetmap guidelines, currently it
> is
HI,
want to commit a new package for the f28 branch, but this fails with:
[martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg switch-branch f28
Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28
existing koji builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=24481
how can i
On 03/22/2018 11:32 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 2018-03-22, 06:51 GMT, Till Maas wrote:
I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the
java openstreetmap editor on request by the original
maintainer. Please adopt it. It needs to be updated regularly
to follow the current
On 22/03/18 12:40, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Martin Gansser
> wrote:
i tried this already, but i don't know where is this "token" under
"fedpkg.pagure"
[martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg
On 22/03/18 12:10, Martin Gansser wrote:
want to commit a new package for the f28 branch, but this fails with:
[martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg switch-branch f28
Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28
existing koji builds:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Martin Gansser
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Very unintuitively under /etc/rpkg...
>
> $ ll /etc/rpkg
> total 8
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1545 Jan 5 03:40 fedpkg.conf
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 581 Feb 6 18:14 rfpkg.conf
>
> Thanks,
>
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating
the whole software management stack.
Please read more details on our blog:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Martin Gansser
wrote:
>
> i tried this already, but i don't know where is this "token" under
> "fedpkg.pagure"
> [martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg --module-name
> nuvola-app-mixcloud request-branch f28
> Could not execute
> On 22/03/18 12:10, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
>
> Well that package doesn't seem to have an f28 branch, which is a
> bit odd given it doesn't seem to be new.
>
> You should be able to request one with "fedpkg request-branch" though.
>
> Tom
i tried this already, but i don't know where is this
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
> version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating
> the whole software management stack.
>
> Please read more details on our
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 136
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.74 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This version
is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating the whole
software management stack.
How does RPM fit into DNF's view of "the whole software management
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
>> or anything else -- please let me know.
>
> On 22/03/18 12:40, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Better to use .config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf rather than change
> the global configuration...
>
> Tom
then I should copy the /etc/rpkg/fedpkg.conf file to ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf
?
___
devel mailing list --
On mardi 20 mars 2018 23:35:04 CET djb djb wrote:
> Ok..I'll do json one when I get home
>
> On Mar 20, 2018 5:19 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I have done all of them
On 22/03/18 14:56, Martin Gansser wrote:
On 22/03/18 12:40, Richard Shaw wrote:
Better to use .config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf rather than change
the global configuration...
Tom
then I should copy the /etc/rpkg/fedpkg.conf file to ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf
?
No, it reads both so just create
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:55:53 -
"Luya Tshimbalanga" wrote:
> Both upstream from Blender and embree responded and provided the
> patches. Blender:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1060683 embree:
>
On 2018-03-22, 11:55 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> What you say, basically means you are questioning and deny the
> usefulness of packaging as a whole. The key feature which has
> made Linux distros great and superior to Windows.
I understand your point, but I just wonder whether there is
Le jeudi 22 mars 2018 à 16:19 +0100, Matěj Cepl a écrit :
> On 2018-03-22, 11:55 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > What you say, basically means you are questioning and deny the
> > usefulness of packaging as a whole. The key feature which has
> > made Linux distros great and superior to Windows.
>
On 03/22/2018 08:51 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> It is sad to hear, but world rolls on.
> I would like to thank you. You have pushed fedora and java FX to
> completely new level. Without your will and endurance, there would be
> nothing of this.
>
> The Fedora+FX as you you are started it is a
Hi, I am going to start working on upgrading qdigidoc 3.x spec file[1],
in order making it compatible with the new (beta) qdigidoc 4.x [2].
I am not yet confident in creating spec files from the scratch, like
often happens with major updates, so I would like to ask you some
suggestions that come
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 12:10 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> HI,
>
> want to commit a new package for the f28 branch, but this fails with:
>
> [martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg switch-branch f28
> Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28
this usually happen when
> On 22/03/18 14:56, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> No, it reads both so just create ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf like this:
>
> [fedpkg.pagure]
> token = ...
>
> Tom
done so, thanks again.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
OLD: Fedora-28-20180321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 03/22/2018 07:55 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/22/2018 11:32 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 2018-03-22, 06:51 GMT, Till Maas wrote:
I orphaned josm
I never packaged something for Fedora before, but can you give me a
chance to see how is the effort to maintain the package before I adopt
it?
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi
>
> I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the java
>
Release status of the Fedora 28 Beta is NO-GO.
Due to missing RC for the F28 Beta release and presence of blocker
bugs, the decision is “No Go”. The Beta release slips for one week to
“Target #1” date (April 3rd). We are not going to slip the Final GA
yet.
For more information please check the
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
>>
>> We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
>> version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating
>> the whole software
On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser wrote:
On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
version is focused on performance improvements, new
Some time ago I've adopted modem-manager-gui. Recently upstream has released a
new version, and while packaging this new version, I noticed a couple of issues:
1) mmgui can work with a couple of backends (different modem managers and
connection managers). Each backend module is compiled into a
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 08:47:58AM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Some time ago I've adopted modem-manager-gui. Recently upstream has released
> a new version, and while packaging this new version, I noticed a couple of
> issues:
>
> 1) mmgui can work with a couple of backends (different modem
Hi Jonny!
It is sad to hear, but world rolls on.
I would like to thank you. You have pushed fedora and java FX to completely new level. Without your
will and endurance, there would be nothing of this.
The Fedora+FX as you you are started it is a working universe, and the chain you started
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 03/13/2018 07:04 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dbus-broker is a new DBus message bus implementation. We are proposing
> it as the default in Fedora as of F29 [0], and as such we would be
> grateful for as much testing as possible before the switch is made.
>
> For instructions on how to
On 03/21/2018 01:52 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 04:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 03/20/2018 11:02 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>>>
>>> I've rec'd about 30 of these in the last hour or so, fedora-28,
>>> fedora-27, fedora-26, and fedora-28-modular.
>>>
>>> Would someone please
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 209813 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209813
ID: 209849 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/126 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 209537 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209537
ID: 209540 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL:
On 22 March 2018 at 17:49, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:49 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to
Hi
I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the java
openstreetmap editor on request by the original maintainer. Please adopt
it. It needs to be updated regularly to follow the current openstreetmap
guidelines, currently it is outdated (also in EPEL).
Kind regards
Till
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559195
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBD-CSV-0.50-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-af3c99ff31
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559211
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559211
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559195
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559474
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-10.80-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559474
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1109 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
872 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
454
Release status of the Fedora 28 Beta is NO-GO.
Due to missing RC for the F28 Beta release and presence of blocker
bugs, the decision is “No Go”. The Beta release slips for one week to
“Target #1” date (April 3rd). We are not going to slip the Final GA
yet.
For more information please check the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559474
Bug ID: 1559474
Summary: postgres support seems to be left out of this package
but is included upstream
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: rt
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559474
--- Comment #3 from Garrett ---
BestPractical has a set of instructions for postgres on Rhel 7 now that should
apply:
https://rt-wiki.bestpractical.com/wiki/CentOS7Install#RT_4.4.2_installation_on_CentOS_7.4.1708
I've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557561
--- Comment #3 from R P Herrold ---
I added positive karma -- thank you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557560
--- Comment #4 from R P Herrold ---
I added positive karma -- thank you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing
55 matches
Mail list logo