Can I be added to the list of maintainers that need help very badly from the
beginning?
I maintain a number of packages that are very low in the Java stack and would
force the whole Java stack to be removed if they are removed but noone wants to
maintain them.
That's how I gained them! If such
Comments inline.
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:36:53 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
On 11/22/2011 08:51 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:57:24 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
On 11/22/2011 09:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/22/2011
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:42:37 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
On 11/22/2011 12:37 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
You don't
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:34:50 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
On 11/22/2011 12:49 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Hmm, haven't
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:57:03 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
On 11/22/2011 01:48 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote
As much as we have disagreed on the previous topic we might have similar
thoughts here :).
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 7:51:31 PM
- Original Message -
From: Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 1:03:27 AM
Subject: A software center for Fedora
As promised in my previous mail, here is what I find that's lacking
in
Fedora, compared to
Ask in pkgdb to become and comaintainer and fix it ?
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: Mailing-List fedora-devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 12:41:39 PM
Subject: careless
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 7:57:57 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 9:20:05 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Wrong. Do you know how
Hmm, actually I have new proposal.
Policy about active/inactive maintainers should be decided only by actual
maintainers. In the true meritocracy way - if you don't maintain anything you
don't have a say.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Reindl
be removed.
P.S. My words would have been a lot more harsh if sending from personal email!!
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday
in the running release cycle
and if you need to find out things automatically you need
any flag to measure - this would be FAS login
Am 04.11.2012 08:37, schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
How does it sound? Really like the right way to build community by
excluding people? Think about this more
m...@zarb.org
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2012 9:43:49 PM
Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how
to install into a LVM partitions (or
RAID))
Le dimanche 04 novembre 2012 à 13:19 -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov a
écrit
- Original Message -
From: drago01 drag...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 9:39:54 AM
Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how
to install into a LVM partitions
Where is the community spirit? What went wrong with fedora community? Why on
earth do you people insist on tracking people activity and not try detecting
unmaintained packages?
Detecting unmaintained packages is even easier and has clearer metrics.
Really, why noone wants people that are ready
6.11.2012 09:52, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
Where is the community spirit? What went wrong with fedora
community? Why on earth do you people insist on tracking people
activity and not try detecting unmaintained packages?
Detecting unmaintained packages is even easier and has clearer
metrics
out of community. I'm afraid we can only loose
maintainers by measurements of activity.
Marcela
On 11/06/2012 12:10 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
It's the whole thread that implies that not your mail only.
No one managed to explain why there should be actions against
people
One have to say the hard truth - only the latest fedora release is supported by
many maintainers because that's what they/we use.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent:
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
To: Fedora Development List devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 6:17:56 PM
Subject: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
There is a perpetual problem facing all
- Original Message -
From: Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 4:30:32 PM
Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
IMHO use of
- Original Message -
From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 5:06:04 PM
Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at
- Original Message -
From: Mark Bidewell mbide...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 5:50:03 PM
Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 11:54:46 AM
Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
Dne 6.12.2012 17:31, Seth Vidal napsal(a):
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012,
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 10:04:29 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
On 01/27/2013 02:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Features/Cinnamon as
- Original Message -
From: Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:13:34 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
On Monday, January 28, 2013,
, Aleksandar Kurtakov
akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:13:34 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
To: Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 6:08:29 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
- Original Message -
From: Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:22:07 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Developers Assistant
On 29. 1. 2013 at 19:18:32, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On
I join late to the discussion but Equinox is the reference implementation for
OSGi R5. What are the problems trying to use eclipse-equinox ?
http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 12:46:40 AM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
Manuel Faux wrote:
Thanks, the current eclipse-equinox-osgi package works as OGSi 5
dependency,
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 7:08:53 PM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:45:07 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
I join late
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:50:33 AM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:46:51 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
I didn't see
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:40:25 PM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:39:06 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Faux manuel.f...@conf.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 3:33:40 PM
Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 07:58:48 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message
I start to think this conversation goes nowhere. The whole split is superficial
and most java developers are used to get full jvm if they require java.
