On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 11:48 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Trying to help packaging dmtcp. There are 2 shared libs installed. They are
stripped by the rpm install, and then fail when attempting to dlopen them (or
1
of them).
1. Is that normal behaviour?
No, the strip performed by the rpm
On 8/1/11 10:55 AM, John Reiser wrote:
On 07/31/2011 01:37 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:22 PM, John Reiserjrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
The nightly build mash for Fedora-16 Branched should go first,
before Rawhide, on a few days per week ...
You should open a ticket with
On 8/3/11 8:58 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
I have a shiny new laptop (HP Pavilion dm4) with the Sandy Bridge video (HD
3000). Installing F15 or the nightly F16 build causes a blank screen during
the
install. Installing/running basic video works but is annoying.
I have spent a few days poking
On 8/3/11 9:48 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
We would love to build all PCI drivers for all platforms if the drivers
compiled for all secondary arches :-) See bug 713609 as an example.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713609
I would debug this problem on an arm builder, if I could
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-08-07)
===
Meeting started by ajax at 17:01:26 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-08/fesco.2011-08-08-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
tl;dr version: If you have a security-sensitive package, and wish to
enable some gcc-level hardening features with a modest performance
impact, you will soon be able to enable them (nearly) automagically by
rebuilding with this line in your spec file:
%define _hardened_build 1
Now for the
On 8/8/11 3:52 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 12:23:43PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
%define _hardened_build 1
just wondering: Is %define really correct here or does it need to be
%global?
I've been using %define out of habit, but either one works.
- ajax
--
devel mailing
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 08:47 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
My main concern is that the macro will be misapplied and overall performance
will take a hit.
That's a valid concern, but any hardened build would have this problem.
I'm happy to talk about how the performance impact can be mitigated, but
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 10:44 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
See attached.
Looks fine to me. The only reason I have to dislike it is the
temptation for people to inspect build logs as a proof of what flags a
package was built with (since the only sane thing is to store that in
the binary itself,
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 19:19 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:14:27 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
If you're volunteering to fix and/or paper over all the spurious
warnings gcc and glibc introduce with every phase of the moon, then
sure.
Yes, I do it for my component, GDB
On 8/12/11 12:28 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:25:17PM +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Third party code built against -devel and depending only on the SONAME is
fine
in this situation as it sticks to the published ABI. In-tree code that plays
with non-ABI symbols will
On 8/13/11 2:23 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
I'd start with -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 and something like
this subset of -Wall:
-Warray-bounds
-Wchar-subscripts
-Wsequence-point
gcc now has:
-Werror=
Make the specified warning into an error. The specifier for a
warning
On 8/17/11 5:51 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hi all,
Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing
slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the following
packages in F16 require rebuilding. The sooner the better to stop
spreading the damage but at any
On 8/17/11 10:41 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
for i in $(cat panu-list) ; do
j=$(koji -q latest-pkg f16-updates-testing $(rpmname $i) | \
awk '{ print $1 }')
rpmdev-vercmp $i $j /dev/null
[ $? == 12 ] echo $j
done
I left out an important step here:
rpmname
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:50 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com wrote:
(aside: when sending lists of rpms like this, it sure would be nice to
also include the maintainer name, so I could just search for me and know
if I have an
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 07:37 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 08/17/2011 05:51 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hi all,
Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing
slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the following
packages in F16 require
On 9/1/11 5:05 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Hmmm, turning off SMP is not realistic, as this laptop has a Core 2 Duo.
Sure it is. Boot with maxcpus=1 on the kernel command line.
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 09:16 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Most of the packages I work with have very few patches so it's not all
that difficult, but there are a couple of packages I'm working with
that have a lot of patches and one of them has a very active upstream
(which is a good thing!) but
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit system?
Is 'setarch i686 yum-builddep foo' not enough?
- ajax
On 9/20/11 9:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Currently
I only see mails of maintainers who plan updating the library, but the
rest of it pretty much depends on the maintainers of the depending
components rebuilding them quickly enough, and the original maintainer
to include them in the F-16
On 9/20/11 10:13 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 04:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into
the OS so close to a release.
Maintainers on vacation, non-trivial changes?
In my case, a major change was introduced into rawhide many
On 9/20/11 11:43 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Of course, the accounts system _still_ doesn't have groups, five years
later, so provenpackager is the big hammer we have. We could get groups
any day now, that'd be just fine.
