Re: How to avoid re-generating Pagure API keys all the time?

Hi Ben, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:42:51AM +0100, Ben Rosser wrote: > I don't know. I feel like we could do a lot to improve the experience > of packaging by investing time into fixing these sorts of minor > annoyances. (But here I am complaining on the devel list and not > actually doing

Re: Future of MongoDB - Legal Issues with SSPLv1

Chris Adams píše v Po 10. 12. 2018 v 12:52 -0600: > Once upon a time, Richard Shaw said: > > Has anyone approached the parent company with a specific lists of > > concerns > > such that they could have the opportunity to update the verbiage of > > the > > license prior to removing it from Fedora?

Re: Did the XML API change?

No, it didn't. BUT I believe that the problem is here: /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -pipe -Wall -Wextra -Werror=strict-prototypes -Werror=missing-prototypes -Werror=missing-declarations -Werror=format=2 -Werror=undef -Werror=missing-include-dirs

Re: Did the XML API change?

On 11/12/2018 16:46, Steve Dickson wrote: I'm getting a bunch of xml routines undefined https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=31408933=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 on my rawhide build... everything builds just fine on f29... and I have BuildRequires: libxml2-devel Is there something

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20181211.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181210.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181211.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 137 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 8.79 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora 30 Change proposal deadlines approaching

Here's an extra early reminder due to the holidays coming up. Several Change proposal deadlines for Fedora 30 are approaching: * 2019-01-02 — Changes requiring infrastructure changes * 2019-01-08 — Changes requiring mass rebuild * 2019-01-08 — System-Wide changes * 2019-01-29 — Self-Contained

Did the XML API change?

Hello, I'm getting a bunch of xml routines undefined https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=31408933=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 on my rawhide build... everything builds just fine on f29... and I have BuildRequires: libxml2-devel Is there something more I have BuildRequires on

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

Hi, Any news ? "But I guess nothing's getting released, for some reason? fedora-review has been on version 0.6.1 since May 2016; all package activity since then has been housekeeping rebuilds. " may you add me as admin to Fedora-review package ? to release a new version . Thanks On Sat,

Fedora Rawhide-20181211.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! all required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 17/131 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Rawhide-20181210.n.0): ID: 317896 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi URL:

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 16:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:30 AM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Any news ? > > > > "But I guess nothing's getting released, for some reason? fedora- > > review has been on version 0.6.1 since May 2016; all package > > activity

Re: How to avoid re-generating Pagure API keys all the time?

On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 16:06 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > you are right. I am thinking this, too. Would you maybe be interested > in > making this a Community Objective[0] such as "Packaging Contribution > Experience"? I support this. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

Dne 11. 12. 18 v 11:29 Raphael Groner napsal(a): 2. PkgDB was recently deprecated. For now, you will need to submit a ticket to the Release Engineering team, stating which package you want to claim. Miro, that isn't worth the effort to maintain pykka. Is there any active upstream? Sorry

Re: /usr/include/GL/glext.h:467:10: fatal error: KHR/khrplatform.h: No such file or directory

On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 09:23 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Hi, > > Got an e-mail from Koschei [1] with a notice that camotics package is > starting to fail to build. The reason for this seems to be that > something that used to pull mesa-libEGL-devel doesn't do so anymore. > >

S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Re: /usr/include/GL/glext.h:467:10: fatal error: KHR/khrplatform.h: No such file or directory

On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 13:29 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 09:23 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Got an e-mail from Koschei [1] with a notice that camotics package > > is > > starting to fail to build. The reason for this seems to be that > > something that

Bodhi stakeholders' meeting next week

Greetings! I have planned an IRC meeting for Bodhi stakeholders for Tuesday 2018- 12-18 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/infrastructure/2018/12/17/#m9429 Feel free to drop by and say hi! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: How to avoid re-generating Pagure API keys all the time?

On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 11:42 +0100, Ben Rosser wrote: > I guess what bothers me here is that it's been a year since I filed > my > ticket against pagure, and nine months since you filed yours against > fedpkg, and it seems like nothing has been done to fix this. I know > it's only a minor

Re: Did the XML API change?

On 12/11/18 11:59 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > No, it didn't. BUT I believe that the problem is here: > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -pipe -Wall > -Wextra -Werror=strict-prototypes -Werror=missing-prototypes > -Werror=missing-declarations -Werror=format=2 -Werror=undef

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:30 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > Any news ? > > "But I guess nothing's getting released, for some reason? fedora-review has > been on version 0.6.1 since May 2016; all package activity since then has > been housekeeping rebuilds. " > > may you add me as admin to

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

> Sorry but I have no idea about pykka. Frankly I don't even know what it is. Upstream obvioulsy uses pykka to connect to spotify with mopidy (currently not packaged). That's a valuable reason for me to look deeper into those packages. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7986

Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?

