no fesco meeting today

2019-08-12 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
This is just a clarification that we decided not to hold a meeting today because people are travelling back from Flock. We'll hold a meeting on the 19th. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

License correction in teckit-2.5.9-2.fc31

2019-08-12 Thread Petr Pisar
After unretiring teckit I reviewed the sources and corrected a license tag from LGPLv2+ or CPL to (LGPLv2+ or CPL) and (LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or MPLv2.0 or MPLv1.1) -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

good to keep your package in sync (for translations)

2019-08-12 Thread Sundeep Anand
Hi, With the deployment of Transtats[1] latest release at https://transtats.fedoraproject.org/ we can track packages which are out of sync. This can answer: Is everything translated packaged? A couple of features: (1) Package Translation Completeness: At a glance picture of statistics from

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-08-12, Florian Weimer wrote: > Do you use the built-in Intel graphics? Can you test with something > else? > Does it have any effect? It happens to me even with a discrete GPU. As far as I know integrated graphics arrays do not share physical memory from point of view of the CPU address

Fedora-Rawhide-20190812.n.0 compose check report

2019-08-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING:

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

2019-08-12 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:35:50PM +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote: > Hi guys, > as discussion was started week ago, Python2 is dying. As that, some > dependencies of mercurial will be orphaned soon (or they are already) > and mercurial as it is has to move in weeks on Python3. As I wrote > in [0], I

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 16:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:35:50PM +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote: Hi guys, as discussion was started week ago, Python2 is dying. As that, some dependencies of mercurial will be orphaned soon (or they are already) and mercurial as it is has to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190812.n.0 changes

2019-08-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190811.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190812.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 16 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 24.57 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Why retire Python 2 packages and games that still work to end user ?

2019-08-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 11-08-19 01:05, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we still haven't a replacement . childsplay and gcompris maintainer here. Childsplay has been in a zombie state upstream for years, some work has been done upstream but mostly

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Florian Weimer
* Petr Pisar: > On 2019-08-12, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Do you use the built-in Intel graphics? Can you test with something >> else? >> > Does it have any effect? It happens to me even with a discrete GPU. I expect that the GEM shrinker (or rather, the reason why it is needed) radically

Re: What other external trackers would you like added to Bugzilla?

2019-08-12 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-08-12, Ankur Sinha wrote: > The new "external trackers" bits in Bugzilla leaves out quite a few > commonly used ones. I filed a ticket[1] and was asked to contact the > admins. Before I do so, I thought I'd post here so we can make a list of > trackers we want to get added. Here is what I

Re: What other external trackers would you like added to Bugzilla?

2019-08-12 Thread Dan Book
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:36 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > - Perl: https://rt.perl.org/Public/ I would not expend effort on this, as it is planned to be moved the github in the near future. https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2019/06/msg255335.html -Dan

Re: Why does anaconda-core runtime depend on python3-coverage?

2019-08-12 Thread Brian C. Lane
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 11:39:34AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hey, I have noticed that anaconda-core has a runtime dependency on > python3-coverage. > > Is it some weird error, or does anaconda actually need a test coverage > measuring tool at runtime? Yes. If you pass inst.debug=1 it will

Re: Orphaning cloud-init, python-boto

2019-08-12 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 8/10/19 9:06 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > Hi, > > My time to work on Fedora cloud-related things has diminished in > recent months, so I have not been able to give the cloud-init and > python-boto packages the care they deserve. They are free to a good > home. > Maybe larks (cc) would

Re: What other external trackers would you like added to Bugzilla?

2019-08-12 Thread Dan Book
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:11 PM Dan Book wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:36 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > >> - Perl: https://rt.perl.org/Public/ > > > I would not expend effort on this, as it is planned to be moved the github > in the near future. > >

Re: Orphaning cloud-init, python-boto

2019-08-12 Thread Igor Gnatenko
python-boto is dead and deprecated. Why do you want to take it? On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 03:43 Gwyn Ciesla via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I'll take python-goto. FAS: limb. > > > Sent from ProtonMail mobile > > > > Original Message > On Aug 10, 2019, 8:06 PM,

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 20:12 +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Sorry for the top posting, "smart" phone... > > What about Qubes OS? Isn't their dom0 using xen, based on Fedora? > > Do they use Xen as packaged by Fedora? If not, couldn't they contribute > whatever they do that Fedora doesn't here?

What other external trackers would you like added to Bugzilla?

2019-08-12 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi, The new "external trackers" bits in Bugzilla leaves out quite a few commonly used ones. I filed a ticket[1] and was asked to contact the admins. Before I do so, I thought I'd post here so we can make a list of trackers we want to get added. Here is what I have so far: - src.fp.o so that one

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 12.08.19 19:06, Benjamin Kircher (benjamin.kirc...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > On 12. Aug 2019, at 18:16, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > On Mo, 12.08.19 09:40, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > > > >> How to do this automatically? Could there be a mechanism for the > >>

Re: What other external trackers would you like added to Bugzilla?

