Re: Incomprehensible rpmlint error messages

On 08/12/2021 09:33, Dan Horák wrote: On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 08:32:10 +0100 zxing-cpp.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error 1 zxing-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libZXing.so.1.2.0 libZXing.so.1.2.0 === 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings, 2

Fedora-Cloud-35-20211208.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211207.0): ID: 1080685 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:01:50PM -0500, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: > On 12/7/21 10:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > >>> If available, use > >>>the TPM2 to additionally tie the password to local hardware. If the > >>>user is removed, also remove that password from that

Re: rpm bug for multiple README.md or LICENSE.md in EPEL 8 and Fedora

On 12/7/21 16:18, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 5:46 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: On 12/5/21 05:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: I've been trying to bundle the current ansible-5.0.1 release as an RPM for Fedora and EPEL use. Leaving aside the peculiar decisions to replace the

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 07/12/2021 23:01, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: I am not sure what would be appropriate for single-user systems: some sort of install-time rescue passphrase [1] perhaps, that the user would write down and safely store [2]? This will be a potential backdoor. -- Sincerely, Vitaly

Re: Incomprehensible rpmlint error messages

On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 08:32:10 +0100 Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Trying to review > "Review Request: zxing-cpp - C++ version of ZXing ("Zebra Crossing") > barcode scanning library" on Fedora 35, `fedora-review -b 2029219` > produces a

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-12-09 17:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2021-12-09 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.libera.chat.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2021-12-09 09:00 PST US/Pacific 2021-12-09

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 7:52 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di, 07.12.21 15:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > Latest systemd versions have been getting some support for the low-level > > parts, i.e. the low-level encrypted-secret storage. But we're missing the >

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

Once upon a time, Björn Persson said: > Introducing a new security hole is not just a change like any other > change. Calling this "introducing a new security hole" is hyperbole and fear-mongering. -- Chris Adams ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Why CVEs are being filed for EPEL?

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 02:13:46PM +0100, Ondřej Holý wrote: > Hi all, > > do you have any idea why CVE bugs are being filed for Fedora EPEL > product in the case of the freerdp component > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freerdp) when there aren't any > builds for epel7, or epel8? What needs

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2021-12-08

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-12-08/fedora_coreos_meeting.2021-12-08-16.29.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-12-08/fedora_coreos_meeting.2021-12-08-16.29.txt Log:

Automatic rawhide update did not contain changelog in description nor bugzilla link

Hello, in this update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4a21ac4839 I would have expected the update description to contain the changelog entry: * Tue Dec 07 2021 Miro Hrončok - 206-1 - brp-mangle-shebangs: also mangle shebangs of JavaScript executables - Fixes: rhbz#1998924

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Di, 07.12.21 15:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > Latest systemd versions have been getting some support for the low-level > parts, i.e. the low-level encrypted-secret storage. But we're missing the > upper parts, i.e. how to actually use and update the passwords. I

Fedora-Cloud-34-20211208.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211207.0): ID: 1080876 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Incomprehensible rpmlint error messages

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 10:41:31AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 08/12/2021 09:33, Dan Horák wrote: > >On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 08:32:10 +0100 > >>>zxing-cpp.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error 1 > >>>zxing-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libZXing.so.1.2.0 > >>>libZXing.so.1.2.0

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 01:50:47PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > So here's what I'd suggest: let's define a group (my suggestion: let's > repurpose "wheel" for that) that has the effect that the passwords of > any user in it are also accepted as password for the root user, My working

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 6:10 PM Björn Persson wrote: > > Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Björn Persson said: > > > Chris Adams wrote: > > > > If the admin has done one thing to lock down the system, then they can > > > > do another (removing the sulogin --force addition). > > > > > > How

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On ke, 08 joulu 2021, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 01:50:47PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: So here's what I'd suggest: let's define a group (my suggestion: let's repurpose "wheel" for that) that has the effect that the passwords of any user in it are also accepted as

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:28 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 12:33:21PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > Fedora defaults to locking the root account, which is needed by > > single-user mode. This Change uses `sulogin --force` so the password > > request is bypassed

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Björn Persson said: > > Chris Adams wrote: > > > If the admin has done one thing to lock down the system, then they can > > > do another (removing the sulogin --force addition). > > > > How do you propose to ensure that the admin is made aware of the

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211208.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211207.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211208.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 105 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.78 GiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Who maintains virtio-win repos?