I'd say BFQ on devices that are not multi-queue, and either none or mq-deadline on devices that are. This is detectable through sysfs. [root@flap ~]# cat /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/scheduler [none] mq-deadline [root@flap ~]# grep SCSI_MQ /boot/config-4.20.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc30.x86_64 #

Re: Orphaning pykka

> I've just orphaned pykka (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package > /rpms/pykka/) as I'm no longer using it. Hi Jonathan, what do you use instead? Regards, Raphael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: How to avoid re-generating Pagure API keys all the time?

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 6:58 PM Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 17:20 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > From time to time I have to submit a ticket with 'fedpkg request- > > repo' or > > 'fedpkg request-branch', and I have feeling that I have to regenerate > > the API > > key very

Re: Need help with Add Package to Source Code Management (SCM) system

On 11/12/2018 09:24, J. Scheurich wrote: I need help: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner I tried: $ fedpkg --release f29 build --scratch --srpm

Agenda for Tuesday's Modularity Working Group Meeting (2018-12-11)

___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

> 2. PkgDB was recently deprecated. For now, you will need to submit a ticket > to the Release Engineering team, stating which package you want to claim. Miro, that isn't worth the effort to maintain pykka. Is there any active upstream? ___ devel

Re: Heads Up: libmodulemd 2.0 coming soon to a Rawhide near you

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:05 AM Pete Walter wrote: > > 10.12.2018, 19:22, "Neal Gompa" : > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:06 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > >> On 12/10/2018 07:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> > It is versioned, actually. The 1.x API is `pkconfig(modulemd)` and 2.x > >> > is

Re: Orphaning some of my packages

Hi Eduardo, thanks for your interest and the help. > I have claimed ownership of jp2a. Co-maintainers are welcome. How did you do that? Still I've several issues with pagure, it does not seem to like me. Anyways, I assign admin role to you. Feel free and enjoy. Regards, Raphael

Re: Need help with Add Package to Source Code Management (SCM) system

On 11/12/2018 10:31, J. Scheurich wrote: $ fedpkg --name wdune-0.99-1.pl1216 request-repo 31403246 Could not execute request_repo: A Bugzilla bug is required on new repository requests What bug is needed ? The review bug that you created when getting the package reviewed:

Re: Heads Up: libmodulemd 2.0 coming soon to a Rawhide near you

10.12.2018, 19:22, "Neal Gompa" : > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:06 PM Kalev Lember wrote: >>  On 12/10/2018 07:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>  > It is versioned, actually. The 1.x API is `pkconfig(modulemd)` and 2.x >>  > is `pkgconfig(modulemd-2.0)`. The source of the conflict between the >>  

Re: Need help with Add Package to Source Code Management (SCM) system

$ fedpkg --name wdune-0.99-1.pl1216 request-repo 31403246 Could not execute request_repo: A Bugzilla bug is required on new repository requests What bug is needed ? The review bug that you created when getting the package reviewed:

Re: Need help with Add Package to Source Code Management (SCM) system

On 11/12/2018 10:57, Tom Hughes wrote: On 11/12/2018 10:31, J. Scheurich wrote: I have reviewed it, but with the name "white_dune": https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481 Should i add a review request with the name "wdune" ? You used "white_dune" in the bug title but the

Need help with Add Package to Source Code Management (SCM) system

Hi, I need help: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner I tried: $ fedpkg --release f29 build --scratch --srpm rpmbuild/SRPMS/wdune-0.99-1.pl1216.fc29.src.rpm . Created task: 31403246

Re: Did the XML API change?

On 12/11/18 11:59 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 11/12/2018 16:46, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> I'm getting a bunch of xml routines undefined >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=31408933=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 >> >> on my rawhide build... everything builds just fine on f29... >>

Re: Heads Up: libmodulemd 2.0 coming soon to a Rawhide near you

11.12.2018, 10:29, "Fabio Valentini" : > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:05 AM Pete Walter wrote: >>  Huh, better to conflict? That's just not true. Conflicting packages are a >> major hurdle that we should try to avoid if at all possible. If it's still >> possible to still change the design of

Re: Heads Up: libmodulemd 2.0 coming soon to a Rawhide near you

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:52 PM Pete Walter wrote: > > > > 11.12.2018, 10:29, "Fabio Valentini" : > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:05 AM Pete Walter wrote: > >> Huh, better to conflict? That's just not true. Conflicting packages are a > >> major hurdle that we should try to avoid if at all

