On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 7:33 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> Without docs, the whole process is a black box.
+1
That was actually one of the two reasons I started this thread.
For instance, is this the package that must be rebuilt in order to see
an AppStream metadata file appear/refreshed
On 25-09-2023 14:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
python-sklearn-genetic-opt
I'm taking this one on behalf of neuro-sig and get it fixed asap. I just
ran a quick scratch build locally. It shouldn't be too hard.
python-whatthepatch
This is part of the Spyder dependency stack, so I'm taking that as
> Ultimately, appstream-util's output is what matters since we use
> appstream-builder (from appstream-glib) to generate our AppStream
> metadata index. If it doesn't pass that tool, it doesn't show up.
Bit of a tangent, but: is this documented anywhere?
Because if if is, then I can't find it.
Dear all,
in the past weeks the updates of GCC for both Fedora and Debian have
introduce few identical Fortran modifications:
fortran/108961
fortran/109684
fortran/110825
As a result my I cannot build the RPM package (nor the Debian package)
for my program 'atomes' anymore,
because the ARM
OLD: Fedora-39-20230924.n.1
NEW: Fedora-39-20230925.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 31
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 251.23 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 2:11 AM Sandro wrote:
> On 24-09-2023 03:26, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I haven't been able to find the new command in my email history to find
> > dependencies but my old script shows the following need to be rebuilt:
> >
> > blender
> > krita
> > luxcorerender
> >
Forgot to mention I'm doing the test builds here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/OIIO/builds/
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230923.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230925.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 166
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.81 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 25-09-2023 14:00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
neuro-sig: python-textdistance, python-qstylizer, python-whatthepatch,
python-pyls-spyder
I've adopted all of these. They are all part of the spyder dependency stack.
I'll look into them and fix what needs fixing as soon as I can.
-- Sandro
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 2:46 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 24/09/23 01:18, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 6:05 PM Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos
> >> wrote:
> >>> Could someone involved
> >>> with
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Branched 20230925.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Could someone (perhaps someone interested in X2Go) please review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215420
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215421
I'd love to be able to offer a review swap, but I'm completely underwater.
If anyone wants to help out on any of my packages,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:45 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 7:33 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> wrote:
> >
> > Without docs, the whole process is a black box.
>
> +1
>
> That was actually one of the two reasons I started this thread.
>
> For instance, is this the package
Good Morning Everyone,
Since June 30th, we have been emailing daily the following user to notify
that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla
account.
This is a requirement for Fedora packagers.
Does someone know how to contact kubo?
kubo is watching
On 24-09-2023 03:26, Richard Shaw wrote:
I haven't been able to find the new command in my email history to find
dependencies but my old script shows the following need to be rebuilt:
blender
krita
luxcorerender
OpenImageIO
usd
This looks correct according to `fedrq`:
$ fedrq wr -s
Hey All!
During the week of September 9-25 2023, the Fedora 39 CoreOS Test Week will
be happening. The test week is an opportunity for the community to test
FCOS based on Fedora 39 content before it is released as part of the
`testing` and `stable` streams.
As part of the Test Week, we'll host a
On 9/15/23 20:27, Colin Walters wrote:
One thing I find amusing about this list (which like some others is kind of a
long-running soap opera that happens to sometimes produce software as a side
effect) is that many times, I can see just two bits of information:
- The subject of the email
-
Dne 22. 09. 23 v 16:01 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233281#c3
This probably answers my question. So heads up to others.
Dne 22. 09. 23 v 10:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Was this
Le 25/09/2023 à 10:38, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
Dne 22. 09. 23 v 16:01 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233281#c3
This probably answers my question. So heads up to others.
Dne 22.
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458
--- Comment #2 from Marcin Juszkiewicz ---
Fedora 39 is not released yet, why not bump to 5.38.1 instead of backporting?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240644
Bug ID: 2240644
Summary: perl-PDF-API2-2.045 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDF-API2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4211889c5a
seamonkey-2.53.17.1-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-981e9f53ff
chromium-117.0.5938.92-2.el7
The following
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-49fe68774a
plantuml-1.2023.11-1.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9abc3565b5
chromium-117.0.5938.92-2.el8
The following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533
Bug ID: 2240533
Summary: perl-Date-Handler-1.2-28.fc40: Should build-require
and require/recommend glibc-langpack-en: Locale en_US
does not seem to be implemented on this system,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Handler-1.2-29.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-12f33849b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-12f33849b5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240584
Bug ID: 2240584
Summary: perl-Time-ParseDate-2015.103-24.fc40 FTBFS: tests fail
without tzdata package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-ScanDeps` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.34 bump (rhbz#2240459)
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-ScanDeps/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240459
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-ScanDeps`
that you are following:
``
1.34 bump (rhbz#2240459)
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-ScanDeps/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240459
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
36 matches
Mail list logo
