Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

Frederic Berat wrote on 2023/11/27 22:23: On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM David King wrote: The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages to fail to build without modification, including: * several

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

Le 27/11/2023 à 14:23, Frederic Berat a écrit : I made a mass rebuild of the packages that directly depend on libxml2, and found 115 packages (out of 621) with build failure correlated to the libxml2 update. I see PHP in the failure report The issue is fixed upstream

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:08 PM David King wrote: > > The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important > changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages > to fail to build without modification, including: > > * several functions now accept or return a

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:23:51PM +0100, Frederic Berat wrote: > guestfs-tools: > Source: (distgit) fedora > NVR: guestfs-tools-1.51.5-1.fc39 > Commit/branch: 68563e35e7b92050a7c47eb01871e2caa166bf38 > libguestfs: > Source: (distgit) fedora >

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:23:51PM +0100, Frederic Berat wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM David King wrote: > > > The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important > > changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages > > to fail to build without

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM David King wrote: > The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important > changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages > to fail to build without modification, including: > > * several functions now accept or return a

Re: [Anaconda-devel] Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 8:13 AM wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 15:15 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 13:34 +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important for your project or workflow? > > > What > > > functionality is

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 15:15 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 13:34 +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important for your project or workflow? > > What > > functionality is absolutely necessary for you? Do you use the text > >

unresponsive maintainer for python-installer

Is someone in contact with cstratak? I started the non-responsive maintainer process [1], because I asked that python-installer be branched and built for epel, or to add the EPEL packagers SIG to the maintainers [2] on 14 Nov 2023 and added a NEEDINFO on 16 Nov. Even after allowing for holidays,

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

On Mon, 2023-11-27 at 14:12 +0100, mkol...@redhat.com wrote: > On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 15:15 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 13:34 +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important for your project or workflow? > > > What > > >

Re: [Anaconda-devel] Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 7:53 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 8:13 AM wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 15:15 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 13:34 +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

Le lun. 27 nov. 2023, 16:45, Leigh Scott a écrit : > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM David King wrote: > > > - Out of the 13 packages that seem correlated but don't show obvious > errors > > directly related to libxml2, there are still some quite suspicious ones, > > like cinnamon which

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 17:17, Frederic Berat wrote: > ERROR: Error in gtkdoc helper script: > > ERROR: ['/usr/bin/gtkdoc-mkhtml', > '--path=/builddir/build/BUILD/cinnamon-5.8.4/docs/reference/cinnamon:/builddir/build/BUILD/cinnamon-5.8.4/redhat-linux-build/docs/reference/cinnamon', >

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 01:38:27PM +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder, I thought that the server images are usually using Anaconda to > create a user during installation. Am I missing something? Well, if you boot the install.iso and go through an anaconda install, then yes, users are

[Test-Announce] Fedora 40 Rawhide 20231127.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 40 Rawhide 20231127.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 6:51 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 01:53:14PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:07:06AM -0800, Davide Cavalca wrote: > > > On 2023-11-21 04:34, Jiri Konecny wrote: > > > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important for

Re: [HEADS UP] Jasper update with .so name update

On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 10:55 +0100, Josef Řídký wrote: > Hi, > > there is a new jasper version (4.1.0) that will be available in Fedora 40+. > As this version is bumping it's .so name, the rebuild of the dependent > package will be necessary. > > There is a side tag created for safe rebuild of

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

I am not sure of the difference between text mode and graphical mode, except that I am an end-user of anaconda,and I use it via the Everything.iso.  Therein, anaconda is a mixed mode, with text / graphical for partition management(creating, mounting,deleting) and graphical mode for application

Re: Possible deprecation/removal of Initial Setup from Fedora

Hi, Good point, I forget about these deliverables are present. Best Regards, Jirka Dne 27. 11. 23 v 10:32 Gerd Hoffmann napsal(a): On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 01:38:27PM +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote: Hi, I wonder, I thought that the server images are usually using Anaconda to create a user during

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231127.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231126.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231127.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 15 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 131 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 35.28 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

F40 Change Proposal: 389_Directory_Server_3.0.0 (System-Wide)

Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389_Directory_Server_3.0.0 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I took ghc-X11-xft and vala-language-server for now (would welcome comaintainers). Jens -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: F40 Change Proposal: 389_Directory_Server_3.0.0 (System-Wide)

On Пан, 27 ліс 2023, Aoife Moloney wrote: Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389_Directory_Server_3.0.0 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive

Re: [HEADS UP] Jasper update with .so name update

On 11/27/23 13:31, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 10:55 +0100, Josef Řídký wrote: Hi, there is a new jasper version (4.1.0) that will be available in Fedora 40+. As this version is bumping it's .so name, the rebuild of the dependent package will be necessary. There is a side tag

Re: packaging of nix

Hi! At the moment, it's not possible to build a NixOS image that adheres to FHS. Therefore, we can either 1. Add the FHS support to NixOS, which makes the whole thing about using NixOS moot. BUT, maybe we can hack our way around it like so? ([snippet

Re: Unannounced soname bump in F39 updates-testing kernel-tools-libs

On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 11:48 AM Chris Adams wrote: > > kernel-tools-libs changed libcpupower.so.0 to libcpupower.so.1 in > 6.6.2-200.fc39, which breaks mate-applets and gnome-applets. This was backed out for the stable Fedora updates. The soname bump stands in F40. Note, there is no

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM David King wrote: > - Out of the 13 packages that seem correlated but don't show obvious errors > directly related to libxml2, there are still some quite suspicious ones, > like cinnamon which fails due to a missing xml file. > [1]

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 04:20:16PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:08 PM David King wrote: > > > > The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important > > changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages > > to fail to build without

[Bug 2251788] perl-Net-DNS-1.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251788 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2001731 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2001731=edit Update to 1.41 (#2251788) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2251788] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251788 Bug ID: 2251788 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.41 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-DNS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[python-SIG] Introduction new member

Hi Folks, I'm seddik, I have joined Fedora Infrastructure Community in July 2020 as a contributor. So I'm helping with automation and monitoring tasks. I have a little experience on python programming, and would be happy to get involved as much as ever. Please feel free to help me with any

[rpms/perl-local-lib] PR #2: Ensure csh syntax is used for C shell even if SHELL env var is unset.

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Ensure csh syntax is used for C shell even if SHELL env var is unset.` that you are following: `` The AVC failure is tracked at . It won't block perl-local-lib because it does not enforce

[Bug 2251701] New: perl-Time-Out-0.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251701 Bug ID: 2251701 Summary: perl-Time-Out-0.24 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Time-Out Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

F40 Change Proposal: 389_Directory_Server_3.0.0 (System-Wide)

Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389_Directory_Server_3.0.0 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-330054b0a8 dbus-broker-28-4.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing anope-2.1.0-2.el8

[Bug 2251844] New: perl-IO-Tty-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251844 Bug ID: 2251844 Summary: perl-IO-Tty-1.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-Tty Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2251844] perl-IO-Tty-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251844 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2001778 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2001778=edit Update to 1.18 (#2251844) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2251844] perl-IO-Tty-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251844 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-IO-Tty-1.18-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109641925 -- You are

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1c906d04ee golang-1.20.10-3.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a371f42add openssl11-1.1.1k-6.el7 The following builds have

[Bug 2251788] perl-Net-DNS-1.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251788 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Net-DNS-1.41-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109620540 -- You are