Out of the 2 computers I own, 2 only boot through legacy BIOS. One claims to
have UEFI support but I haven't managed to get it running with tens of hours of
work over the years.
In other words: I think it is too early to drop support for this legacy
technology.
_
The package conduit [1] hasn't seen an update since 2010-01-31 and FTBFS since
6 months ago [2]. There was no build for F22 or F23. Upstream website from spec
file has gone. There is another upstream website at gnome.org [3] with links to
a download folder [4] with no more releases. Wikipedia do
That's a very good idea, thanks!
Are there any plans to make dnf work with those? Or do I have to edit repo
files for that? `dnf copr enable` could use these GPG keys if it could make
sure this package is installed.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.o
Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel? See
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the related
.spec files in git repos?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraprojec
I like this idea very much, thank you!
Independent to whether this proposal is accepted or not, I'd like to point out
that it would be very useful to notify all maintainers of this issue, probably
by filing a bug to every package that uses one of these packages (webkitgtk,
webkitgtk3), adding a
Wow, looks mostly fine, except for this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349016
Even playing youtube videos works without crashes.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> I've failed to launch the application properly under X.org and Wayland using
> the
> launcher icon in GNOME shell.
This is not expected to work on gnome x11 sessions (Xorg), according to
instructions. Works fine for me on gnome wayland sessions. Do you have a bug
report, backtrace, etc.?
> B
> It should be possible to touch /.autorelabel and have the SELinux
> labels on the filesystem fixed at next boot.
[…]
> (a) Configure /etc/selinux/config to set SELinux permissive, and
> modify the fedora-autorelabel.service so it edits /etc/selinux/config
> to re-enable SELinux next time. This
First, have you contacted them? This looks like a misunderstanding between the
way you (and probably most fedora packagers + bodhi developers) think "karma"
works and the way they understand it.
My perspective is being someone who often tests packages but doesn't package
them.
From my point of
I can confirm this issue. I've already reported this as an issue to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317195 4 months ago, but nothing
happened. There is no indication that one should use upstream (github.com) to
report bugs instead of RedHat Bugzilla. Please don't expect users to rep
1. your link is broken. This should work:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/AKVB363GFCHHJ5MTHGVYHYT6NLLTF5VM/
2. I like the idea!
3. about the FESCO exceptions:
> Question: What if my application doesn't process untrusted input?
>
> Answer: I
I think it is still broken somewhere. I uninstalled fedora-easy-karma, which
makes use of weak deps, and tried to reinstall it. I'm not seeing any
suggested/weak deps.
See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://l
Still not working.
The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing "recommends" XML
tags is the
2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
file, but it just has those tags for 6 packages.
¹ /var/cache/dnf/updates-testing-648243a4cddd356c
--
devel m
So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies go into repo
metadata? This was not obvious from the first posting by Kevin Fenzi and
probably should go into a separate post here and on devel-announce too.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedor
Still broken.
Steps to reproduce:
0. have updates-testing enabled
1. do not have python2-dnf installed
2. try to install fedora-easy-karma
3. have a look at the transaction
What happens:
Transaction doesn't include python2-dnf
What should happen:
Transaction should include python2-dnf
Addition
I think this works now. At least the fedora-easy-karma bug is resolved and `dnf
repoquery --recommends fedora-easy-karma` lists python2-dnf. Thank you!
I've added a comment in
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120 too.
___
deve
In theory, I like this idea.
In practice, Kevin Kofler is probably right. Unless there is a big hammer,
bugs don't get fixed in many cases.
So I think the solution should be different: gfx team needs more manpower so
they can handle bug reports. Right now, for some packages bugzilla serves as
+1
There is no need to keep broken deprecated stuff in fedora repositories. If
somebody really wants to use this, use a COPR. Or use the distro with
conservative risky update policy you are developing against (CentOS, RHEL,
Debian, Ubuntu, …).
