Re: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:30:43 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:27:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > > > > Hello, all. > > > > > > Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul

Re: sundials-5.4.0 updating

Thank you Orion. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ OpenPGP_0x7B30EE04E576AA84.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go and Release Readiness meetings

Hi everyone, It's that time already! The Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go[1] and Release Readiness[2] meetings are scheduled for Thursday 15 October. As a reminder, please update the Release Readiness page[3] with your team's readiness if appropriate. We will use that to keep the Release Readiness

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, Petr Menšík wrote: I would like to request pausing any new systemd-resolved features system-wide, until its current bugs and deficiencies are resolved sufficiently. I agree for two reasons. One, the FESCO decision to postpone making systemd-resolvd the default resolver. I

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 12:43:31PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > "Brian C. Lane" writes: > > > I don't think it is currently possible to make the iso accessible, > > That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it. Are > there things that could be done to make it easier to

Re: [Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

Looks like a mistake, lists shouldn't be used for needinfo. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

"Brian C. Lane" writes: > I don't think it is currently possible to make the iso accessible, That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it. Are there things that could be done to make it easier to add? By way of comparison, Debian's installer accessibility is documented

Re: Updated zdicts for F33 zchunk metadata

Thanks Dusty for the pointers on the Freeze Exception process. I've created https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886581 blocked the Final Freeze Exception bug. Jonathan On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:32 PM Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > I'm afraid I'm late to the party on updating the zstd

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:43 pm, Robbie Harwood wrote: That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it. Are there things that could be done to make it easier to add? Currently anaconda is not accessible even in the default live Workstation install that runs under

Re: Error creating the package RPM: make:*** No rule to make target 'install'.

Hi Helg, On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 4:54 AM Helg Green via devel wrote: > Hi Jerry! > I want to send a small donation, I can use PayPal. Thank you. I appreciate the thought. One of the great things about the Fedora community is how helpful people are. I've been the recipient of help many times

Updated zdicts for F33 zchunk metadata

I'm afraid I'm late to the party on updating the zstd dictionaries used by zchunk for F33. I've just built fedora-repo-zdicts-2010.1, which now includes the F33 dictionaries, but we're obviously past final freeze. I would appreciate karma on the following update so it can go in as a zero-day

Re: [Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 04:10, wrote: > The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has > been > waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take > action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these > bugs > might already be closed,

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:28 pm, Paul Wouters wrote: I agree for two reasons. One, the FESCO decision to postpone making systemd-resolvd the default resolver. I would like to ensure this change happens properly and securely for f34. Well it's too late, since we are now in final freeze. FESCo

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 12:05:34PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:43 pm, Robbie Harwood > wrote: > > That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it. > > Are > > there things that could be done to make it easier to add? > > Currently anaconda is

Re: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > Hello, all. > > Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka > Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS usernames > are pghmcfc and jplesnik respectively. > > Is there someone on the

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

On 2020-10-05 13:53, Richard Shaw wrote: I updated fail2ban and gmsh and committed to master. I assume that is sufficient? Thank you! As I understand it, it is sufficient. But since repo queries look at "live" packages, you might get some spurious notifications about this in the future.

Re: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:27:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > > Hello, all. > > > > Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka > > Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

I would like to request pausing any new systemd-resolved features system-wide, until its current bugs and deficiencies are resolved sufficiently. And no, repeating that non-sense again, saying DNSSEC is only the server stuff nobody needs on desktop, would not count as fixed bug. Every TLS

Fedora-IoT-34-20201008.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201005.0): ID: 688487 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL:

ganglia builds on mock/copr, fails on koji

ganglia EPEL 7 successfully builds on mock and copr [1] but fails on koji [2], complaining about a missing close in a %if block. By seeing the spec file I don't see any missing closure in the block, and I don't understand this different behaviour between copr and koji What do you think about?

