Any ideas or problems with anyone else?
>
> --
> Mike Chambers
> Madisonville, KY
>
> "Best little town on Earth!"
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
*Antonio Trand
This is exactly what i had to do to hack Chromium. :)
2012/3/19 Matej Cepl
> On 18.3.2012 21:38, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> So to install this web browser you could try:
>>
>> # yum install libsrtp
>> # yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-chromium-**stable
I'm sorry, i do not want contradict you but ... i haven't any AVC message
about Chromium although deny_ptrace is on (selinux-policy-3.10.0-95.fc17).
:)
2012/3/19 Tom Callaway
> On 03/19/2012 07:49 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > On 18.3.2012 21:38, Antonio Trande wrote:
> >
Thanks, Dave
>
>
I'm willing to review both your packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/2015 09:23 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Antonio Trande
> mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>
> On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave J
ase, review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884.
>
> Named Data Networking (NDN) is a content based Future Internet
> Architecture. This library provides the primitives to develop
> applications for NDN.
>
> Thanks!
>
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagi
.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E653C
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV8GyW
illa.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marco
Please, read carefully this guide-lines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_gro
up
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/23/2015 10:24 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 09/23/2015 10:03 AM, Marco Driusso wrote:
>> OK, many thanks for the replies. Go for plain 'itpp'.
>
>> For anyone interested in reviewing the package, this is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all.
I need XSD on EPEL7. Is it possible a build?
Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xsd/
Bugzilla request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251682
Thanks.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter &#x
eviews swap between your RR and mine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103420 ?
--
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: D400D6C4
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 07/29/2014 07:45 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Antonio Trande
> wrote:
>> We are "victims" of same man :D
>
> "Victim" is kind of a harsh word. I suspect something has happened in
> Real Life that is making him extra
archlist=x86_64
ascend-libs-0:0.9.8-10.20140710svn4695.fc20.x86_64
I don't know what's the problem...
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: D400D6C4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> It looks like your repoquery running over f20, not f21
I forgot, these messages are arrived some days ago without any RPM
change over f21 and f22.
> I would try to rebuild ascend to see if that fixes things.
Okay.
- --
Antonio Trande
show_bug.cgi?id=1128754
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: D400D6C4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUAHymAAoJED2vIvfUANbECJsP/2UOXtyrYDlL
e not performed so auto-header.h file is not created:
./bin/generate ./auto/scheme.tlo > auto/auto.c
./bin/generate -H ./auto/scheme.tlo > auto/auto-header.h
Regards.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:S
On Mon 01 Sep 2014 07:09:34 PM CEST, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 19:03 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I don't understand why same code is not compiled with rpmbuild unlike
>> when I compile in local.
>>
>>
;> ./auto/scheme.tlo > auto/auto-header.h
>
> Without looking at the spec, apparently it is not parallel make
> safe, try removing "%{?_smp_mflags}" from the make arguments (and
> comment about it).
Yes, this is already advised by upstream
(https://github.com/vyshen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
scalapack-2.0.2-5.fc21 is still waiting for pushing in stable since 10
days. It's stopping updates of other packages. Is there any reason to
leave it in pending?
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
ata.sh, code 80,
output: stdout:None stderr:./review-env.sh: line 7: unset:
`BASH_FUNC_module()': not a valid identifier
What they are?
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x66E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
I'm working on Icecat-31's RPM building but I'm blocked by a strange
problem. Have you never seen something like that?
..
STOP! /home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILD/icecat-31.1.1/js/src/configure
has changed and needs to be run again.
Please rerun
agement in my SPEC to build
correctly: no more by executing 'make -f client-mk' but directly by
calling 'configure'.
It wasn't a timestamp issue as I thought.
Thanks.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> [freesteam] freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc21.armv7hl
> requires libascend.so.1
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/201840.html
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraprojec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/25/2014 02:46 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Antonio Trande
> mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all.
>
>
est in
> collaborating, please contact me.
>
Open a bug (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sheepdog/) and
point out missing upgrade of sheepdog. Maintainer will be directly
contacted and will be possible to talk with him/her about eventual
packaging collaborations.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sag
x27;m using,
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat.spec
--
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x66E15D00
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
--
devel mail
Hi Dan.