This would probably change with Java 8 introducing Profiles [1]. And any proper
packaging should be modeled after this one. Inventing even more
, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
I start to think this conversation goes nowhere. The whole split is
superficial and most java developers are used to get full jvm if they
require java. This would probably change with Java 8 introducing Profiles
[1]. And any proper packaging should be modeled after
- Original Message -
From: Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:23:29 PM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0100,
, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
The thing is this is pointless. If the people that would do most of this
auditing (Java SIG) do not agree with such scenario the result would be
that old Require:java will be kept whenever full java jvm is used as this
keeps compatibility, ease of cooperation
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:34:08 AM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java
Am 20.11.2013 20:56, schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
- Original Message
I'm just about to orphan few packages due to not using them and not having time
to properly maintain them:
* eclipse-subclipse - pretty active upstream but as I don't use it updates are
delayed and I haven't tried it in months
* sqljet - dependency of svnkit which was dependency(disabled now due
And I forgot one:
* eclipse-cmakeed - haven't seen upstream release in quite sometime, seems the
project is not really active anymore
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related
- Original Message -
From: Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:17:17 AM
Subject: Re: Orphaning few java packages
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:01:51 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:03:25 -0500, JLTI (Jason) wrote:
For
- Original Message -
From: Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:18:50 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging
No dia 26 de Abril
- Original Message -
From: Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:13:52 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging
On 04/26/2012 05:49 PM,
I have seen way too many problems caused by people installing such
*nonmaintained* packages to even think this will cause more troubles than it
will solve.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012
- Original Message -
From: Roman Kennke rken...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:15:14 PM
Subject: Re: Important kernel update should not break stuff
Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 13:05 +0100
- Original Message -
From: Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:27:03 PM
Subject: Re: Important kernel update should not break stuff
On 13 June 2012 13:31, Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message -
From: Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:45:25 AM
Subject: Netbeans IDE package for Fedora
Hi,
Is there a specific reason that Netbeans IDE is not available in
Fedora repository?
A
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 10:12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Are you trying to say the Fedora Project has made it
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 7:15:51 AM
Subject: Re: UsrMove feature breaking yum upgrade upgrades from older
releases to F17?
Am 26.01.2012 05:02, schrieb Rahul
- Original Message -
From: Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 2:44:21 AM
Subject: Re: Rolling release Fedora - fantastic idea
On 01/30/2012 12:59 AM, Henrique Junior wrote:
I've started talking to Greg KH,
Isn't it time for v4 ?
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:38:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:33:39 -0800, AW (Adam)
- Original Message -
From: Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 7:05:14 PM
Subject: Re: Does the X server in Rawhide eat Control-Space?
Le Mer 8 février 2012
:36PM -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 7:05:14 PM
Subject: Re: Does the X server in Rawhide eat
Johann,
Aren't you provenpackager? If not this looks like the best thing to do so you
push these changes yourself and considering that systemd is the initd system
noone should complain as this was already approved. I bet not every packager
that hasn't responded is unresponsive and have done
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 12:20:10 PM
Subject: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
I am a feature owner for a feature that
- Original Message -
From: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 1:57:11 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 03/02/2012 12:52 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:00:32 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 02/03/12 12:52, Aleksandar
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:05:07 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 02/03/12 12:53, Marcela Mašláňová
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:15:51 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 02/03/12 13:10, Aleksandar
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:16:28 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 03/02/2012 11:52 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
So I would make a contra
- Original Message -
From: Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:27:04 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:34:11 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 02/03/12 13:24, Aleksandar
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:34:10 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 03/02/2012 12:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Well, Fedora ships packages
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:37:53 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
Dne 2.3.2012 13:19, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:54:52 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
Dne 2.3.2012 13:47, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message
- Original Message -
From: Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 3:08:26 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
- Original Message
Matthias Runge:
On 02/03/12 12:52, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
If a maintainer doesn't respond to a bug repord with the status
new in a week - give commit rights to the reporter in pkgdb
so he/she can fix it himself.