Do you mean
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 20:05 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
%rename cc1_options rh_cc1_options_old
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 20:22 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Such packages would be broken and would fail to link without hardening
or at least have text relocations too. Packagers shouldn't rely on
this spec hack to fix up their packaging bugs (or upstream bugs), the hack
should be just about
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #663 Late F16 Feature Java7
.fesco 663
On 10/3/11 11:43 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:34:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
If not blacklisting then whitelisting them, you have the community. This is
X.org's task,
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-03)
===
Meeting started by ajax at 17:00:30 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-03/fesco.2011-10-03-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 11:46 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
Grovelling around in the F15 xorg-server sources and reviewing the Xorg
log file on my F15 box, I see, with _modern hardware_ at least, that we
do have the monitor geometry available from DDC or EDIC, and obviously
it is trivial
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 21:03 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
I am clearly going to have to explain this one more time, forever.
Let's see if I can't write it authoritatively once and simply answer
with a URL from here out
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 23:45 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Another bigger source of slowness at boot is currently Plymouth which
also requires synchronous settling of devices (tough it's not as bad as
LVM in that regard though, but costs too since EDID probing is
apparently quite slow, and
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 19:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
96dpi, however, is almost *never* correct, is it? So just taking a
hardcoded number that Microsoft happened to pick a decade ago is hardly
improving matters.
The X default used to be 72dpi. Maybe it'll be something else in the
future,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 23:11 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org writes:
We have no technological solution for dealing with the fact that
applications may move from one DPI to another at runtime, and may even
be displaying on both displays at once.
From a
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 11:14 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 13:54 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
EDID does not reliably give you the size of the display.
How about EDID as it exists today. Since you're able to so beautifully
explain what the pitfalls are, I'd assume you've
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 20:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Except that Fedora _has_ been glibc's development platform for as long
as I can remember. The Fedora project might not think so, but it's
exactly what upstream glibc does.
Indeed, this has been the case since it was still called Red Hat
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 10:10 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
HekaFS runs a daemon from init. It's a Bottle (python-based) http server.
In order to work on, e.g. RHEL6 in addition to Fedora, the old init
script has:
...
vercmd=from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 09:14 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
I have 2 new packages. The first one, flocq, has been in F16 testing
for 5 days. It is needed to build the second one, gappalib-coq. I go
to the BuildRoot override page to submit an override for flocq. After
typing in flocq, it offers
As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat
llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even
on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt guests.
There are probably bugs! I've done some quick tests on the hardware I
have handy and in kvm,
On 10/26/11 12:32 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/682
I've made another attempt to reach out the the glibc maintainer
directly again this morning to hopefully answer the questions
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:11 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
For now let's say yes, but that's more like implementation detail than
fundamental property. Clutter'd be perfectly happy atop a GLES
renderer, we just don't have that wired up.
Ok -- that doesn't sound so terrible. Are there
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:55 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't
tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and
likely the next build I do I'll add all the components to test the
llvmpipe feature on them.
Don't freak
On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/11/8 Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com:
2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowskimkkp...@gmail.com:
Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system?
Checkout http://www.freedesktop.org/software/colord/ for details about
the project.
On 11/8/11 1:08 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Yea, but a lot of people don't have those either. I have around 5K
servers in DCs with not a single printer or scanner in site. The vast
majority of the 4 million odd XOs out there while they have a screen
don't have a printer or scanner anywhere in
On 11/8/11 1:59 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On a server like that, you won't have cups installed, so nothing will be
pulling in colord. Whereas if you _do_ have cups installed, because it's a
print server, then you might like
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Please test these updates and let me know if all is good, or if you
have other issues. Bodhi karma, email, IRC, smoke signal, just let me
know.
[ajax@f17 fedora]$ fedpkg co xorg-x11-server
Could not execute clone: must be type, not
I'm currently rebuilding the X stack for F17, and we'll be tracking git
snapshots of the X server and drivers until xserver 1.12 comes out. I
don't know yet how many of the drivers will ftbfs now, so --skip-broken
might be your friend for a while. Binary and out-of-tree driver users
will want to
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 16:14 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'm currently rebuilding the X stack for F17, and we'll be tracking git
snapshots of the X server and drivers until xserver 1.12 comes out. I
don't know yet how many of the drivers will ftbfs now, so --skip-broken
might be your friend
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 06:48 -0500, Mystilleef wrote:
Hello,
Wow, I read this a little too late. I did an update, using
--skip-broken, today and now Xorg is broken. I use the open source ati
drivers. The Xorg log indicates a version mismatch between Xorg and
the drivers. Is there a way to
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 16:44 +, Paul Johnson wrote:
What I'm thinking is that if (say) xorg-x11 is built, the drivers also
get built to ensure the likes of the ABI problem I've hit doesn't
happen
I understand the desire, yes. I was expressing surprise that I hadn't
adequately guarded you
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
Hi,
GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
A quick scan says this affects:
avahi-ui-tools (LGPLv2)
gnu-smalltalk (GPLv2+ with exceptions)
jpilot-backup (GPLv2+)
libguestfs (LGPLv2+)
librep (GPLv2+)
man-db
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 11/14/2011 07:57 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 18:18 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
Hi,
GNU database indexing library (gdbm) has changed its license to GPLv3+.
