This is running now:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=62208=-build_id=1
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual
Thank you, Tomas,
Great investigation.
Your suggested hack really fixed my issue.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 3:46 PM Tomas Korbar wrote:
> Hello,
> since i encountered this in the past and postponed it, I did a bit of a
> digging and found this:
> As you probably found out by now it is caused by
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > I found more 5 with
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> >
> > 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> >
On 24/01/2023 07:28, Jeff Law wrote:
On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
I have some packages failed.
One of them libtins. Problem is that:
error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
See
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:13:56AM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 24/01/2023 07:28, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> > > > I have some packages failed.
> > > > One of them libtins. Problem
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:22 AM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:52 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > > maven-scm mizdebsk, trawets
> >
> > For those affected by this, I've made a COPR with a possible
> > resolution:
> >
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
>
> The problem was libunistring-1.1-3.fc38 (again).
>
> We untagged it in december, but looks like no
Hi,
we are going to introduce new Ghostscript 10.0.0 with bumped soname into
the rawhide.
Rebuilds will be done in the tag 'f38-build-side-62054'.
Affected packages: xcircuit, libspectre, texlive-base, gimp, graphviz,
doxygen, ImageMagick
Maintainers were notified.
Best regards
--
Richard
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-01-24 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
done.
$ koji list-tagged eln libunistring
Build
libunistring-1.0-2.eln120
libunistring-1.0-2.fc37
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:59 AM Tomáš Popela wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 2 weeks, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:07:10 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96612861
>
> The build has completed already on other arches, but on ppc64le it has
> been stuck for ~ 45 minutes. What's especially odd is that it has
> apparently picked a
hobbes1069 (9):
cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
gmsh - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
openCOLLADA - error: possibly dangling reference to a temporary. Don't know
how
Need help with rebuilding doublecmd.
вт, 24 янв. 2023 г. в 16:21, Richard Shaw :
>
> hobbes1069 (9):
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
> gmsh - Needed
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:01, Vascom wrote:
>
> I have some packages failed.
> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
>
> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
>
> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
>
> I must patch sources now?
> sed -i 's|stdint.h|cstdint|' include/tins/ip_address.h
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96612861
The build has completed already on other arches, but on ppc64le it has
been stuck for ~ 45 minutes. What's especially odd is that it has
apparently picked a builder (so it's not stuck waiting for a free
machine) but the builder isn't
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
This is most likely my fault, since Lazarus seems to be quite tightly coupled
to specific FPC versions.
Historically, whenever we updated/rebuilt FPC, we'd also rebuilt Lazarus. This
time, when I rebuilt
FPC as part of the
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Packaging_22%2B
This document represents a proposed Change. As
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
> proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
> package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 23 2023 at 09:27:08 PM -0800, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
Time will tell if that's credit or blame. LOL.
Sincerely, though, I know I'm not the first person to work on tackling
this, and I can't take all of the credit.
Good, since I fear it's going to be blame. :D I have
The recent update of gtest to 1.13.0 in Rawhide bumped the .so version.
I reminded the maintainers of the Updates Policy for Rawhide and asked
them to please announce and coordinate similar updates in the future[1].
The following packages depend on a specific .so version of gtest/gmock
at
fpc has a Requires: on the units package, so it should always be installed.
The build failures for packages using FPC, as far as I can see, are all packages
using Lazarus. As far as I can tell, this is because Lazarus seems to quite
tightly
depend on specific FPC versions, and historically,
Meeting summary
---
* init process (zbyszek, 17:00:06)
* Meeting is cancelled because of lack of quorum. (zbyszek, 17:04:36)
* ACTION: zbyszek will chair the next meeting. (zbyszek, 17:04:45)
* Open Floor (zbyszek, 17:04:49)
Meeting ended at 17:05:14 UTC.
Minutes:
Il 24/01/23 18:02, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ha scritto:
> fpc has a Requires: on the units package, so it should always be installed.
>
> The build failures for packages using FPC, as far as I can see, are all
> packages
> using Lazarus. As far as I can tell, this is because Lazarus seems to quite
On 23. 01. 23 15:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d823c8dfb8
F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8362bcf475
One package which is known to depend on the exact version of xz is
perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma. The updates above
Il 24/01/23 08:16, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
>> I have some packages failed.
>> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
>>
>> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
>>
>> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
> See
>
On 24. 01. 23 16:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 01. 23 15:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d823c8dfb8
F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8362bcf475
One package which is known to depend on the exact version of xz is
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:11:03PM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > FYI:
> >
> > memkind failure (aarch64) seems to be koji/mock related:
> >
> > This package was updated and sucessfully built in rawhide and f37 a week
> > ago (01/13)
> >
> >
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:29, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> >> I have some packages failed.
> >> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
> >>
> >> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
> >>
> >> Is
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to bootstrap package which has bootstrap support written
> according to the [1]. I am able to bootstrap it locally (rpmbuild,
> mock, ...) with the "--with bootstrap" or "-D '_with_bootstrap 1'". Is
> there support for it
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:42 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to bootstrap package which has bootstrap support written
> > according to the [1]. I am able to bootstrap it locally (rpmbuild,
> > mock, ...) with the
On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
Also, isn't this basically going to break the pythondistdeps
generator, since it was switched to use packaging a while ago?