I kind a' like this proposal. You're speaking of current package
maintainers
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 5:56:10 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
Am 02.03.2012 16:47, schrieb Karel
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 6:45:24 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 03/02/2012 04:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Yes the automation would just
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 6:45:14 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 6:56:47 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 03/02/2012 04:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
What access do you need? If you
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 1:38:21 PM
Subject: Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora
On 03/07/2012 04:34 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Any plans for sunsetting GCJ?
That's an interesting
- Original Message -
From: Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 11:58:39 AM
Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Roadmap for Java things in Fedora
Quoting Garrett Holmstrom
According to repoquery nothing depends on this package anymore so I orphaned it
in rawhide.
If noone takes it I'll deprecate and remove it in beginnning of April.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
To: json-ow...@fedoraproject.org,
- Original Message -
From: Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:14:11 PM
Subject: Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements
On 03/20/2012 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
So if you're willing to live like
- Original Message -
From: nomnex nom...@gmail.com
To: List Fedora-dev devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 2:39:48 AM
Subject: End user needs info: Freeplane on Fedora 17
http://freeplane.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Will there be a
- Original Message -
From: Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:55:23 AM
Subject: Re: End user needs info: Freeplane on Fedora 17
On 12/04/12 08:54, Caterpillar wrote:
Which problems do you have with freemind? Maybe
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 12:27:35 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
On 02/05/2013 10:06 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 2013-02-05, 06:19 GMT, Ralf
- Original Message -
From: Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 9:51:41 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
On 11 February 2013 07:15, Casey Dahlin
Rhino package is updated in rawhide to 1.7R4 and with this it's now licensed
under MPL 2.0 instead of MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ it was in previous versions.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
From: Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 9:34:24 PM
Subject: Re: tomcat6 unresponsive maintainer deprecation
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stanislav
- Original Message -
From: Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 3:00:36 PM
Subject: Re: A need for build triggers automatic rebuilds
On 06/21/2013 08:28 AM, Krzysztof Daniel wrote:
OSGI records that there is a file
- Original Message -
From: Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:45:53 PM
Subject: Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Jaroslav
, Aleksandar Kurtakov
akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:45:53 PM
Subject: Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary
:47PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 08:28 -0400, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
I still have serious concerns regarding build times:
* arm - https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=150248
~ 17h
* current primary -
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:02:48 AM
Subject: Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:23:50 -0700
- Original Message -
From: Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 7:01:33 PM
Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile Fedora.next (draft of my Flock
talk)
I think there is another data point to include in the discussion. As
- Original Message -
From: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 7:45:46 PM
Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile Fedora.next (draft of my Flock
talk)
On 07/23/2013 06:07 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Matthew
- Original Message -
From: Peter MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 4:33:18 PM
Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile Fedora.next (draft of my Flock
talk)
On 07/26/2013 05:23
- Original Message -
From: Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 12:31:25 PM
Subject: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile Fedora.next (draft of my Flock
talk)
snip
On the other hand some projects might benefit
- Original Message -
From: Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 11:22:36 AM
Subject: Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes
On 1/25/14, Adam Williamson
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 12:32:57 PM
Subject: Another questionable dependency chain -- libreoffice-writer installs
log4j-chainsaw
If
-chainsaw
On 30 January 2014 11:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
Clarification the actual chain is
java-headless-rhino-jline-jansi-hawtjni-xbean-avalon-framework-log4j
Ahh, thanks for working that one out. Java isn't my area of expertise.
It's time to prune such things
-chainsaw
On 30 January 2014 11:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
Clarification the actual chain is
java-headless-rhino-jline-jansi-hawtjni-xbean-avalon-framework-log4j
Ahh, thanks for working that one out. Java isn't my area of expertise.
It's time to prune such things
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 2:21:53 PM
Subject: Re: Auto-expiring bugs are getting absurd
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:50:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 22:48
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Todorov atodo...@redhat.com
To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora
packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org,
Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: For testing and quality assurance of
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