Is there a contact for the virtio-win repos? I looked to see if there was anything in Bugzilla that looked relevant, but didn't find anything. I'm talking about this: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/repo/ The repos need work; there have been new release RPMs added, but the

Fedora-Rawhide-20211208.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 6/208 (x86_64), 7/142 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, at 1:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 7:52 AM Lennart Poettering > wrote: >> >> On Di, 07.12.21 15:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: >> >> > Latest systemd versions have been getting some support for the low-level >> > parts,

Re: F36 Change: Make Rescue Mode Work With Locked Root (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi all, On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 12:33:21PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FixRescueMode > > == Summary == > Fedora defaults to locking the root account, which is needed by > single-user mode. This Change uses `sulogin --force` so the password > request is

Update python-musicbrainzngs by a proven packager and request for adding a co-maintainer to the package

Hi all, the package python-musicbrainzngs [1] has a long-standing bug [2] and is not upgraded to the latest version, which creates all sorts of issues for dependent packages. Therefore, I would like to ask if a proven-package could initiate an update. There's already a pull-request at

[Bug 2029516] Please branch and build perl-Any-URI-Escape in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029516 --- Comment #1 from Troy Dawson --- I don't usually push hard for new packages, but this one in particular is holding up about 200 of the packages in the epel9 KDE Plasma Desktop build. I have no problem maintaining this package in epel9 if

[Bug 2030284] New: Please branch and build perl-IO-SessionData in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030284 Bug ID: 2030284 Summary: Please branch and build perl-IO-SessionData in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-SessionData Assignee:

[Bug 2030283] New: Please branch and build perl-MIME-tools in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030283 Bug ID: 2030283 Summary: Please branch and build perl-MIME-tools in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-MIME-tools Assignee:

[Bug 2030288] New: Please branch and build perl-MIME-Types in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030288 Bug ID: 2030288 Summary: Please branch and build perl-MIME-Types in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-MIME-Types Assignee:

[Bug 2030313] New: Please branch and build perl-Convert-ASN1 in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030313 Bug ID: 2030313 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Convert-ASN1 in epel9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Convert-ASN1 Assignee:

[Bug 2030285] New: Please branch and build perl-SOAP-Lite in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030285 Bug ID: 2030285 Summary: Please branch and build perl-SOAP-Lite in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-SOAP-Lite Assignee:

[Bug 2030311] New: Please branch and build perl-Authen-Krb5 in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030311 Bug ID: 2030311 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Authen-Krb5 in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Authen-Krb5 Assignee:

[Bug 2030310] New: Please branch and build perl-WWW-Curl in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030310 Bug ID: 2030310 Summary: Please branch and build perl-WWW-Curl in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-WWW-Curl Assignee:

[Bug 2030281] Please branch and build perl-XML-Parser-Lite in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030281 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jples...@redhat.com | Doc Type|---

Re: openQA tests in Pull Requests?

On 07. 12. 21 19:25, Miro Hrončok wrote: There's no public/self-serve way to schedule for a scratch build at the moment; someone with admin/moderator access (so, usually, me) needs to do it for you. Got it. At the moment, I am mostly interested in

[Bug 2030279] New: Please branch and build perl-Test-XML in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030279 Bug ID: 2030279 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-XML in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-XML Assignee:

[Bug 2030281] New: Please branch and build perl-XML-Parser-Lite in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030281 Bug ID: 2030281 Summary: Please branch and build perl-XML-Parser-Lite in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-XML-Parser-Lite Assignee:

[Bug 2030286] New: Please branch and build perl-Convert-BinHex in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030286 Bug ID: 2030286 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Convert-BinHex in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Convert-BinHex Assignee:

[Bug 2030287] New: Please branch and build perl-Email-Date-Format in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030287 Bug ID: 2030287 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Email-Date-Format in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2030312] New: Please branch and build perl-LDAP in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030312 Bug ID: 2030312 Summary: Please branch and build perl-LDAP in epel9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-LDAP Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

Re: openQA tests in Pull Requests?

On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 19:25 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > If there is substantial interest I could look at implementing > > something > > here...I would expect that some system or other (CI? Koschei?) must > > surely have a way of turning pull requests into package builds > > already, > > so I'd

[Bug 2030491] New: perl-Class-MethodMaker for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030491 Bug ID: 2030491 Summary: perl-Class-MethodMaker for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Class-MethodMaker Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 2030496] New: perl-Test-Compile for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030496 Bug ID: 2030496 Summary: perl-Test-Compile for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Compile Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 2030283] Please branch and build perl-MIME-tools in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030283 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2028935 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2030494] perl-DateTime-Format-Mail for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030494 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2028935 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2030495] perl-Net-CIDR for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030495 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2028935 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2030285] Please branch and build perl-SOAP-Lite in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030285 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2028935 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2030493] perl-CGI-Fast for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030493 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2028935 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2030496] perl-Test-Compile for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030496 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2028935 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2030310] Please branch and build perl-WWW-Curl in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030310 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2030495] New: perl-Net-CIDR for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030495 Bug ID: 2030495 Summary: perl-Net-CIDR for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-CIDR Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 2030493] New: perl-CGI-Fast for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030493 Bug ID: 2030493 Summary: perl-CGI-Fast for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-CGI-Fast Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

Re: openQA tests in Pull Requests?

On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 22:54 +0100, Dan Čermák wrote: > > So, opensuse and suse do the following for the released distributions > (e.g. opensuse Leap): > each update gets put into a staging area in the build service, which > rebuilds a subset of the distribution, creates the installation images >

[Bug 2029516] Please branch and build perl-Any-URI-Escape in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029516 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2030494] New: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030494 Bug ID: 2030494 Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail Assignee: