Hi sir, I installed and configured successfully freeipa.
The problem now is I can't login my admin account.
No error when running "kinit admin", but when logging in through the web UI, it
will return an error message saying "Login failed due to an unknown reason. ".
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 8:37:02 AM CEST Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am aiming to orphan java-comment-precprocessor package, as it seems,
> there are no other packages (AFAIK) depending on it. If there is someone,
> who is actively using this package, or maintains a package, which
The license tag on python-cligj appears to have always been wrongly
tagged as MIT. I have now corrected it to BSD in Rawhide while
updating to its latest beta, and will let this trickle down to other
releases once the new release is out.
--
Elliott
___
Yes, thanks for the notice. This package is buildable without
java-comment-preprocessor (
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5346). Do you know
about any other packages ?
Thanks.
Ondrej
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:30 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, October 15, 2020
Hi guys,
I am aiming to orphan java-comment-precprocessor package, as it seems,
there are no other packages (AFAIK) depending on it. If there is someone,
who is actively using this package, or maintains a package, which depends
on it, please let us know to this thread, so we can discuss next
Proposed upstream change:
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/1930
Downstream change will be done during this day.
Thanks!
Ondrej
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:20 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, October 15, 2020 10:10:20 AM CEST Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> > Yes, thanks for the notice. This
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 10:10:20 AM CEST Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Yes, thanks for the notice. This package is buildable without
> java-comment-preprocessor (
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5346). Do you know
> about any other packages ?
You should have tell that
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201014.0):
ID: 695877 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 10/14/20 11:43 PM, rodents...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi sir, I installed and configured successfully freeipa.
The problem now is I can't login my admin account.
No error when running "kinit admin", but when logging in through the web UI, it will
return an error message saying "Login failed due
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
OLD: Fedora-33-20201014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201015.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201014.0):
ID: 696960 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/696960
ID: 696961 Test: x86_64
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20201014.n.0):
ID: 696540 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Elliott Sales de Andrade <
quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The license tag on python-cligj appears to have always been wrongly
> tagged as MIT. I have now corrected it to BSD in Rawhide while
> updating to its latest beta, and will let this trickle down to other
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 95/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in
I orphaned perl-Math-FFT:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-FFT#
I do not use it for long time.
It is basicaly no-op package. But I just got notified that there is a new
version.
Feel free to take it.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10
== Summary ==
Update the Python stack in Fedora from Python 3.9 to Python 3.10.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Thrnciar|Tomáš Hrnčiar]]
* Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]]
* Email: python-ma...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
We would
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:24 PM David S. wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I just spotted that there is a difference in the default log levels on
> Fedora and RHEL-8 vs RHEL-7.
>
> Fedora/RHEL-8 uses:
>
># cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk
>7 4 1 7
>
> while RHEL-7 uses:
>
># cat
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:06 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:43 pm, Robbie Harwood
> wrote:
> > That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it.
> > Are
> > there things that could be done to make it easier to add?
>
> Currently anaconda is not
During installation, I encountered these errors.
● krb5-kdc.service - Kerberos 5 Key Distribution Center
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/krb5-kdc.service; enabled; vendor
preset: enabled)
Drop-In: /lib/systemd/system/krb5-kdc.service.d
└─slapd-before-kdc.conf
Active:
On 10/12/20 9:24 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:15 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> wrote:
>>
>> I wrote to Igor a week ago, but it seems he's away currently, as I didn't
>> get an answer yet.
>>
>> Do you know of some document that describes how to "go through Igor's whole
On 10/15/20 9:36 PM, rodents...@gmail.com wrote:
Still the same sir, installing it on Ubuntu 18.04 desktop (Oracle Virtual Box).
Following these simple steps.
Then why are you emailing this list? It's very much the wrong one.
This is the Fedora development list, nothing to do with Ubuntu or
Still the same sir, installing it on Ubuntu 18.04 desktop (Oracle Virtual Box).
Following these simple steps.
https://computingforgeeks.com/install-and-configure-freeipa-server-on-ubuntu/
Btw, I tried installing it both my non-root and root account sir.
Re: Can you use the username and password instead?
That's the only way I tried logging in sir, I can't login even with correct
credentials.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I am looking to some performance considerations for the /etc/fstab btrs
default config generated by anaconda.
It appears to have created a subvol for root (root00) and for home (home00).
I would like to put in /opt with it's subvol, and to migrate the /var to a
subvol where I can specify
On 2020-10-14 12:59 a.m., Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:13:18AM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I took over the maintenance of nodejs-svgo needed for Inkscape.
Unfortunately, two dependencies were retired due to lack of
maintenance: sax and js-ymal.
On 10/15/20 4:45 PM, rodents...@gmail.com wrote:
During installation, I encountered these errors.
I don't know. I've installed it several times with no problems. I just
noticed that in your original email you said you were installing 389ds
on Ubuntu. What are you trying to install freeipa
I forgot to mention, that one way tI can isolate /var is to use a separate
partition. Ditto for /opt
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|c...@redhat.com |emman...@seyman.fr
--
You are
On 14.10.20 19:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We now allow scls if:
>
> * They only need to be used at build time (ie, the rpms produced do not
> require users to install/enable any scls)
> * They are approved by the epel steering comittee.
>
> So far we have only enabled devtoolset. (so for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from
Hi,
For my part, I have seen mapping tree misconfiguration popping from time to
time but it is quite rare (maybe 7 or 8 times in 15 years)
So although in pure term or architecture your proposal is IMHO the
cleanest, in term of risks it is not a good solution:
there will likely be regressions
Hi Pierre,
you expressed my concerns much clearer. I agree with you,
Thanks,
Ludwig
On 15.10.20 13:00, Pierre Rogier wrote:
Hi,
For my part, I have seen mapping tree misconfiguration popping from
time to time but it is quite rare (maybe 7 or 8 times in 15 years)
So although in pure term
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9374ba063f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-174525f97d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bd6a96cd24
python34-3.4.10-7.el7
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-9eaf8d2e11
prosody-0.11.7-1.el7
12
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f853880b07
prosody-0.11.7-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
R-inline-0.3.16-1.el6
R-littler-0.3.12-1.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870762
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-5608fa4a78 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888767
Bug ID: 1888767
Summary: perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.85 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-CheckOS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10
== Summary ==
Update the Python stack in Fedora from Python 3.9 to Python 3.10.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Thrnciar|Tomáš Hrnčiar]]
* Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]]
* Email: python-ma...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
We would
Due to many of the members of the EPEL Steering Committee not being
able to make the meeting,
this week's meeting has been canceled.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:00 PM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-10-16 from 21:00:00 to
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-10-16 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/10/16/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20201015gitb8b1691.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4375
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs, Australia
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msu...@redhat.com
47 matches
Mail list logo