[Bug 1658189] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658189 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1653175] Upgrade perl-Git-Repository to 1.323

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653175 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 1653180] Upgrade perl-SNMP-Info to 3.63

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653180 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 1655089] Upgrade perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases to 3.84

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655089 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC|

[EPEL-devel] Re: missing -devel packages in 8 beta

> Failed to synchronize cache for repo > 'codeready-builder-beta-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms', ignoring this repo. > > whereas the base and appstream repo work. Does anyone have that > working, and, if so, how? The codeready-builder repo is not part of the public beta I think. - Thomas

[Bug 1624360] perl-Redis-1.991-7.fc29 FTBFS: Failed test 'pipeline with embedded error'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624360 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 1658188] Upgrade perl-List-AllUtils to 0.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658188 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-List-AllUtils-0.15-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b24374f0f0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1658188] Upgrade perl-List-AllUtils to 0.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658188 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-List-AllUtils-0.15-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c776b91239 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

Fedora 30 Change proposal deadlines approaching

Here's an extra early reminder due to the holidays coming up. Several Change proposal deadlines for Fedora 30 are approaching: * 2019-01-02 — Changes requiring infrastructure changes * 2019-01-08 — Changes requiring mass rebuild * 2019-01-08 — System-Wide changes * 2019-01-29 — Self-Contained

[Bug 1658189] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658189 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.55-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2fce43790c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[EPEL-devel] Re: missing -devel packages in 8 beta

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 10:10, Thomas Moschny wrote: > > > Failed to synchronize cache for repo > > 'codeready-builder-beta-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms', ignoring this repo. > > > > whereas the base and appstream repo work. Does anyone have that > > working, and, if so, how? > > The

[Bug 1658189] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658189 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.55-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f42162a98d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1658188] Upgrade perl-List-AllUtils to 0.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658188 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2018-12-12 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the

[Bug 1646751] CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646751 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|impact=moderate,public=2018 |impact=moderate,public=2018

[Bug 1646734] CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646734 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|impact=moderate,public=2018 |impact=moderate,public=2018

[Bug 1646730] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|impact=important,public=201 |impact=important,public=201

[Bug 1646738] CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646738 Doran Moppert changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|impact=low,public=20181129, |impact=low,public=20181129,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 185 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-61fe7c6e70 nagios-4.4.2-3.el6 2

[Bug 1655552] Upgrade perl-DBD-SQLite to 1.60

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-SQLite-1.60-1.fc30 |perl-DBD-SQLite-1.60-1.fc30

[Bug 1655555] Upgrade perl-L to 1.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-12-12 - 89% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/12/12/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.19-20181212git5ed5f87.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 185 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7 136 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7

[Bug 1654921] CVE-2018-18313 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow read in regcomp.c [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654921 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-5.28.1-426.fc30|perl-5.28.1-426.fc30

[Bug 1654923] CVE-2018-18314 perl: Heap-based buffer overflow [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654923 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-5.28.1-426.fc30|perl-5.28.1-426.fc30

[Bug 1654918] CVE-2018-18311 perl: Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654918 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-5.28.1-426.fc30|perl-5.28.1-426.fc30

[Bug 1654919] CVE-2018-18312 perl: Heap-buffer-overflow write / reg_node overrun [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654919 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-5.28.1-426.fc30|perl-5.28.1-426.fc30

[Bug 1658188] Upgrade perl-List-AllUtils to 0.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658188 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1658189] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658189 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1658189] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658189 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.55-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1658188] Upgrade perl-List-AllUtils to 0.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658188 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-List-AllUtils-0.15-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1613221] Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.004002

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613221 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: missing -devel packages in 8 beta

Stephen John Smoogen writes: > Most -devel packages have been moved into the CodeReady Linux Builder > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/11/15/introducing-codeready-linux-builder/ > which is supposed to be available in the developer subscription. If > the package you need isn't there then

[EPEL-devel] Re: missing -devel packages in 8 beta

R P Herrold writes: > What particular -devel are you seeking? Is it > non-versioned, such that you can work-around > with an earlier one? I gave an example; I assume the openmpi BRs are in the builder repo. > Customarily I would just bootstrap forward to a needed leaf > node package from

[Bug 1658189] New: Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658189 Bug ID: 1658189 Summary: Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.55 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-RT-Client-REST Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1658188] New: Upgrade perl-List-AllUtils to 0.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658188 Bug ID: 1658188 Summary: Upgrade perl-List-AllUtils to 0.15 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-List-AllUtils Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com