A quick scan says this affects:
[...]
ypserv (GPLv2
quvi 0.4.0 is both an ABI and API break. See the rawhide report for
details.
Nicoleau, please remember to announce changes that may affect others:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainer_responsibilities#Notify_others_of_changes_that_may_affect_their_packages
- ajax
signature.asc
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 11:28 +0100, Michal Nowak wrote:
I've just orphaned following packages:
* xcb-util
Taken. Thanks for looking after it!
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 23:38 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote:
Hi there,
is it possible to update rawhide's xcb-util to the current version which was
released earlier this year?
I've taken ownership of xcb-util, and submitted a build for 0.3.8.
The following packages depend on it in F17:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #689 Consider including bash-completion
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I did test rebuilds in mock of all rawhide packages that are reported to
be dependent on libpng. Out of 964 packages with dependencies on libpng,
we have:
Packages that rebuilt successfully with 1.5 658
Packages that FTBFS for
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-12-05)
===
Meeting started by ajax at 18:01:03 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-12-05/fesco.2011-12-05-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been completely
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
$ i386 fedpkg local --arch=i686
...
+ ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --program-prefix=
--disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/bin
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 22:18 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 03:26:16PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org would be the place to go for this. As a
guess, you've got LVDS attached over SDVO and we screwed that up again.
I'm happy to do that, but I
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 23:12 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:41:33PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
This is almost certainly the root of the problem. We don't try to set
up SDVO devices if they're not listed in the VBT, but not having a VBT
means nothing's gonna be listed
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:20 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote:
If support for text mode installation is dead (or dying), recent
traffic on the test develop list indicates that there's still a
strong need to have a fall-back installation mode. Just in case the
your particular version of Radeon, NVidia,
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 15:00 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
EDID DDC are mere conveniences unnecessary to the function of the device. I
really couldn't care less whether EDID/DDC exists, much less works. What
matters (works just fine) from a display, which may have been manufactured
before the
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 15:13 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
For the benefit of those few, and there will likely always be some, for whom
automatic isn't, some tool is needed upstream in Xorg, possibly SaX2 or SCD
at least as a starting point. A wider call for a maintainer of SaX2 or SCD or
some
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:43 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at said:
I tried many things, even running for FESCo and getting voted in. As you
can
see, it didn't achieve anything either.
Is it impossible for you to accept the fact that not
On Fri, 1994-08-19 at 16:22 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I want none of that useless crap, thank you very much! Applications should
be written as applications, delivered through our package repository, in a
compiled language. Web sites should just be web sites and have as little
code as
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 15:01 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
If we tolerate any non free software then what's the point? Why not
just run Windows or OSX?
Received: from mail-fx0-f45.google.com (mail-fx0-f45.google.com
[209.85.161.45]) by smtp-mm1.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:48 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 20:37 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Given the degree to which sysadmins are religious about MTA choice, I'd
suspect that a large proportion of people who run an MTA on Fedora are
probably already swapping it out
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 14:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is it OK to use 'git rebase -i' to compress my mistakes together into
a single working Fedora git commit? (Provided I don't push things in
between or otherwise try to rewrite public history)
Yes.
I'm a bit confused by whether
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 08:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
BOOTUP
- System boots successfully to GUI, when configured.
- System boots successfully to text mode, when configured.
- System properly handles being passed [1-5],
I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If
someone else feels like owning it, go wild.
This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so, do
speak up if you take it so we can sort that out.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/26/2010 01:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If
someone else feels like owning it, go wild.
This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so, do
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic
configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a set as
default button.
Uh…
1. Not everyone uses GNOME.
Demonstrably true, but I
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:59 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic
configuration
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
(Is it actually impossible for the vesa driver to work after
KMS has kicked in, btw, or is it just something that doesn't work at
present?)
Right now, it may work or it may not. Typically the vesa bios assumes
it's the only thing
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:58 -0700, Carl Byington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a package (ghemical) which requires a courier 12 font for use in
its xwindow gui. I clearly need some dependency that will drag in
xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi
or
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:42 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Apologies, I won't be able to make this, I'll be on a plane headed to
France for XDS.
-
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:21 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
This here sounds strange:
| The update rate for any given release should drop off over time,
| approaching zero near release end-of-life; since updates are primarily
| bugfixes, fewer and fewer should be needed over time.