Break? No. It will only handle some invalid requirements or provided version as
errors. The affected packages are listed in the
Hi,
Development of Bottles is moving fast and we have been struggling to
keep up with upstream releases, especially since the introduction of
Rust components.
Upstream has approached the maintainers [1,2] and asked us to retire the
package in favor of the Flatpak packages provided by
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:36:41PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > >
> > > I initially thought about:
> > > release bump
> > > $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
Hi,
I need to bootstrap package which has bootstrap support written
according to the [1]. I am able to bootstrap it locally (rpmbuild,
mock, ...) with the "--with bootstrap" or "-D '_with_bootstrap 1'". Is
there support for it in koji? E.g. something like:
koji build SIDE-TAG PACKAGE --bootstrap?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:20 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> hobbes1069 (9):
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
> gmsh - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
> openCOLLADA
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:37 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > >
> > > I initially thought about:
> > > release bump
> > > $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
> > >
Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> Thanks for the info, we will try it. It would be great to have it
> documented somewhere in the guidelines
Yes it would. This looks like a good place:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping
"koji edit-tag --help" calls it "Set tag
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
> I initially thought about:
> release bump
> $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
> build
> handle circular dep
> $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -r %_with_bootstrap
> build
>
> But I haven't tried it yet because I didn't
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:01:39PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:20 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > hobbes1069 (9):
> > cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> > flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> > flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> > freecad -
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> >
> > I initially thought about:
> > release bump
> > $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
> > build
> > handle circular dep
> > $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -r
FYI debuginfo generation failed on several packages. I've had to
disable it on a few to get around this. For example:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96625872
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5943/96625943/build.log
I'm not clear exactly why this is
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:29 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > See
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
> > Some libstdc++ headers included in older versions
> > as an implementation detail but no longer do.
> >
> > Including stdint.h
On 1/24/23 15:52, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
Had I seen cstdint I like to think that I would have
tried a rebuild with gcc 13 earlier to see what
(if any) upstream(s) needed some encouragement
for support gcc 13.
I actually did stuff like this in the past -- build all of Fedora with
the new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162191
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160057
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.030 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla` that
you are following:
``
6.030 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162191
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163998
Bug ID: 2163998
Summary: F38FailsToInstall: perl-LDAP-tests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-LDAP
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163999
Bug ID: 2163999
Summary: F38FailsToInstall: perl-SQL-Interp-tests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SQL-Interp
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:26 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> Just so people don't need to go to the bug.
> This has already been reported for RHEL 9.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140266
>
> If I understand "Approved Release" correctly, the fix will come out in RHEL
> 9.2
Most people
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 2 weeks, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since
Hi,
Sorry, now subject is correct, the gcc have one patch for the error
above, that is seen on rhel 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163998
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:01 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Sorry, now subject is correct, the gcc have one patch for the error
> above, that is seen on rhel 9
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
If you believe this is present in RHEL 9, please clone the bug to the
Red
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:11, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:01 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Sorry, now subject is correct, the gcc have one patch for the error
> > above, that is seen on rhel 9
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
>
> If you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161072
Fedora Fails To Install changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Just so people don't need to go to the bug.
This has already been reported for RHEL 9.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140266
If I understand "Approved Release" correctly, the fix will come out in RHEL
9.2
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:57 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Pcap` that
you are following:
``
0.21 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Pcap/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162651
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163998
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162301
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Pcap-0.21-1.fc38
Notification time stamped 2023-01-24 16:24:21 UTC
From 7ab188b5c779ec958555b85546f486505a6d7f33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Jan 24 2023 16:24:09 +
Subject: Use SPDX-format license tag
---
diff --git a/perl-Specio.spec b/perl-Specio.spec
index 0fbc6c4..824720a 100644
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149
Bug ID: 2164149
Summary: CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for
style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164150
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2164147
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2164147
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Packaging_22%2B
This document represents a proposed Change. As
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-01-25 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164151
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2164147
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164150
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164151
Bug ID: 2164151
Summary: CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser:
perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is
vulnerable to ReDoS [epel-all]
Product:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164151
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164148
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164150
Bug ID: 2164150
Summary: CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser:
perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is
vulnerable to ReDoS [fedora-all]
Product:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164148
Bug ID: 2164148
Summary: CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for
style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164148
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2164147
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Pcap` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.21 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Pcap/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163999
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Sub-Quote` that
you are following:
``
2.006008 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Quote/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164242
Bug ID: 2164242
Summary: perl-Text-BibTeX-0.89 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-BibTeX
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164242
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1674596402.536418.iBSNaYxa/perl-Text-BibTeX-0.89-1.fc36.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158290
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160110
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162841
--- Comment #5 from David ---
I grabbed the rpm's and installed them:
perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.19-19.el9
perl-DateTime-Set-0.3900-20.el9
perl-Set-Infinite-0.65-37.el9
Issues solved and the scheduling software now runs perfectly.
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Sub-Quote` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
2.006008 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Quote/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162651
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Sub-Quote-2.006008-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162841
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
90 matches
Mail list logo