___
deve
Hi Tim,
thanks for all the great work on yumex and yumex-dnf!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Issues and Details
> --
>
> Since this is an alpha release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or
> missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact
> the Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode. As
> testing progresses, common is
Hi folks,
I noticed that there is an empty directory /usr/src/debug/tmp on my system,
which does not make much sense to me. `dnf provides /usr/src/debug/tmp`
reveals, that this folder is provided by 50 (!) different debuginfo
(sub-)packages (on Fedora 25). They are provided by these source pack
Oh, thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> On Ter, 2016-03-08 at 14:49 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Meanwhile , can't we hack copr , with gpgcheck=0 in Fedora 24 repos. It
> will be much less stressful.
Please don't. Having unchecked code shipped and installed is a risk we don't
need to take. How about signing every package instead, inc
Answers from my (user and frequent bug reporter) view:
1. abrt/libreport reports way too much data. There is no need to report my
hostname to Fedora/RedHat infrastructure. Same for UID, PID, username, time,
environ, …
2. abrt/libreport leaks much sensitive data. This includes paths in my home
di
1. and 2.: Yes, it often takes at least 3 days for security critical updates in
important packages (e.g. kernel update to 4.8.3) to land.
I think the real challenge here is to continue shipping quality software while
reducing time to ship. Scratch builds and release-monitoring.org (Anitya) have
> On 10/30/2016 03:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Fedora updates so often that attempts to pre-download anything updates
> related are pointless. Chances are you
> a) waste gobs of bandwidth downloading that changing data over and over
> again without ever using it
> b) when you actually *do*
One good thing we would gain from using bodhi for rawhide is having all
packages signed, especially in Rawhide. Since rawhide is used by developers,
this is a pretty important thing to do.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
Yeah, sorry, looks like either hyperkitty or I messed up.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> The UID can actually matter. We have a frequently reported non-bug that
> graphical KDE applications will not work (and abort with a qFatal, which
> fires the SIGABRT signal) if you run them under tools like su or sudo
> because they won't find some resources (usually the D-Bus session service
I think N+2 updates are barely done pre release by users out there, so issues
will rarely be noted before final (F25 final in this case) lands. N+1 updates
happen quite often during N+1 alpha and beta phase, thus they'll probably see
more testing and should be recommended. OpenQA is fine, but it
The firefox update from 50.0.0 to 50.0.2 [1] isn't being pushed to
updates-testing or updates in F25 and F24 for more than 24 hours. This update
is urgent because it fixes a 0-day remote code execution bug in SVG handling
plus another critical bug in same-origin handling [2]. This bug has reache
Can you say for sure you're seeing this after clicking on the notification?
Because I'm seeing massive freezes (2…5 seconds) when notifications fade in
sometimes. I'm 100% sure though, that I didn't click the notification before
gnome-shell froze. Same symptoms even about switching to virtual co
Thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> exaile
They are working on a port to Gtk3/GObject including a port to Gtk3WebKit2
a.k.a. gtkwebkit4.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
How about handling it the same way we handle old GtkWebKit versions? As soon as
F26 is branched from Rawhide (expected in 2017-02-21), retire this package?
This would give package maintainers enough time to get their packages fixed
(about 9 months) until Fedora 27 is released. Any package that h
sorry, I meant webkitgtk4 instead of gtkwebkit4.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I am running in a reproducible traceback which happens during `dnf
system-upgrade download` as reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700551. Does anyone know whether
this will let me run into upgrade issues?
___
devel mailing list --
This was fallout from an older bug in rtkit's rpm scripts:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637496. Thanks for the help!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
How does one mark a bug as CRITICAL or IMPORTANT?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guideline
Your e-mail is missing the contents. Can you please try again?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pr
As per step 4 of Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers [1], I'm asking
here whether anyone knows cquad, who is maintainer of the josm package, and has
a way of contacting him/her. This package is quite outdated as it has not seen
an update in 14 months. There is a bug report requesting an
Thank you for this proposal!
I found a small typo:
> fro mother
> The following packages will be retired:
> arora
> […]
> rekonq
Is there any reasons why they should retired and not also being obsoleted?