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 20:24, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi, The new "external trackers" bits in Bugzilla leaves out quite a few commonly used ones. I filed a ticket[1] and was asked to contact the admins. Before I do so, I thought I'd post here so we can make a list of trackers we want to get added. Here is

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:01 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Chris Murphy: > > > Summary of findings (restated, but basically the same as found at [2]): > > Test system, Macbook Pro, Intel Core i7-2820QM (4/8 cores), 8GiB RAM, > > Samsung SSD 840 EVO, Fedora Rawhide Workstation. > > Do you use the

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Benjamin Kircher
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 17:40, Chris Murphy wrote: > > If I just run the example program, let's say systemd MemoryLimit is > set to /proc/meminfo MemAvailable, the program is still going to try > and bust out of that and fail. The failure reason is also non-obvious. > Yes this is definitely an

Re: License correction in teckit-2.5.9-2.fc31

2019-08-12 Thread Igor Gnatenko
This is horrifying :) Curious how much time it took to figure that out.. On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 14:21 Petr Pisar wrote: > After unretiring teckit I reviewed the sources and corrected a license > tag from > > LGPLv2+ or CPL > > to > > (LGPLv2+ or CPL) and (LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or MPLv2.0 or MPLv1.1)

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:30 AM Benjamin Kircher wrote: > > > > > On 11. Aug 2019, at 23:05, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > I think the point at which the mouse pointer has frozen, the user has > > no practical means of controlling or interacting with the system, it's > > a failure. > > > > In the

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Benjamin Kircher
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 18:16, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mo, 12.08.19 09:40, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > >> How to do this automatically? Could there be a mechanism for the >> system and the requesting application to negotiate resources? > > Ideally, GNOME would run

Re: What other external trackers would you like added to Bugzilla?

2019-08-12 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:24:49PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi, > > The new "external trackers" bits in Bugzilla leaves out quite a few > commonly used ones. I filed a ticket[1] and was asked to contact the > admins. Before I do so, I thought I'd post here so we can make a list of > trackers

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

2019-08-12 Thread Petr Stodulka
On 12. 08. 19 16:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12. 08. 19 16:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:35:50PM +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote: Hi guys, as discussion was started week ago, Python2 is dying. As that, some dependencies of mercurial will be orphaned soon (or

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 12.08.19 09:40, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > How to do this automatically? Could there be a mechanism for the > system and the requesting application to negotiate resources? Ideally, GNOME would run all its apps as systemd --user services. We could then set

Re: Why does anaconda-core runtime depend on python3-coverage?

2019-08-12 Thread Igor Gnatenko
What is the point of this? I am probably missing something obvious.. On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 18:46 Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 11:39:34AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hey, I have noticed that anaconda-core has a runtime dependency on > python3-coverage. > > > > Is it some

Re: OpenCL on Intel processors

2019-08-12 Thread Benson Muite
Ok. Arm and AMD also support OpenCL https://developer.arm.com/solutions/graphics/apis/opencl https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm-OpenCL-Runtime https://rocm.github.io/install.html AMD part for OpenCL only seems to be MIT licensed. On 8/12/19 9:24 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: I've dropped

RE: Self Introduction: Muneendra

2019-08-12 Thread Muneendra Kumar M via devel
Hi All, I have addressed the review comments and the details of SPEC and SRPM are available in the below path. Spec URL: https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/SPEC/fc_txptd.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/fc_txptd-0.1-1.fc28.sr c.rpm Regards,

Re: repoquery: Modular dependency problems: nothing provides module(platform:f30)

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 8:21, Igor Gnatenko wrote: You need to explicitly set --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:F31 I thought itvwas fixed, but probably it does not work for repoquery. It was fixed for a long time. This just started again now. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Why retire Python 2 packages and games that still work to end user ?

2019-08-12 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 8/11/19 2:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote: We are still planning to maintain the interpreter. As is documented in the change. So can we please stop arguing about maintaining the interpreter over and over? It is staying and our team will maintain it at least until RHEL 7 EOL,

Re: OpenCL on Intel processors

2019-08-12 Thread Benson Muite
On 8/11/19 3:19 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 08 August 2019 at 08:19, Benson Muite wrote: Hi, Beignet has been deprecated, might it be possible to put Intel(R) Graphics Compute Runtime for OpenCL(TM) in the Fedora repositories? There is a COPR repository at:

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Benjamin Kircher
> On 11. Aug 2019, at 23:05, Chris Murphy wrote: > > I think the point at which the mouse pointer has frozen, the user has > no practical means of controlling or interacting with the system, it's > a failure. > > In the short term, is it reasonable and possible, to get the oom > killer to

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Florian Weimer
* Chris Murphy: > Summary of findings (restated, but basically the same as found at [2]): > Test system, Macbook Pro, Intel Core i7-2820QM (4/8 cores), 8GiB RAM, > Samsung SSD 840 EVO, Fedora Rawhide Workstation. Do you use the built-in Intel graphics? Can you test with something else? Thanks,

Re: OpenCL on Intel processors

2019-08-12 Thread Igor Gnatenko
I've dropped beignet a while ago since I was getting bugs, but upstream is dead. Also many times, POCL performed better than beignet. And after all, if you want to do something complicated with OpenCL, you already have high-end AMD or latest Intel card.. However, anyone is free to unretire it.

