Re: Delinquent mirror process

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 04:06:47PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote: I've noticed that mirror.bytemark.co.uk hasn't been updated since 8th September: http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/fedora/linux/updates/15/x86_64/repodata/ However, it's still being handed out by our mirror list. It seems to me

libcdio update coming to rawhide

I will soon update libcdio to 0.83 in rawhide which requires a rebuild of following the packages: audacious-plugins cdw gvfs kover libcddb oxine pragha pycdio qmmp xmms2 I will rebuild these packages if the corresponding maintainers do not object. Adrian -- devel mailing list

strange koji behaviour

I just tried to rebuild kover and it failed during build with a strange error: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3527418name=build.logoffset=-4000 The reason for this error is, however, a broken dependency.

Re: libcdio update coming to rawhide

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:52:57AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: I will soon update libcdio to 0.83 in rawhide which requires a rebuild of following the packages: audacious-plugins cdw gvfs kover libcddb oxine pragha pycdio qmmp xmms2 I will rebuild these packages

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:03:23AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: facepalmYeah, I forgot that bit. Adrian(CCd), if you like, orphan both wordpress and wordpress-mu, and I'll take over. If I do, I plan to update wordpress to 3.0.1 and EOL wordpress-mu. I orphaned it for EL-5 and EL-6. I

Re: OpenVZ

been packaged by Adrian Reber, so that's at least one down. For live migration, that would be enough. I was actually unaware that criu has been packaged already, so this is very good news. I have packaged crtools but not yet submitted for review. I was waiting until the kernel has enabled

libcdio 0.90 update in rawhide

Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate package called libcdio-paranoia. libcdio-paranoia has been imported and I will now also update libcdio to 0.90 in rawhide. I will rebuild all dependencies over

Re: libcdio 0.90 update in rawhide

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:22:18PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate package called libcdio-paranoia. libcdio-paranoia has been imported and I will now also update

Re: libcdio 0.90 update in rawhide

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:03:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:22:18 +0100 Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de wrote: Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate package called libcdio

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Checkpoint/Restore

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:37:46PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: To offer the checkpoint/restore functionality the package crtools has been imported into Fedora and changes are still necessary to the kernel RPM. The CRIU

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Checkpoint/Restore

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:55:53PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 07:35:50PM +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: To offer the checkpoint/restore functionality the package crtools has been imported into Fedora and changes are still necessary to the kernel RPM. Is this

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Checkpoint/Restore

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:37:46PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: To offer

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Checkpoint/Restore

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: CONFIG_NAMESPACES seems to be required to make all those activated _NS options actually enabled: config-generic:CONFIG_PID_NS=y config-generic:CONFIG_UTS_NS=y config-generic:CONFIG_IPC_NS=y config-generic:CONFIG_NET_NS=y

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Checkpoint/Restore

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:13:44AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: CONFIG_NAMESPACES seems to be required to make all those activated _NS options actually enabled

Re: libcdio update

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:43:49 +0100, Adrian wrote: I would like to update libcdio to the latest version (0.82). This requires a rebuild of its dependencies: audacious-plugins gvfs kover libcddb oxine pycdio

Re: something changed with provides/requires (probably new rpm???)

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: Is this a bug in the spec file or in rpm? $ rpmls -p bind-libs-lite-9.7.3-0.4.b1.fc15.i686.rpm lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libdns-export.so.69 -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/libdns-export.so.69.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libirs-export.so.60

Re: rpmbuild: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttrans)

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:52:50PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: I was trying to do a scratch build an got following error: error: line 78: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttrans): /sbin/service Is Requires(posttrans) deprecated with the newest RPM or is that a bug? http

Re: Cannot reach Adrian R.

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:22:53PM +0200, Honza Horak wrote: I'm trying to reach Adrian Reber for a couple of days, but all emails sent to his address have returned back undelivered. He's a maintainer of What error did you get? I have not seen anything. Adrian -- devel

gforth and gcc 4.7

Trying to build gforth with gcc 4.7 fails currently. The forth engine is build but it fails its included tests. The problem is that every newline the forth engine writes is replaced with 0x00 as seen in following diff: 010: 6566 696e 6564 2047 4458 2020 594f 5520 efined GDX YOU 020:

wordpress needs a new (co-)maintainer

After FESCO's decision that the wordpress package needs to unbundle the included libraries nothing happened for over three months. The hope that somebody would step up and claim wordpress in the FESCO ticket [1] did not fulfill itself and therefore I am asking here for help or a new maintainer

libcdio updated to 0.93

libcdio has been updated to 0.93 in rawhide. As always this includes a new soname. All dependencies have been rebuilt. Adrian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

ninja/ninja-build

I am planning to orphan the IRC client ninja. One of the reasons to orphan it is that there is a build system[1] which has the same name. In Fedora the ninja build system is called ninja-build which makes it incompatible with most other Linux distributions[2]. In addition the current release is