This essentially
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 08:39 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:45:30PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:21 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
This here sounds strange:
| The update rate for any given release should drop off over time,
| approaching zero near
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:18 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 22.09.2010 22:45, Adam Jackson wrote:
Again: if we kept updating everything to the very latest thing all the
time, why even bother doing releases. Everyone would just run rawhide.
Right?
No, because with rawhide you get
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 15:13 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:48:34AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Say you ship with 50 bugs in a package. As you update it through the
lifetime of a release, that number should decrease more or less
monotonically. The bugs that take
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 11:46 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
I don't blanket label everything with open code as free software.
Some stuff bundles things which make it non-free. Code open-ness !=
free. You can call Firefox open source if you want, but it's not free
software.
You certainly have the
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 15:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to
illustrate the benefits. That way we can evaluate feasibility and
overall value add before we dive
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 01:39 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Er, really? I don't see where I offered any insult or un-excellent-ness.
I just meant it as a vaguely humorous way of wondering why Kevin was
replying to an email I sent over a week ago in a discussion which I
We've been carrying a patch to libOSMesa for far too long now to fix the
soname at .6, since there was no actual ABI change between .6 and .7.
I'm tired of porting the patch so it'll be libOSMesa.so.7 in the next
Mesa build in F15.
The only affected packages seem to be vtk and paraview, so I'll
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 17:07 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
BTW, it's annoying that rpm allows only 1 %files -f.
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.8.0
%files now accepts multiple filelists through -f (ticket #70,
RhBug:475359)
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 12:12 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Please fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635865 while you're at
it, or paraview won't build. Thanks!
Done (upstream, even), thanks!
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 11:33 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 11/01/2010 09:12 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this
week; this is going to be a little painful, since there are some api
changes that will require minor adjustment of
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:11 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
As far as I can tell, none of the callers to pynotify.init() pass any
named arguments, so nothing should notice the lack of attach=. I only
searched for explicit calls to pynotify.init, if someone's doing like
foo = pynotify
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (2:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
NOTE: Matthew Garrett, Steven Parrish, Bill Nottingham and Matthias Clasen
are all
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I know nothing has
changed ... with default compilation options, getting callgraph
profiling on x86_64 really requires a
I've got some stuff that I can't really give proper attention to, and
I'd rather not even get the bugmail. I just packaged them because I
wanted to consume them, not because I wanted to own them. So, free to a
good home:
bing
bootchart
powertop
wdfs
Already orphaned in pkgdb for rawhide, first
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 08:00 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7794
RK guess you pulled that somewhere else.
fedpkg co xorg-x11-drv-intel; less xorg-x11-drv-intel/*spec
2.13.901 wasn't
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
+1 for bringing these points up. No offense to krh (because it's nice
technology) but you can pull my genuine networked applications from my
cold dead hands. I agree that I see this ongoing trend to move toward
things that are fluffy and
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 11:44 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I think we'd like to see the Fedora community figure out its position
on the subject— so that it can tell the Wayland developers If you
continue on this track, then as things stand, Fedora will not be
making it a part of the default
On 10/9/12 9:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
From the list of packages this minimal set still installs, that I'd
really like to see gone:
chkconfig
gamin
info
systemd-sysv
chkconfig seems like it could have the 'alternatives' bit split off.
I've not investigated this in detail.
gamin is
Mesa 9.0 no longer includes a copy of libGLU, it is instead available as
a separate tarball. To reflect this the packaging has been changed to
build mesa-libGLU as its own srpm; likewise for the GL manpages, since
both libGL-devel and libGLU-devel want to depend on them.
This change has already
On 10/9/12 12:34 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 10/9/12 9:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
From the list of packages this minimal set still installs, that I'd
really like to see gone:
chkconfig
gamin
info
systemd-sysv
chkconfig seems like it could have the 'alternatives' bit split off.
I've
On 11/2/12 3:18 PM, Anthony Green wrote:
Several months ago I attempted to upgrade libffi 3.0.10 to 3.0.11.
The change was reverted because the soname change in this version of
the library broke the build environment. I would still like to get
3.0.11 in Fedora. I don't anticipate any future
On 11/15/12 2:11 PM, John Reiser wrote:
# yum install bodhi
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
fedora/18/x86_64/metalink | 12 kB
00:00:00
updates/18/x86_64/metalink | 18 kB
00:00:00
No package
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 16:13 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Sending this to the relevant package owners as well as the development
list - if there's too much pushback, I'll look at backporting the
patches instead, though given that LLVM 3.2 is scheduled for release
next month, if we
1 - 100 of 619 matches
Mail list logo
