There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling the meeting.
I'll chair the next one too.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2674 F36 Change: PHP 8.1
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2674
APPROVED (+7,0,-0)
#2669 Non responsive maintainer: michelmno
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2669
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:26:46PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings
> > > which breaks the build of:
> > >
> > > 1. osmpbf
> > > Problem: package protobuf-java-3.14.0-6.fc35.noarch conflicts with
> > > protobuf-compiler >
Hi,
> So in short the best current scenario is Anaconda booted in text mode
> from a USB stick or via PXE with NFS installation source - that should
> require the least amount of RAM at installation time.
>
> Still even then, especially with kickstart installations that have
> elaborate post
On 18/10/2021 15:55, Adrian Reber wrote:
Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings
which breaks the build of:
1. osmpbf
Problem: package protobuf-java-3.14.0-6.fc35.noarch conflicts with
protobuf-compiler > 3.14.0 provided by
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/204 (x86_64), 9/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211017.n.0):
ID: 1032154 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1032154
ID: 1032281 Test: x86_64
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/206 (x86_64), 7/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211017.0):
ID: 1032402 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211015.0):
ID: 1032539 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1032539
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
I looked at a few of the failures.
> 4. opencv
> 6. gazebo
> 7. fawkes
The root cause is of course a bad python-flake8 update, as described here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014589
A lot of other packages are affected as well. The python-flake8 package
should
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211017.0):
ID: 1031605 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Sunday, October 17, 2021 2:40:05 PM CEST Steven Grubb wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:08 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
>
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > I'd like to suggest making libcurl-minimal very minimal for security
> > > reasons. The main curl
On Monday, October 18, 2021, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Is it worth paying hundreds of MBytes of installer space, and the new
> 2 GB minimum RAM to simply install Fedora? I'm not saying "discard
> anaconda". I'm saying "be aware of some very real reasons the
> installer has gotten so huge". And
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211018.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:145.42
On Saturday, October 16, 2021 5:32:17 PM CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:52:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hi Kamil and everyone,
> >
> > what is the plan with introduction of libcurl-minimal in Fedora?
> > IIUC, libcurl and libcurl-minimal both
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211017.0):
ID: 1031621 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 10/14/21 14:57, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Enforce Authselect Configuration Consistency
This sounds good, I updated the page title. Thank you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in
rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires
a rebuild of all dependencies. The list of dependencies grows with each
rebuild and we have now reached 58 protobuf dependencies according to
repoquery.
This time
Resending with correct maintainers aliases (-owner does not work anymore)
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:45:51PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in
> rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires
> a rebuild of all
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 05:33:17PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Now, my makefile is a horrific hand-built thing from literally twenty years
> > ago, and it's probably not up to, like, best pratices of THAT time, let
> > alone now. But I do pass OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to %make_build in the
> >
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:10:38 AM +0200, Björn Persson
> wrote:
> > My question is: Is it true that this usage of SHA-1 makes the TLS
> > session weak, so that it's correct to forbid it in the crypto policy?
>
> Hm, I think Fedora's
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 02:20, drago01 wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 18, 2021, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Is it worth paying hundreds of MBytes of installer space, and the new
>> 2 GB minimum RAM to simply install Fedora? I'm not saying "discard
>> anaconda". I'm saying "be aware of some
OLD: Fedora-35-20211017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211018.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Adrian Reber writes:
> The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in
> rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires
> a rebuild of all dependencies. [...]
Is it futile to point them to https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
in hope of avoiding this
Version 0.9.9 of gap-pkg-float is out, and changes the license from GPLv3+
to GPLv2+.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 2021-10-17 at 15:56 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:36 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:01 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I still remember how Red Hat Linux and (IIRC) Fedora Core 1 could
> >
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:01 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 05:33:17PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Now, my makefile is a horrific hand-built thing from literally twenty
> > > years
> > > ago, and it's probably not up to, like, best pratices of THAT time, let
> > > alone
I am going to reply to the parent and grandparent post at once, starting
with the parent post:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> This conversation is one that seems to happen to computer people as
> they age. I remember in the early 1990's that the Sun 4.1 installer
> was incredibly bloated and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-4afdc698f2 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c10f197b24 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-d5dbd037b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-53699cc586 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7b9db947a9 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e6469621e0 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-a8387e3b13 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7beea2c6d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f408964c1b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8d41be54fd has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-235ff0a1b1 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e65ac3fecd has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-eb671ca8cc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-cae5cf5823 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-86f6c80321 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3431570a36 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-eaf1b7d447 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-686675288e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2f392e788b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ff589b06fa has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3e42d77c54 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9cac11389f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-70df8f8a5b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015018
--- Comment #1 from Wes Hardaker ---
Upgraded on main.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015018
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6129d68cab has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ec8e3912d9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ec8e3912d9
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013631
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ec8e3912d9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ec8e3912d9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0aab571d73 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0aab571d73
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013637
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0aab571d73 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0aab571d73
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7beea2c6d0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7beea2c6d0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-686675288e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-686675288e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-686675288e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-686675288e
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015011
Bug ID: 2015011
Summary: Upgrade perl-CHI to 0.61
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CHI
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015018
Bug ID: 2015018
Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.19
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Assignee: wjhns...@hardakers.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014723
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6129d68cab has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6129d68cab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-a8387e3b13 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a8387e3b13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6fe217985d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6fe217985d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014315
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014714
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-5ec380b3f3 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013643
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
83 matches
Mail list logo