On 11/05/2014 06:44 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:17 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I don't know how to fix these errors during IceCat compilation. Lately I
>> tried to adapt Fedora compilations flags but there is wro
cjpeg.h involved:
>> http://ur1.ca/ipcjo
>
> Can you get/post the jconfig.h and jmorecfg.h that's getting used?
> Those are where the defines in question come from, and perhaps some
> options in jconfig.h are different on this build than in past builds.
>
Of course.
jconfig.h: h
Hi David.
On 11/06/2014 01:03 PM, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:17:27PM +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I don't know how to fix these errors during IceCat compilation. Lately I
>> tried to adapt Fedora compilati
/bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206950
>
> Thanks, Mukundan.
>
>
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0
ps://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9361514
>
> I can build this for rawhide if you (sagitter) wish.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207628
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
ht
oji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=9687732&name=root.log&offset=-4000
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E65
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/2015 08:58 PM, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Antonio Trande
> mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> root.log --> tail:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/2015 09:28 PM, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Antonio Trande
> mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Your koji build requires suitesparse-devel >= 3.4.0-9
>
> DEBUG util.py:38
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/2015 10:04 PM, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Antonio Trande
> mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> suitesparse has been retired on EPEL6
> (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgd
.
Is it a problem if i downgrade the current release of SeqAn on pkgdb
until the new 2.0.0 is fully ready ?
[1] http://www.seqan.de/
[2] http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=18320
[3] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=18665
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all.
Do exist packaging guidelines for building boost-related C++ projects
with 'bjam' utility ?
Are there particular rules or packages already in Fedora built with
this method ?
Thanks.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- Forwarded Message
Subject: clang++ compiler flags
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 21:05:55 +0200
From: Antonio Trande
To: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
'clang++' compiler is unable to use ARM %optflags used
org
(pkgs.fedoraproject.org)|10.5.125.44|:80... connected.
DEBUG util.py:388: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
DEBUG util.py:388: 2015-06-04 10:23:44 ERROR 404: Not Found.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject '
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:27:52 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> is there something wrong wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2015 12:46 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> is there something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2015 12:47 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 06/04/2015 12:46 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>&g
** Mono application
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#gacutil_in_a_spec_file)
and is not considered any strong-name to the maintainer
(https://github.com/fbergmann/libSEDML/issues/10),
how can i manage this situation?
Thanks.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject
te.org/w9IL/
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"
**mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
temperature. *Until to the Bios formatting. *
Can, for example, a kernel under testing affect the bios directly ?
2012/3/24 Reindl Harald
>
>
> Am 24.03.2012 13:42, schrieb Antonio Trande:
> > Hello.
> >
> > With my Acer Aspire 6930G happen that after an indefinite tim
2012/3/26 Jan Synacek
> On 03/24/12 at 01:42pm, Antonio Trande wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > With my Acer Aspire 6930G happen that after an indefinite time, the fan
> > starts to work permanently regardless of temperature.
> > In this moment, according to nvclock
ne is interested to it, will think that it is not as
important if disabled on default.
Also:
- If this feature is turned off by default, less feedbacks will come back
from comunity.
In any case i will advice to active it if necessary.
My two cents. :)
Regards.
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fed
aproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"
**mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagi
>
> The poll should really have run through the regular elections to reach a
> wider user base.
>
> -- Bob
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
What do you mean with "regular elections" ?
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
_bug.cgi?id=801885>),
that problem is disappeared.
What do you think ?
Regards.
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"
**mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagi
oEZzYiUH
> ayJKc88KjLQ6BAAyqrAZnkktqmTVHGZYrjfnzJQvEV1g+acP5GXZzVmzhlyj/ve8
> Bpfjf1sCNo5RiAJl9gGUtPvep5ciT/W8dhP2C2prF8Xh+QNig0xaTSSrQlRZwHI=
> =8MO1
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
t now the
> downloader
> runs in a different process, so we can exit even if curl is still stuck.
> The "skip to next mirror" feature is gone (we don't want to restart all
> currently running downloads).
>
> Known limitations:
>
> - metalink.xml and repomd.
/admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/f1lt?_csrf_token=c6813dd12c379d1616574a2fcffc59e335152fc5
[2] http://www.fpaste.org/85836/
[3]
https://bitbucket.org/pieczar/f1lt/issue/3/f1lt-commit-7440f9a-does-not-run
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraos.worpress
On 03/23/2014 03:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Antonio Trande wrote:
>> I need your help with F1LT application[1]. Its latest release (3.0.0)
>> seems not work even if little things are changed in SPEC file.
>
> I see you already resolved your problem with upstream's hel
ket/419
>
> #topic #420 PHP Guidelines change - numeric prefix .fpc 420
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/420
>
I don't see the topic about bundled files in Icecat (
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/391).
It's still pending.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 09:53 PM, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 20:45 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> I don't see the topic about bundled files in Icecat (
>> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/391). It's still
y maintainer). Here's the
> remaining bits that need a new home:
>
> * plotutils * python-gudev * python-icalendar *
> python-webdav-library * freemind
plotutils releases seems suspended since 2009.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraos.worpress.
.cgi?id=908088) and mMass tool
for the analytical chemistry already in Fedora.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: D400D6C4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using Gnu
o '-O1' or '-O0', latest attempt is the removal of '-pipe'
from RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
What's best choice in these cases?
Which flags should never be removed/changed?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105730
[2] http://www.seqan.de/
Regards.
- --
Antoni
Errata corrige.
On 06/15/2014 06:03 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> These compilations have been particularly annoying because it was
> nearly impossible to compile on my PC without blocks dependent by
> hardly memory usage.
These compilations have been particularly annoying because it w
have 4GB of RAM then you must have
> swap space (paging space) to make up the difference; and compiling
> that file will take much longer (estimate: 10 to 20 times as long)
> because of the paging.
>
So my RAM is not adequate. Even if, maybe, not even koji seems to can
build pair_
On 06/16/2014 12:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Antonio Trande wrote:
>> To pass these problems, I had to decrease '-O' optimization flag
>> gradually to '-O1' or '-O0', latest attempt is the removal of '-pipe'
>> from RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
>
>
> Given today's memory prices ... just buy an additional ram stick and
> be done with it ;)
>
I wish but my hardware does not support more than 4GB of RAM. :(
--
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com
https://fedoraproject.org/w
On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all.
>
> I need XSD on EPEL7. Is it possible a build?
>
> Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xsd/
> Bugzilla request: https://bugzilla.redhat.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/08/2015 05:19 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 03:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Hi all.
On 10/08/2015 05:47 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 05:30 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 10/08/2015 05:19 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> >> On 10/08/2015 03:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> >
ption : Intel(R)
> Fortran Compiler 16.0 for Linux*
> ---
>
> How can I solve this issue properly? Is there anything I can do
> at build time or add in the spec file? I can fo course # rpm -i
> --nodep
dead
confirming that current release still works with latest TclTk, so, I
think, upstream support is still valid.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565
On 10/17/2015 11:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wish take care of tktable package currently retired by Fedora.
> This package was retired on 2012-02-06 due to lack of a maintainer,
> also latest relea
e user may feel
exempt from this clause if they are below drinking age or think the
author
has already partaken of too many drinks.
*
Thanks.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http:/
On 10/18/2015 12:55 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi all,
>
> tktable package is newly under review; can someone clarify to me how
> to identify its license? (license file attached)
>
> In particular, i have a doubt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/17/2015 12:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 10/17/2015 11:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wish take care of tktable package currently re
On 10/22/2015 05:04 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I need two packages reviews:
>
> 1. arb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272606
>This is a FLINT add-on that newer versions of sagemath want.
I take it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272652
--
Antonio Tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
Is there any reason to leave log4cpp-1.1.1 in testing since over 7 months?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=log4cpp
Maintainer is not responding.
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWK/
orrectly.
SPEC file: http://fpaste.org/285749/
Scratch build on F22:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1121
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
i have a couple of review requests in waiting:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267189
I'm willing to exchange them for two other.
Thanks.
- --
Antonio Trande
m
--nodeps
/builddir/build/SPECS/libsbml.spec
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9975/11819975/build.log
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E653C
Check
ote: You can
> skip this check with --skip-nvr-check. See help for more info.
>
Rawhide is now populated by Python3.5 (and Python2.7) modules.
Rebuild your package as new release in rawhide.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
python-mysql has broken dependencies in rawhide.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=698817
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fe
t.org//work/tasks/8811/11838811/build.log
Maybe this type of caption (0.1rc1) is not swallowed by the code.