Re: [Fedora-join] NeuroFedora is looking for a Spin/Labs master

2019-08-12 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 07:11:13 +0200, Vendaval wrote: > Hello Ankur, Hello! > I found this idea very interesting; also, I attend one of the talks in the > FLOCK. > > If you still don't have a spin master, I will do it. Sure. We've had @dan1mal volunteer, but we'd like to have a team around it

Re: Why does anaconda-core runtime depend on python3-coverage?

2019-08-12 Thread Martin Kolman
- Original Message - > From: "Miro Hrončok" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: anaconda-maint-l...@redhat.com > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 11:39:34 AM > Subject: Why does anaconda-core runtime depend on python3-coverage? > > Hey, I have noticed that

Re: repoquery: Modular dependency problems: nothing provides module(platform:f30)

2019-08-12 Thread Igor Gnatenko
You need to explicitly set --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:F31 I thought itvwas fixed, but probably it does not work for repoquery. On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 23:07 Miro Hrončok wrote: > I've noticed that recently, I see this with repoquery regardless of the > query: > > $ repoquery

Re: bootctl: no entry could be determined as default (Was: Upgrade to F30 gone wrong)

2019-08-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sa, 10.08.19 12:18, Dridi Boukelmoune (dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > > That only works properly on distros that implement the boot loader > > spec and the boot loader interface properly: > > > > https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION > >

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

2019-08-12 Thread nils
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-08-13 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread David Airlie
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 2:57 AM Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:50:43PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > [..] > > Problem and thesis statement: > > Certain workloads, such as building webkitGTK from source, results in > > heavy swap usage eventually leading to the system becoming

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-08-12 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected > packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package > or > retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your > package will be retired when the affected package gets

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:31 PM David Airlie wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 2:57 AM Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:50:43PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > [..] > > > Problem and thesis statement: > > > Certain workloads, such as building webkitGTK from source,

Re: What other external trackers would you like added to Bugzilla?

2019-08-12 Thread Florian Weimer
* Ankur Sinha: > The new "external trackers" bits in Bugzilla leaves out quite a few > commonly used ones. I filed a ticket[1] and was asked to contact the > admins. Before I do so, I thought I'd post here so we can make a list of > trackers we want to get added. Here is what I have so far: > > -

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

2019-08-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:07 AM Benjamin Kircher wrote: > > (… I definitely need to play around with Silverblue to learn what they are > doing.) I'm pretty sure Silverblue will be rebased on Fedora CoreOS which recently released a preview. I'm not sure what the time frame for that is, but

Orphaned some (mostly Python) packages

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
# python-behave Leaf. Doesn't build yet with Python 3.8, but a patch exists: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706085 # python-cligj python-rasterio and python-fiona depend on that. # python-coverage_pth python-pytest-testmon depends on that. # python-jeepney python-SecretStorage

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 20:37, Petr Stodulka wrote: Can you explain better what do you mean by that? I am little lost here. Sure. The idea was: 1) When Fedora 31 is branched (scheduled for tomorrow [1]), push the switch to rawhide (Fedora 32) 2) See what happens, collect feedback. 3) Soon before

[Bug 1740149] New: Upgrade perl-App-cpm to 0.983

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740149 Bug ID: 1740149 Summary: Upgrade perl-App-cpm to 0.983 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-App-cpm Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1740224] New: Upgrade perl-PDF-API2 to 2.035

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740224 Bug ID: 1740224 Summary: Upgrade perl-PDF-API2 to 2.035 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PDF-API2 Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1740151] New: Upgrade perl-Class-Method-Modifiers to 2.13

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740151 Bug ID: 1740151 Summary: Upgrade perl-Class-Method-Modifiers to 2.13 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Class-Method-Modifiers Assignee:

[Bug 1740152] New: Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 to 2.087

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740152 Bug ID: 1740152 Summary: Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 to 2.087 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 Assignee:

[Bug 1740154] New: Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma to 2.087

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740154 Bug ID: 1740154 Summary: Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma to 2.087 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma Assignee:

[Bug 1740155] New: Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib to 2.087

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740155 Bug ID: 1740155 Summary: Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib to 2.087 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib Assignee:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 13:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 08. 19 11:13, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. 'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on EPEL7 ppc64le only? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=36879492=DEFAULT=root.log=-4000 Funny thing: ppc64le

[Bug 1740155] Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib to 2.087

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740155 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

2019-08-12 Thread Tuomo Soini
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:52:34 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > > python3_other is now defined to 3 in rhel7.7. > > By what? Do you mean python3_pkgversion? W can override that as well. Sorry. python3_pkgversion. -- Tuomo Soini Foobar Linux services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 08. 19 11:13, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. 'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on EPEL7 ppc64le only? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=36879492=DEFAULT=root.log=-4000 Funny thing: ppc64le gets: Problem: conflicting requests -

[Bug 1731802] Upgrade perl-Carp-Assert-More to 1.20

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731802 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Upgrade |Upgrade

[Bug 1740223] New: Upgrade perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse to 1.01

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740223 Bug ID: 1740223 Summary: Upgrade perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse to 1.01 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse Assignee:

[Bug 1740224] Upgrade perl-PDF-API2 to 2.035

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740224 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le

2019-08-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 07:21, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 08. 19 11:13, Antonio Trande wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > 'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on > > EPEL7 ppc64le only? > > > > >

[Bug 1740200] New: perl-Scalar-List-Utils 1.51 is available

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740200 Bug ID: 1740200 Summary: perl-Scalar-List-Utils 1.51 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Scalar-List-Utils Status: NEW

[Bug 1740149] Upgrade perl-App-cpm to 0.983

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740149 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1740152] Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 to 2.087

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740152 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1740156] New: Upgrade perl-IO-Compress to 2.087

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740156 Bug ID: 1740156 Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-Compress to 2.087 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-Compress Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1740157] New: Upgrade perl-IO-Compress-Lzma to 2.087

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740157 Bug ID: 1740157 Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-Compress-Lzma to 2.087 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-Compress-Lzma Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 1740151] Upgrade perl-Class-Method-Modifiers to 2.13

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740151 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1740223] Upgrade perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse to 1.01

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740223 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1740154] Upgrade perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma to 2.087

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740154 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

2019-08-12 Thread Tuomo Soini
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:26:45 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > %python3_other_pkgversion 34 > > I believe the easiest fix is to define that directly in > epel-rpm-macros: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/5 Correct. That fixes this issue but not the huge issue we

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 12. 08. 19 11:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 12. 08. 19 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > >>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > See for

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 8:14, Tuomo Soini wrote: On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:26:45 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: %python3_other_pkgversion 34 I believe the easiest fix is to define that directly in epel-rpm-macros: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/5 Correct. That fixes this

[Bug 1738791] Upgrade perl-TheSchwartz to 1.13

2019-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738791 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 11:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12. 08. 19 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: See for example:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 10:52, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12. 08. 19 8:14, Tuomo Soini wrote: On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:26:45 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: %python3_other_pkgversion 34 I believe the easiest fix is to define that directly in epel-rpm-macros:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: See for example: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7 2019-08-11 07:50:11 - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.6 ... This is provided in RHEL 7.7. (Note

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > See for example: > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7 > 2019-08-11 07:50:11 > > - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.6 ... > > This is provided in RHEL 7.7. > > (Note that we've unretired the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 12. 08. 19 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> See for example: > >> > >> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7 > >> 2019-08-11

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-12 Thread Dave Dykstra
Hi Kevin, I have fedpkg-1.37-4.el7, the latest version. My yum log shows I updated it from 1.37-2 on August 6 an hour and a half before I started this thread. If I recall correctly I saw an instruction somewhere that said to update it, and I did that before my initial attempt. Dave On Sun,

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-08-13 - 96% PASS

2019-08-12 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/08/13/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190812git21ba842.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2019-08-12 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing indent-2.2.12-4.el8 pugixml-1.9-1.el8 python-ratelimitingfilter-1.1-3.el8 robin-map-0.6.1-2.el8 will-crash-0.12-3.el8 Details about builds:

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-12 Thread Troy Dawson
Looks like you need at least fedpkg-1.37-3.el7 for it to work with the playground stuff, so you should be good. When I did the branches for KDE (about 350 of them) there were 6 that didn't properly branch to epel8-playground. They *said* they were branched, but they weren't. I was able to push and

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 17:47, Troy Dawson wrote: > Looks like you need at least fedpkg-1.37-3.el7 for it to work with the > playground stuff, so you should be good. > When I did the branches for KDE (about 350 of them) there were 6 that > didn't properly branch to epel8-playground. > They *said*

[EPEL-devel] RHEL-7.7 problems

2019-08-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
This release has had a multitude of problems this release. * The python3 problems were caused because there were complaints that the python36 was conflicting with the RHEL-7 python3 causing build problems. The maintainers removed python36 to try and fix this and broke centos consumers who relied