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Timely article in the Register today: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/ > > > > I've been

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/05/2016 11:09 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> > > &

Switching bogofilter from db4 to db5

A bug was opened against bogofilter asking why it still uses db4 instead of db5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367329 I never changed the BRs because it works and I was never sure how the upgrade from db4 to db5 would impact the database format of the bogofilter wordlist. I just

libcdio soname bump in rawhide

Recently libcdio upstream released a new version of libcdio. I will update rawhide to this latest libcdio version and rebuild all dependencies. Adrian signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list --

Re: libcdio soname bump in rawhide

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 08:13:16AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > Recently libcdio upstream released a new version of libcdio. I will > update rawhide to this latest libcdio version and rebuild all > dependencies. libcdio and all dependencies have been rebuilt.

Re: F28 `dnf update` "Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-debuginfo'"

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:53:10AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On F28, `dnf update` recently started to fail for me with "Error: Failed to > synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-debuginfo'": > > > $ sudo dnf -vv --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=fedora-debuginfo --refresh > > makecache > > Loaded

libcdio soname bump in rawhide

libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will updated rawhide to the latest libcdio version. It comes with a new soname and I will also rebuild all dependencies. Adrian signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: libcdio soname bump in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:50:16AM +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2018-01-18 22:25 GMT+01:00 Adrian Reber <adr...@lisas.de>: > > libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will > > updated rawhide to the latest libcdio version. It comes with a new >

Re: libcdio soname bump in rawhide

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will > updated rawhide to the latest libcdio version. It comes with a new > soname and I will also rebuild all dependencies. libcdio and libcdio-paranoia

Orphaning jabberd

I just orphaned jabberd on all branches as I just stopped my last instance of jabberd and upstream seems to have stopped development. Adrian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Something odd going on with the Fedora mirror manager?

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:08:59PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > This site: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ > > Shows releases for 25835, 25788, 25775, 25757 and 25748. That is a know bug of MirrorManager picking up directories in alt/ which are interpreted as versions. The

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:59:49AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > > There is no f31 repo yet > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/ so > > perhaps mirror-manager is redirecting f31 to rawhide. > > It is mirror manager doing the redirection to rawhide. > >

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:18:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 8/19/19 1:13 PM, Adrian Reber wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:59:49AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > >>> There is no f31 repo yet > >>> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:34:11AM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:38:45 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote > > >> Can you now try: > >> > >> curl -v > 'https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/development/31/Everything/ppc64le/os/' > > Attached file curlv.homer54.txt

Re: dnf unable to download source due to rpmfusion-free-source

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 03:44:03PM -, Neal Becker wrote: > dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free-source download --enablerepo=rawhide > --source mercurial > enabling fedora-modular-source repository > enabling rawhide-source repository > enabling updates-modular-source repository > enabling

Re: rawhide protobuf update with new soname

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 12/1/19 10:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > > I prepared a protobuf upgrade from 3.6 to 3.11 in rawhide. It comes with > > a soname update and requires its dependencies to be rebuilt. > > > > I tes

rawhide protobuf update with new soname

I prepared a protobuf upgrade from 3.6 to 3.11 in rawhide. It comes with a soname update and requires its dependencies to be rebuilt. I tested it all in copr and most of the packages are rebuilding except for the following packages: * dynafed - compile error: In file included from

Re: rawhide protobuf update with new soname

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 07:36:25AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 12/1/19 10:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > I prepared a protobuf upgrade from 3.6 to 3.11 in rawhide. It comes with > > > a son

Re: rawhide protobuf update with new soname

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:30:39PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 12/18/19 8:35 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 07:36:25AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > On 12/1/1

Re: libcdio soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:27:56AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > I will update libcdio to 2.1.0 next week in rawhide. As always, libcdio > comes with a new SO version. > > The following packages have to be rebuilt and I will do the necessary > rebuilds: > > cantata > cdw &

libcdio soname bump in rawhide

I will update libcdio to 2.1.0 next week in rawhide. As always, libcdio comes with a new SO version. The following packages have to be rebuilt and I will do the necessary rebuilds: cantata cdw clementine gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free gvfs kover libcddb libcdio-0:2.0.0-6.fc32.src libcdio-paranoia

protobuf (3.13) update is coming to rawhide

I will do a protobuf update in rawhide which comes, as always, with a new SO version. Before starting the builds in rawhide I will try it out first in COPR and once that is done I will do the builds in rawhide in a side tag. repoquery gives me a list of 53 dependent packages I have to rebuild.

