On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 06:43, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Brad Bell wrote on 2024/01/18 14:00:
> > I got the Result in the subject above for the following build:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111912575
> >
> > Looking at the corresponding root.log
> >
Ben Beasley writes:
> sestatus
This is based on upstream commit d464187c37529c [1]:
policycoreutils: sestatus belongs to bin not sbin
It is quite useful even to non-privileged users and doesn't require any
privileges to work, except for maybe -v.
Some tools hard code
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:52 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Given the problems we had with font packages not being rebuilt in the
> last mass rebuild, can we ensure that the mass rebuild script uses
> "git push --no-verify" instead of plain "git push"?
>
This is not a good idea. Because of a few
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:32 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> You got mass rebuild script here [1] in massrebuildsinfo.py [2] you may
> define what packages you are going to rebuild , in line 93 of mass-
> rebuild.py [3] you got the list of packages that you go rebuild
> and since line 132 [4] you have
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 3:48 PM kevin wrote:
> I suppose this might be a good idea... I'd be afraid of what it might
> break, while fixing the fonts packages though. But of course if it was
> completely broken it would fail after that anyhow...
That's exactly my thinking. The package is either
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.30
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 4:50 AM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> This is not a good idea. Because of a few packages that are not rebuilding we
> would disable the hook for every push the script does.
My thinking is that the hook is not useful for automated build scripts
anyway, so disabling it doesn't
In about a week, I plan to update the cryptominisat package to version
5.11.15 in Rawhide, which comes with an soname bump. We have been
stuck on version 5.8.0 for a long time because some consuming packages
were not compatible with newer versions. At last all of them are
ready for the update.
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-anthy_1.5.16
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_ntlm_in_cyrus_sasl
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_IoT_Unified_Core
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTSimplifiedProvisioning
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:30 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ArmMinimalImageOSBuild
>
> This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 14:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:30 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ArmMinimalImageOSBuild
> >
> > This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of
Hello,
In my packager dashboard there are six AusweisApp2 bugs listed, all of
them are actually resolved. The bugs currently open are not listed
either. Is this a known problem?
Best regards,
Julian
--
___
devel mailing list --
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ArmMinimalImageOSBuild
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:58 AM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I just wanted to quickly announce a small project I did in collaboration with
> the Packit folks.
>
> Do you have some tools or services that perform actions on all currently
> active Fedora releases? And do you have to manually
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_IoT_Bootable_Container
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
Unfortunately this is causing gating tests to fail for rawhide builds,
e.g.:
https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/081ad2a3-76cd-4aa0-b95e-e870ff75a65c/
Hardened: /usr/bin/pkcon: FAIL: cf-protection test because
.note.gnu.property section did not contain the necessary flags
I'm not sure
On 2024-01-18 12:28, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Unfortunately this is causing gating tests to fail for rawhide builds,
e.g.:
https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/081ad2a3-76cd-4aa0-b95e-e870ff75a65c/
Hardened: /usr/bin/pkcon: FAIL: cf-protection test because
.note.gnu.property section did
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 09:15:18AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 4:50 AM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > This is not a good idea. Because of a few packages that are not rebuilding
> > we would disable the hook for every push the script does.
>
> My thinking is that the hook is not
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 08:24:38PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
>
> If, hypothetically, a defect in the mass-rebuild script would corrupt
> thousands of spec files, how easy would it be to write a mass-revert
> script to repair the damage? The mass-revert script shouldn't just
> revert the latest
kevin wrote:
> The mass rebuild is only doing a bump/rebuild. There's no reason it
> should ever cause something that be caught by the hook, and if it did,
> it would be better for it to do the commit anyhow and cause a failed
> build. IMHO.
If, hypothetically, a defect in the mass-rebuild script
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:43 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> > This is also a valid approach. This is the first alternative proposal
> > which makes me say "hmm, this would also work". It is possibly even
> > simpler than setting the $PATH. A very small disadvantage is that the
> > wrapper would
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> the f40-build-side-81691
> side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
>
> If your package gets a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.83.0" comment,
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> > the f40-build-side-81691
> > side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 00:21 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them
> > > in
> > > the
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 22:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> heaptrack
> Could NOT find Libunwind (missing: LIBUNWIND_HAS_UNW_BACKTRACE)
This one's already fixed in dist-git! (thanks, aleasto)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi all,
Please note that we are now past all change proposal submission deadlines.
Thank you to all who have submitted changes to Fedora Linux 40. If you have
changes accepted, please note your changes must be in a 'Testable
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> the f40-build-side-81691
> side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow).
>
> If your package gets a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.83.0" comment,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 4:33 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please note that we are now past all change proposal submission deadlines.
> Thank you to all who have submitted changes to Fedora Linux 40. If you have
> changes accepted, please note your changes must be in a 'Testable
>
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 09:13 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > You got mass rebuild script here [1] in massrebuildsinfo.py [2] you
> > may
> > define what packages you are going to rebuild , in line 93 of
> > mass-
> > rebuild.py [3] you got the
https://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/KDE-Plasma-6-Sets-Release-Date
February 28th, 2024. Mark your calendars, as that's the official date the KDE
team has set for the release of KDE Plasma 6.0.
--
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259087
Bug ID: 2259087
Summary: perl-Imager-1.023 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Imager
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258287
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731718
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Version|32
praiskup opened a new pull-request against the project: `rt` that you are
following:
``
Don't build-require files outside of permitted directories
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/3
--
___
perl-devel
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.30
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_IoT_Unified_Core
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-anthy_1.5.16
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731718
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Fedora Package Sources
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_ntlm_in_cyrus_sasl
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTSimplifiedProvisioning
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258808
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Do not depend on files from
/usr/share` that you are following:
``
I do not agree with this patch nor with the new Guidelines
The package directly accesses this file by its path, which is why this file is
required.
I.e. letting the package require a
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Convert-Color` that
you are following:
``
Do not depend on files from /usr/share
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Convert-Color/pull-request/1
--
___
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ArmMinimalImageOSBuild
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731721
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Fedora Package Sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731721
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|32 |rawhide
Status|CLOSED
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_IoT_Bootable_Container
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258808
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|berra...@redhat.com,|
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Font-AFM` that you
are following:
``
Do not depend on files from /usr/share
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/4
--
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258808
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Hi all,
Please note that we are now past all change proposal submission deadlines.
Thank you to all who have submitted changes to Fedora Linux 40. If you have
changes accepted, please note your changes must be in a 'Testable
54 matches
Mail list logo