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:28 pm, Paul Wouters wrote: > > I agree for two reasons. One, the FESCO decision to postpone making > > systemd-resolvd the default resolver. I would like to ensure this > > change happens properly and securely for f34. > > Well it's too late,

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201008.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20201007.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201008.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 141 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

On 10/8/20 2:24 PM, Björn Persson wrote: Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:28 pm, Paul Wouters wrote: I agree for two reasons. One, the FESCO decision to postpone making systemd-resolvd the default resolver. I would like to ensure this change happens properly and securely for

Fedora-33-20201008.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201007.n.0): ID: 688579 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688579 ID: 688582 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

Re: ganglia builds on mock/copr, fails on koji

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:37 PM Germano Massullo wrote: > ganglia EPEL 7 successfully builds on mock and copr [1] but fails on > koji [2], complaining about a missing close in a %if block. By seeing > the spec file I don't see any missing closure in the block, and I don't > understand this

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201008.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201007.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201008.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 161 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.52 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Fedora-Rawhide-20201008.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 21/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in

EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

Hello, all. Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS usernames are pghmcfc and jplesnik respectively. Is there someone on the list who can do this? Regards, Emmanuel

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 04:40:54PM +0100, majid wrote: > hey all, > > I would like to start off by saying i'm not a programmer or dev person, > just a end user of fedora. > > would it be possible to have espeakup and espeak added to the net > install iso of fedora? > > the iso where you can

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201008.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: libvirt and systemd-resolved integration?

El mié., 7 oct. 2020 a las 10:35, Petr Menšík () escribió: > > > On 10/7/20 6:44 AM, Pavel Zhukov wrote: > > > > I don't think it's a good idea. > > dnsmasq is not dns resolver but acts as DHCP and DNS server. It provides > > VMs with IP > > address/lease and create corresponding dns record for

Re: Where did my keys go in Thunderbird?

@Zdeněk, thx for the tip. And if you wonder like my why you cannot see the menu item, them the reason might be you are using thunderbird-enigmail installed from Fedora, which is 2.1.x version. But you need to install Engimail 2.2.x from Mozilla addons to have this functionality available, unless

Fedora33 : Screenrecording and Wayland still don't work

Hi, yes, I know, wayland calls it a security feature, but you still can't screen share a gnome desktop via a browser i.e. in a Jitsi Meet conference. Test on Fedora 33 liveimage There is an additional bug in the next mail. best regards, Marius ___

Fedora 33: pcscd and xrdp issue

Hi, this is a topic since a lot of time and it's still hits the user in it's face for no reason. Found: while presenting Fedora 33 changes to an audience and screenrecording with wayland isn't working yet :( Tested on Fedora 33 liveimage: su dnf install xrdp  -y adduser -s /bin/bash -d

Fedora-IoT-33-20201008.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 688028 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688028 Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by

Re: Error creating the package RPM: make:*** No rule to make target 'install'.

Hi Jerry! I want to send a small donation, I can use PayPal. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1886390] perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886390 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1870755] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870755 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #6 from

Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go and Release Readiness meetings

Hi everyone, It's that time already! The Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go[1] and Release Readiness[2] meetings are scheduled for Thursday 15 October. As a reminder, please update the Release Readiness page[3] with your team's readiness if appropriate. We will use that to keep the Release Readiness

[Bug 1886390] perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886390 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||CPAN 133492 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1886491] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.075 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886491 Bug ID: 1886491 Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.075 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1886085] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.96 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886085 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1884617] F32->F33 upgrade: obsolete removed Perl packages requiring perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884617 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from

[Bug 1879713] perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879713 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1886085] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.96 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886085 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1884617] F32->F33 upgrade: obsolete removed Perl packages requiring perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884617 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1790461e43 chromium-85.0.4183.121-1.el8 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0f2bfced63 prosody-0.11.7-1.el8 1

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-10-09 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7d1114b762 xawtv-3.105-2.el6 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f853880b07 prosody-0.11.7-1.el6 The following builds have been

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e943b78209 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-10-09 - 94% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/10/09/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20201008git7cb9a63.fc32.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1886655] New: perl-SVN-Look-0.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886655 Bug ID: 1886655 Summary: perl-SVN-Look-0.42 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-SVN-Look Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6dfb98688e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6dfb98688e --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-6dfb98688e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6dfb98688e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1885000] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885000 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from

[Bug 1885000] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885000 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar --- I reported it to the upstream . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1885000] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885000 --- Comment #9 from Jitka Plesnikova --- I'll remove it from Fedoras 31-33. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1879713] perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879713 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com Doc

[Bug 1886390] New: perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886390 Bug ID: 1886390 Summary: perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL:

[Bug 1886390] perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886390 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar