Fedora-Cloud-34-20211225.0 compose check report

2021-12-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211224.0): ID: 1091392 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: How do we announce new packages?

2021-12-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:07 PM Eduard Lucena wrote: > > Hello people. > > First of all, I'm not a developer or a packager, I just try to help with the > little things I know to do. One thing I try to do is to check news, forums, > ML and places where people talk about Fedora. > > A thing I

Fedora-IoT-35-20211225.0 compose check report

2021-12-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211222.0): ID: 1091420 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1091420 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests

Re: Advise needed: guideline for very big data rpms?

2021-12-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 4:12 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:33 PM Marius Schwarz > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > for a new project hopefully coming to soon to Fedora, I like to know > > the policy for really big data rpms. > > > > The project could offer 18 language

Re: debug_package when using go_generate_buildrequires

2021-12-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 6:47 AM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 12/20/21 8:09 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Having to disable debug packages practically always indicates a bug in > > the package - either packaging, upstream or both. > > > > Typical causes for "error: Empty %files file > >

Re: Advise needed: guideline for very big data rpms?

2021-12-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:33 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Hi, > > for a new project hopefully coming to soon to Fedora, I like to know > the policy for really big data rpms. > > The project could offer 18 language files for a voice recognition > system, which is ( unpacked ) up to 2.4 GB each

Re: Non-responsive maintainer hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

2021-12-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:41 PM Remi Collet wrote: > > Le 21/12/2021 à 15:47, Remi Collet a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Pavel is non responsive for a while > > > > Already managed 4 years ago > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1758 > > > > > > I've been maintaining for a while > > > > -

Re: xorg-x11-server maintenance

2021-12-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:46 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17 2021 at 03:10:11 PM +0100, Hans de Goede > wrote: > > Note this does not takeaway that the classic Xorg server packages > > could definitely use some love / use some community co-maintainers. > > If xgl-maint isn't

Re: How do we announce new packages?

2021-12-25 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 8:16 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > (the community blog might be the right place for some of those, > but it is a higher barrier to actually write a blog post that gets > edited etc. instead of writing an e-mail to a mailing list). The Fedora Community Blog and the Fedora

Re: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-12-25 Thread Dan Čermák
Ben Cotton writes: *snip* > > It will also make Fedora able to detect tampering of its components at > a more privileged level, the kernel, without the interference of user > space programs. Once tampering has been detected, the actions of the > altered component are prevented before that

Re: Package wishlist site?

2021-12-25 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi Jakube, Jakub Kadlčík writes: > Hello, > > TL;DR What about a place where people could ask for something to be > packaged in Fedora? As others already commented: I don't think that this is a good idea. Packaging a program for others where you have no real personal interest/benefit/buy-in

[Bug 2035606] New: perl-File-Slurper-0.013 is available

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035606 Bug ID: 2035606 Summary: perl-File-Slurper-0.013 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-File-Slurper Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2033227] Please branch and build perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect for EPEL-9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033227 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-1.90

[Bug 2032441] perl-Test-MockModule for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032441 Bug 2032441 depends on bug 2033559, which changed state. Bug 2033559 Summary: perl-SUPER for EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033559 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2033559] perl-SUPER for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033559 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-SUPER-1.20190531-1.el9

[Bug 2031818] perl-Test-MockObject for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031818 Bug 2031818 depends on bug 2033558, which changed state. Bug 2033558 Summary: perl-UNIVERSAL-can for EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033558 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2031818] perl-Test-MockObject for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031818 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2031796] perl-Email-Sender for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031796 Bug 2031796 depends on bug 2031818, which changed state. Bug 2031818 Summary: perl-Test-MockObject for EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031818 What|Removed |Added

PySide2 error building with Python 3.10/.11

2021-12-25 Thread Richard Shaw
Upstream isn't really working on PySide for Qt 5 as all of their development is on PySide6 for Qt6 and therefore unlikely to get fixed. I worked through a couple of errors but got stuck at this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025599#c6 Any help would be appreciated. Thanks,

[Bug 2032452] perl-Test-Perl-Critic for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452 Bug 2032452 depends on bug 2033226, which changed state. Bug 2033226 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Object for EPEL-9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033226 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2033558] perl-UNIVERSAL-can for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033558 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-UNIVERSAL-can-1.201403

[Bug 2031759] perl-Config-IniFiles for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031759 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Config-IniFiles-3.

[Bug 2032452] perl-Test-Perl-Critic for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032452 Bug 2032452 depends on bug 2033227, which changed state. Bug 2033227 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect for EPEL-9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033227 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2033226] Please branch and build perl-Test-Object for EPEL-9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033226 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Object-0.08-13.el

[Bug 2033597] Add perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF to EPEL9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033597 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2032426] perl-RDF-Query for EPEL 9

2021-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032426 Bug 2032426 depends on bug 2033597, which changed state. Bug 2033597 Summary: Add perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF to EPEL9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033597 What|Removed |Added