(Just asking, not suggesting. I don't really know the process but what happens
if someone
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
The most important step would be to *NOT* change /usr/bin/python to
/usr/bin/python3, but have it provided by a separate (non-default) package. For
Fedora and RHEL, this would mean the separate package does not get installed
I'd like to see this change land in F28!
Anyway, I think there is a showstopper:
* Fedora Packaging guidelines demand packages bundle no dependencies (e.g.
libraries, or in Rust's case crates). This is a good choice in my opinion.
* Rust currently has no ABI definition compatible over different v
> On 08/21/2017 04:20 PM, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
>
> I think ABI compatibility is achieved by shipping source code only in
> the -devel packages (similar to what Perl does).
No, you are writing about API stability. Source code may provide API stability,
but no ABI stability.
A
So for now, there will be no shared rust libraries?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
When I opened gnome-software today, it tells me that Fedora 27 is available
(which is wrong) and shows 2 buttons, one, "More information" [1], which is a
dead link and the other one to download Fedora 27, which I doubt will work.
Is this a bug, or is this expected to happen? Shouldn't this happe
> On 20 September 2017 at 07:37, Christian Stadelmann
>
> is "gsettings get org.gnome.software show-upgrade-prerelease" set to true?
Yes, it is. Thanks for the hint!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:09:02AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If this is causing problem, I can easily revert and bring it back at/after
> beta.
Doesn't look like a problem, thanks anyway!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
The package tnef [1][2] has unfixed CVEs [3][4]. A fix has been commited and an
update has been released upstream. The fedora version has not seen this update
yet. Can someone please step in?
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tnef
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/tnef
[3] https:/
After setting "widget.allow-client-side-decoration" to true and restarting
firefox, I can see those CSDs even with default Fedora 26 and Fedora 27 builds.
See also:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XXNOQ6GVGGNNTFGSEUIR3IXURMMRMOJK/
__
Did you restart Firefox after setting widget.allow-client-side-decoration ?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thank you, Martin!
I've just updated the wiki page to remove the rdd stuff which should no longer
be necessary with Firefox 96.
Thanks to the wiki page, one can check whether hardware acceleration is
available.
Is there any indication (e.g. in about:support) to see whether video hardware
acce
Hi Mark,
> Of course gcc -fsanitize=undefined cannot be used on production code.
Why not? Will it find too many errors?
Kind regards,
Chris
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedora
Hi Adam,
thanks for asking this question!
Due to similar horrible bugs before, I have uninstalled sudo and friends, but I
never managed to uninstall pkexec due to those dependencies.
> The issue and some of the comments around it prompted me to wonder -
> why is `pkexec` still a thing? Particul
Hi Ondřej,
you wrote:
> also gvfs uses pkexec currently to start gvfsd-admin backend...
The gvfs .spec file does not reflect that so it may fail on a system without
polkit installed. Is this by intention? If no, I've created a PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gvfs/pull-request/2
Feel fre
As per step 4 of Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers [1], I'm asking
here whether anyone knows cwickert (Christoph Wickert), who is maintainer of
the different packages including gtkhash, and has a way of contacting him/her.
This package is quite outdated as it has not seen an update in
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 01:40:58PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> What is the availibility of TLS 1.2 vs 1.1/1.0 on the internet ?
> ie how likely is this to break the ability of users to access websites
> they care about ?
There is quite a lot, sadly. I'd say about 0.1…1% of all internet sites of my
I just saw that SSL pulse has data on TLS versions supported under the
"Protocol Support" section. It shows that 8.1% of all websites don't have TLS
1.2 support. Surely, this data is not weighted by real-world usage nor by how
it will affect people, but it does sort of speak against this radical
"Fallback option" always smells like "protocol downgrade attack". This would
undermine the idea of a crypto policy. Anyway, implementing it seems way out of
scope for the crypto policy.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
> […] and move to uefi only supported boot which
> has been available on any common intel based x86 platform since atleast
> 2005.
(U)EFI was not available for the general market in 2005 (except on Apple
devices maybe). It was introduced around 2011.
I own 2 devices which are booting with non-
61 matches
Mail list logo