Re: protobuf (3.13) update is coming to rawhide

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:26:00PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:23:40AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > I will do a protobuf update in rawhide which comes, as always, with a > > new SO version. > > > > Before starting the builds in rawhide I wi

Re: protobuf (3.13) update is coming to rawhide

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:23:40AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > I will do a protobuf update in rawhide which comes, as always, with a > new SO version. > > Before starting the builds in rawhide I will try it out first in COPR > and once that is done I will do the builds in rawhid

Re: protobuf update coming to rawhide

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:51:32AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to > rebuild. The following packages are failing: > > clementine > closure

Re: protobuf update coming to rawhide

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:19:33PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:51 PM Adrian Reber wrote: > > mozc: > > > > /builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-2.23.2815.102/dictionary/user_dictionary_storage.h:77:7: > > error: cannot derive from ‘final’ base

Re: protobuf update coming to rawhide

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:04:09AM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild > > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to > > rebuild. The following packages are failing: > > > > clementine > >

Re: protobuf update coming to rawhide

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:17:10PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 10:51 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:51:32AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a > > > rebuil

Re: protobuf update coming to rawhide

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:34:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 06:51 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild > > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to > > r

Re: protobuf update coming to rawhide

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 09:11:33PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On Monday, 15 June 2020 06:51:32 CEST Adrian Reber wrote: > > The following packages are failing: > > > > clementine > > I rebuild the dep which was causing issue with cleme

protobuf update coming to rawhide

I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to rebuild. The following packages are failing: clementine closure-compiler fawkes gazebo hidviz kismet libgadu mir mozc pokerth and the failures do not seem

protobuf 3.14 update coming to rawhide

I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild of all dependencies and of the 54 dependencies currently only 3 fail to rebuild in COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adrian/protobuf-3-14/packages/ paraview: timeout after 10 hours, should work in koji

Re: protobuf 3.14 update coming to rawhide

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild > of all dependencies and of the 54 dependencies currently only 3 fail to > rebuild in COPR: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adria

Re: protobuf 3.14 update coming to rawhide

.16, once this tag is merged. > I guess building significant rebase into your tag is not welcome. > > Is there any ETA, when it could be merged? Could you please send me a > mail, once it is merged? Is there any bug for the rebase I can watch? > > Thanks, > Petr > > On

Re: protobuf 3.14 update coming to rawhide

On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 08:16:48PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/01/14 21:48: > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild > > > of all

Re: protobuf 3.14 update coming to rawhide

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:15:11AM +0100, Dan Čermák wrote: > Adrian Reber writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > >> I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild > >> of all dependencies and of the 54

Re: Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > Hi all, > > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in > Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class > to the

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F33 to F34

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:10:27AM +, Sven Kieske wrote: > On Sa, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run: > > > ># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > ># next time

Re: protobuf 3.18.1 update coming to rawhide

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:26:46PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings > > > which breaks the build of: > > > > > > 1. osmpbf > > > Problem: package protobuf-java-3.14.0-6.fc35.noarch conflicts with > > > protobuf-compiler >

protobuf 3.18.1 update coming to rawhide

The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires a rebuild of all dependencies. The list of dependencies grows with each rebuild and we have now reached 58 protobuf dependencies according to repoquery. This time

Re: protobuf 3.18.1 update coming to rawhide

Resending with correct maintainers aliases (-owner does not work anymore) On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:45:51PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in > rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires > a re

protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/7 At first I was 'not again', but as I still remember all the necessary commands I agreed to rebuild

Re: protobuf 3.18.1 update coming to rawhide (done)

) * mysql-connector-java (protobuf-java subpackage has been removed) * postgres-decoderbufs (dependency resolution error) Non of the build failures seem protobuf related as far as I can tell. Adrian On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 04:55:16PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > Resend

Re: protobuf 3.18.1 update coming to rawhide

On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:11:00PM +0100, Zuzana Miklankova wrote: > Sorry for the late reply, but I noticed this change only when the rebuild > of mysql-connector-java failed. > > > Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings > > which breaks the build of: > >

Re: [SONAME BUMP] jsoncpp 1.9.5

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:10:58PM +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > jsoncpp 1.9.5 has just been released and it bumps its library soname > from 24 to 25. The following packages are affected: > > * cmake > * domoticz > * guayadeque > * libopenshot > * minetest > * notekit > * oomd > *

Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:38:00PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf > > > 3.19.0 was relea

Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf > 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/7 >

Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 02:02:11AM +0100, allan2016--- via devel wrote: > På Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:59:15 +0200 > Adrian Reber skrev: > > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf > > 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was ma

Re: Installing from updates-testing not working?

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 11:31:49AM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:38:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > > > > > I guess it was a mirror caching issue. I tried again just now and it > > picked > >

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:31:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. > GCC 12 is going to enter its stage4 development phase (only regression > and documentation bugfixes allowed) on Monday 17th, so there should be > just those

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately, > > > so that those bugs can be fixed before the mass rebuild next we