'assimulo' is rebuilt successfully in a mock rawhide-tree by
downgrading 'numpy' to the 1.10.1-6 release.
Any suggestion? (upstream has already been contacted, uselessly
#x27;htop' shows a
> python3 dnf .. -resolve 'something' python3 dnf .. -resolve
> 'something else'
(where 'something' are the BuildRequires packages) that runs over and
over again.
The result directory of fedora-review contains an empty 'review.t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
does anybody know how to contact 'python-biopython' maintainers?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274276
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285861
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fed
> from the same source dir, then you should build both under rpm
> build dir, while %{py3dir} is actually one level up.
Okay, i will modify tomorrow.
>
> [...]
>> %changelog -* Tue Dec 08 2015 Luis Bazan
>> - 1.66-1 -- new upstream version +*
>> Wed Dec 09 2015 Anto
y definitions, or have
references to local frame addresses.
So,
1) From point of view of packaging, is it acceptable a forcing of
- -fstack-protector-all?
2) Does -fstack-protector-all permit a real protection where
- -fstack-protector-strong does not?
- --
Antonio Trande
ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/15/2015 02:27 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:18:59 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> libmodplug/libtimidity in 'MOC' (RPM Fusion free)
>
> Oh, this made me thought this actually refers to d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/15/2015 12:35 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 12:18 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> Since i started to rebuild my packages for hardened builds issue,
>> I discovered (until now) a couple of libraries that result
] are in [u'epel7-testing-candidate',
u'dist-6E-epel-testing-candidate', u'dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate',
u'f22-updates-candidate', u'f23-updates-candidate',
u'f21-updates-candidate']."
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
I don't know how to fix this blocked request for testing of
tktable-2.10-8.el5:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-b8de338e32
Do I forget something?
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedorapr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/03/2016 05:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:52:45 +0100 Antonio Trande
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I don't know ho
that is split into individual
> libararies and can hopefully be installed in parallel with the system
> suitesparse.
>
> Add yourself to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/scitech if
> you want to join the effort.
>
I wish to join; do I need an invitation?
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/06/2016 05:44 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 09:39 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 01/06/2016 05:31 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> I've created a "scitech" FAS and COPR group for the SciTech SIG
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/29/2016 11:41 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
Latest IceCat-38.6.0 does not compile with GCC-6.0:
> ... In file included from
> ../../dist/include/mozilla/MathAlgorithms.h:15:0, from
> /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/29/2016 02:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:28:27PM +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Latest IceCat-38.6.0 does not compile with GCC-6.0:
>>
>>> ... In file included from
>>> ../../dist
mailman/listinfo/devel
>
This part worries me
> But, and this needs to be noted, updating with this repo added *will* replace
some core GNOME components with Unity-compatible versions.
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Jussi Lehtola
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:49:15 +0200
> > Antonio Trande wrote:
> >> 2012/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)
> >> > This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers h
.org/2012/09/13/workaround-for-vbox-modules-loading/
> > Antonio Trande says that modules of vbox ( don't matter what) doesn't
> > load at boot time .
> > But if this is true neither should boot bluez or qemu-system.
> > 1 - Which package is responsibility to load m
2012/9/19 Antonio Trande
> 2012/9/19 Bill Nottingham
>
>> Sérgio Basto (ser...@serjux.com) said:
>> > Hi,
>> > In my F17 system
>> > rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/modules/*
>> > bluez-4.99-2.fc17.x86_64
>> > qemu-system-x86-1.0.1-1.fc17.x86_
2012/9/26 Sérgio Basto
> On Qua, 2012-09-26 at 17:04 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
> > As long as another issue: at every reboot I am compelled to restart
> > 'fedora-loadmodules.service', otherwise the problem with vbox modules
> > arises again.
>
> No , fedo
2012/9/26 Sérgio Basto
> On Qua, 2012-09-26 at 19:23 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
> > 2012/9/26 Sérgio Basto
> > On Qua, 2012-09-26 at 17:04 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
> > > As long as another issue: at every reboot I am compelled to
> >
he greatness of Fedora is not measured but how many user it have, compared
> to other Linuxes or other os'es.
>
> Tim
>
Amen
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagit...@
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
